It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 2:44 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1016 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 ... 34  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
I literally didn't say any of that. I said they wanted Jay Cutler. That's why they signed him to a contract. If they had the chance to sign Rodgers instead, they probably would, though.


And that's what I said. Wanting him more than Josh McCown or Matt Schaub is different than wanting him. You seemed to be suggesting that Cutler was the guy they were targeting as the man to carry this franchise. If they did think that, it's time for a new front office.

The point is you didn't need to pay him like he's Peyton Manning. It won't turn out well for anyone but Jay.


Dude, you're off your rocker. My point was that they wanted Cutler to be the QB for the next 3 years, so they signed him for 3 years. This wasn't intended to be a controversial statement. Typically teams want players they sign.


I'm off my rocker? You're expecting a guy to play better than he ever has. That's what it would take to justify that contract. Teams often sign guys they don't really want. As a Cub fan, I would think you would know that all too well.


He had his best season as a Bear this year. That actually happened. And I didn't say any of that when I mentioned that the Bears wanted him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:24 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Cutler isn't in Romo's class. Based on production he isn't better than Matt Schaub over the past 5 seasons.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
I dont think there is that big of a difference between Romo and Cutler.
We can only dream of Cutler having a season like Romo did last year, and people were on him about that saying it wasn't good enough.

Romo, like Ryan, is put down because of a lack of playoff success. Well, Cutler doesn't even beat them there.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
I literally didn't say any of that. I said they wanted Jay Cutler. That's why they signed him to a contract. If they had the chance to sign Rodgers instead, they probably would, though.


And that's what I said. Wanting him more than Josh McCown or Matt Schaub is different than wanting him. You seemed to be suggesting that Cutler was the guy they were targeting as the man to carry this franchise. If they did think that, it's time for a new front office.

The point is you didn't need to pay him like he's Peyton Manning. It won't turn out well for anyone but Jay.


Dude, you're off your rocker. My point was that they wanted Cutler to be the QB for the next 3 years, so they signed him for 3 years. This wasn't intended to be a controversial statement. Typically teams want players they sign.


I'm off my rocker? You're expecting a guy to play better than he ever has. That's what it would take to justify that contract. Teams often sign guys they don't really want. As a Cub fan, I would think you would know that all too well.

Alright, just leave them out of this JORR


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Bucky Chris wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'm was wrong. I wish the Bears did use the Franchise Tag on Cutler.


ARE YOU FUCKING WITH ME!?!?!?!? I FEEL LIKE YOU GUYS ARE FUCKING WITH ME!!!!!!!!!!


Tag still would have cost more over the 3 years, and he probably would hold out. I've changed though too. I wanted them to tag Jay and take a QB high. With how bad the defense is, I'm happy they locked him in and can use the high picks on the defense. They can still take a QB later. And if all the McCown lovers think Marc can coach up anyone, it should work out long term.[/quote]

If Trestman can truly coach up anyone, that makes this a horrible decision.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
leashyourkids wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'm was wrong. I wish the Bears did use the Franchise Tag on Cutler.


ARE YOU FUCKING WITH ME!?!?!?!? I FEEL LIKE YOU GUYS ARE FUCKING WITH ME!!!!!!!!!!


Tag still would have cost more over the 3 years, and he probably would hold out. I've changed though too. I wanted them to tag Jay and take a QB high. With how bad the defense is, I'm happy they locked him in and can use the high picks on the defense. They can still take a QB later. And if all the McCown lovers think Marc can coach up anyone, it should work out long term.[/quote]

If Trestman can truly coach up anyone, that makes this a horrible decision.


I don't think that's actually true, fwiw. If Trestman thought it was true, they wouldn't have signed Cutler. I still think they will take a QB late, and if it doesn't work out, they will draft another next year and maybe even the next year. Could also find a young QB cast off to try to rebuild.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bucky Chris wrote:

He had his best season as a Bear this year. That actually happened. And I didn't say any of that when I mentioned that the Bears wanted him.



First of all, he missed a lot of games.

Beyond that, you know who else had his best season last year? Josh McCown. Is that a coincidence or does it have something to do with the offense that was run? Why is it Cutler gets credit for "his best season", but McCown is simply a product of an offense?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:

He had his best season as a Bear this year. That actually happened. And I didn't say any of that when I mentioned that the Bears wanted him.



