It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 3:35 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 359 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
We are all born with advantages or disadvantages. Some are born tall. Some are born with good looks. Some are born rich.

Just work hard and do your best and save your money. You'll end up happier and better adjusted then a trust fund baby who spends his whole life without direction.


I don't think that's a bad philosophy. But don't try to tell me the wealthy "work harder" or are "smarter", when that so obviously isn't true.
I think we need to talk about who exactly we are talking about here.

The wealthy who were the driving force behind that wealth likely worked harder, and almost certainly worked smarter.
The ones who simply got it by inheritance did neither just like those who won the lottery didn't.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 2:58 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
stoneroses86 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
stoneroses86 wrote:
I have no idea, because I am unaware of what kind of job you have. I also have never heard of Brandon Davis.


What difference does it make what kind of job I have as long as you believe me when I say I work hard? Isn't the "hard work" part the thing that decides success? Isn't that what Zell said and what you seemed to agree with? The 1% work harder, right? Well, I have no problem with dividing the earth's resources based on hard work. I'm pretty sure I outwork Sam Zell on most days.

I said I agree that successful people are becoming the subject of unfair scorn. I never said I agree with his conclusion that he works harder than anyone else.


In that case, we have to be able to agree that "successful" is not a synonym for "wealthy". I think the scorn is quite fair, as those at the top go deeper and deeper into crony capitalism and using their vast sums to create favorable laws that assist them in amassing more and more of the world's resources.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Where are you sitting?

http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/07/ ... icans-earn

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 2:59 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The wealthy who were the driving force behind that wealth likely worked harder, and almost certainly worked smarter.


Or they had the right friends. I guess you might say that making such friends is "smart".

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The wealthy who were the driving force behind that wealth likely worked harder, and almost certainly worked smarter.


Or they had the right friends. I guess you might say that making such friends is "smart".


hey JORR, will you be my friend ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Don't we all plan to leave our money & worldly possessions to our Children? I believe that as a parent, it is my responsibility to not spend all of my money foolishly so I can help my kids. The 1% just have a lot more to give. It's not their kids fault that their parents were smart enough to build wealth. God bless 'em.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:09 am
Posts: 3272
Location: Woodstock (not the trailer part)
pizza_Place: Jobu
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The wealthy who were the driving force behind that wealth likely worked harder, and almost certainly worked smarter.


Or they had the right friends. I guess you might say that making such friends is "smart".


Joe may be making some decent points. It just does not concern me in the slightest bit that there may be people who make more money than I do. I control my life, and my life alone, to the best of my ability.

_________________
1923-1927-1928-1932-1936-1937-1938-1939
1941-1943-1947-1949-1950-1951-1952-1953
1956-1958-1961-1962-1977-1978-1996-1998
1999-2000-2009
----------
XXI - XXV - XLII - XLVI


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Although a lot of them didn't really "earn" it, I'm not a proponent of taking it away from them.
------
I just wish more of them had a clue. A lot of the guys that actually did earn it are really just savants at wealth generation with little in the way of broader life experiences and lacking in "emotional intelligence." A little introspection really is beyond the ability of these people.

I mean, who makes a lot of money? Mostly people who really really love money...people who's identity is defined by how much they have. Typically not someone you'd want to be around.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Scorehead wrote:
Don't we all plan to leave our money & worldly possessions to our Children? I believe that as a parent, it is my responsibility to not spend all of my money foolishly so I can help my kids. The 1% just have a lot more to give. It's not their kids fault that their parents were smart enough to build wealth. God bless 'em.


I really think along these lines. I just don't get the resentment to the rich that leave tons of cash to their kids as well as use the system that we are stuck with to further their position. As long as said person is operating lawfully and more importantly ethically as well as giving something back to society in some form leave them alone.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Furthermore, I never once hear any people here say things about our modern mega rich athletes and entertainers. Only business people. Why is there no disdain to cap their wealth and force them to give back?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
pittmike wrote:
Furthermore, I never once hear any people here say things about our modern mega rich athletes and entertainers. Only business people. Why is there no disdain to cap their wealth and force them to give back?


