Hatchetman wrote:
Do B&B really want Martellus Bennett? Hopefully this goes the way of the Gordon Beckham segments.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the whole segment was born of B&B having him on and being so tickled by him that they proposed making it weekly. It's not like, say, the Dennis McKinnon segment, where you could tell they were just trying to get through it and never speak of it again. I always thought they liked doing the Beckham segments, though. I mean, any time you can be in the presence of a member of the Chicago White Sox, how can you complain.
There are way too many guests on the show lately. I know it's a directive to do Bears analysis out the ass, but when you have Chris Tannehill producing slick intro packages for
a guy who writes for Bleacher Report, you've reduced yourself to absurdity. I could write for Bleacher Report.
_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.