It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:34 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
veganfan21 wrote:
I'd add change in rules and quality of competition, although that's difficult to determine. Players in the '70s competed against less teams than players in the '80s, and players in the '80s competed against less teams than those in the '90s, and so on. I'd love to see some contraction so the quality of the average team increases substantially, but I know that won't happen. It's just fun to think of how the landscape may change if players like Cousins, Gay, Ellis, Jennings, Evans, Eric Gordon, Anthony Davis, etc. were redistributed throughout the league via a draft.


I agree that this needs to be considered, but I think it is part of the categories listed above. It makes grading someone's career a "curve."

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231
veganfan21 wrote:
I'd add change in rules and quality of competition, although that's difficult to determine. Players in the '70s competed against less teams than players in the '80s, and players in the '80s competed against less teams than those in the '90s, and so on. I'd love to see some contraction so the quality of the average team increases substantially, but I know that won't happen. It's just fun to think of how the landscape may change if players like Cousins, Gay, Ellis, Jennings, Evans, Eric Gordon, Anthony Davis, etc. were redistributed throughout the league via a draft.


I would say that, even with more teams, the quality of basketball in the 80s and 90s (from Bird/Magic through at least Jordan) was as good as any era the game has seen. I don't think you can say that now.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231
leashyourkids wrote:
Keeping Score wrote:
There's something irrational about the 'hate' most Chicagoans seem to have about Lebron.

I don't know if there's a perceived threat to the legacy of Michael. Or if it's tied in to the disdain so many have for Boers & Bernstein. Or if has something to do with the free agency flirting that kind of went on between the 'Big 3' and the Bulls.

Either way, the vitriol appears more furious emanating out of Chicagoland as opposed to other parts of the country. I know I hear next to none of it on Wisconsin sports radio.

That said, one of my buddies absolutely hates Lebron and the Heat, and he's as impossible to rationalize with as most of y'all are.

So :tongue:


I disagree. I think it's completely rational and warranted. Lebron is often compared to Jordan, which gives Chicago fans an obvious angle, but even more than that, Lebron came off as a huge douche during The Decision. Personally, I enjoy rooting against him. If it weren't for Lebron, I wouldn't have a rooting interest in the NBA Finals. I would watch, but I wouldn't enjoy it as much.

Let me ask you this question... and it isn't aimed at you in particular, KS, but... why do so many people get upset when others dislike a particular team or person or radio announcer? I'm genuinely curious. Disdain drives ratings more than admiration, so it's good for business. Does it make you uncomfortable? I just don't get it.


The Decision
the douchebaggery after the decision
the petulance in defeat
my life is still going to be great whether I win or lose while you couch jockeys will still be slobs

There is plenty of perfectly valid reasons to dislike Lebron as a player. The people who say otherwise have their heads in the sand.

Lebron is kind of like Isiah for me. I loved both of them early in their careers. Their actions as they got older, especially in defeat, soured me on both of them.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:

I would say that, even with more teams, the quality of basketball in the 80s and 90s (from Bird/Magic through at least Jordan) was as good as any era the game has seen. I don't think you can say that now.


Without having seen a lot of ball in the 80s and 90s, I'd have to agree with you in theory. We can't absolute about this, but I do think having less teams overall meant better day to day competition. That probably didn't come out clear from my post, but that's what I was trying to suggest. Without creating teams like Toronto, Vancouver/Memphis, and New Orleans/Charlotte in the past 15 years or so, I wonder how much better the quality of play would have been today.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
I recently watched a rerun of the 83 Philly-L.A finals and one of the things that struck me was the pace of the game. It was faster guys did not milk the shot clock down to the last millisecond as they so often do today. For all the talk about today's superior athletes it is striking to me how slow the game is played. Back then if you were open you took the shot. Part of the reason was due to the fact that there were more scoring options and also because the ball was not dominated by the star players as it is today.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231
veganfan21 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

I would say that, even with more teams, the quality of basketball in the 80s and 90s (from Bird/Magic through at least Jordan) was as good as any era the game has seen. I don't think you can say that now.


