It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 3:27 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 203 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'm chill as can be. I just think Some Guy is only funny about 20% of the time. I wish he would trim about 80% of his act.


i agree in general...but i thought it was a decent shot, gotta give credit where it's due


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:36 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bagels wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Hey, this cop probably started a savings account for his kid or helped with his kids college tuition....he deserved to get shot in the face.


:lol: ok, that was pretty good


No, it was actually pretty goddamn dumb.

Anyway, everyone who is applauding this is obviously strongly pro-concealed carry, right?

I am. I used to be on the fence but have recently shifted to in favor.


Enough of people's rights have been trampled.


That's fine. I don't want to truncate anyone's Second Amendment rights myself. Personally, I won't have a gun in my house since the numbers show that the odds of it killing me or someone I care about are immensely greater than ever using it successfully in a situation such as the one we're discussing. I just want to make sure we don't have any of the gun control guys cheering this.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:36 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
He eliminated the threat.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Right, but the only reason the victim was able to do what he did was because he was armed, no?
Its the only reason the kid got shot in the head, but its not the only way this could have went down. Maybe the kid decides to rob a black belt or a marine or ends up getting stabbed.


is Jack Dempsey still alive ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:38 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Anyway, everyone who is applauding this is obviously strongly pro-concealed carry, right?

Right.

You think the cop was in the wrong here?


No, and I haven't come anywhere near to suggesting such a thing. But how can you cheer this and be anti-concealed carry at the same time?

I haven't come anywhere near suggesting I am anti-concealed carry.


I never said that either. Are you trying to start an argument where there is none to be had?

I just want to make sure that guys who are anti-concealed carry don't applaud this just because it happened to be a cop who was carrying.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

No, and I haven't come anywhere near to suggesting such a thing. But how can you cheer this and be anti-concealed carry at the same time?

I haven't come anywhere near suggesting I am anti-concealed carry.


I never said that either. Are you trying to start an argument where there is none to be had?

I just want to make sure that guys who are anti-concealed carry don't applaud this just because it happened to be a cop who was carrying.

:lol: :lol:

So why are you quoting my posts and saying things like "how can you cheer this and be anti-concealed carry at the same time?"

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

No, and I haven't come anywhere near to suggesting such a thing. But how can you cheer this and be anti-concealed carry at the same time?

I haven't come anywhere near suggesting I am anti-concealed carry.


I never said that either. Are you trying to start an argument where there is none to be had?

I just want to make sure that guys who are anti-concealed carry don't applaud this just because it happened to be a cop who was carrying.

:lol: :lol:

So why are you quoting my posts and saying things like "how can you cheer this and be anti-concealed carry at the same time?"


I quoted your post because you asked me a question. The second sentence was an explanation of what I meant. I have no idea about your thoughts on carrying concealed weapons. I thought that Nas and RPB were pro- gun control. I could be mistaken. In any case, I understand it's satisfying to see the bad guy get shot. But it probably doesn't work out so nice and neat nine out of ten times. And maybe some innocent person gets caught in the crossfire.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Last edited by Rod on Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:44 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38372
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
I don't think anyone is cheering the death of a 16 year old kid. We just understand why the officer did it.



He did what he felt he needed to do.

It may cross his mind later that he could have shot the kid somewhere else.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
"Pro gun-control" is such a vague phrase that I have no idea why you would use it to describe what you assume someone's position to be. I don't think Nas and RPB have ever said that all guns should be banned. I don't think a .50 cal MG should be legal to own. Maybe that makes me "pro-gun control".

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I think its not that so much as a lot of us are against dumbass muggers.



Right, but the only reason the victim was able to do what he did was because he was armed, no?

It's illegal to mug somebody. I highly doubt the mugger would have chosen not to use a gun if guns were illegal.


statistics prove that wrong though. in england, most muggings happen with knives or bats. criminals would use guns, but they are hard to find and expensive... and the punishment goes exponentially up for shooting someone. gun fatalities are like 3% of all homicides, most people over there basically never have to worry about having a gun pointed at them. and survival rate from knife and blunt force wounds are much better then being shot.

thing is, i also realize how bad the gun problem is in the us. it would be impossible to just ban them and take them all away at this point, at least impossible without causing violent mass riots. it going to take generations to phase them out... we just have to do it slowly so people can adjust (and grandpas can die). eventually, we will though. theyre simply too dangerous for modern society.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:48 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38372
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
The gun that kid was carrying appeared to be a big one.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Seacrest wrote:
Nas wrote:
I don't think anyone is cheering the death of a 16 year old kid. We just understand why the officer did it.



He did what he felt he needed to do.

It may cross his mind later that he could have shot the kid somewhere else.


You shoot the kid somewhere else, that means there's a chance he might shoot back.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
IkeSouth wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I think its not that so much as a lot of us are against dumbass muggers.



Right, but the only reason the victim was able to do what he did was because he was armed, no?

