It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 2:20 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Orton
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
Nas wrote:
Looks like he might be promoted to #2 on the depth chart.


Does that say more about him or Brian Griese?

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
Has Orton lost that beard weight yet? That alone would make him more mobile...

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
I feel unable to make comments on Orton(I am a big fan) due to my school. You can be sure that I have never called into Boers and Bernstein comparing him to Johnny Unitas.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
What I do find interesting is the fact that they are planning on putting in some shotgun plays this year, which they refused to do in Kyle Orton's rookie season. Kyle Orton is at his best out of the shotgun(and it should help Rex since he is slower and less mobile than Orton). I wonder if this is a case where they are preparing the team just in case Rex fails.

I'm a big Orton fan, but if he never sees the field, that means that Rex is doing well. That would be fine with me because I want the Bears to win the Super Bowl. Now if Rex is erratic as last year, then I'm sure Nas and me will have some epic arguments.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
Killer V wrote:
Has Orton lost that beard weight yet? That alone would make him more mobile...

All the Bears 'experts' have said he came to camp about 10-15 lbs less than last year. So the beard plus a few six packs are gone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Now if Rex is erratic as last year, then I'm sure Nas and me will have some epic arguments.


I'll take the 11 games where he had 22 touchdowns and 3 interceptions and I'll let you keep the rest. I don't have much use for the 5 games where he had 1 touchdowns and 17 interceptions. Is it possible to be that good and that bad in the same season? Those numbers are crazy :shock: :o


If he does the same thing this year, I think he'll be benched and on his way out of Chicago. You have to have some degree of consistency in the NFL. It's not his physical skills, but his decision making. I don't know if that will ever be fixed. I think Rex thinks he is a gunslinger who is playing Madden 08 and can just hit the X button. His receivers aren't good enough for that and neither is he. Let's hope we have a quality starter in Rex, and a quality backup in Orton.

You won't hear me talking about knowing if Griese is good or not. He isn't this training camp and may not have been last year. I just wish we had known last year so we could have cut him and found someone else as a veteran backup/third option.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
I think you have to go to Orton if Rex struggles. I still can't believe those numbers. They're Jekyll and Hyde at their best. No one could make something up like that.

Rick what if he has 22 touchdowns and 3 picks in his first 11 games but sucks for the last 5 games do you bench him?


You can't bench any QB after week 13. He would only have 2 bad games under his belt at that point. I would have given Griese a shot last year during the St. Louis game, but I understand why Lovie didn't. After that it was all Grossman.

If found it crazy that people were calling for Grossman to be benched the last game of the season, or for the first round of the playoffs. You have to give any starting QB at least 2 games to get his rhythm(including the first two regular season games).

So to answer your question, no. If he has a good first 5 or 6 games, and then a bunch of bad ones, then yes you do. This is magnified if Orton does look to be a capable backup, which he wasn't last year. If the reports are true, I would like to see Orton has in his arsenal now, if Rex struggles. I believe Kyle Orton will be a starter in the NFL one day, but if it's not this season so be it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:11 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Please show some patience with Rex. As long as he shows more consistentcy, which I think we will see, he will develop into a very good NFL QB. Last year was his first year as the starting QB - there aren't QB's who step in, and just dominate - there are growth pains, and sometimes players never get beyond them.

In Rex's case, I think he can, and will get beyond them, provided he stays healthy. The Bears have added all kinds of speed (Hester, Olson, a healthy Bradley) to Berrian's down the field ability, and that will only help to allow him to make big plays.

I'm going with 27 TD, 19 INT in Year 2 of the Rexperience. He's going to make mistakes still, but I don't exepect as many valley's. He's got better offensive players around him, and a good offensive line.

With that defense as loaded as it is, if the Bears score 20 points a game, and that's not much, they are going to win a minimum of 10 games, and probably more if the offense does become more consistent.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:29 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Nas wrote:
They averaged 28 points a game last year so I think they might average of 30+ this year. They will have too because I don’t believe the defense will be able to hold down the other teams offenses like they have in the past. I see Rex throwing 29 touchdowns and 14 interceptions. I think Bradley will be the sleeper this year.


Bradley could be a steal this season, entering his 3rd year, and hopefully healthy after the ankle injuries last season. I also have similar hopes for him, especially with Muhammed getting up there in age. Bradley has the speed, and he's been productive when he's been on the field, so it's just a matter of getting past these injuries now. Big year upcoming for him.

I think this defense is set for another great season. They are absolutely loaded with talent everywhere.

If the speed on the offensive side of the ball stays on the field, this offense is going to break out (Bears did aveerage 28 per game, but some of that came from defensive scores, and Hester - not to discredit the offense though because I see them being a lot more consistent from game to game).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
Are we already having one of these debates? BEARSSSS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Rex on the Bears reminds me of Plummer to the Broncos when it happened. If you have a very good defense and smashmouth running game, it makes no sense to get a gunslinger QB, which is what rex is. This inherently makes him who he is. I dont see Rex changing because historically gunslingers are who they are. If they could get a decent game manager at QB who isnt ancient, i think that would be the best direction. I dont know if Orton is or isnt that QB, but I'm pretty sure Rex never will be. I think he will always be the guy that will win you games or lose you games, and you already have a defense capable of winning games, so you dont necessarily need a qb to win you games, just a qb to not lose you games.

Think the 2000 Ravens would have won it all with Rex as their QB instead of Dilfer. I'm not saying they wouldnt have, but i think its an interesting question

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
Tom Brady with mediocre receivers

Passing yards: 2002-6, 2003-6, 2004-10, 2005-1, 2006-7

Ratings in the high 80's/low 90's

Interceptions typically around 12 per year.



I'd take that for Rex with mediocre wideouts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Hawkeye Vince wrote:
Tom Brady with mediocre receivers

Passing yards: 2002-6, 2003-6, 2004-10, 2005-1, 2006-7

Ratings in the high 80's/low 90's

Interceptions typically around 12 per year.



I'd take that for Rex with mediocre wideouts.


and three super bowl titles with mediocre receivers, although Branch did have that one outstanding Super Bowl and a couple other decent seasons

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: NME and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group