It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 3:50 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 395 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
The Cubs have a lefty reliever in AA who has been lights out this season. They have some other lefty starters that have been effective and could be moved to the pen. I think they are driving up the price. You only need 1 of these guys and 1 in the wings.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
I wonder what it will take along with Gregg to get Crosby away from Detroit. I would give them DeJesus over Nasty Nate and close that deal in a second.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
Quote:
The Braves are "among the many teams expected to show interest in Cubs closer Kevin Gregg," writes MLB.com's Mark Bowman. Bowman notes that the righty closed for current Braves manager Fredi Gonzalez when both were with the Marlins in 2007-08. Gregg is just one of many relievers the Braves may be looking at as they pursue veteran help with Eric O'Flaherty and Jonny Venters out for the season.

Gregg, 35, has become an unlikely asset for the Cubs, returning to their closer role and posting a 1.42 ERA, 9.2 K/9, 2.5 BB/9, 0.71 HR/9, and 36.5% groundball rate in 25 1/3 innings. He's proof of the volatility of relievers. In March, ESPN Los Angeles' Mark Saxon wrote that Gregg "quietly stewed" over the fact that he couldn't find a Major League deal in the offseason coming off a 2012 campaign in which he posted a 4.95 ERA and 1.5 K/BB ratio in 43 2/3 frames for the Orioles. He signed a minor league deal with the Dodgers, who couldn't find a spot on their big league pitching staff due to their starter surplus and released him. He then signed a minor league deal with the Cubs, who selected his contract in a mid-April bullpen shakeup.

It's a little early for a clear picture of Gregg's market, but the Braves, Reds, Red Sox, Tigers, and Padres are likely to be on the hunt for bullpen help. The Cubs and Braves hooked up on a notable trade near the deadline last year, with Chicago shipping veterans Paul Maholm and Reed Johnson to Atlanta for prospects Arodys Vizcaino and Jaye Chapman.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 4:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:44 am
Posts: 53
Location: Brighton Park
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
TRADE GARZA BEFORE HE HURTS HIMSELF!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
Quote:
Cubs righthander Matt Garza, who may be the best active pitcher currently available in trade, is drawing considerable interest from both leagues and both coasts.

The Orioles, Rangers, Giants, Padres and Dodgers are all said by sources to have varying degrees of interest, with the Red Sox, Blue Jays and several others seen as possibilities.

Garza and Marlins ace Ricky Nolasco are the top two active starters on the trade market. But Garza's one edge is that he's had success in the American League, too.

Chicago looks like it's going to be the Merchandise Mart of cities this trade deadline, with the Cubs now joining the White Sox as early sellers, Garza – who is battled-tested in the tough A.L. East, not to mention very hot at the moment – at the heart of their trade talks.

Folks who have talked to the Cubs say they determined that Garza will surely go for two reasons: 1) Cubs people are taking a very realistic approach to their team and understand they aren't a contender, especially in the formidable N.L. Central, and 2) they realized awhile go that there's no long-term deal to be made with the free-agent-to-be Garza, in fact as far back as two springs ago when multiyear talks never got traction.

Garza is cooperating nicely on the field, as he has pitched brilliantly lately, having allowed just three earned runs in his last three starts over 22 innings. Overall, he is 3-1 with a 3.83 ERA, 1.16 WHIP and 47 strikeouts against just 15 walks. His $10.25 million salary looks pretty reasonable.

The Cubs have quite a smorgasbord of available players, and according to one rival GM all among starter Scott Feldman, outfielders Nate Schierholtz, David DeJesus and Alfonso Soriano and relievers Kevin Gregg and Shawn Camp are also out there. They've also gotten hits on lefty reliever James Russell.

But as far as the Cubs go, Garza looks like the star du jour. He's put concerns abut his arm to the side with very strong performances since his return from the disabled list.

The Rangers, who have had interest in Garza before, are pitching well but had been hoping to get Colby Lewis back this month, and that isn't going to happen now.

The Orioles are seeking a veteran starter, and while they seemed lukewarm on Garza originally, he's enhanced his status with everyone with his recent outings. He beat the Brewers 7-2 Thursday, striking out 10 in seven innings.

All the N.L. West teams are looking for starting pitching, with the Padres, Giants and Dodgers connected to Garza so far, though at least Los Angeles seems to be more in the mix for Nolasco.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
who in their right mind wants Shawn Camp?

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Why are the Cubs not looking to sign Garza?

Fuck, you gave long term money to Edwin Jackson because he was young enough to be there when the winning started. Here you have Garza in house.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
good dolphin wrote:
Fuck, you gave long term money to Edwin Jackson because he was young enough to be there when the winning started. Here you have Garza in house.

That is not why they signed Jackson.

Come on dolphin, you are better than this.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Fuck, you gave long term money to Edwin Jackson because he was young enough to be there when the winning started. Here you have Garza in house.

That is not why they signed Jackson.

Come on dolphin, you are better than this.


Right,they signed him because they mistakenly "flipped" Paul Maholm the season before.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
oh jimmy jimmy jimmy. Your irrational love for guys like Maholm and Keppinger is something. Don't ever change.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Fuck, you gave long term money to Edwin Jackson because he was young enough to be there when the winning started. Here you have Garza in house.

That is not why they signed Jackson.

Come on dolphin, you are better than this.


