It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 1:26 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:09 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
That's not an opinion. That's a fact.

You can forget that trade. Even if the Sox eat half of his remaining contract. Who the hell wants him? Teams have kids in the minors who can post a 5.50 ERA. That's better the Jose. 19 earned runs in his last 2 starts.

He's signed for 2 more years at 10 million per year right? Jeez.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:28 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Wow. I just did the math. Jose's ERA went from 5.76 to 6.20 after todays performance.

You have to be the worst pitcher with that ERA. No team allows a guy to pitch if they are that high.

Jose's next goal - Can he lose 20 games this year? That's tough to do.

Probably won't get the chance. Might as well shut him down and play the kids if you can't trade him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:55 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
He is horrible, and we should throw a party for Kenny if he's able to convince some team to take him, and his bloated contract.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:59 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
BD wrote:
He is horrible, and we should throw a party for Kenny if he's able to convince some team to take him, and his bloated contract.

For that to happen, Kenny is going to have to convince the Chairman to eat a portion of that bloated contract. Otherwise the Sox are stuck with him.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:04 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
It's not even that. They could offer to eat half of it and it wouldn't matter. Who the hell wants a guy with a 6.20 ERA? Nobody.

The 6.20 is misleading as well. He has to be like a 10 or a 12 ERA in his last 7 or 8 starts.

Every team has some ass hole in the minors that could give you a 6.00 ERA. Why would you trade for an old man to give you that?

Kenny waited too long. He probably could have moved him a month ago. Wouldn't have gotten much but the contract releif was the most important thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:25 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Well. You're gonna get your wish Nas. They will hold on to him because they have no other options.

They're not gonna release him with that contract. Might as well pray he gets it together next year. You have to pay him every dime if you release him anyway.

They should shut him down however. Why risk getting him hurt since you have to bring him back next year?

Let Charlie Haeger, Gio Gonzonleaz, Gavin Floyd or Nick Masset take his spot in the rotation.

Get the MLB growing pains out of the way now for these guys. That's the only option that makes sense. So it probably won't happen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82235
I would start him until the trade deadline. After that, move him to the bullpen. Who knows, maybe he can do something in one inning bursts. Still, it looks like we are stuck with him as a starter going into next year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
As PT Barnum once said, there's a sucker born every minute. The Mets are desperate for starting pitching that I would offer to pay for this year and take a low level prospect to move him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82235
Thinking back to last year Hawkeye, the Cardinals trade for Weaver and he helped them to win a world series. He was worse than Contrearas, however, he was not signed for two more years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
And in reality, I believe he was released by the initial club and was in essence a free agent.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:52 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
To move Contreras, which I find highly doubtful, the White Sox would probably have to put in at least $10 million, and then also not get anything back as well (not that you could get much for a guy with a 6+ ERA with a big contract). Hopefully, the Mets are that stupid.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:59 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:17 am
Posts: 3073
Location: Chicago-West Side
It makes ZERO sense to trade him now, especially since they'll have to pony up a bunch of money anyways. Put him in the bullpen or sit him down the rest of the year. He's old and maybe the rest will do him good next year. Or, maybe you'll find a gem of a reliever and he'll get back to throwing 94 or 95 with some consistency. Bring in a young guy like Haeger or Floyd and let them start the rest of the year to see what you have. Hell, I'd rather see Gio than those two but I doubt we'll see him for the next year or 2 at all. Now repeat after me...Rest or Reliever, Rest or Reliever...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:12 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
hawkeye wrote:
It makes ZERO sense to trade him now, especially since they'll have to pony up a bunch of money anyways. Put him in the bullpen or sit him down the rest of the year. He's old and maybe the rest will do him good next year. Or, maybe you'll find a gem of a reliever and he'll get back to throwing 94 or 95 with some consistency. Bring in a young guy like Haeger or Floyd and let them start the rest of the year to see what you have. Hell, I'd rather see Gio than those two but I doubt we'll see him for the next year or 2 at all. Now repeat after me...Rest or Reliever, Rest or Reliever...


I don't think there's a scenario, even in the off-season, where the White Sox won't have to pick up a sizable portion of his contract.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
For all the Gio Gonzalez love, I dont see him being called up seeing as he is not on the 40 man roster. I don't think they will release anyone currently on the 40 man to make room (unless they made a trade along the way here)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:21 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:17 am
Posts: 3073
Location: Chicago-West Side
Hawkeye Vince wrote:
For all the Gio Gonzalez love, I dont see him being called up seeing as he is not on the 40 man roster. I don't think they will release anyone currently on the 40 man to make room (unless they made a trade along the way here)


I think it's just because he's so young and they don't want to bring him up before he's ready when they don't really have a good reason to yet. BD that's exactly why they shouldn't trade him. He's guaranteed 10mil next year so lets see if we can at least get 5mil in value for him by keeping him either as a reliever (test out 2nd half) or as a 5th starter with the potential for some good games. If we can get "5 mil of reliever quality" next year than it's a bonus because we'd have to hypothetically pay that 5mil plus to another team to get rid of him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82235
There are plenty of playoff caliber teams with Contrearas types acting as 5th starters. You could live with keeping him in that role next year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:44 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
he's worse than todd ritchie.

at least gio speaks spanish. for some reason, ozzie seems to love the latin players. remember timo perez? yeah, that old slow firstbasemen we had in 2005..

