It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 11:02 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 150 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 12:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
RFDC wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
No one who knows Hockey thinks that Q should be fired.

So you don't think shakes knows hockey?


His thoughts on Q are bad. Who really thinks that the Hawks should replace Q? Do you think the Hawks should fire Q too?

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 2:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55966
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
If the Hawks had lost that series with the Wings, he would have been on the hot seat. Not fired, but they certainly would have put the squeeze on him, maybe fired his assistants and picked the new ones for him. Now, of course, he's made three conference finals in five years, and he's two games away from two Stanley Cup Finals in four years. It's getting harder to make the case. He might be here a while.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:12 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57246
Scorehead wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
No one who knows Hockey thinks that Q should be fired.

So you don't think shakes knows hockey?


His thoughts on Q are bad. Who really thinks that the Hawks should replace Q? Do you think the Hawks should fire Q too?

But that is not what you said. You said no one that knows hockey thinks Q should be fired. shakes says he thinks Q should be fired. So shakes does not know about hockey?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
YES OR NO ???????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I do not like Q for a variety of reasons most notably his near constant line flipping. I still can't believe how poor and inconsistent this team is on the power play especially given all the highly skilled players. It's easy to support Q now because they are playing well, but I stand by my dislike of his coaching style.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 12:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
denisdman wrote:
I do not like Q for a variety of reasons most notably his near constant line flipping. I still can't believe how poor and inconsistent this team is on the power play especially given all the highly skilled players. It's easy to support Q now because they are playing well, but I stand by my dislike of his coaching style.


Do you think this team could be better with a different head coach? I don't.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 12:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
RFDC wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
No one who knows Hockey thinks that Q should be fired.

So you don't think shakes knows hockey?


His thoughts on Q are bad. Who really thinks that the Hawks should replace Q? Do you think the Hawks should fire Q too?

But that is not what you said. You said no one that knows hockey thinks Q should be fired. shakes says he thinks Q should be fired. So shakes does not know about hockey?


I don't like the meatball knee jerk "fire the head coach" reaction from some fans. If its a guy who hasn't won anything or put together a resume of success like Wanny, Jauron, Lovie, Sveum, Ventura, Vinnie, fine. But an NHL head coach with Q's resume? Come on...

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 7:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Scorehead wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I do not like Q for a variety of reasons most notably his near constant line flipping. I still can't believe how poor and inconsistent this team is on the power play especially given all the highly skilled players. It's easy to support Q now because they are playing well, but I stand by my dislike of his coaching style.


Do you think this team could be better with a different head coach? I don't.


Absolutely it could be.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 7:09 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79585
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Northside_Dan wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I do not like Q for a variety of reasons most notably his near constant line flipping. I still can't believe how poor and inconsistent this team is on the power play especially given all the highly skilled players. It's easy to support Q now because they are playing well, but I stand by my dislike of his coaching style.


Do you think this team could be better with a different head coach? I don't.


Absolutely it could be.


I'm sure it could, but is the coach who could make it better one they could reasonably hire? I guess they could get Bowman out of retirement.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 7:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I'm sure it could, but is the coach who could make it better one they could reasonably hire? I guess they could get Bowman out of retirement.


In terms of known commodities, no, they are coaching elsewhere. I'm sure there's guys we've never heard of. I'm not saying replace Q at all, just responding to the scorehead saying that no coach is better than Q for the Hawks. They played one last round who took them to OT in Game 7 with a roster that's maybe half as talented.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 7:17 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79585
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Northside_Dan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I'm sure it could, but is the coach who could make it better one they could reasonably hire? I guess they could get Bowman out of retirement.


In terms of known commodities, no, they are coaching elsewhere. I'm sure there's guys we've never heard of. I'm not saying replace Q at all, just responding to the scorehead saying that no coach is better than Q for the Hawks. They played one last round who took them to OT in Game 7 with a roster that's maybe half as talented.


Well, I know you know more hockey than Scorehead or I, and I agree there are better coaches out there. My impression was that Scorehead was saying it would be hard for the Hawks to replace Q with a guy who was known to be better.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 1:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I'm sure it could, but is the coach who could make it better one they could reasonably hire? I guess they could get Bowman out of retirement.


In terms of known commodities, no, they are coaching elsewhere. I'm sure there's guys we've never heard of. I'm not saying replace Q at all, just responding to the scorehead saying that no coach is better than Q for the Hawks. They played one last round who took them to OT in Game 7 with a roster that's maybe half as talented.


Well, I know you know more hockey than Scorehead or I, and I agree there are better coaches out there. My impression was that Scorehead was saying it would be hard for the Hawks to replace Q with a guy who was known to be better.


Who are the better head coaches than Q? Babcock & who else?

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 6:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Scorehead wrote:
Who are the better head coaches than Q? Babcock & who else?

