It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 6:26 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 289 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next

Is Homosexuality curable or treatable through therapy?
Yes 17%  17%  [ 7 ]
No 83%  83%  [ 35 ]
Total votes : 42
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:27 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
And thats fine, BRick.

A homosexual couple cannot reproduce with eachother. At least not yet.
There are many couples out there that cannot reproduce with eachother. Are those relationships wrong or in need of curing too?
Did I say or imply they were wrong? Or did I say or imply that a gay relationship needs "curing"?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92100
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
And thats fine, BRick.

A homosexual couple cannot reproduce with eachother. At least not yet.
There are many couples out there that cannot reproduce with eachother. Are those relationships wrong or in need of curing too?
Did I say or imply they were wrong?
What was your point then? I mean, if you were just stating a fact, then it is fairly obvious.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
The issue of the main question is that it it too basic for the complex nature of being gay in our modern society. When I was a young lad I do not remember noticing or knowing anyone asking the question of born gay vs. somehow becoming gay. Now in at least some part it is a bigger deal because there is a larger more public fight for acceptance and against discrimination. How better to make something more acceptable than to make it something you are born with like race.

As I said earlier, I can't get to either end of the spectrum 100% and it also isn't very important in my selfish scheme of things. One thing I do know is that I have known gay people who I could have said when they were very young oh yeah seen that coming. I also know people that have become gay later in life for whatever reasons. Who knows?

The curing thing may be more applicable to the experimenter or the confused person. Maybe there are different levels of gay, straight, bi for all I know?

One point of the argument that gets me thinking seriously though is if you are born or hard wired gay then how? Now that is interesting. Is it a gene? Something in the conception mix that is different? Chromosome? Why do I like size 2-4 dark haired chicks?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92100
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Sure, they're capable of reproduction. But what would be the point? Simply to carry on humanity? You want to compartmentalize sex and realtionships? Or are you suggesting we should use the abominations of science to continue the human race in a homosexual society?
Humans already do this in a fairly unique way compared to other species. Humans are one of the few species that have sex without the specific purpose of reproduction. In fact, it has gone as far as humans now take steps to ensure that reproduction will not happen.

The point would be that people want families. Even homosexual people still have a desire to have children.


I believe dolphins are the only other animal that has sex for pleasure so it would be hard to know.
Can you train dolphin to not be a homosexual?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:32 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Sure, they're capable of reproduction. But what would be the point? Simply to carry on humanity? You want to compartmentalize sex and realtionships? Or are you suggesting we should use the abominations of science to continue the human race in a homosexual society?
Humans already do this in a fairly unique way compared to other species. Humans are one of the few species that have sex without the specific purpose of reproduction. In fact, it has gone as far as humans now take steps to ensure that reproduction will not happen.

The point would be that people want families. Even homosexual people still have a desire to have children.


I believe dolphins are the only other animal that has sex for pleasure so it would be hard to know.
Can you train dolphin to not be a homosexual?


Put something in their blow hole?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:33 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Can you train dolphin to not be a homosexual?
Given his recent posts on the Bears Bengals game, I would say no.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Are there homosexual dolphins? They seem pretty happy. I thought someone in the past year posted on here maybe not about a species or two found to be engaging in gay or bi traits but I can't remember it.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:37 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Sure, they're capable of reproduction. But what would be the point? Simply to carry on humanity? You want to compartmentalize sex and realtionships? Or are you suggesting we should use the abominations of science to continue the human race in a homosexual society?
Humans already do this in a fairly unique way compared to other species. Humans are one of the few species that have sex without the specific purpose of reproduction. In fact, it has gone as far as humans now take steps to ensure that reproduction will not happen.

The point would be that people want families. Even homosexual people still have a desire to have children.



And how do you suggest they do that? Do you really think that commercial reproduction is a good idea? Just from the limited amount of it we have now there are all kinds of problems.

I'm not sure what you're arguing. It's clear that homosexuality is abnormal. Sure, science can subvert nature to get all kinds of desired results. That doesn't mean it's a good idea.

The problem comes in when the normal use the status of a group of abnormal people as an excuse to marginalize them. A person born with six toes is abnormal too. We don't deny him any human rights.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
I am in agreement with NSD.

I think you can be "trained" to behave a certain way.

chaspoppcap wrote:
according to most that believe in Jung and Freudian psychoanalysts anything can be cured. I think it can be to a point. It all depends on your ego,can it be weak enough to be twisted to go an other way or is it strong enough to resist being changed. Why do a lot of normal straight people have a problem with gays,that is easy. They look like they are happy and having a good time in life. The typical stereotype is someone who is not tied down by family obligations,can have numerous and readily available sex. They have no true moral compass. I have no problem with the majority of homosexual people,I do have a problem with the in your face shit. The extroverted flamboyant rub my nose in it and I need to accept their lifestyle stuff.


@DrunkChas wrote:
Fukceng homoes kneed two ceep taht lovie dovey stuf behined clothesed dores sew aye doo knot half too halve et shuved inn mie fase!

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92100
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
And how do you suggest they do that? Do you really think that commercial reproduction is a good idea? Just from the limited amount of it we have now there are all kinds of problems.
Do I really need to explain how a homosexual person can have a child?
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'm not sure what you're arguing. It's clear that homosexuality is abnormal. Sure, science can subvert nature to get all kinds of desired results. That doesn't mean it's a good idea.
You don't have to "subvert" nature though there are probably easy alternative ways to accomplish the goal.

