It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:30 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Wow,the cheer leaders lay down as good as the D-Line,huh?

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
jimmypasta wrote:
Wow,the cheer leaders lay down as good as the D-Line,huh?


I'm worried about you, jimmy.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
Wow,the cheerleaders lay down as good as the D-Line,huh?


I'm worried about you, jimmy.


Sorry,as I type it I'm thinking it's funny. 5 minute later,I look at it and say "Speeps got into my account,too!"

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 9:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 1678
Beardown wrote:
Here's another weird thing about the NFL. It just so happen that this year was the Bears turn in the schedule rotation to play the AFC North. Well, the Bears went 4-0 against that division. Not a bad division, but who's to say that we'd to as well against another AFC division. Also, the Bears just happen to get the two best teams in that division at home (Bengals and Ravens) and the two bad teams in that division on the road (Steelers and Browns). Say that's reveresed, we could be 2-2. Cuz playing the Ravens and Bengals at their place is different and the Bears barely beat both of those teams at Soldier Field.


The NFL blessed the Bears with the NFC East, too.

Beardown wrote:
Like I said, the NFL is weird. Sometimes their is not much difference in that 7-9 team that misses the playoffs and the 10-6 team that makes it.


Yep.

Beardown wrote:
Not to mention injuries. I think the Packers would have this division clinched right now had it not been for Rodgers injury.



Yep.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 9:56 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I predict Aaron Rodgers doesn't play another game this year.


I agree.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Glad we arent playing The Ravens, because those Harbaugh boys sure know how to coach. These guys have teams that no matter how they start, they improve and hit damn hard all year. They just get better each week. Tough to create that pace in the NF of L

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
bigfan wrote:
Glad we arent playing The Ravens, because those Harbaugh boys sure know how to coach. These guys have teams that no matter how they start, they improve and hit damn hard all year. They just get better each week. Tough to create that pace in the NF of L



I guess they learned some never quit stuff from their dad? I wondered why Ditka couldn't make it work with Jim. Didn't he have some dream season with Ted Marchibroda after he left?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:03 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Now, because the Bears were 3rd in the division last year they got the 3rd place NFC teams of the non division rotation (which was thhe NFC East this year). So it was the Saints and the Rams. Lost both those games. Rams suck but the Saints aren't the 3rd place team they were last year.

Again, every team has their story. Lions have lost 4 games or so with leads in the 4th quarter. So the Bears can't bitch about their tough losses. Packers have a lot to cry about as well.

Just pointing out how weird this NFL is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 1678
And no need for the Bears to apologize if they get in. They were 10-6 last year and weren't allowed in. Screw Detroit and Green Bay.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37836
Location: ...
they would've been worse with a heavier schedule. any bears fan who doesn't recognize they get a beneficial schedule nearly every year needs to pay better attention to the NFL. this has been a cream puff schedule for them and they're still fighting for a playoff spot. they have a terrible record against teams over .500 and those are the teams they'd be playing in the playoffs.

out of their 8 wins this year, 2 have come against teams with a winning record. by a combined 6 points. i wouldn't be writing off any potential opponents with that stat.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:40 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
W_Z wrote:
they would've been worse with a heavier schedule. any bears fan who doesn't recognize they get a beneficial schedule nearly every year needs to pay better attention to the NFL. this has been a cream puff schedule for them and they're still fighting for a playoff spot. they have a terrible record against teams over .500 and those are the teams they'd be playing in the playoffs.

out of their 8 wins this year, 2 have come against teams with a winning record. by a combined 6 points. i wouldn't be writing off any potential opponents with that stat.


They get a beneficial schedule every year? You do realize, as we've pointed out, that they rotate AFC and NFC divisions every year for every team. Only 2 games are based on record (it was the Saints and Rams for the Bears this year - one tough team, one easy team). You really thought the NFL tries to give the Bears an easy schedule?

By the way, before the year started, it was one of the toughest schedules based on last year's records. Which you can never go by. Just saying.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:03 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Beardown wrote:
W_Z wrote:
they would've been worse with a heavier schedule. any bears fan who doesn't recognize they get a beneficial schedule nearly every year needs to pay better attention to the NFL. this has been a cream puff schedule for them and they're still fighting for a playoff spot. they have a terrible record against teams over .500 and those are the teams they'd be playing in the playoffs.

out of their 8 wins this year, 2 have come against teams with a winning record. by a combined 6 points. i wouldn't be writing off any potential opponents with that stat.


They get a beneficial schedule every year? You do realize, as we've pointed out, that they rotate AFC and NFC divisions every year for every team. Only 2 games are based on record (it was the Saints and Rams for the Bears this year - one tough team, one easy team). You really thought the NFL tries to give the Bears an easy schedule?

By the way, before the year started, it was one of the toughest schedules based on last year's records. Which you can never go by. Just saying.


Agreed

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
The Rams are going to have a bad record and will be one of the easier teams on peoples schedules next year. I wouldnt want to play them. the packers could be a 3rd place team and be slotted as a lessor team next year, which would be inaccurate with Rogers back. ATL with Jones back and some new RB's that dont get hurt every play. Imagine having all of them on your schedule because you are supposed to be playing the weaker teams?

