It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 7:46 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 6513
pizza_Place: sit down
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I hated Jack Morris but he should be in the HOF.


There are other guys that should probably be in ahead of him. Jim Kaat, for example. Maybe Tiant.


Kaat was more about longevity.

Morris was probably the best pitcher in the AL for a decade and his postseason games put him over the top.



viewtopic.php?f=92&t=83471

Agreed, Morris is getting a lot of support, Tom Verducci today makes the best argument for Morris I've read as Verducci puts Morris' career in the context of the changing role of starting pitchers:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/mlb/ne ... l-of-fame/

Quote:
From 1971 through 1983, 615 pitchers made their first start in the major leagues. None of them have been elected to the Hall of Fame as a starting pitcher. It is baseball's Dark Ages for superb starting pitchers.

It is, by far, the longest and deepest drought in baseball history when it comes to the debut of a Hall of Fame starting pitcher. The previous drought ran only from 1931-35 and involved only 150 starters.

The modern drought technically extends to today, but will end with the election from this ballot of Greg Maddux (debut: 1986), who will be the first starting pitcher elected who debuted since Bert Blyleven (1970). The drought should have ended with Roger Clemens (1984) but his association with performance-enhancing drugs has kept him out. The 13-year starting pitcher drought between Blyleven and Clemens does not include Dennis Eckersley (1975), who established his Cooperstown credentials as a reliever.

The Dark Ages has one last chance: Jack Morris, who gets his 15th and final opportunity on the baseball writers' ballot. The best of the rest of his contemporaries are long gone from the ballot: Dennis Martinez, Frank Tanana, Bob Welch, Rick Reuschel, Dave Stieb and Fernando Valenzuela, all of whom fell off the ballot after one or two years for failing to gain the minimum five percent support.

Morris is the last chance from an era of enormous change in how the game was played. The widespread use of the five-man rotation, the accepted wisdom of using relief specialists and the adoption of the designated hitter in 1973 combined to jump-start a trend that hasn't stopped its course: starting pitchers were asked to throw fewer starts, fewer complete games and fewer innings.

The Dark Ages began with starters completing 28 percent of their starts in 1971. By 1983 the completion rate was down to 18 percent. By the time Morris threw his last pitch, in 1994, it was down to 8 percent. Today it is down to 2.6 percent.

As the game changed -- especially in the DH-infused American League -- no starting pitcher who debuted in that transitional era held up better than Morris. Plenty of pitchers posted better individual years, more than a few posted better peaks and many have Cy Young Awards or boast better run prevention metrics. But none of the 615 starting pitchers who debuted between 1971 and 1983 had the staying power that Morris did.

Among all starting pitchers who debuted between Blyleven and Clemens, Morris won the most games (254) and completed the most games by far (175, or 22 percent more than the next closest pitcher, Tanana) and posted the second best winning percentage (.577, trailing only Bob Welch and his .591 among pitchers with 400 starts) and the second most strikeouts (2,478, second to the 2,773 of Tanana).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Havent heard the great sports minds in weeks now. And I am doing OK

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
LeggoMYego wrote:
"it doesn't matter...who said it..what did they say!" Dan

"they said Frank Thomas isn't a first ballot Hall of Famer" Caller

"Who said that!??!!" Dan

YOU ARE A FUCKING JOKE DAN!!!

:bom:



Lol I was driving but wanted to post this exact thing immediately. What an ass.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I hated Jack Morris but he should be in the HOF.


There are other guys that should probably be in ahead of him. Jim Kaat, for example. Maybe Tiant.


Kaat was more about longevity.

Morris was probably the best pitcher in the AL for a decade and his postseason games put him over the top.



I don't recall playoffs but by your argument Mussina should be in as well.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I think Mussina probably should be in also.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I think Mussina probably should be in also.


Alrighty then 8)

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Dave In Champaign wrote:
Hey, look, everyone! Turns out Mike Florio's a fucking moron! #shocking


And then he followed it up with a Cowherd-esque nerd-voice. Classic.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
I dunno, the best part of the day for me was still


"I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS IS IN THE SUN-TIMES! THIS IS IDIOTIC! YOU! NEED! LOTTERY! PICKS! LOTTERY PICKS! YOU HAVE TO HAVE THEM! HOW CAN YOU NOT GET THIS?"
"who wrote that?"
"joecowley. BUT SERIOUSLY HOW CAN THIS EVEN RUN IN A MAJOR NEWSPAPER? LOTTERY PICKS!!!"

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Curious Hair wrote:
I dunno, the best part of the day for me was still


"I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS IS IN THE SUN-TIMES! THIS IS IDIOTIC! YOU! NEED! LOTTERY! PICKS! LOTTERY PICKS! YOU HAVE TO HAVE THEM! HOW CAN YOU NOT GET THIS?"
"who wrote that?"
"joecowley. BUT SERIOUSLY HOW CAN THIS EVEN RUN IN A MAJOR NEWSPAPER? LOTTERY PICKS!!!"


Which, when Dan explained it was one of the most head-slappingly stupid arguments he's ever made. "You need lottery picks, or else you just have guys" and he used the Heat as an example. LeBron, Wade, Bosh were all lottery picks but only Wade was initially drafted by the Heat. His argument basically boils down to having the best players playing for your team makes your team more likely to win. Wow...what a revelation.

And if the point is needing lottery picks why are we worried about next year's draft? Why not go with established talent? By his logic the Bulls should just bring in Durant, Paul, and Love. It's simple really.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Dan's point made perfect sense, that the best players you have will always have been drafted in the lottery range. God, Bulls talk is so fucking belabored on this show.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Curious Hair wrote:
Dan's point made perfect sense, that the best players you have will always have been drafted in the lottery range. God, Bulls talk is so fucking belabored on this show.