Without having seen a lot of ball in the 80s and 90s, I'd have to agree with you in theory. We can't absolute about this, but I do think having less teams overall meant better day to day competition. That probably didn't come out clear from my post, but that's what I was trying to suggest. Without creating teams like Toronto, Vancouver/Memphis, and New Orleans/Charlotte in the past 15 years or so, I wonder how much better the quality of play would have been today.


This is true. I didn't think it would be a huge impact at the time but I think its clear that last expansion has damaged the overall quality of the game.

However, there have been other less obvious factors beyond expansion. The one that comes to my mind is the proliferation of early entry into the league. The NBA is simply not equipped for development, yet once you get out of the top 5 (and sometimes not even that far down) of the draft, the draftees are all young and undeveloped (physically, mentally and in terms of game). They usually have a skill, which keeps them in the league, but rarely develop SKILLS to become more than they are the day they are drafted.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
I agree that the overall competition level has gone down, primarily due to expansion, but I think it's less than we think because the overall talent pool has increased due to more summer leagues, scouting, etc. The superstar talent is similar, but I just think the talent pool is larger.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231
long time guy wrote:
I recently watched a rerun of the 83 Philly-L.A finals and one of the things that struck me was the pace of the game. It was faster guys did not milk the shot clock down to the last millisecond as they so often do today. For all the talk about today's superior athletes it is striking to me how slow the game is played. Back then if you were open you took the shot. Part of the reason was due to the fact that there were more scoring options and also because the ball was not dominated by the star players as it is today.


I was thinking about this in terms of the LeBron v. Michael debate. I think just about every other sport you can say today's athletes are bigger, stronger and faster. I don't think that is true in the NBA of today versus what existed 20-30 years ago. They aren't jumping higher. It doesn't seem like the movement up court is any quicker. I'm not even sure they are much stronger

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Agreed. I think that is where Bernstein gets it wrong. NBA athletes are similar in body type to the players of yesteryear. There are big players today but there were big players 20-30 years ago. The most athletically gifted center probably ever is still Wilt Chamberlain yet you rarely ever hear that. It should not be assumed as often it is that today's NBA athlete is superior or bigger than yesteryear's simply because it is today's athlete.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Keeping Score wrote:
wood

Now imagine Jordan, Bird, Mchale and Antoine Carr doing the same


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Camps has really been working out.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:

This is true. I didn't think it would be a huge impact at the time but I think its clear that last expansion has damaged the overall quality of the game.

However, there have been other less obvious factors beyond expansion. The one that comes to my mind is the proliferation of early entry into the league. The NBA is simply not equipped for development, yet once you get out of the top 5 (and sometimes not even that far down) of the draft, the draftees are all young and undeveloped (physically, mentally and in terms of game). They usually have a skill, which keeps them in the league, but rarely develop SKILLS to become more than they are the day they are drafted.


I'd agree on early entry being an issue, but I gotta think opportunities to develop one's game/skills is not a problem nowadays. Leash just wrote about this here:

leashyourkids wrote:
I agree that the overall competition level has gone down, primarily due to expansion, but I think it's less than we think because the overall talent pool has increased due to more summer leagues, scouting, etc. The superstar talent is similar, but I just think the talent pool is larger.


All throughout high school most NBA prospects go through AAU training/developing/etc. before they enter college. And during both college and the pros they're exposed to the all the training and amenities they need in order to work on their game. What I think is a somewhat recent problem is the fat contract. Guys get guaranteed money whether they work out or not, and only the mature take advantage of the development opportunities staring them right in the face. For every workout warrior like Kobe or KG, there are ten Tyrus Thomases who were drafted on "potential" that are just sitting around collecting checks with no motivation to work on their games.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231
I'm not sure the AAU games actually help players develop. AAU coaches are more street pimp than educator and the games are designed to showcase talent.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 6/21: Don't Listen
PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Point taken. I just think development opportunities are plentiful for those who want to actually get better. Some players for a variety of reasons need to be nurtured more than others. Perhaps some teams have failed in that regard, but there has to be a degree of personal responsibility here.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group