It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 5:26 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55840
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
cpguy wrote:
And yes, Jerry knew Cuban would drop 200M per annum on payroll and make the Sox look like spendthrifts and Jerry wanted no part of that.

Psst, "spendthrift" means the opposite of what it looks like it means.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 12:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
The Cubs are fine. The minor leagues are well stocked and it's just a matter of time (which is not that far off now) till the players that are so highly thought of, take their place at the major league level. I LIKE the way they are doing things. I don't like the idea of them just over-spending for free agents to compete. I like the idea that they draft and develop their own players and cultivate a system that allows the organization to contend year in and year out. It has been a difficult and frustrating run, waiting for the team to aquire and develop young talent, rather than just spending to aquire talent good enough to be mediore. But the way they are doing it is the right way. It's not a mess. It's just a process that takes some time.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I was right. You're welcome.

I had "Ricketts doesnt have the money to make this work" loooooong before you


You tried to blame Theo. Its obviously not Theo. Welcome to the right side.
Blame Theo? I think he was all in on the intentionally losing plan. He just didn't expect it to last this long.

I believe when Theo was hired one of the first things I said was "This gives Ricketts huge cover for losing. The $4M a year they are paying Theo allows them to cut payroll by massive amounts".


Theo is a space voyager who wanted to use the gravity of a black hole as fuel to go whipping through the cosmos but miscalculated the event horizon

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
rogers park bryan wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I was right. You're welcome.

I had "Ricketts doesnt have the money to make this work" loooooong before you


You tried to blame Theo. Its obviously not Theo. Welcome to the right side.

it is more than a little Theo's fault for not understanding what he was getting himself into. I disagree.

Ok, yes. That part is true.

But as far as furthering the team, its not on Theo


His approach bought him time from a proper evaluation either way regarding this point...he's got two more years for his grade to be reported

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It gets worse. I guess the Cubs are out on Tanaka:

From Bob Nightengale via Twitter


The #Dodgers have let it be known they plan to go all-out in their efforts to sign Tanaka, saying they and certainly won't be out-bid.
12:46 PM - 10 Jan 2014



While I think it is a great call by the dodgers and I dont think they are bluffing, why not get a few out of the game.

The dodgers are going to make the highest offer, of course Jerry will need a private meeting first with Tanakas people. lol

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
The Cubs are fine. The minor leagues are well stocked and it's just a matter of time (which is not that far off now) till the players that are so highly thought of, take their place at the major league level. I LIKE the way they are doing things. I don't like the idea of them just over-spending for free agents to compete. I like the idea that they draft and develop their own players and cultivate a system that allows the organization to contend year in and year out. It has been a difficult and frustrating run, waiting for the team to aquire and develop young talent, rather than just spending to aquire talent good enough to be mediore. But the way they are doing it is the right way. It's not a mess. It's just a process that takes some time.


This would have been the worst year for them to enter into long term contracts (Tanaka is a different case). However, as I said, they could have entered into those contracts two years ago, have won at the major league level, and now have minor league talent percolating as those veteran contracts expire.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
The Cubs are fine. The minor leagues are well stocked and it's just a matter of time (which is not that far off now) till the players that are so highly thought of, take their place at the major league level. I LIKE the way they are doing things. I don't like the idea of them just over-spending for free agents to compete. I like the idea that they draft and develop their own players and cultivate a system that allows the organization to contend year in and year out. It has been a difficult and frustrating run, waiting for the team to aquire and develop young talent, rather than just spending to aquire talent good enough to be mediore. But the way they are doing it is the right way. It's not a mess. It's just a process that takes some time.


This would have been the worst year for them to enter into long term contracts (Tanaka is a different case). However, as I said, they could have entered into those contracts two years ago, have won at the major league level, and now have minor league talent percolating as those veteran contracts expire.