It sort of terrifies me that not a single caller could explain how stupidly obvious Dan's point was. But I suppose if there were I wouldn't get to come here and pretend how above it all I am. It's a catch-22 really.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Curious Hair wrote:
Dan's point made perfect sense, that the best players you have will always have been drafted in the lottery range. God, Bulls talk is so fucking belabored on this show.
Its tortured thats for sure.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
That smart caller would have been summarily dismissed for going against there narrative. Just like the guy that called seeming prepared to school Danny on probabilities.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
by the way, the 2005 Pistons with Antonio McDyess had 4th (Sheed), 2nd (McDyess), 3rd (Billups), 7th (Hamilton).

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Yeah they did say pistons were exception to their rule.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
The Bulls have 4 lottery picks. Is that good enough? Pencil it in?

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I hated Jack Morris but he should be in the HOF.


There are other guys that should probably be in ahead of him. Jim Kaat, for example. Maybe Tiant.

Morris and Schilling both made up for the just below hall of fame numbers with the dominant post seasons imo


Tiant should be in. Not sure on Kaat


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
IMO, the reason writers vote on this stuff, presumably, is because they've seen the games.

If you watched Morris, stats be damned, he's in the Hall of Fame. And he's a cocksucker. But credit where it's due.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:13 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Morris and Schilling both made up for the just below hall of fame numbers with the dominant post seasons imo


To me, Schilling and Kevin Brown are exactly the same guy. I can't see them in the Hall of Fame. I have less of a problem with Morris, but he's facing an uphill battle against the conventional wisdom of today that says "a pitcher's job is to prevent runs." Something Morris wasn't particularly good at. Now, I don't agree that that's a pitcher's job. I think his job is to allow less runs than the opposing pitcher(s). Such a thing results in a good W/L record. But every time I post something like that- here or anywhere else- I am faced with ridicule from younger fans. And now we want to put Morris in the HoF based on my philosophy? I'm not sure we should have it both ways. Either something matters or it doesn't. You could never convince me that Felix Hernandez is close to as good a pitcher as Morris. But such a thought is generally considered absurd.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
I really don't feel good about Schilling being a Hall of Famer, but I feel worse about keeping him out after his 2004 postseason, if that makes any sense.

Kevin Brown, pffft, wrong side of the borderline all the way.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:34 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Curious Hair wrote:
I really don't feel good about Schilling being a Hall of Famer, but I feel worse about keeping him out after his 2004 postseason, if that makes any sense.

Kevin Brown, pffft, wrong side of the borderline all the way.


He has exactly the same career as Schilling. I guess I can see some post-season heroics putting a close guy over. I just hate Schilling and I think that was fake blood on that sock.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 7:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92053
Location: To the left of my post
The lottery pick thing is kind of stupid. The second round is mostly garbage every year. We'll give an average of three NBA second round picks on every roster.

That leaves 12 spots available.

The lottery accounts for 14/30 total picks, or for a total of about 47% of all first round picks. That means just on averages that 5-6 spots on every team should be lottery picks even if the NBA simply chose the top 30 players and randomized it. So there really is no point in talking about how you need lottery picks because Team X had 5 lottery picks. Every team has lottery picks because 47% of the players in the first round are lottery picks. If every championship team had 10 or 11 lottery picks maybe we'd have something here.

There was an email that made the best point of the show, but it is a death sentence for the Bulls, in that every champion, except the latest Pistons team, had a top 15 all time NBA player on it. So lottery picks don't matter. You could fill your team with lottery picks today who are sitting at home watching television. What you really need is Jabari Parker to have a chance to win a title. If you don't get Jabari Parker then you might as well not watch the Bulls at all because they aren't winning the title without a top 15 all time player.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37835
Location: ...
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

He has exactly the same career as Schilling. I guess I can see some post-season heroics putting a close guy over. I just hate Schilling and I think that was fake blood on that sock.


he has a much better post season career than brown though. 11-2, 2.23 ERA. brown's stats: 5-5, 4.19 ERA.

schilling should be in.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:30 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
W_Z wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

He has exactly the same career as Schilling. I guess I can see some post-season heroics putting a close guy over. I just hate Schilling and I think that was fake blood on that sock.


he has a much better post season career than brown though. 11-2, 2.23 ERA. brown's stats: 5-5, 4.19 ERA.

schilling should be in.


Should Andy Pettitte get in?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Morris and Schilling both made up for the just below hall of fame numbers with the dominant post seasons imo


To me, Schilling and Kevin Brown are exactly the same guy. I can't see them in the Hall of Fame. I have less of a problem with Morris, but he's facing an uphill battle against the conventional wisdom of today that says "a pitcher's job is to prevent runs." Something Morris wasn't particularly good at. Now, I don't agree that that's a pitcher's job. I think his job is to allow less runs than the opposing pitcher(s). Such a thing results in a good W/L record. But every time I post something like that- here or anywhere else- I am faced with ridicule from younger fans. And now we want to put Morris in the HoF based on my philosophy? I'm not sure we should have it both ways. Either something matters or it doesn't. You could never convince me that Felix Hernandez is close to as good a pitcher as Morris. But such a thought is generally considered absurd.

Its not like Morris had bad numbers. He struck out a lot of guys but his consistentcy was remarkable too. Add in the post season and you have a hall of famer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
W_Z wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

He has exactly the same career as Schilling. I guess I can see some post-season heroics putting a close guy over. I just hate Schilling and I think that was fake blood on that sock.


he has a much better post season career than brown though. 11-2, 2.23 ERA. brown's stats: 5-5, 4.19 ERA.

schilling should be in.


Should Andy Pettitte get in?

If he was clean then, yes, no doubt


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group