It's illegal to mug somebody. I highly doubt the mugger would have chosen not to use a gun if guns were illegal.


statistics prove that wrong though. in england, most muggings happen with knives or bats. criminals would use guns, but they are hard to find and expensive... and the punishment goes exponentially up for shooting someone. gun fatalities are like 3% of all homicides, most people over there basically never have to worry about having a gun pointed at them. and survival rate from knife and blunt force wounds are much better then being shot.

thing is, i also realize how bad the gun problem is in the us. it would be impossible to just ban them and take them all away at this point, at least impossible without causing violent mass riots. it going to take generations to phase them out... we just have to do it slowly so people can adjust (and grandpas can die). eventually, we will though. theyre simply too dangerous for modern society.

Your second point invalidates your first point. You cant just cite statistics without context. Because when you added the context with your second point, you explained why the two situations aren't comparable.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
"Pro gun-control" is such a vague phrase that I have no idea why you would use it to describe what you assume someone's position to be. I don't think Nas and RPB have ever said that all guns should be banned. I don't think a .50 cal MG should be legal to own. Maybe that makes me "pro-gun control".

I have voiced some anti gun type stuff. Never went so far to say they should be banned, but I was against concealed carry at first.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:51 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
"Pro gun-control" is such a vague phrase that I have no idea why you would use it to describe what you assume someone's position to be. I don't think Nas and RPB have ever said that all guns should be banned. I don't think a .50 cal MG should be legal to own. Maybe that makes me "pro-gun control".


You are trying to get an argument.

I'm almost certain that both of them thought the shooting in the movie theater could have been avoided if concealed carry was illegal. Am I mistaken, gentlemen? I think the guy who got shot at the gas station richly deserved it. But if we're going to have everyone walking around armed, it's not just going to be obvious cases of justice being served like this one. Sometimes it's going to be a guy bullying an old man in a movie theater who gets shot.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
"Pro gun-control" is such a vague phrase that I have no idea why you would use it to describe what you assume someone's position to be. I don't think Nas and RPB have ever said that all guns should be banned. I don't think a .50 cal MG should be legal to own. Maybe that makes me "pro-gun control".


You are trying to get an argument.

I'm almost certain that both of them thought the shooting in the movie theater could have been avoided if concealed carry was illegal. Am I mistaken, gentlemen? I think the guy who got shot at the gas station richly deserved it. But if we're going to have everyone walking around armed, it's not just going to be obvious cases of justice being served like this one. Sometimes it's going to be a guy bullying an old man in a movie theater who gets shot.

I'm not trying to get in an argument. I'm responding to the one that you started, by making this thread about concealed carry and "pro-gun control" advocates thoughts.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
"Pro gun-control" is such a vague phrase that I have no idea why you would use it to describe what you assume someone's position to be. I don't think Nas and RPB have ever said that all guns should be banned. I don't think a .50 cal MG should be legal to own. Maybe that makes me "pro-gun control".


You are trying to get an argument.

I'm almost certain that both of them thought the shooting in the movie theater could have been avoided if concealed carry was illegal. Am I mistaken, gentlemen? I think the guy who got shot at the gas station richly deserved it. But if we're going to have everyone walking around armed, it's not just going to be obvious cases of justice being served like this one. Sometimes it's going to be a guy bullying an old man in a movie theater who gets shot.

I'm not trying to get in an argument. I'm responding to the one that you started, by making this thread about concealed carry and "pro-gun control" advocates thoughts.



Those are definitely relevant thoughts when we have guys who are on the record against concealed carry supporting a shooting- as justifiable as it may have been- that could not have occurred without concealed carry.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38372
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Nas wrote:
I don't think anyone is cheering the death of a 16 year old kid. We just understand why the officer did it.



He did what he felt he needed to do.

It may cross his mind later that he could have shot the kid somewhere else.


You shoot the kid somewhere else, that means there's a chance he might shoot back.


He still was trying to shoot back. He kept trying to reach for the gun.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
No, JORR, never said or thought that about the movie shooting. Concealed carry wouldnt even apply to a retired cop, would it?


Anyway, it could have been avoided if the shooter wasnt an dumb angry asshole. But he was.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
"Pro gun-control" is such a vague phrase that I have no idea why you would use it to describe what you assume someone's position to be. I don't think Nas and RPB have ever said that all guns should be banned. I don't think a .50 cal MG should be legal to own. Maybe that makes me "pro-gun control".


You are trying to get an argument.

I'm almost certain that both of them thought the shooting in the movie theater could have been avoided if concealed carry was illegal. Am I mistaken, gentlemen? I think the guy who got shot at the gas station richly deserved it. But if we're going to have everyone walking around armed, it's not just going to be obvious cases of justice being served like this one. Sometimes it's going to be a guy bullying an old man in a movie theater who gets shot.

I'm not trying to get in an argument. I'm responding to the one that you started, by making this thread about concealed carry and "pro-gun control" advocates thoughts.



Those are definitely relevant thoughts when we have guys who are on the record against concealed carry supporting a shooting- as justifiable as it may have been- that could not have occurred without concealed carry.