You don't get the opportunity to draft Almora and Bryant if you are choosing your first round pick from #15 or 20. They will have another top pick this year, as a result of having the 4th worst record last season (after Houston, Miami and the White Sox. ). Having top 5 picks in multiple years (this will be the 3rd such year, gives them the opportunity to draft TOP amateur talent, rather than 2nd tier guys. It's easier to identify guys who are can't-miss type's in the top 5 picks, than late in the round. It doesn't make it fool proof by any means, but it's more likely to get a top talent in the first 5 picks.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91929
Location: To the left of my post
The Cubs should be the worst team in the league for the next 10 years. Imagine how many high draft picks they'd have!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40610
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
How long had the KC Royals plan and before past season the Pirates been working a plan? I am not jagging you Cub fans simply saying that in baseball even the best plans sometimes do not work out.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
cpguy wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
This is all Jerry's fault for leading the fight against Mark Cuban being allowed to buy the Cubs.


This is true. Cuban wanted to buy the Cubs bad and he got the ole blackball.

And yes, Jerry knew Cuban would drop 200M per annum on payroll and make the Sox look like spendthrifts and Jerry wanted no part of that.

Damn shame.

Them blackballing him is total bullshit. What justifiable reason did they have for not allowing him to bid on the Cubs? Fuck Jerry and his cronies.


Yeah,I said this about 4 years ago,but I'm just a babbling old guy.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
The Cubs are fine. The minor leagues are well stocked and it's just a matter of time (which is not that far off now) till the players that are so highly thought of, take their place at the major league level. I LIKE the way they are doing things. I don't like the idea of them just over-spending for free agents to compete. I like the idea that they draft and develop their own players and cultivate a system that allows the organization to contend year in and year out. It has been a difficult and frustrating run, waiting for the team to aquire and develop young talent, rather than just spending to aquire talent good enough to be mediore. But the way they are doing it is the right way. It's not a mess. It's just a process that takes some time.


This would have been the worst year for them to enter into long term contracts (Tanaka is a different case). However, as I said, they could have entered into those contracts two years ago, have won at the major league level, and now have minor league talent percolating as those veteran contracts expire.


You don't get the opportunity to draft Almora and Bryant if you are choosing your first round pick from #15 or 20. They will have another top pick this year, as a result of having the 4th worst record last season (after Houston, Miami and the White Sox. ). Having top 5 picks in multiple years (this will be the 3rd such year, gives them the opportunity to draft TOP amateur talent, rather than 2nd tier guys. It's easier to identify guys who are can't-miss type's in the top 5 picks, than late in the round. It doesn't make it fool proof by any means, but it's more likely to get a top talent in the first 5 picks.


Almora certainly isn't some talent that you tank a season in order to acquire.

However, Theo is your star. He should be trusted to find talent throughout the draft. He certainly did in Boston (with plenty of caveats).

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It gets worse. I guess the Cubs are out on Tanaka:

From Bob Nightengale via Twitter


The #Dodgers have let it be known they plan to go all-out in their efforts to sign Tanaka, saying they and certainly won't be out-bid.
12:46 PM - 10 Jan 2014


I've read the Cubs won't be outbid. Tanaka is going to get infinity dollars and play for both teams, I guess.


In all seriousness, Tanaka also wants a good place to play. Hey may want to play in LA/Chi, and he may not. May not be highest absolute bidder.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 9:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 1553
Location: Long Grove,IL
pizza_Place: Thin crust cheese extra cheese ....Pizza DOC
Dylan Hernandez ‏@dylanohernandez 7h
The Yankees, Dodgers and Angels are finalists to sign Masahiro Tanaka, according to Sports Hochi.

The Sports Hochi story lists the Yankees as the favorites to land Tanaka.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I don't waste my time with the Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
I have a question. The Cubs had to pay 20 million just to talk to him or is that only if they sign him they pay 20 mil?

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 1553
Location: Long Grove,IL
pizza_Place: Thin crust cheese extra cheese ....Pizza DOC
jimmypasta wrote:
I have a question. The Cubs had to pay 20 million just to talk to him or is that only if they sign him they pay 20 mil?


