It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
I wonder how his Paul George love is faring also. One of his arguments has also been that the Bulls even if they supplant the Heat will have the mighty Pacers to contend with because they have Paul George as the mighty Derrick Rose stopper. I know Rose's future is in doubt as that "guy" but Paul George has been vastly overrated and so has that team for that matter. They won 49 games last year yet people such as Bernstein had anointed them as world champions because they took the Heat to seven games. We will never know but I believe that a fully healthy Bulls team would have beaten the Heat. It is ironic how the Bulls team that won 62 games was not good enough to beat Miami but a Pacers team that won 49 games was considered the next great thing in the NBA.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
the Pacers are a better team than they are playing like right now. Bad acquisitions.

And I guess I'll be alone on this one, but Paul George is the real deal.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23838
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
long time guy wrote:
I wonder how his Paul George love is faring also. One of his arguments has also been that the Bulls even if they supplant the Heat will have the mighty Pacers to contend with because they have Paul George as the mighty Derrick Rose stopper. I know Rose's future is in doubt as that "guy" but Paul George has been vastly overrated and so has that team for that matter. They won 49 games last year yet people such as Bernstein had anointed them as world champions because they took the Heat to seven games. We will never know but I believe that a fully healthy Bulls team would have beaten the Heat. It is ironic how the Bulls team that won 62 games was not good enough to beat Miami but a Pacers team that won 49 games was considered the next great thing in the NBA.

Danny overrates Hibbard just as much. Another guy he'd rather have than Noah.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Bernstein: New MLB Cameras Will Expose Ignorant Announcers
March 9, 2014 6:06 PM

(CBS) You may have missed the news last week that’s going to change forever how we look at baseball.
It’s understandable if you failed to pay close attention to the eighth annual MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference in Boston, but the game improved last week in a way that has general managers and intellectually curious fans drooling. Some insecure longtime scouts will be nervous, however, as will some veteran broadcasters.
I’m looking at you, Hawk Harrelson. You too, Harold Reynolds.
Thanks to a revolutionary system of real-time data-collection via interconnected tracking cameras, three major league ballparks will provide instant information about every single movement on the field. Citi Field in New York, Target Field in Minneapolis and Milwaukee’s Miller Park are already online, up and running for this season. More parks will be ready as this year progresses, and it will be fully implemented across MLB for the start of 2015.
Everything quantifiable, measured either comparably to that of others or as a percentage of an ideal. Seven terabytes per game, accessible by the production truck in time for the first replay and in time to measure the opinion of anyone analyzing what they saw, or – more significantly – what they thought they saw.
As MLB Network’s Brian Kenny tweeted, “Data-haters in sports are about to be left behind … forever.”

So no more, “He took a really good route to that ball.” That now becomes, “Here you see what would have been a perfect route to that ball, and Mike Trout does a remarkable job of keeping 94 percent route-efficiency.”

No more, “Yu Darvish is really getting great rotation on his curveball.” That’s now, “His curve is averaging 1700 RPM, which is 100 more than it did in his last start and 12 percent above league average.”
Really wrap your head around this for a second, because I still don’t think enough awareness has been created about how significant this is.
The speed and vector of each movement can now be known for every player and the ball, all at once. We will see virtual heat maps of defensive range that include not just which balls a fielder gets to but how quickly and from exactly how far away. Baserunners will have their speed, jumps and route-efficiency known, too, as we can see who gives away valuable time with sloppy angles rounding the bags and who doesn’t. Which outfielders’ throws are most often true to perfect trajectory? Which hitters generate the highest batted-ball velocity, and on what pitches and where in the zone? We’re about to know.