First of all, he missed a lot of games.

Beyond that, you know who else had his best season last year? Josh McCown. Is that a coincidence or does it have something to do with the offense that was run? Why is it Cutler gets credit for "his best season", but McCown is simply a product of an offense?


McCown gets a lot of credit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:32 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bucky Chris wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:

He had his best season as a Bear this year. That actually happened. And I didn't say any of that when I mentioned that the Bears wanted him.



First of all, he missed a lot of games.

Beyond that, you know who else had his best season last year? Josh McCown. Is that a coincidence or does it have something to do with the offense that was run? Why is it Cutler gets credit for "his best season", but McCown is simply a product of an offense?


McCown gets a lot of credit.


Not really. No one thinks he can maintain a 100+ rating. If they did, the Bears would have signed him for at lot less than they just paid that goof.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
This is going to end up being the longest thread on the board.

:lol: Even as an avowed Cutler hater I have trouble believing its raging on this long. For the week in review I'm just going to link this thread and be done .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
Tag still would have cost more over the 3 years, and he probably would hold out. I've changed though too. I wanted them to tag Jay and take a QB high. With how bad the defense is, I'm happy they locked him in and can use the high picks on the defense. They can still take a QB later. And if all the McCown lovers think Marc can coach up anyone, it should work out long term.
Shocking. Reacting positively to a move by the Bears even when you thought it was stupid a day ago.

Let me guess, you think the iPhone 7 is great too!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Bucky Chris wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'm was wrong. I wish the Bears did use the Franchise Tag on Cutler.


ARE YOU FUCKING WITH ME!?!?!?!? I FEEL LIKE YOU GUYS ARE FUCKING WITH ME!!!!!!!!!!


Tag still would have cost more over the 3 years, and he probably would hold out. I've changed though too. I wanted them to tag Jay and take a QB high. With how bad the defense is, I'm happy they locked him in and can use the high picks on the defense. They can still take a QB later. And if all the McCown lovers think Marc can coach up anyone, it should work out long term.

I'm beginning to think you're literally retarded. If you franchise Cutler for one year, there's no obligation to do it again for two more. Saying this is cheaper is idiotic; inexplicably so unless you have some kind of disability that prevents normal reasoning.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
This is getting out of hand


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Bucky Chris wrote:
Dude, it's a market deal over the 3 years of the deal. Which is what is guaranteed. His average annual salary is market rate for a second tier QB over the first 3 years.

Even saying over 3 years it turns out to be a market deal is an issue. Why are people commending the Bears for paying market rate? They had a market inefficiency staring them right in the face. Franchise Cutler and then draft and develop a QB in the most loaded draft in recent history. Emery put the tools in place with Trestman and Cavanaugh to help pick and develop the QB.

Hey, it's 2006 and I bought a 2 bedroom ranch in Wheeling for only $250,000! I deserve kudos since I only paid market rate!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:37 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Kirkwood wrote:
Hey, it's 2006 and I bought a 2 bedroom ranch in Wheeling for only $250,000! I deserve kudos since I only paid market rate!!!
And that Aaron Rodgers was a great draft pick!

Hindsight is always 20-20

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
MattInTheCrown wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'm was wrong. I wish the Bears did use the Franchise Tag on Cutler.


ARE YOU FUCKING WITH ME!?!?!?!? I FEEL LIKE YOU GUYS ARE FUCKING WITH ME!!!!!!!!!!


Tag still would have cost more over the 3 years, and he probably would hold out. I've changed though too. I wanted them to tag Jay and take a QB high. With how bad the defense is, I'm happy they locked him in and can use the high picks on the defense. They can still take a QB later. And if all the McCown lovers think Marc can coach up anyone, it should work out long term.

I'm beginning to think you're literally retarded. If you franchise Cutler for one year, there's no obligation to do it again for two more. Saying this is cheaper is idiotic; inexplicably so unless you have some kind of disability that prevents normal reasoning.


Thanks. But the point is, they wanted him for 3 years. There plan is to have him as the QB for the next 3 years. Using the tag would then cost them $8MM more than what they spent ($54MM). And it might not work, since he could hold out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:40 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Kirkwood wrote:
They had a market inefficiency staring them right in the face.