I know I have mentioned about "reality" stars making millions for no apparent reason. I'm still trying to figure out how Oprah became a billionare from syndicating a daytime talk show.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
jimmypasta wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Furthermore, I never once hear any people here say things about our modern mega rich athletes and entertainers. Only business people. Why is there no disdain to cap their wealth and force them to give back?


I know I have mentioned about "reality" stars making millions for no apparent reason. I'm still trying to figure out how Oprah became a billionare from syndicating a daytime talk show.


I don't care how they made it really. They sure as shit get left out of the 1% arguments though.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Don't we all plan to leave our money & worldly possessions to our Children? I believe that as a parent, it is my responsibility to not spend all of my money foolishly so I can help my kids. The 1% just have a lot more to give. It's not their kids fault that their parents were smart enough to build wealth. God bless 'em.


I really think along these lines. I just don't get the resentment to the rich that leave tons of cash to their kids as well as use the system that we are stuck with to further their position. As long as said person is operating lawfully and more importantly ethically as well as giving something back to society in some form leave them alone.

Many times its not ethical and they are not giving back to society.

But I think its a slippery slope into Family Dynasties. That's part of why we left England, right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Furthermore, I never once hear any people here say things about our modern mega rich athletes and entertainers. Only business people. Why is there no disdain to cap their wealth and force them to give back?


I know I have mentioned about "reality" stars making millions for no apparent reason. I'm still trying to figure out how Oprah became a billionare from syndicating a daytime talk show.


I don't care how they made it really. They sure as shit get left out of the 1% arguments though.

What?

Were you out of the country in 1994 and since 2001 when A Rod signed his deal?

And the 1 percenter term is wrong. You can make 400K a year and you are a 1%. I dont think that is what people mean.

But the 85 people who have as much money as half the planet? That seems to be a bit much


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Don't we all plan to leave our money & worldly possessions to our Children? I believe that as a parent, it is my responsibility to not spend all of my money foolishly so I can help my kids. The 1% just have a lot more to give. It's not their kids fault that their parents were smart enough to build wealth. God bless 'em.


I really think along these lines. I just don't get the resentment to the rich that leave tons of cash to their kids as well as use the system that we are stuck with to further their position. As long as said person is operating lawfully and more importantly ethically as well as giving something back to society in some form leave them alone.

Many times its not ethical and they are not giving back to society.

But I think its a slippery slope into Family Dynasties. That's part of why we left England, right?


Yeah but they pick and choose there as well. Kennedys good. Other 1% dynasty bad.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Furthermore, I never once hear any people here say things about our modern mega rich athletes and entertainers. Only business people. Why is there no disdain to cap their wealth and force them to give back?


I know I have mentioned about "reality" stars making millions for no apparent reason. I'm still trying to figure out how Oprah became a billionare from syndicating a daytime talk show.


I don't care how they made it really. They sure as shit get left out of the 1% arguments though.

What?

Were you out of the country in 1994 and since 2001 when A Rod signed his deal?

And the 1 percenter term is wrong. You can make 400K a year and you are a 1%. I dont think that is what people mean.

But the 85 people who have as much money as half the planet? That seems to be a bit much



Sure in baseball particularly with that Arod contract there was some hand wringing. I am talking about the actual real hatred and anger I see toward rich people.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Well, the hatred should be for the politicians who make laws allowing such a system.

Problem is, the wealthiest can buy lobbyists. Its hard to separate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
rogers park bryan wrote:
Well, the hatred should be for the politicians who make laws allowing such a system.

Problem is, the wealthiest can buy lobbyists. Its hard to separate.



Image

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:38 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
stoneroses86 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The wealthy who were the driving force behind that wealth likely worked harder, and almost certainly worked smarter.


Or they had the right friends. I guess you might say that making such friends is "smart".


Joe may be making some decent points. It just does not concern me in the slightest bit that there may be people who make more money than I do. I control my life, and my life alone, to the best of my ability.


I agree. I try to be happy with what I have, which is really far more than enough.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:38 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bagels wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The wealthy who were the driving force behind that wealth likely worked harder, and almost certainly worked smarter.


Or they had the right friends. I guess you might say that making such friends is "smart".


hey JORR, will you be my friend ?