Harrelson’s musty brand of “I’ve been around this game a long time” superiority just got vaporized. Right away we can put many cornpone musings about lively bats and good instincts to the test. Maybe he’s right more than not, even. The point is that actual knowledge is supplanting the mysticism of self-appointed witch doctors.
We’ll soon find out if Reynolds was merely playing a part as a wrongheaded public denier of the value of advanced metrics. It’s possible he’s dropping that whole bit as he assumes the lead analyst role for FOX, or he may be risking a real combination of discomfort and embarrassment as the technology of the game passes him by. For him to be hired by the game’s primary broadcast network just as this is happening suggests either that he’s ready to enlighten himself or somebody at FOX made a terrible mistake.
The response from some is inevitable, predictable and trite. Dumb people are afraid of knowing new things or confronting the idea that long-held beliefs are going to be objectively weighed for veracity. It’s a specious argument that the game is rendered less fun when we know more about what is actually happening. Just like that durn Copernicus with all his highfalutin book-larnin’ ruining the non-stop party that was geocentrism.
Bob Bowman is the CEO of MLB Advanced Media, and he told MLB.com that the new data merely adds more richness to how we talk about baseball.
“This is going to be pretty exciting,” he said. “We think it’s going to change the way we argue about the game, but we don’t think it’s going to settle any debates. We think it starts more.”
While he’s dead on about the last part, he’s kidding himself if he doesn’t think that all this new sunlight won’t chase some old misunderstandings scurrying out of the shadows. Harrelson, for one, is fond of prefacing baseless, grandiose opinions in a way that presents them as immutable, eternal truth.
“That’s the way it is,” he likes to say, sounding like an unsettling combination of Walter Cronkite and Paula Deen. “That’s the way it always has been, and that’s the way it always will be.”
And that’s already wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9964
pizza_Place: world famous
This is why I watch baseball...to see great route-efficiencies.

OK. It's neat. I get it. But, he is going to be insufferable this season.

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
City of Fools wrote:
the Pacers are a better team than they are playing like right now. Bad acquisitions.


The Pacers are somewhat overrated. They have essentially been bum slayers in the East. They are being exposed for what they are in their recent stretch against the West. They struggle to score and they turn the ball over. You can't win like that if your defense doesn't stop your opponent.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bernstein: New MLB Cameras Will Expose Ignorant Announcers
March 9, 2014 6:06 PM

(CBS) You may have missed the news last week that’s going to change forever how we look at baseball.
It’s understandable if you failed to pay close attention to the eighth annual MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference in Boston, but the game improved last week in a way that has general managers and intellectually curious fans drooling. Some insecure longtime scouts will be nervous, however, as will some veteran broadcasters.
I’m looking at you, Hawk Harrelson. You too, Harold Reynolds.
Thanks to a revolutionary system of real-time data-collection via interconnected tracking cameras, three major league ballparks will provide instant information about every single movement on the field. Citi Field in New York, Target Field in Minneapolis and Milwaukee’s Miller Park are already online, up and running for this season. More parks will be ready as this year progresses, and it will be fully implemented across MLB for the start of 2015.
Everything quantifiable, measured either comparably to that of others or as a percentage of an ideal. Seven terabytes per game, accessible by the production truck in time for the first replay and in time to measure the opinion of anyone analyzing what they saw, or – more significantly – what they thought they saw.
As MLB Network’s Brian Kenny tweeted, “Data-haters in sports are about to be left behind … forever.”

So no more, “He took a really good route to that ball.” That now becomes, “Here you see what would have been a perfect route to that ball, and Mike Trout does a remarkable job of keeping 94 percent route-efficiency.”

No more, “Yu Darvish is really getting great rotation on his curveball.” That’s now, “His curve is averaging 1700 RPM, which is 100 more than it did in his last start and 12 percent above league average.”
Really wrap your head around this for a second, because I still don’t think enough awareness has been created about how significant this is.
The speed and vector of each movement can now be known for every player and the ball, all at once. We will see virtual heat maps of defensive range that include not just which balls a fielder gets to but how quickly and from exactly how far away. Baserunners will have their speed, jumps and route-efficiency known, too, as we can see who gives away valuable time with sloppy angles rounding the bags and who doesn’t. Which outfielders’ throws are most often true to perfect trajectory? Which hitters generate the highest batted-ball velocity, and on what pitches and where in the zone? We’re about to know.