That's it right there. And they succumbed to it. They had to look at Cutler as their only viable option. That may even have been the case, though I doubt it. But even if we grant that, there was no reason to pay him the way they did.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
Thanks. But the point is, they wanted him for 3 years. There plan is to have him as the QB for the next 3 years. Using the tag would then cost them $8MM more than what they spent ($54MM). And it might not work, since he could hold out.
When is the last time a quarterback missed an NFL game due to a holdout?

Also, doesn't this deal have cap considerations for the length of the deal regardless if they cut him after year 3? So, whatever savings they had was simply giving the Bears more money rather than fielding the most competitive team.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Bears were in a hard spot. So they paid him a couple mil per year more than playing hardball and maybe losing him. BFD.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Thanks. But the point is, they wanted him for 3 years. There plan is to have him as the QB for the next 3 years. Using the tag would then cost them $8MM more than what they spent ($54MM). And it might not work, since he could hold out.


Also, doesn't this deal have cap considerations for the length of the deal regardless if they cut him after year 3?


Literally zero, as I understand it. He is on a game by game contract at that point. They can cut him at any time after the 3rd year because there aren't any bonuses, etc. His cap number is his salary.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:58 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hatchetman wrote:
Bears were in a hard spot. So they paid him a couple mil per year more than playing hardball and maybe losing him. BFD.


They couldn't lose him. They had control. Maybe they paid him a couple mil more to stop him from pouting like a little Caller Bob. I'm betting it won't work.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
Literally zero, as I understand it. He is on a game by game contract at that point. They can cut him at any time after the 3rd year because there aren't any bonuses, etc. His cap number is his salary.
So why not just do a 3 year deal? Isn't the whole point of these longer deals to get cap relief?

That just doesn't add up. If what you describe is true, the Bears basically franchised Cutler for 3 years yesterday and gave up any chance to move on over those three years to save about $2.5 million a year. That's pretty horrible since even Emery talked about how much the franchise tag hurts your team to use.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
They don't want to move on. They want Cutler. And they can still trade him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:05 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bucky Chris wrote:
They want Cutler.


Then they're stupid.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
They want Cutler.


Then they're stupid.


Ok. Maybe we should agree to disagree on that part.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:14 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bucky Chris wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
They want Cutler.


Then they're stupid.


Ok. Maybe we should agree to disagree on that part.


That's fine. But I have a reasonable basis for my thought. I simply don't expect him to do something he has never done. He's not a second year player. He's been in the league a long time. Believing that he is going to take a leap forward in terms of performance is pure whimsy based on nothing but hopes and wishes.

If the Bears thought they needed a legitimate starting quarterback for next season and he was the only one they could reasonably get, I understand using the franchise tag. I just don't see making a commitment to this guy.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16489
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
They had a market inefficiency staring them right in the face.


That's it right there. And they succumbed to it. They had to look at Cutler as their only viable option. That may even have been the case, though I doubt it. But even if we grant that, there was no reason to pay him the way they did.


I do wonder if Cutler used the nuclear threat of holdout right off the bat and scared Emery/Phillips. At the very least, it seems they were concerned Jay would pout if franchised. I think this contract is more about that (and lack of decent FA) than it is about the Bears "wanting" Cutler for 3+ years.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
They don't want to move on. They want Cutler. And they can still trade him.
They want him today. It's harder to say what they will want in a year or two.

I still find it incredibly hard to believe there is no cap hit in year 4 if they cut him. That just isn't how NFL contracts seem to work.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
They want Cutler.


Then they're stupid.


Ok. Maybe we should agree to disagree on that part.


That's fine. But I have a reasonable basis for my thought. I simply don't expect him to do something he has never done. He's not a second year player. He's been in the league a long time. Believing that he is going to take a leap forward in terms of performance is pure whimsy based on nothing but hopes and wishes.

If the Bears thought they needed a legitimate starting quarterback for next season and he was the only one they could reasonably get, I understand using the franchise tag. I just don't see making a commitment to this guy.


He took a leap this year, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
They want Cutler.


Then they're stupid.


Ok. Maybe we should agree to disagree on that part.


That's fine. But I have a reasonable basis for my thought.



:lol:

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1016 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 ... 34  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group