Only the team he signs with pays the 20 million to his Japanese team the Rakuten Eagles.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I don't waste my time with the Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
THE INQUISITOR wrote:
Dylan Hernandez ‏@dylanohernandez 7h
The Yankees, Dodgers and Angels are finalists to sign Masahiro Tanaka, according to Sports Hochi.

The Sports Hochi story lists the Yankees as the favorites to land Tanaka.


Isn't Ichiro still on the Yankee payroll? I would imagine that makes them hugely attractive in addition to all the other things that make the Yankees hugely attractive.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16459
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Elmhurst Steve wrote:

You don't get the opportunity to draft Almora and Bryant if you are choosing your first round pick from #15 or 20. They will have another top pick this year, as a result of having the 4th worst record last season (after Houston, Miami and the White Sox. ). Having top 5 picks in multiple years (this will be the 3rd such year, gives them the opportunity to draft TOP amateur talent, rather than 2nd tier guys. It's easier to identify guys who are can't-miss type's in the top 5 picks, than late in the round. It doesn't make it fool proof by any means, but it's more likely to get a top talent in the first 5 picks.


But that's why this strategy blows. If and when they become good, then the high draft pick streak ends and they will be just like everyone else. In the meantime, the MLB product is an embarrassment. In my opinion, Selig should not allow teams to do what the Cubs are doing (intentionally tanking seasons), but it's hard to enforce.

Ricketts is poor (relatively speaking) and under him, the Cubs will never spend what they should based on their market and revenue.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
The idea tat they're tanking seasons is a little exaggerated. Its not like they're three games out of first when they start trading people

I know the whole idea that 78 wins is no better than 68 makes everyone uncomfortable but its true


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 1553
Location: Long Grove,IL
pizza_Place: Thin crust cheese extra cheese ....Pizza DOC
good dolphin wrote:
THE INQUISITOR wrote:
Dylan Hernandez ‏@dylanohernandez 7h
The Yankees, Dodgers and Angels are finalists to sign Masahiro Tanaka, according to Sports Hochi.

The Sports Hochi story lists the Yankees as the favorites to land Tanaka.


Isn't Ichiro still on the Yankee payroll? I would imagine that makes them hugely attractive in addition to all the other things that make the Yankees hugely attractive.


Yes Ichiro is still a Yankee as is Hiroki Kuroda.

Casey Close who is Tanaka's agent was drafted and played in the Yankee system and has been Derek Jeter's only agent during Jeter's entire career. Close also represents Clayton Kershaw and Zack Greinke thus the Dodger connection.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I don't waste my time with the Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:

You don't get the opportunity to draft Almora and Bryant if you are choosing your first round pick from #15 or 20. They will have another top pick this year, as a result of having the 4th worst record last season (after Houston, Miami and the White Sox. ). Having top 5 picks in multiple years (this will be the 3rd such year, gives them the opportunity to draft TOP amateur talent, rather than 2nd tier guys. It's easier to identify guys who are can't-miss type's in the top 5 picks, than late in the round. It doesn't make it fool proof by any means, but it's more likely to get a top talent in the first 5 picks.


But that's why this strategy blows. If and when they become good, then the high draft pick streak ends and they will be just like everyone else. In the meantime, the MLB product is an embarrassment. In my opinion, Selig should not allow teams to do what the Cubs are doing (intentionally tanking seasons), but it's hard to enforce.

Ricketts is poor (relatively speaking) and under him, the Cubs will never spend what they should based on their market and revenue.

Thats foolish to say. When they renegotiate the TV/Radio deals after next season, their revenue will increase dramatically. Add to that extra revenue from signage, including the new scoreboard. By the time the team is contending, there will be streams of revenue they don't have now. They will spend when it's time to spend, the team is in contention and they identify a player/players that can put them over the top.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:38 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:

You don't get the opportunity to draft Almora and Bryant if you are choosing your first round pick from #15 or 20. They will have another top pick this year, as a result of having the 4th worst record last season (after Houston, Miami and the White Sox. ). Having top 5 picks in multiple years (this will be the 3rd such year, gives them the opportunity to draft TOP amateur talent, rather than 2nd tier guys. It's easier to identify guys who are can't-miss type's in the top 5 picks, than late in the round. It doesn't make it fool proof by any means, but it's more likely to get a top talent in the first 5 picks.