Harrelson’s musty brand of “I’ve been around this game a long time” superiority just got vaporized. Right away we can put many cornpone musings about lively bats and good instincts to the test. Maybe he’s right more than not, even. The point is that actual knowledge is supplanting the mysticism of self-appointed witch doctors.
We’ll soon find out if Reynolds was merely playing a part as a wrongheaded public denier of the value of advanced metrics. It’s possible he’s dropping that whole bit as he assumes the lead analyst role for FOX, or he may be risking a real combination of discomfort and embarrassment as the technology of the game passes him by. For him to be hired by the game’s primary broadcast network just as this is happening suggests either that he’s ready to enlighten himself or somebody at FOX made a terrible mistake.
The response from some is inevitable, predictable and trite. Dumb people are afraid of knowing new things or confronting the idea that long-held beliefs are going to be objectively weighed for veracity. It’s a specious argument that the game is rendered less fun when we know more about what is actually happening. Just like that durn Copernicus with all his highfalutin book-larnin’ ruining the non-stop party that was geocentrism.
Bob Bowman is the CEO of MLB Advanced Media, and he told MLB.com that the new data merely adds more richness to how we talk about baseball.
“This is going to be pretty exciting,” he said. “We think it’s going to change the way we argue about the game, but we don’t think it’s going to settle any debates. We think it starts more.”
While he’s dead on about the last part, he’s kidding himself if he doesn’t think that all this new sunlight won’t chase some old misunderstandings scurrying out of the shadows. Harrelson, for one, is fond of prefacing baseless, grandiose opinions in a way that presents them as immutable, eternal truth.
“That’s the way it is,” he likes to say, sounding like an unsettling combination of Walter Cronkite and Paula Deen. “That’s the way it always has been, and that’s the way it always will be.”
And that’s already wrong.
It's interesting that Bernstein and Kenny don't seem to realize that this makes them irrelevant too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
The joy he takes in pointing out other people's flaws is quite telling


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
City of Fools wrote:
the Pacers are a better team than they are playing like right now. Bad acquisitions.

And I guess I'll be alone on this one, but Paul George is the real deal.

George is a good player on a good team. He was anointed by Bernstein to be a great player on a great team. That was where the problem lie for me. How could the Bulls possibly be considered title contenders when they have the insurmountable Paul George and Indiana Pacers as well as the mighty Miami Heat to contend with. Rose's injury changes that significantly but Bernstein was making these types of proclamations without factoring in the injury status of Rose.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11005
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
KDdidit wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I wonder how his Paul George love is faring also. One of his arguments has also been that the Bulls even if they supplant the Heat will have the mighty Pacers to contend with because they have Paul George as the mighty Derrick Rose stopper. I know Rose's future is in doubt as that "guy" but Paul George has been vastly overrated and so has that team for that matter. They won 49 games last year yet people such as Bernstein had anointed them as world champions because they took the Heat to seven games. We will never know but I believe that a fully healthy Bulls team would have beaten the Heat. It is ironic how the Bulls team that won 62 games was not good enough to beat Miami but a Pacers team that won 49 games was considered the next great thing in the NBA.

Danny overrates Hibbard just as much. Another guy he'd rather have than Noah.


hibbard averages 17 and 10 in the 2013 playoffs but reverts back to his career averages this season? Not a pacers observer, but what the heck?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
dan bernstein wrote:
Dumb people are afraid of knowing new things or confronting the idea that long-held beliefs are going to be objectively weighed for veracity.


That's not an oversimplified generalization or anything.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bernstein: New MLB Cameras Will Expose Ignorant Announcers
March 9, 2014 6:06 PM

(CBS) You may have missed the news last week that’s going to change forever how we look at baseball.
It’s understandable if you failed to pay close attention to the eighth annual MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference in Boston, but the game improved last week in a way that has general managers and intellectually curious fans drooling. Some insecure longtime scouts will be nervous, however, as will some veteran broadcasters.
I’m looking at you, Hawk Harrelson. You too, Harold Reynolds.
Thanks to a revolutionary system of real-time data-collection via interconnected tracking cameras, three major league ballparks will provide instant information about every single movement on the field. Citi Field in New York, Target Field in Minneapolis and Milwaukee’s Miller Park are already online, up and running for this season. More parks will be ready as this year progresses, and it will be fully implemented across MLB for the start of 2015.
Everything quantifiable, measured either comparably to that of others or as a percentage of an ideal. Seven terabytes per game, accessible by the production truck in time for the first replay and in time to measure the opinion of anyone analyzing what they saw, or – more significantly – what they thought they saw.
As MLB Network’s Brian Kenny tweeted, “Data-haters in sports are about to be left behind … forever.”

So no more, “He took a really good route to that ball.” That now becomes, “Here you see what would have been a perfect route to that ball, and Mike Trout does a remarkable job of keeping 94 percent route-efficiency.”