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:27 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
That's just it. The Bears got the Saints this year cuz of a 3rd place record. The Packes got the Falcons this year cuz of a 1st place record. How did that work out as far as strength of schedule based on record?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 2:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
W_Z wrote:
they would've been worse with a heavier schedule. any bears fan who doesn't recognize they get a beneficial schedule nearly every year needs to pay better attention to the NFL. this has been a cream puff schedule for them and they're still fighting for a playoff spot. they have a terrible record against teams over .500 and those are the teams they'd be playing in the playoffs.

out of their 8 wins this year, 2 have come against teams with a winning record. by a combined 6 points. i wouldn't be writing off any potential opponents with that stat.

You know how this goes Zack. The Bears are almost always mediocre, but if you talk to their fans it's always either "Fire everyone!" or "Super Bowl!".

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37836
Location: ...
FavreFan wrote:
W_Z wrote:
they would've been worse with a heavier schedule. any bears fan who doesn't recognize they get a beneficial schedule nearly every year needs to pay better attention to the NFL. this has been a cream puff schedule for them and they're still fighting for a playoff spot. they have a terrible record against teams over .500 and those are the teams they'd be playing in the playoffs.

out of their 8 wins this year, 2 have come against teams with a winning record. by a combined 6 points. i wouldn't be writing off any potential opponents with that stat.

You know how this goes Zack. The Bears are almost always mediocre, but if you talk to their fans it's always either "Fire everyone!" or "Super Bowl!".


i know. it never gets...less annoying.

Beardown wrote:
You really thought the NFL tries to give the Bears an easy schedule?


i don't think the NFL tries to do anything except stretch their goddamn product thinner and thinner. i'm saying that the bears in the past 5 or 6 years have been extremely fortunate in their schedules, regardless of when they were made...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
W_Z wrote:
they would've been worse with a heavier schedule. any bears fan who doesn't recognize they get a beneficial schedule nearly every year needs to pay better attention to the NFL. this has been a cream puff schedule for them and they're still fighting for a playoff spot. they have a terrible record against teams over .500 and those are the teams they'd be playing in the playoffs.

out of their 8 wins this year, 2 have come against teams with a winning record. by a combined 6 points. i wouldn't be writing off any potential opponents with that stat.

You know how this goes Zack. The Bears are almost always mediocre, but if you talk to their fans it's always either "Fire everyone!" or "Super Bowl!".

As if that's specific to Bears fans?

That's every team in every sports fans, including the one you and six Zack roots for


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Id be very surprised if the Bears beat the Panthers in Carolina

I dont think they can beat any team that is solid on both sides of the ball. (Notwithstanding the Bengals win.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
W_Z wrote:
they would've been worse with a heavier schedule. any bears fan who doesn't recognize they get a beneficial schedule nearly every year needs to pay better attention to the NFL. this has been a cream puff schedule for them and they're still fighting for a playoff spot. they have a terrible record against teams over .500 and those are the teams they'd be playing in the playoffs.

out of their 8 wins this year, 2 have come against teams with a winning record. by a combined 6 points. i wouldn't be writing off any potential opponents with that stat.

You know how this goes Zack. The Bears are almost always mediocre, but if you talk to their fans it's always either "Fire everyone!" or "Super Bowl!".

As if that's specific to Bears fans?

That's every team in every sports fans, including the one you and six Zack roots for

Completely agree. I was drunk and talking shit. My post actually describes me too. I made a $100 bet on the Pack after Week 1, then wrote them off like 5 different times, and now am convincing myself we can win the Super Bowl with a healthy Rodgers.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Completely agree. I was drunk and talking shit. My post actually describes me too. I made a $100 bet on the Pack after Week 1, then wrote them off like 5 different times, and now am convincing myself we can win the Super Bowl with a healthy Rodgers.

It's 2010 all over again. I already took Monday and Tuesday off after the Super Bowl so I could up to Lambeau and see the Super Bowl celebration. CAN'T WAIT.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
W_Z wrote:
they would've been worse with a heavier schedule. any bears fan who doesn't recognize they get a beneficial schedule nearly every year needs to pay better attention to the NFL. this has been a cream puff schedule for them and they're still fighting for a playoff spot. they have a terrible record against teams over .500 and those are the teams they'd be playing in the playoffs.

out of their 8 wins this year, 2 have come against teams with a winning record. by a combined 6 points. i wouldn't be writing off any potential opponents with that stat.

You know how this goes Zack. The Bears are almost always mediocre, but if you talk to their fans it's always either "Fire everyone!" or "Super Bowl!".

As if that's specific to Bears fans?

That's every team in every sports fans, including the one you and six Zack roots for

Completely agree. I was drunk and talking shit. My post actually describes me too. I made a $100 bet on the Pack after Week 1, then wrote them off like 5 different times, and now am convincing myself we can win the Super Bowl with a healthy Rodgers.

:lol:

I was all ready to argue!

(Not really)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57241
rogers park bryan wrote:
That's every team in every sports fans, including the one you and six Zack roots for

:lol: :lol:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
RFDC wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
That's every team in every sports fans, including the one you and six Zack roots for

:lol: :lol:

Just for you, Ralphie


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57241
rogers park bryan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
That's every team in every sports fans, including the one you and six Zack roots for

:lol: :lol:

Just for you, Ralphie

Thanks Paulie, I appreciate it.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37836
Location: ...
rogers park bryan wrote:

That's every team in every sports fans, including the one you and six Zack roots for


only six? i thought it was more...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group