No, I think that was a stated reason at the time of the signing. They certainly didn't sign him for today, when they knew they would lose. He and Sanchez both fit the mix of still being in their 20s while being a reliable quantity in terms of production so that when they were good, either could top their rotation.

I could probably pull up quotes if I gave a fart.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
good dolphin wrote:
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Fuck, you gave long term money to Edwin Jackson because he was young enough to be there when the winning started. Here you have Garza in house.

That is not why they signed Jackson.

Come on dolphin, you are better than this.


No, I think that was a stated reason at the time of the signing. They certainly didn't sign him for today, when they knew they would lose. He and Sanchez both fit the mix of still being in their 20s while being a reliable quantity in terms of production so that when they were good, either could top their rotation.

I could probably pull up quotes if I gave a fart.

Yes because the "stated" reason is always the reason.

Good call.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
Cubs Rumor Thread: Cubs scouting Jays, Nats heavily -- both teams saw Garza's dominant start

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Fuck, you gave long term money to Edwin Jackson because he was young enough to be there when the winning started. Here you have Garza in house.

That is not why they signed Jackson.

Come on dolphin, you are better than this.


No, I think that was a stated reason at the time of the signing. They certainly didn't sign him for today, when they knew they would lose. He and Sanchez both fit the mix of still being in their 20s while being a reliable quantity in terms of production so that when they were good, either could top their rotation.

I could probably pull up quotes if I gave a fart.

Yes because the "stated" reason is always the reason.

Good call.


Then what is the reason? Do you think they threw down 13 million for him to eat innings for a team that will lose 90+ games?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
good dolphin wrote:
Then what is the reason? Do you think they threw down 13 million for him to eat innings for a team that will lose 90+ games?


You really are struggling lately. It is like watching Jordan in a Wizards uniform.

They signed him to eat some innings for awhile and then be flipped for a couple prospects.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:26 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
RFDC wrote:
They signed him to eat some innings for awhile and then be flipped for a couple prospects.
If that is the real reason, that is flat out stupid. They could have spent a LOT less money to get somebody to do that.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Then what is the reason? Do you think they threw down 13 million for him to eat innings for a team that will lose 90+ games?


You really are struggling lately. It is like watching Jordan in a Wizards uniform.

They signed him to eat some innings for awhile and then be flipped for a couple prospects.


Oh, now it is all so logical, the old "flip him for prospects" mantra. Except, you will have spent 39+ million by that time when you could have spent less than half of that on pitchers for one year deals...and Edwin Jackson is running out of people who haven't tired of his work and into his 30s by then.

Committing 52 million to a player is not a flip him for prospects contract.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
They overpaid an innings eater. That's the whole story. TheoJed screwed the pooch on that one.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
The Cubs will be extremely lucky if Jackson puts himself into a position to be flipped for prospects.

They could have continued to sign the Scott Feldmans of the world to 1 or 2 year deals and they would have performed equal to what Jackson will give the Cubs.

Stupid signing at the time and now looks even worse.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Note to RFDC: Paul Maholm is 8-6 with a 3.86 ERA. 91 IP 91 hit with a great K to W ratio.


Your Wrong, I'm right. Theo over flipped last year. There was no point in flipping a guy signed for 2 years who eats innings and pitches well.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57201
jimmypasta wrote:
Note to RFDC: Paul Maholm is 8-6 with a 3.86 ERA. 91 IP 91 hit with a great K to W ratio.


Your Wrong, I'm right. Theo over flipped last year. There was no point in flipping a guy signed for 2 years who eats innings and pitches well.

Of course there was a point to flipping Maholm. In the Cubs situation you trade everyone you possibly can in order to rebuild for the future. Having Maholm right now would not do anything for them.

You develop these man crushes on certain guys and cannot see reason.

Hey Keppinger hit a Homerun tonight, I am sure that makes you happy.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Just as there is no point in overpaying for an innings eater after trading an innings eater the previous year who made waaay less in salary. What's that line of thinking all about?

Maholm 74-90 4.23 ERA 6.5 million this year
Jackson 73-81 4.49 ERA 13 million this year and for the next 3 years.

They basically signed a guy for double of what the guy they traded was making. They traded Maholm for a guy who's currently out for the season and for a guy who's pitched 6 innings and given up 12 runs.

The issue isn't about a man crush. It's about a stupid baseball and business decision. Epstoyer spend the 1st 2 years of their regime getting rid of bad money to turn around and give their 1st big contract.......to Edwin Jackson?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
Buster Olney ‏@Buster_ESPN
When the Diamondbacks and Cubs talked briefly about Jeff Samardzija, the Cubs asked about Archie Bradley/Tyler Skaggs; those talks ended.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
Never understood the Jackson signing at all. Why give big money to a journeyman starter? It made no sense then or now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Marmol traded to the Dodgers? Dodgers are nuts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Marmol traded to the Dodgers? Dodgers are nuts.

For what?? fucking broke dick out for the season Beckett??

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
This could get even better!!!!! Marmol can still invoke his Hendry Special No Trade Clause so he could become a free agent.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
It's really too bad management forced hendry into all these shitty deals.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
God damn Sappelt is going to be the one called up tomorrow. Why??????????? He is terrible. Jed and Theo are really wearing on my nerves with their handling of this roster.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
I'm pretty sure I just heard Theo say Marmol would get a change of scenery for a player that would get a change of scenery. But nothing is done yet. I heard this on the David Kaplan Show, 7-11 weeknights on WGN.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 395 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group