Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
the NBA has also created a product that is generally boring to watch.
The funny thing is that this is exactly what the NBA wants. They rig the whole system so the dominant player in the league WILL win the title. The only question is if the second most dominant player can be dominant enough to win the title. The way the game is called. The way it is played. The types of offense and defense that are allowed. The salary cap structure. All of these things are designed so Lebron/Kobe/Shaq/Duncan/Jordan/Magic/Bird win titles. They are constantly chasing the 90s NBA because it was so much of a force then. Lebron screwed it up by being an unlikable douchebag at just the wrong time.
If you are a team without Lebron, you don't matter. Eventually, a team without Kevin Durant won't matter though he may be looking like another Karl Malone who just can't get over another player. And if you are a team that doesn't get whoever the superstar is out of this years draft(probably Jabari Parker) you won't matter either.
I think the way the league is today is not structural, but just the result of overpopulation. I've said this before, and I strongly believe in this, it is harder to succeed at a pro level in basketball than it is in something like football. There are no Arian Fosters or Tom Bradys in the NBA - guys who come out of nowhere (Foster was undrafted) and just dominate the league from their positions for years. Since the pool of elite talent in the NBA is comparatively lower, it follows that when you spread an already thin talent pool across 31-32 teams, the competition is going to be less fierce than if that same talent pool was spread across...let's say 20-25 teams.
Separately, I think parity would exist in the NFL even if the league didn't try so hard to foster said parity. I do believe if a Pro Bowl team became a real team next season, it still wouldn't be a lock to in it all because opponents can produce players out of nowhere, whether off the street or late round drafting, and still be competitive.