But that's why this strategy blows. If and when they become good, then the high draft pick streak ends and they will be just like everyone else. In the meantime, the MLB product is an embarrassment. In my opinion, Selig should not allow teams to do what the Cubs are doing (intentionally tanking seasons), but it's hard to enforce.

Ricketts is poor (relatively speaking) and under him, the Cubs will never spend what they should based on their market and revenue.

Thats foolish to say. When they renegotiate the TV/Radio deals after next season, their revenue will increase dramatically. Add to that extra revenue from signage, including the new scoreboard. By the time the team is contending, there will be streams of revenue they don't have now. They will spend when it's time to spend, the team is in contention and they identify a player/players that can put them over the top.

When when, if if, I've been dealing with that shit for damn near forty years. I like some things that have been done the last few seasons, but I'm dubious of Little Lord Fauntleroy Tommy. The finances haven't worked out the way he thought. He seems to be in over his head thus far.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
I was listening to the flagship yesterday. Bruce Miles was interviewed and said that this team is likely going to be the worst of the three during Theo's tenure. Memelo said that he got complaints from fans a couple of years ago when he had their timeframe for success as 2014 but it is realistically 2016 now. This was on WGN.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Mr. Reason wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:

You don't get the opportunity to draft Almora and Bryant if you are choosing your first round pick from #15 or 20. They will have another top pick this year, as a result of having the 4th worst record last season (after Houston, Miami and the White Sox. ). Having top 5 picks in multiple years (this will be the 3rd such year, gives them the opportunity to draft TOP amateur talent, rather than 2nd tier guys. It's easier to identify guys who are can't-miss type's in the top 5 picks, than late in the round. It doesn't make it fool proof by any means, but it's more likely to get a top talent in the first 5 picks.


But that's why this strategy blows. If and when they become good, then the high draft pick streak ends and they will be just like everyone else. In the meantime, the MLB product is an embarrassment. In my opinion, Selig should not allow teams to do what the Cubs are doing (intentionally tanking seasons), but it's hard to enforce.

Ricketts is poor (relatively speaking) and under him, the Cubs will never spend what they should based on their market and revenue.

Thats foolish to say. When they renegotiate the TV/Radio deals after next season, their revenue will increase dramatically. Add to that extra revenue from signage, including the new scoreboard. By the time the team is contending, there will be streams of revenue they don't have now. They will spend when it's time to spend, the team is in contention and they identify a player/players that can put them over the top.

When when, if if, I've been dealing with that shit for damn near forty years. I like some things that have been done the last few seasons, but I'm dubious of Little Lord Fauntleroy Tommy. The finances haven't worked out the way he thought. He seems to be in over his head thus far.


No, the finances are probably not what he had hoped for. I think he foolishly had thought that the city of Chicago/State of Illinois would chip in to pay for the renovations to the ballpark. Plus, his father lost a bunch of money as a result of the downturn in the economy. So he doesn't have the money he might like to have, to do all the renovations as quickly as would be ideal. He will build the scoreboard first, because it will then begin to bring in new revenue faster. He will get a new TV/Radio deal after 2014 also. Then the renovations to the ballpark will begin. The new spring training site is done now as is the Baseball academy in the Dominican. That money will not need to be spent again, so that spending is out of the way. Once the ballpark renovations are complete, imagine all the new revenue, without the need for any of the additional spending they have incurred/are incurring ....there will be plenty of money for free agents. By then, the team will have built a contending team and whatever pieces are missing, they can fill in with free agents.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Mr. Reason wrote:
When when, if if, I've been dealing with that shit for damn near forty years. I like some things that have been done the last few seasons, but I'm dubious of Little Lord Fauntleroy Tommy. The finances haven't worked out the way he thought. He seems to be in over his head thus far.