I'm arguing that the ability to reproduce is not and should not be used as a criteria for judging what is normal or acceptable because it is so often violated even by heterosexual couples. Sex is more of a social activity than it is a reproductive activity.

Homosexuality is considered "abnormal" because we've decided it is "abnormal". Now, if the numbers are to be believed, it is definitely not the type of relationship with the highest percentage of participation but that doesn't make it abnormal.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Does this go in the Syria thread,the Russia Afraid thread or here? I'm confused.


Image

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:53 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Do I really need to explain how a homosexual person can have a child?


Okay, you want to BRick it rather than have a real discussion.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Homosexuality is considered "abnormal" because we've decided it is "abnormal".



No, it's considered abnormal because a species cannot exist without reproduction. And homosexuals cannot reproduce without engaging in sex with the opposite sex (or without assistance from scientists) which defies the categorization of homosexual. The fornication of millions of heterosexuals doesn't support your argument.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
I'm so sick of Gay talk,it's everywhere. They can go fuck off. I like the old days when guys like Paul Lynde and Charles Nelson Reily were just "wacky" bachelors.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92100
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
No, it's considered abnormal because a species cannot exist without reproduction. And homosexuals cannot reproduce without engaging in sex with the opposite sex (or without assistance from scientists) which defies the categorization of homosexual. The fornication of millions of heterosexuals doesn't support your argument.
The reproduction would be abnormal if you are using that criteria. The relationship is not unless you think that all relationships are defined by reproduction which is a very flawed way to view it.

If reproduction is what defines a relationship, then any heterosexual couple not planning on having children or without the ability to do so is also in an "abnormal" relationship. Anyone who adopts is in an "abnormal" relationship. Anyone who is not dating with the purpose of starting a family is in an "abnormal" relationship.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
jimmypasta wrote:
Does this go in the Syria thread,the Russia Afraid thread or here? I'm confused.


Image



I laughed so loud at that picture. Talk about great timing with this thread and world events. Everyone looks so happy there.

Between this picture and Bingo That, it has been a fine day on the CSFMB.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Image

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The bigger question is why do we demonize homosexuality?



There's a whole lot of room between demonizing it and declaring it normal.

We don't demonize deaf people, but I don't think we would call them normal.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
jimmypasta wrote:
Does this go in the Syria thread,the Russia Afraid thread or here? I'm confused.


Image


:lol: :lol:

Wait til Don Tiny sees this.

His respect for James E. Pasta will be through the roof.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92100
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There's a whole lot of room between demonizing it and declaring it normal.

We don't demonize deaf people, but I don't think we would call them normal.
We don't call being deaf a sin or an abomination against God.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
God there are some funny ones out there:

Image

Image

Image

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
No, it's considered abnormal because a species cannot exist without reproduction. And homosexuals cannot reproduce without engaging in sex with the opposite sex (or without assistance from scientists) which defies the categorization of homosexual. The fornication of millions of heterosexuals doesn't support your argument.
The reproduction would be abnormal if you are using that criteria. The relationship is not unless you think that all relationships are defined by reproduction which is a very flawed way to view it.

If reproduction is what defines a relationship, then any heterosexual couple not planning on having children or without the ability to do so is also in an "abnormal" relationship. Anyone who adopts is in an "abnormal" relationship. Anyone who is not dating with the purpose of starting a family is in an "abnormal" relationship.



You're having an argument with someone else. I don't think reproduction defines a realtionship. I don't have any children and don't intend on having any. I'd suggest that makes me abnormal. Or at least it better, for the sake of the human race.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92100
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You're having an argument with someone else. I don't think reproduction defines a realtionship. I don't have any children and don't intend on having any. I'd suggest that makes me abnormal. Or at least it better, for the sake of the human race.
You think there is something wrong with homosexuality because it can't reproduce.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You're having an argument with someone else. I don't think reproduction defines a realtionship. I don't have any children and don't intend on having any. I'd suggest that makes me abnormal. Or at least it better, for the sake of the human race.
You think there is something wrong with homosexuality because it can't reproduce.


If everyone were homosexual, how would you suggest the species continue on? Through science or by having people ignore their base nature to fuck people they are unattracted to? I don't believe either way is a great societal model.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You're having an argument with someone else. I don't think reproduction defines a realtionship. I don't have any children and don't intend on having any. I'd suggest that makes me abnormal. Or at least it better, for the sake of the human race.
You think there is something wrong with homosexuality because it can't reproduce.


Also,something wrong in their choice of clothes.

Image

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I contend there's a difference between abnormal and wrong. Abnormal just means not like others.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:14 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
denisdman wrote:
I contend there's a difference between abnormal and wrong. Abnormal just means not like others.



Agreed. I believe I started in this thread by saying, "of course it's wrong", which was perhaps a poor choice of words. "Wrong" suggests the people in question are violating some moral imperative. I don't believe that for a minute.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Obviously, there is something wrong with it. If it were widespread enough it would mean the end of the human race. That doesn't mean that homosexuals should be treated as lesser human beings.
Homosexuals can reproduce. That's like saying if video game playing were widespread enough it would mean the end of the human race.


Not now, Rick.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon
Image
Image
Image

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92100
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If everyone were homosexual, how would you suggest the species continue on? Through science or by having people ignore their base nature to fuck people they are unattracted to? I don't believe either way is a great societal model.
People have the desire to have children. Many people now plan it out and take steps to not have children. They still would. Right now, that is how homosexual couples do it. They find a way. In that scenario, I think the species could find a way to survive.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
Putin isn't even ripped for a guy who loves taking his shirt off in public.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 289 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group