I never said they aren't relevant. But don't act like you weren't trying to take this thread in an argumentative direction. All I am doing is responding to the points you brought up.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:00 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38372
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
"Pro gun-control" is such a vague phrase that I have no idea why you would use it to describe what you assume someone's position to be. I don't think Nas and RPB have ever said that all guns should be banned. I don't think a .50 cal MG should be legal to own. Maybe that makes me "pro-gun control".


You are trying to get an argument.

I'm almost certain that both of them thought the shooting in the movie theater could have been avoided if concealed carry was illegal. Am I mistaken, gentlemen? I think the guy who got shot at the gas station richly deserved it. But if we're going to have everyone walking around armed, it's not just going to be obvious cases of justice being served like this one. Sometimes it's going to be a guy bullying an old man in a movie theater who gets shot.


And sometimes you won't have clear video showing the altercation.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I'm almost certain that both of them thought the shooting in the movie theater could have been avoided if concealed carry was illegal. Am I mistaken, gentlemen? I think the guy who got shot at the gas station richly deserved it. But if we're going to have everyone walking around armed, it's not just going to be obvious cases of justice being served like this one. Sometimes it's going to be a guy bullying an old man in a movie theater who gets shot.




some surgeries get botched, perhaps we should stop performing surgeries

yes if concealed carry is 100% legal there will be things like the movie theater incident, but I guess i just don't feel like it will devolve into the wild west, which is what it sound like you think . nothing will ever be perfect, but i am in favor of it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
No, JORR, never said or thought that about the movie shooting. Concealed carry wouldnt even apply to a retired cop, would it?


Anyway, it could have been avoided if the shooter wasnt an dumb angry asshole. But he was.


As much as I'm not losing any sleep over a rude asswipe getting shot in a theater after bullying what he thought to be a weak old man, I understand the situations aren't at all the same, and in this instance the shooting was far more justified. But I'm pretty sure you didn't think a guy should be carrying a gun in the theater, right? Why should cops have special rights to defend themselves?

And where the fuck is Darkside when I need him? He's always around to bust my balls when he's on the other side of an issue. Get off that HVAC call and back me up in defending the rights of ALL citizens to defend themselves, not just off-duty cops.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:04 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bagels wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I'm almost certain that both of them thought the shooting in the movie theater could have been avoided if concealed carry was illegal. Am I mistaken, gentlemen? I think the guy who got shot at the gas station richly deserved it. But if we're going to have everyone walking around armed, it's not just going to be obvious cases of justice being served like this one. Sometimes it's going to be a guy bullying an old man in a movie theater who gets shot.




some surgeries get botched, perhaps we should stop performing surgeries

yes if concealed carry is 100% legal there will be things like the movie theater incident, but I guess i just don't feel like it will devolve into the wild west, which is what it sound like you think . nothing will ever be perfect, but i am in favor of it


I'm not against it.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Bagels wrote:
some surgeries get botched, perhaps we should stop performing surgeries

Image

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I'm not against it.


thank you for clarifying


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
No, JORR, never said or thought that about the movie shooting. Concealed carry wouldnt even apply to a retired cop, would it?


Anyway, it could have been avoided if the shooter wasnt an dumb angry asshole. But he was.


As much as I'm not losing any sleep over a rude asswipe getting shot in a theater after bullying what he thought to be a weak old man

Bullied :lol: The old man wanted a confrontation, which is why he told the guy "throw popcorn at me"

Anwyay...


Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
[I understand the situations aren't at all the same, and in this instance the shooting was far more justified. But I'm pretty sure you didn't think a guy should be carrying a gun in the theater, right? Why should cops have special rights to defend themselves?

I dont know if cops should but they do, so concealed carry doesnt apply.

I never said you should be allowed to bring a gun into a theater, just wondered why you'd need it. That crazy old retired bully changed my mind on that specifically. Its needed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65797
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

That's fine. I don't want to truncate anyone's Second Amendment rights myself. Personally, I won't have a gun in my house since the numbers show that the odds of it killing me or someone I care about are immensely greater than ever using it successfully in a situation such as the one we're discussing. I just want to make sure we don't have any of the gun control guys cheering this.

So you don't want to truncate anyone's second amendment rights but you're cool truncating their 1st amendment rights?
Got it.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
FavreFan wrote:
Your second point invalidates your first point. You cant just cite statistics without context. Because when you added the context with your second point, you explained why the two situations aren't comparable.


what are you talking about? no it doesn't. england didn't ban guns overnight... took a century of acts and amendments do get where they are. i did include context with my statistics. i think you mean cite my sources, but i dont feel like it. give me an F on this paper if you want to, it doesnt mean the contents are wrong.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Darkside wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

That's fine. I don't want to truncate anyone's Second Amendment rights myself. Personally, I won't have a gun in my house since the numbers show that the odds of it killing me or someone I care about are immensely greater than ever using it successfully in a situation such as the one we're discussing. I just want to make sure we don't have any of the gun control guys cheering this.

So you don't want to truncate anyone's second amendment rights but you're cool truncating their 1st amendment rights?
Got it.


:drunken:

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 203 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group