I'm with you on Ricketts, Reason. Very disappointed in the new ownership.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91929
Location: To the left of my post
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
No, the finances are probably not what he had hoped for. I think he foolishly had thought that the city of Chicago/State of Illinois would chip in to pay for the renovations to the ballpark. Plus, his father lost a bunch of money as a result of the downturn in the economy. So he doesn't have the money he might like to have, to do all the renovations as quickly as would be ideal. He will build the scoreboard first, because it will then begin to bring in new revenue faster. He will get a new TV/Radio deal after 2014 also. Then the renovations to the ballpark will begin. The new spring training site is done now as is the Baseball academy in the Dominican. That money will not need to be spent again, so that spending is out of the way. Once the ballpark renovations are complete, imagine all the new revenue, without the need for any of the additional spending they have incurred/are incurring ....there will be plenty of money for free agents. By then, the team will have built a contending team and whatever pieces are missing, they can fill in with free agents.
What is more likely is that they slowly bump up payroll but still pay at or below what you would expect for a team in Chicago.

To think that the Cubs are laying the groundwork here to spend like the Yankees, Red Sox, or Dodgers is not supportable with any evidence yet. Ricketts is clearly a guy who is more concerned about making money and less concerned with winning. To think one day he'll flip the switch and say "Let's spend like the Yankees" is wishful thinking.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Agreed, the Cubs will have to be making crazy money, like the late 90's and then maybe he'll spend


But spending is not an automatic recipe for success, either


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91929
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Agreed, the Cubs will have to be making crazy money, like the late 90's and then maybe he'll spend


But spending is not an automatic recipe for success, either
The value will be in keeping your own players if they meet the lofty expectations they have.

While the Cubs may be pretending they are the Royals or Rays right now they don't have to do that at the time that Brett Jackson is getting a $150 million dollar offer from the Yankees.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Agreed, the Cubs will have to be making crazy money, like the late 90's and then maybe he'll spend


But spending is not an automatic recipe for success, either
The value will be in keeping your own players if they meet the lofty expectations they have.

While the Cubs may be pretending they are the Royals or Rays right now they don't have to do that at the time that Brett Jackson is getting a $150 million dollar offer from the Yankees.

Hopefully they do what the Phillies did after their prospects came up and performed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
No, the finances are probably not what he had hoped for. I think he foolishly had thought that the city of Chicago/State of Illinois would chip in to pay for the renovations to the ballpark. Plus, his father lost a bunch of money as a result of the downturn in the economy. So he doesn't have the money he might like to have, to do all the renovations as quickly as would be ideal. He will build the scoreboard first, because it will then begin to bring in new revenue faster. He will get a new TV/Radio deal after 2014 also. Then the renovations to the ballpark will begin. The new spring training site is done now as is the Baseball academy in the Dominican. That money will not need to be spent again, so that spending is out of the way. Once the ballpark renovations are complete, imagine all the new revenue, without the need for any of the additional spending they have incurred/are incurring ....there will be plenty of money for free agents. By then, the team will have built a contending team and whatever pieces are missing, they can fill in with free agents.
What is more likely is that they slowly bump up payroll but still pay at or below what you would expect for a team in Chicago.

To think that the Cubs are laying the groundwork here to spend like the Yankees, Red Sox, or Dodgers is not supportable with any evidence yet. Ricketts is clearly a guy who is more concerned about making money and less concerned with winning. To think one day he'll flip the switch and say "Let's spend like the Yankees" is wishful thinking.


I don't believe they will spend along the lines of the Dodgers, Yankees and Red Sox. They will continue to build and then maintain their minor league teams and that will provide the bulk of the talent. They will use free agency only to fill in the gaps. To add guys that can put them over the top. Not to use as a main source of talent. Think Tampa Bay Rays, with a little bit more willingness to spend on a free agent when needed.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:34 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Except the Rays have never been over the top. They've been close, but have won as many World Series since 1909 as the Cubs have.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group