No more, “Yu Darvish is really getting great rotation on his curveball.” That’s now, “His curve is averaging 1700 RPM, which is 100 more than it did in his last start and 12 percent above league average.”
Really wrap your head around this for a second, because I still don’t think enough awareness has been created about how significant this is.
The speed and vector of each movement can now be known for every player and the ball, all at once. We will see virtual heat maps of defensive range that include not just which balls a fielder gets to but how quickly and from exactly how far away. Baserunners will have their speed, jumps and route-efficiency known, too, as we can see who gives away valuable time with sloppy angles rounding the bags and who doesn’t. Which outfielders’ throws are most often true to perfect trajectory? Which hitters generate the highest batted-ball velocity, and on what pitches and where in the zone? We’re about to know.

Harrelson’s musty brand of “I’ve been around this game a long time” superiority just got vaporized. Right away we can put many cornpone musings about lively bats and good instincts to the test. Maybe he’s right more than not, even. The point is that actual knowledge is supplanting the mysticism of self-appointed witch doctors.
We’ll soon find out if Reynolds was merely playing a part as a wrongheaded public denier of the value of advanced metrics. It’s possible he’s dropping that whole bit as he assumes the lead analyst role for FOX, or he may be risking a real combination of discomfort and embarrassment as the technology of the game passes him by. For him to be hired by the game’s primary broadcast network just as this is happening suggests either that he’s ready to enlighten himself or somebody at FOX made a terrible mistake.
The response from some is inevitable, predictable and trite. Dumb people are afraid of knowing new things or confronting the idea that long-held beliefs are going to be objectively weighed for veracity. It’s a specious argument that the game is rendered less fun when we know more about what is actually happening. Just like that durn Copernicus with all his highfalutin book-larnin’ ruining the non-stop party that was geocentrism.
Bob Bowman is the CEO of MLB Advanced Media, and he told MLB.com that the new data merely adds more richness to how we talk about baseball.
“This is going to be pretty exciting,” he said. “We think it’s going to change the way we argue about the game, but we don’t think it’s going to settle any debates. We think it starts more.”
While he’s dead on about the last part, he’s kidding himself if he doesn’t think that all this new sunlight won’t chase some old misunderstandings scurrying out of the shadows. Harrelson, for one, is fond of prefacing baseless, grandiose opinions in a way that presents them as immutable, eternal truth.
“That’s the way it is,” he likes to say, sounding like an unsettling combination of Walter Cronkite and Paula Deen. “That’s the way it always has been, and that’s the way it always will be.”
And that’s already wrong.
It's interesting that Bernstein and Kenny don't seem to realize that this makes them irrelevant too.


How? Kenny shows replays. And if anything, this will enhance the Bernstein shtick by giving him even more evidence against the meatballs than he has now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
How? Kenny shows replays. And if anything, this will enhance the Bernstein shtick by giving him even more evidence against the meatballs than he has now.
Kenny does more than show replays. He's involved in discussing the game too. That is why he is involved in this.

If the answer to questions are answered by irrefutable computer evidence, then all discussion about it is irrelevant. We have the answer. It would be like arguing what 12 x 12 is.

The factory workers thought that computers were making things easier for them too. We don't really need sports radio to read off numbers.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
If you think this system is going to completely shut down discussion, I think you're wrong. People don't understand and disregard WAR entirely. This will probably be treated similarly. I imagine Bernstein's discussions will be exactly those he has had for years on the merits of WAR.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Thankfully we will have indisputable proof what a shitty player DeAza is. :lol:

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
If you think this system is going to completely shut down discussion, I think you're wrong. People don't understand and disregard WAR entirely. This will probably be treated similarly. I imagine Bernstein's discussions will be exactly those he has had for years on the merits of WAR.
No, WAR is a made up statistic. It may have merit, but it's contrived based on circumstantial adjustments done by REALLY. SMART. PEOPLE.

This is literally a measurement that answers the question with irrefutable evidence. It would be like arguing against the results of a track meet.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
You're right, probably not a great example.


That said, if you are predicting this system eliminates sports radio, I'd be interested in a board wager.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
That said, if you are predicting this system eliminates sports radio, I'd be interested in a board wager.
If it's as good as Bernstein describes, it eliminates the need for pretty much any baseball analysis of players. Other, better sports still exist though which can't be solved by a computer.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Can't imagine living in a brain that thinks football is a better sport than baseball. Must not be a lot going on in there most of the time. :lol:

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
That said, if you are predicting this system eliminates sports radio, I'd be interested in a board wager.
If it's as good as Bernstein describes, it eliminates the need for pretty much any baseball analysis of players. Other, better sports still exist though which can't be solved by a computer.


The Bulls beat the Heat. That's definitive. That doesn't mean there is nothing to discuss about what it means.


