It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 7:43 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Curious Hair wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
There is a chance that all of them, perhaps with the exception of Baez will in fact be bad. It's fairly well settled, but never politely mentioned that Theo & his boyquarium have a spotty (at best) record of finding and developing young talent on an even playing field. The next pitcher they "find" will still be their first (I never got the Papelbon love). Their free agent record may be worse. That is, unless you can wield the resources to fleece a sob sister like the Marlins.

He no longer has his needle in the ass guys, nor his crutch (Bill James), nor the deep pockets of the BoSox organization. Nor an actual baseball guy to hand hold him (Larry Lucchino). The longer I hear about Theo and his plan, or look at how things actually came into place in Boston, the more I'm convinced he's simply another rich kid fraud. After looking at the development of Rizzo and the regression of Castro (after a big $ deal), I'm starting to believe he knows less than a LL parent whose kid is better off in the back row of a school band.

Maybe the Red Sox should have let his soft, entitled, whiny bitch ass go away the first time he quit on them.

Nailed everything.

So getting Papelbon, Jon Lester, and Clay Bucholz = cant find pitching?

Really?

And how is he soft or entitled?

I understand frustration with the plan but this post is full of nonsense


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Nas wrote:
I think the fact that the farm is rich with talent is a reason to be a little patient. We're not talking about 1 so called can't miss prospect like we were 5 to 10 years ago. There are about 10 of these guys and there is no chance all of them will be bad.


There is a chance that all of them, perhaps with the exception of Baez will in fact be bad. It's fairly well settled, but never politely mentioned that Theo & his boyquarium have a spotty (at best) record of finding and developing young talent on an even playing field. The next pitcher they "find" will still be their first (I never got the Papelbon love). Their free agent record may be worse. That is, unless you can wield the resources to fleece a sob sister like the Marlins.

He no longer has his needle in the ass guys, nor his crutch (Bill James), nor the deep pockets of the BoSox organization. Nor an actual baseball guy to hand hold him (Larry Lucchino). The longer I hear about Theo and his plan, or look at how things actually came into place in Boston, the more I'm convinced he's simply another rich kid fraud. After looking at the development of Rizzo and the regression of Castro (after a big $ deal), I'm starting to believe he knows less than a LL parent whose kid is better off in the back row of a school band.

Maybe the Red Sox should have let his soft, entitled, whiny bitch ass go away the first time he quit on them.

Nice.

Rack him, Bryan.

I would except the pitching statement is absurd and I dont know of Theo being entitled or soft?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91931
Location: To the left of my post
Curious Hair wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
There is a chance that all of them, perhaps with the exception of Baez will in fact be bad. It's fairly well settled, but never politely mentioned that Theo & his boyquarium have a spotty (at best) record of finding and developing young talent on an even playing field. The next pitcher they "find" will still be their first (I never got the Papelbon love). Their free agent record may be worse. That is, unless you can wield the resources to fleece a sob sister like the Marlins.

He no longer has his needle in the ass guys, nor his crutch (Bill James), nor the deep pockets of the BoSox organization. Nor an actual baseball guy to hand hold him (Larry Lucchino). The longer I hear about Theo and his plan, or look at how things actually came into place in Boston, the more I'm convinced he's simply another rich kid fraud. After looking at the development of Rizzo and the regression of Castro (after a big $ deal), I'm starting to believe he knows less than a LL parent whose kid is better off in the back row of a school band.

Maybe the Red Sox should have let his soft, entitled, whiny bitch ass go away the first time he quit on them.

Nailed everything.
We should bump this post when Theo is either fired or quits and walks out of Wrigley in a gorilla costume.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
So getting Papelbon, Jon Lester, and Clay Bucholz = cant find pitching?

They also found Masterson but traded him for V-Mart. Pretty nice collection of pitchers. But Sox fans gonna sox fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Kirkwood wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
So getting Papelbon, Jon Lester, and Clay Bucholz = cant find pitching?

