Peoria Matt wrote:
I would usually agree with you on this one, Sini but when I hear -30 to -50 wind chills I don't have a problem with it. Hopefully, it keeps the idiots from going out to get smokes or a lottery ticket. People just don't have enough common sense.
That being said, my employer is expecting all of us to be at work tomorrow. And then heading outside to work.
dude, it doesn't take a brain surgeon / rocket scientist to realize that it's a good idea to be inside when it's -10 degrees out (fuck wind chills and heat indexes... they're just stupid hyperbole meant to sell sensationalized media coverage by convincing people that it's hotter/colder than it really is, you know,
IT FEELS LIKE it's X degrees out there...." --- then why have temperatures in the first place if you're going to sell me an exaggerated # that you claim is what it really is out there?
but see matt, you're touching on the point that i find somewhat disturbing. yes, you wanna do your due diligence in warning the idiots that it's not a good idea to go out and do superfluous stuff in this weather.... but it's a whole different ball game to actually make it
illegal to be outside in the wake of the weather. isn't part of freedom being allowed to do stupid things that might potentially harm yourself? i mean i'm allowed to go to the store and buy cigarettes and it doesn't exactly take the aforementioned brain surgeon / rocket scientist to realize that "anything you smoke will kill you"
i just worry that we're on a slippery slope where our
privileges to leave our houses are gonna start being rescinded for various reasons.... and once it starts off with extreme stuff like terrorism and/or record low temperatures, once people get used to the paradigm of "things aren't normal therefore i have to stay home" --- well man.....sigh, you know? obviously i'm not going to run outside tomorrow and start streakiing like some feminist who thinks showing off her naked body makes an important political/social statement, but at the same time i always thought part of freedom was that i had the
right to make my own decisions and therefore face the consequences for my actions, not the
privilege to go outside unless condition X means that i have to stay inside until the TV/radio/internet tells me that it's formally/legally OK for me to leave the house.
so if we start saying "we have to do this in order to save some idiots from themselves" how long does it take for us to eventually get grouped in with the "idiots" ??? and fret not this isn't some tinfoil-hatted conspiracy theory like OMFG EVERYONE JOIN YOUR LOCAL MILITIA AND LOAD UP YOUR ARSENAL CUZ THE FEMA DEATH CAMPS ARE READY AND WE GOTTA STAND FOR WHAT WE BELIEVE IN AS AMERICANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! there ain't no revolution; c'est la vie..... but still at the same time i find it worrysome that society en masse is becoming more and more eager to present us with conditions where we have to "shelter in place" or "lockdown" or as many people have known it for years: "house arrest."
_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?