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:45 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
I figured it out right after Jose was pulled. Whitesox.com doesn't add it up that quick.

It took me 10 seconds. ER / Innings x 9. Not that tough.

You guys might be right. We're stuck with him so maybe he's a bullpen guy next year. 10 million for a set up guy is pretty steep. But we have no choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:04 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
i agree with hawkeye. he is going zewro good for the team or himself right now, so just set him down and let one of the younger guys come up and learn here at the big league level. alan trammel let all his pitchers learn at the MB level and take thier lumps, and look at that staff now

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:23 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
My new favorite past time. Figuring out how high Contreras ERA goes after each start.

It went from 6.22 to 6.60 after todays abortion. 2.2 innings and 7 runs. He's gonna get those 20 losses if they keep running him out there. He had 13 coming in.

This is the worst pitching year by any Sox that I can remember.

We're stuck with him for 2 years. Shut him down I say. Keep him healthy at least. If he struggles next april we're just gonna have to cut him. You can't have this shit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:46 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
It really doesn't matter at this point my good man, but I do agree with you regardless. He certainly seemed to peak in 2005 and has been on the downward spiral ever since.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
Beardown wrote:
My new favorite past time. Figuring out how high Contreras ERA goes after each start.

It went from 6.22 to 6.60 after todays abortion. 2.2 innings and 7 runs. He's gonna get those 20 losses if they keep running him out there. He had 13 coming in.

This is the worst pitching year by any Sox that I can remember.



The worst since Todd Ritchie back in 2002. I think he was 5-15 with above a 6 ERA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:46 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Ozzie said he might pull him from the rotation. Thanks for listening Ozzie.

Guys, in Jose's last 11 starts he's 1-10 with a 10.00 ERA.

That might be the worst 11 consecutive starts in the history of the game. I'm serious. Somebody look that up or call John Dewan. It has to be. Nobody would be allowed to make the 8th start, let alone 11 starts.

I'm sure guys have lost more than 11 in a row before but not with a 10 ERA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 2974
Location: who wants to know?
The last 10 starts for all White Sox starting pitchers....one of these things is not like the other, try and guess which one.

Buehrle 6-3, 2.18 ERA
Vazquez 5-2, 3.14 ERA
Garland 4-4, 4.76 ERA
Danks 3-3, 5.74 ERA
Contreras 1-9, 9.27 ERA

Also the bullpen is 2-8 over this same span


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65770
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
I was expecting more from Garland.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:15 pm
Posts: 2014
Location: In a slightly better place than before each day I remember where I'm going
pizza_Place: My house. I make a good pizza according to my family. I'll take it.
How the hell did Buehrle lose three games with that ERA? Low 2 ERA in the AL over ten starts? That is very, very impressive!

_________________
Stupidity irritates the crap outta me... and yes, I irritate myself far too often.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 2974
Location: who wants to know?
Darkside wrote:
I was expecting more from Garland.


Garland has a 3.36 ERA without the 3 inning/11 earned run bitch slappin he took from Minnesota a month ago


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:05 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
WestmontMike wrote:
Darkside wrote:
I was expecting more from Garland.


Garland has a 3.36 ERA without the 3 inning/11 earned run bitch slappin he took from Minnesota a month ago


Yeah, Garland has been fine. He will go through occassional rough stretches, but the majority of his outings have been solid/good/excellent.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 9:02 am
Posts: 468
Location: Schaumburg
BD wrote:
WestmontMike wrote:
Darkside wrote:
I was expecting more from Garland.


Garland has a 3.36 ERA without the 3 inning/11 earned run bitch slappin he took from Minnesota a month ago


Yeah, Garland has been fine. He will go through occassional rough stretches, but the majority of his outings have been solid/good/excellent.


Garland got torched again today, but that will happen. The Sox torched the Rocket. I read somewhere that Jose will he skipped on his next turn. Maybe move him to the pen, you never know. Or, shut him down for the year. He is just killing us now.

_________________
"YOU GOTTA BE BLEEPING ME"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 7:18 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
OldSchoolScoreFan wrote:
BD wrote:
WestmontMike wrote:
Darkside wrote:
I was expecting more from Garland.


Garland has a 3.36 ERA without the 3 inning/11 earned run bitch slappin he took from Minnesota a month ago


Yeah, Garland has been fine. He will go through occassional rough stretches, but the majority of his outings have been solid/good/excellent.


Garland got torched again today, but that will happen. The Sox torched the Rocket. I read somewhere that Jose will he skipped on his next turn. Maybe move him to the pen, you never know. Or, shut him down for the year. He is just killing us now.


Yeah, it seems when Garland doesn't have it, he gets killed out there with today being an excellent example.

Contreras has been moved out of the rotation, and I hope they shut him down for the rest of the season. He has no confidence right now, and I'd let him start his winter vacation about 2 months early.

I want Gavin Floyd, regardless of how bad he may end up being, getting the last 2 months worth of starts.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group