They also found Masterson but traded him for V-Mart. Pretty nice collection of pitchers. But Sox fans gonna sox fan.

I was never big on 20 game winners, MVP's of World Series and dominant closers


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
RPB, we all know the Cubs needed an entire rebuild. They had a collection of bad contracts at the major league level. They had a fairly weak minor system with "top" guys like Brett Jackson and Vitters providing nothing. They clearly couldn't scout well and were even worse at development. The stadium needed a lot of investment from fixing falling concrete to generating more revenues. The tv contract was way undervalued due to the association with Tribune/WGN.

I look at what has been accomplished already:

1) All bad contracts and old guys are gone.
2) They have traded every asset short of the Shark to pick up young assets.
3) They have restocked the minor league system and now have the #4 rated farm system.
4) New minor league stadium.
5) Revamped scouting and development.
6) Working on new broadcast contracts as they come due which will generate a lot more revenue to support player salaries.
7) Approval to extract more revenues out of Wrigley Field held up only by the rooftop owners. The rooftop issue is another legacy issue not created by the current folks.

On the downside:
1) Castro and Rizzo are making management look bad. They got their contracts and both regressed. They have plenty of time to turn it around, but there is no doubt this is a problem.
2) They signed Edwin Jackson and that Japanese reliever. Wasted money in my opinion.
3) Burned through one manager already who clearly was not up to the task.

On balance, they are directionally ok. But the jury is still out.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Nas wrote:
I think the fact that the farm is rich with talent is a reason to be a little patient. We're not talking about 1 so called can't miss prospect like we were 5 to 10 years ago. There are about 10 of these guys and there is no chance all of them will be bad.


There is a chance that all of them, perhaps with the exception of Baez will in fact be bad. It's fairly well settled, but never politely mentioned that Theo & his boyquarium have a spotty (at best) record of finding and developing young talent on an even playing field. The next pitcher they "find" will still be their first (I never got the Papelbon love). Their free agent record may be worse. That is, unless you can wield the resources to fleece a sob sister like the Marlins.

He no longer has his needle in the ass guys, nor his crutch (Bill James), nor the deep pockets of the BoSox organization. Nor an actual baseball guy to hand hold him (Larry Lucchino). The longer I hear about Theo and his plan, or look at how things actually came into place in Boston, the more I'm convinced he's simply another rich kid fraud. After looking at the development of Rizzo and the regression of Castro (after a big $ deal), I'm starting to believe he knows less than a LL parent whose kid is better off in the back row of a school band.

Maybe the Red Sox should have let his soft, entitled, whiny bitch ass go away the first time he quit on them.


RPB is going to explode.

You weren't lyin'

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:12 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79461
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
ZephMarshack wrote:
I've always thought Rozner and Rosenbloom get too much credit here for "standing up to Bernstein" when that's not always the case, as in this example, and that's hardly sufficient for being good at radio.


They don't really need to stand up to him. bernstein doesn't come over the top of them like he does with the goyim and Zach Zaidman.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40610
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
denisdman wrote:
RPB, we all know the Cubs needed an entire rebuild. They had a collection of bad contracts at the major league level. They had a fairly weak minor system with "top" guys like Brett Jackson and Vitters providing nothing. They clearly couldn't scout well and were even worse at development. The stadium needed a lot of investment from fixing falling concrete to generating more revenues. The tv contract was way undervalued due to the association with Tribune/WGN.

I look at what has been accomplished already:

1) All bad contracts and old guys are gone.
2) They have traded every asset short of the Shark to pick up young assets.
3) They have restocked the minor league system and now have the #4 rated farm system.
4) New minor league stadium.
5) Revamped scouting and development.
6) Working on new broadcast contracts as they come due which will generate a lot more revenue to support player salaries.
7) Approval to extract more revenues out of Wrigley Field held up only by the rooftop owners. The rooftop issue is another legacy issue not created by the current folks.