Barry Trotz
Dave Tippett
Claude Julien
Dan Bylsma
Peter Laviolette

Trotz and Tippett are system coaches using below average talent to exceed expectations. So their success may be overstated. Bylsma might be a pick that's a stretch but he's a coach that's been screwed by a GM thinking defense and goaltending aren't important to win a Cup.

You could argue for guys like Michel Therrien, Ken Hitchcock and Randy Carlyle but I wouldn't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 12:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:47 pm
Posts: 791
Give Q credit for making the line change to get Kaner going. I like Hossa w/ Sharp and Hanzus.

_________________
The motto of the B&B section:

I honestly don't listen much-Reared On The Score Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:38 am


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 12:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Q is a great head coach & he may go down in history as the best Blackhawks head coach in history if he sticks around a while longer. Billy Reay was great but he never won the cup.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Bump.

Black Sox like scandal is brewing. Appears Q is attempting to throw Cup finals with blendered lines and Bollig getting practice time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Kirkwood wrote:
Bump.

Black Sox like scandal is brewing. Appears Q is attempting to throw Cup finals with line ups.


No shit. I don't understand the line changes at all. Wouldn't Q want to leave the lines as they were in the last game -vs- the Kings?

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 1:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:47 pm
Posts: 791
hopefully he's just trying to throw the bruins off and not seriously playing these lines. would be a shame to piss away game 1 with a stupid lineup

_________________
The motto of the B&B section:

I honestly don't listen much-Reared On The Score Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:38 am


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65779
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
How does a guy who "lives the game" have such crappy hockey thoughts?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Ben Smith had the fewest minutes last night at 10:23. That's fine. 2nd fewest? Bickell at 11:43. Q's lost his damn mind

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:47 pm
Posts: 791
I actually thought Ben Smith looked pretty decent out there. Sure he's not a game changer but he looked a helluva lot better then bumbling Bollig, which led me to question why he wasn't in the lineup when Q was trying to send a message to Stahlberg. I know he isn't the physical presence Bollig is but I can tell you that he would have got that puck out of his zone in game 2 and he can play in any situation.

Onto Bickell. I was unaware that he played the 2nd amount of time of anyone on the team. Q, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING???? This guy at one point was our playoff MVP. Are you trying to drive down his market value during the offseason? This, like a lot of other things makes no sense.

_________________
The motto of the B&B section:

I honestly don't listen much-Reared On The Score Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:38 am


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16823
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Y'all ready to jump on the Fire Q bandwagon yet? The guy is a fucking retard and has proven it beyond a shadow of a doubt this series.

Kruger-Toews-Frolik? is that supposed to be a joke?

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
shakes wrote:
Y'all ready to jump on the Fire Q bandwagon yet? The guy is a fucking retard and has proven it beyond a shadow of a doubt this series.

Kruger-Toews-Frolik? is that supposed to be a joke?


I liked that line in the 1st period but after Boston shut it down the rest of the way and he didn't adjust, I became increasingly frustrated. If Toews and Kane aren't together next game and we lose, I might put one foot in. I'm more on the Fire Kompon bandwagon, at the moment.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Per Toews, early in the day he learns they will be without Hossa.

Fast forward to pre-game. Ben Smith, the guy would would replace him, doesn't warm up.

Jamal Meyers warms up.

Hossa ruled out.

Jamal scratched, Ben inserted in the lineup.




Pardon?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Bring back Alpo!

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38699
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
29 88 19 account for 3 goals tonight. Nice job waiting to put them back together you fuck.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 11:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
I questioned Q's line changes last game, but in his defense, Kane & Toews have been awful so he was trying something different to shake things up.
Hawks will win the next 2 & Q will become the greatest head coach in Hawks history.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16823
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Scorehead wrote:
I questioned Q's line changes last game, but in his defense, Kane & Toews have been awful so he was trying something different to shake things up.
Hawks will win the next 2 & Q will become the greatest head coach in Hawks history.


Yep, Kane and Toews were awful when they played together in game 5 vs LA and Kane had a hat trick. Just awful. I can totally see why Q split them up for game 1 vs Boston and then didn't decide to put them back together again till last night when they went out and produced 3 goals.

Scorehead, you're an idiot, you should probably just shut up now.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Other than game 5 vs the Kings, Toews and Kane have been terrible. Unless you live in s cave, every Hockey analyst has been talking about this. Q was lauded for many of his line changes in both the Detroit and LA series.
You do realize that Q is the winningist active head coach in the NHL, right? If he wins another cup with the Hawks, he will go down in history as the greatest had coach on Hawks history.
Maybe you were an Alpo or Bob fan?
I won't call you names because mature adults don't do that.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Its time for Q to go
PostPosted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38699
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
You think its a coincidence that the Hawks 2 best offensive games during the LA and Boston series have been when Toews and Kane have been together then? It was a bad move to split them up starting this series. Dont know how you and Q cant see that.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 150 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group