We're friends already, aren't we, Bagels?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:40 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Scorehead wrote:
Don't we all plan to leave our money & worldly possessions to our Children? I believe that as a parent, it is my responsibility to not spend all of my money foolishly so I can help my kids. The 1% just have a lot more to give. It's not their kids fault that their parents were smart enough to build wealth. God bless 'em.


Why? So your kids don't have to work hard? I get so confused talking to Republicans! Is hard work virtuous or not?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Don't we all plan to leave our money & worldly possessions to our Children? I believe that as a parent, it is my responsibility to not spend all of my money foolishly so I can help my kids. The 1% just have a lot more to give. It's not their kids fault that their parents were smart enough to build wealth. God bless 'em.


Why? So your kids don't have to work hard? I get so confused talking to Republicans! Is hard work virtuous or not?


It has nothing to do with not working hard. A good parent instills good work ethic in their children long before they get any of Mom & Dads money. It's all about helping them get on their feet...buy a house...start a family. Surely you will do this for your kids, no? Maybe not.
Democrats don't leave their money & worldly possessions to their Children?

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Well, the hatred should be for the politicians who make laws allowing such a system.

Problem is, the wealthiest can buy lobbyists. Its hard to separate.



Here is a MAJOR issue! Maybe the biggest issue in the country today. Almost Everything can be traced back this.

And yes, POTUS has this as a major issue and he did very little to curb this. he raised the fees to be a lobbyist, so they people who could no longer afford to be lobbyist had to close up shop. Well, those are not the people being given big money. So, he then takes credit for decreasing lobbyist by over 2,000 during his term, essentially eliminated the smaller opposition for many causes. Nice work.

"THE BUSINESS OF GOVERNMENT"

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:16 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Scorehead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Don't we all plan to leave our money & worldly possessions to our Children? I believe that as a parent, it is my responsibility to not spend all of my money foolishly so I can help my kids. The 1% just have a lot more to give. It's not their kids fault that their parents were smart enough to build wealth. God bless 'em.


Why? So your kids don't have to work hard? I get so confused talking to Republicans! Is hard work virtuous or not?


It has nothing to do with not working hard. A good parent instills good work ethic in their children long before they get any of Mom & Dads money. It's all about helping them get on their feet...buy a house...start a family. Surely you will do this for your kids, no? Maybe not.
Democrats don't leave their money & worldly possessions to their Children?


I'm just trying to understand your philosophy. You seem to like to point out how the lower classes need to work hard. As if that's some kind of virtue unto itself. Arbeit macht frei. And yet, you would hand an opportunity to your own children that allows them to skirt around that same hard work you prescribe as the answer to all others? What kind of kids do you want to raise? Do you respect people who work hard or people who happen to have money?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:09 am
Posts: 3272
Location: Woodstock (not the trailer part)
pizza_Place: Jobu
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Arbeit macht frei.


Too soon.

_________________
1923-1927-1928-1932-1936-1937-1938-1939
1941-1943-1947-1949-1950-1951-1952-1953
1956-1958-1961-1962-1977-1978-1996-1998
1999-2000-2009
----------
XXI - XXV - XLII - XLVI


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Don't we all plan to leave our money & worldly possessions to our Children? I believe that as a parent, it is my responsibility to not spend all of my money foolishly so I can help my kids. The 1% just have a lot more to give. It's not their kids fault that their parents were smart enough to build wealth. God bless 'em.


Why? So your kids don't have to work hard? I get so confused talking to Republicans! Is hard work virtuous or not?


It has nothing to do with not working hard. A good parent instills good work ethic in their children long before they get any of Mom & Dads money. It's all about helping them get on their feet...buy a house...start a family. Surely you will do this for your kids, no? Maybe not.
Democrats don't leave their money & worldly possessions to their Children?


I'm just trying to understand your philosophy. You seem to like to point out how the lower classes need to work hard. As if that's some kind of virtue unto itself. Arbeit macht frei. And yet, you would hand an opportunity to your own children that allows them to skirt around that same hard work you prescribe as the answer to all others? What kind of kids do you want to raise? Do you respect people who work hard or people who happen to have money?