Make the prediction then. Are you saying this system is going to be very flawed? Or that sports radio is going to die?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
The Bulls beat the Heat. That's definitive. That doesn't mean there is nothing to discuss about what it means.
Yes, results can still be discussed. However, anyone can discuss past results. Bernstein does not provide value by knowing that the Heat lost.
Bucky Chris wrote:
Make the prediction then. Are you saying this system is going to be very flawed? Or that sports radio is going to die?
No and no.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
So how is this system going to "make them irrelevant?"

I would argue this is going to give Bernstein a helluva lot of show content.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
So how is this system going to "make them irrelevant?"
How is it going to make Hawk irrelevant?

If it works as Bernstein describes, there is no grey area. There is a right and wrong answer. I don't need Hawk to tell me what he thinks. I don't need Bernstein to tell me what he thinks. It's just a fact.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Bernstein wrote:
So no more, “He took a really good route to that ball.” That now becomes, “Here you see what would have been a perfect route to that ball, and Mike Trout does a remarkable job of keeping 94 percent route-efficiency.”

No more, “Yu Darvish is really getting great rotation on his curveball.” That’s now, “His curve is averaging 1700 RPM, which is 100 more than it did in his last start and 12 percent above league average.”

If announcers begin talking like that I’m going to have to PTFB. He doesn’t understand the announcer/fan dynamic. Most fans don’t want to listen to a computer.

Bernstein wrote:
Bob Bowman is the CEO of MLB Advanced Media, and he told MLB.com that the new data merely adds more richness to how we talk about baseball.
“This is going to be pretty exciting,” he said. “We think it’s going to change the way we argue about the game, but we don’t think it’s going to settle any debates. We think it starts more.”
While he’s dead on about the last part, he’s kidding himself if he doesn’t think that all this new sunlight won’t chase some old misunderstandings scurrying out of the shadows. Harrelson, for one, is fond of prefacing baseless, grandiose opinions in a way that presents them as immutable, eternal truth.

Actually he isn’t dead on. Calls will likely be even worse than they already are:

Carl in Alsip: Uh, yea, I feel like Chris Sale has the nastiest slider in the MLB. We as Sox fans are pretty...
Bernstein: Wait, what did you just say? Best slider? No, MLBAM says he only gets 8% more rotation than average. Verlander gets 11%.
Carl: I mean I’ve watched every Sox game this year in person or on TV. He makes hitters look…
Bernstein: Carl! Your eyes are better than cameras? Than the engineers and mathematicians? Ha. After you hang up on yourself please kill yourself as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
All this verbiage obfuscates the fundamental truth that Hawk is a senile jackass that needs to be put out to pasture. Give him a carrot.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
I think it's unfortunate that we have to discuss the White Sox. Yes, they won a World Series 9 years ago and then they made the playoffs after the blackout game, but the team is not going anywhere. Baseball is boring enough. It's bad enough it's all that is talked about during the summer until the Bears start.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Mini Ditka wrote:
Baseball is boring enough. It's bad enough it's all that is talked about during the summer until the Bears start.


Ah, another simpleton. "Great" minds think alike. :lol:

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
Hatchetman wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
Baseball is boring enough. It's bad enough it's all that is talked about during the summer until the Bears start.


Ah, another simpleton. "Great" minds think alike. :lol:


Why is it championship or bust in the NBA and then they spend 7 months talking about two last place baseball teams?

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Bucky Chris wrote:
So how is this system going to "make them irrelevant?"

I would argue this is going to give Bernstein a helluva lot of show content.

Oh sure this will give him plenty of content to misinterpret the findings like he did with defensive shifts. He just assumed that because the Cubs were employing defensive shifts they were preventing runs. That was until the data showed they actually allowed more runs than they prevented.

Guys like Lil Danny can have all the stats in the world but it doesn't make a damn bit of difference because he doesn't understand the game of baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:43 pm
Posts: 3715
Location: The Kingdom of Gene Siegel
I knew Beerstain would be frothing at the mouth with orgasmic giddiness about the MIT Sloan Statistics Conference. Coincidentally, it was a top story on Deadspin during the weekend.

The first two sentences of Dan's column are filled with such condescension. They essentially translate to the following:

You stupid ignorant hick pigfucker! Get out of your goober world and start playing attention to this important stuff! This is Big Boy Baseball.

_________________
Back off, Warchild. Seriously.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group