Do you have kids? Would you help your kids financially? Who would you rather give your money to instead of your kids? You don't think that it is incumbent on you to help your kids if they need it? I mean I know that you are arguing just to be contrary, but I'm asking anyway.
You act like leaving ones money & worldly possessions to their Children is a new revolutionary idea. It isn't!. Its been done for years!
And to be clear, I believe that all classes of people should work had, but those in the lower class may need to work harder to get out of the lower class.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Last edited by Scorehead on Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Scorehead wrote:
Do you have kids? Would you help your kids financially? Who would you rather give your money to instead of your kids? You don't think that it is incumbent on you to help your kids if they need it? I mean I know that you are arguing just to be contrary, but I'm asking anyway.
And top be clear, I believe that all classes of people should work had.


I'm not arguing just to be contrary. I think, like most people- including myself much of the time- you're just bouncing along through your own life without much thought of the larger picture. The big difference between you and me is that I'm not sitting in judgment of everyone else. There's a lot of "should" in your political and economic posts, if not explicitly, then certainly by implication. As in what those less fortunate than you "should" be doing.

If, as a society, we find work to be virtuous and want to reward those who work hard, how can we justify the automatic award of the fruits of a parent's labor (a parent who ostensibly worked hard and is thus virtuous) to a child who worked not at all?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Do you have kids? Would you help your kids financially? Who would you rather give your money to instead of your kids? You don't think that it is incumbent on you to help your kids if they need it? I mean I know that you are arguing just to be contrary, but I'm asking anyway.
And top be clear, I believe that all classes of people should work had.


I'm not arguing just to be contrary. I think, like most people- including myself much of the time- you're just bouncing along through your own life without much thought of the larger picture. The big difference between you and me is that I'm not sitting in judgment of everyone else. There's a lot of "should" in your political and economic posts, if not explicitly, then certainly by implication. As in what those less fortunate than you "should" be doing.

If, as a society, we find work to be virtuous and want to reward those who work hard, how can we justify the automatic award of the fruits of a parent's labor (a parent who ostensibly worked hard and is thus virtuous) to a child who worked not at all?


So you aren't interested in answering any of my questions?

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:35 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Scorehead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Do you have kids? Would you help your kids financially? Who would you rather give your money to instead of your kids? You don't think that it is incumbent on you to help your kids if they need it? I mean I know that you are arguing just to be contrary, but I'm asking anyway.
And top be clear, I believe that all classes of people should work had.


I'm not arguing just to be contrary. I think, like most people- including myself much of the time- you're just bouncing along through your own life without much thought of the larger picture. The big difference between you and me is that I'm not sitting in judgment of everyone else. There's a lot of "should" in your political and economic posts, if not explicitly, then certainly by implication. As in what those less fortunate than you "should" be doing.

If, as a society, we find work to be virtuous and want to reward those who work hard, how can we justify the automatic award of the fruits of a parent's labor (a parent who ostensibly worked hard and is thus virtuous) to a child who worked not at all?


So you aren't interested in answering any of my questions?



Apparently as much as you are interested in answering mine.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Do you have kids? Would you help your kids financially? Who would you rather give your money to instead of your kids? You don't think that it is incumbent on you to help your kids if they need it? I mean I know that you are arguing just to be contrary, but I'm asking anyway.
And top be clear, I believe that all classes of people should work had.


I'm not arguing just to be contrary. I think, like most people- including myself much of the time- you're just bouncing along through your own life without much thought of the larger picture. The big difference between you and me is that I'm not sitting in judgment of everyone else. There's a lot of "should" in your political and economic posts, if not explicitly, then certainly by implication. As in what those less fortunate than you "should" be doing.

If, as a society, we find work to be virtuous and want to reward those who work hard, how can we justify the automatic award of the fruits of a parent's labor (a parent who ostensibly worked hard and is thus virtuous) to a child who worked not at all?


Who said anything about leaving money to a child who has worked not at all? I said that it is a parents responsibility to instill good work ethic in their children. I'm not sure that I would leave everything to a child of mine if he/she was a lazy bum. Then again you would be ok with the government giving the same person money, right?

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 359 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group