On the downside:
1) Castro and Rizzo are making management look bad. They got their contracts and both regressed. They have plenty of time to turn it around, but there is no doubt this is a problem.
2) They signed Edwin Jackson and that Japanese reliever. Wasted money in my opinion.
3) Burned through one manager already who clearly was not up to the task.

On balance, they are directionally ok. But the jury is still out.



One minor thing that gets overlooked though is that the Cubs took on a lot of salary to unload all those players. So even if those contracts are "gone" and not on the current payroll they still cramp Rickett's cash flow.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
They paid to make Hendry's mess go away. And people complain they don't spend money :)

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Pittmike, All this PNC talk during the opening series reminded me. Are you and your lovely girlfriend going to join my crew for a Cubs game in June. Here's our seats at PNC?

Chicago Cubs at Pittsburgh Pirates at PNC Park, Pittsburgh, PA
Tue, 06/10/2014, 7:05 p.m. EDT
Field Level Box 25 | 5 tickets
Row J |

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55842
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Don Tiny wrote:
And it's possible that Boston, at the time, didn't give too much mind to their farm system due to being willing to buy people as well as having the aforementioned needle-in-the-ass veterans ... at least most teams don't usually stay up night worrying about both to the same degree.

Boston had a great farm system because, again, they could buy people. MLB drafting was (is) fucked up.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Nas wrote:
I think the fact that the farm is rich with talent is a reason to be a little patient. We're not talking about 1 so called can't miss prospect like we were 5 to 10 years ago. There are about 10 of these guys and there is no chance all of them will be bad.


There is a chance that all of them, perhaps with the exception of Baez will in fact be bad. It's fairly well settled, but never politely mentioned that Theo & his boyquarium have a spotty (at best) record of finding and developing young talent on an even playing field. The next pitcher they "find" will still be their first (I never got the Papelbon love). Their free agent record may be worse. That is, unless you can wield the resources to fleece a sob sister like the Marlins.

He no longer has his needle in the ass guys, nor his crutch (Bill James), nor the deep pockets of the BoSox organization. Nor an actual baseball guy to hand hold him (Larry Lucchino). The longer I hear about Theo and his plan, or look at how things actually came into place in Boston, the more I'm convinced he's simply another rich kid fraud. After looking at the development of Rizzo and the regression of Castro (after a big $ deal), I'm starting to believe he knows less than a LL parent whose kid is better off in the back row of a school band.

Maybe the Red Sox should have let his soft, entitled, whiny bitch ass go away the first time he quit on them.


RPB is going to explode.

You weren't lyin'


RPB melting like a Nazi in an Indiana Jones movie

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
GD, nice analogy...pretty funny.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
denisdman wrote:
GD, nice analogy...pretty funny.


I needed that affirmation after being voted out of March Madness

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
rogers park bryan wrote:
Im sorry you dont GET the love for a dominant closer who was dominant through the World Series, but it still counts

As do Lester and Bucholz who both played major roles on two World Series winners.


So, that pretty much blows up that nonsense. I know you hate the Cubs, but you're better than this.

1. I remain skeptical of the oddly rage filled :wink: Papelbon and will continue to believe that were he not of ESPN's pet team, he wouldn't be nearly as "beloved" as many seem to insist. He HAS gotten awfully average really quickly, though no?

2. As I mentioned & Lester embodies, the BoSox' deep pockets allowed them to pay for 1st round talent that others couldn't afford. He can no longer rely on that Bill James' taught "ability" given that Big Daddy Ricketts is looking to actually try and make money off his kids' toy. But I'll give you Buchholz.


You're right about the spotty free agent record.

Wrong again about the Marlins. That trade still counts and it led to a WS. (although that was Jed's move. Theo was gone)

How am I wrong? They fleeced a cheap owner who didn't/doesn't deserve a major league team? The great Theo won't have that arrow in his quiver again, unless He'll be at the head of the line when and if the Rays have a fire sale. Again, deep pockets & little competition to fleece an asshole owner. He won't be that lucky again.


Ok, so to sum up. Theo gets no credit for the two WS he won and you think two guys regressing for one year negates Two World Series.

But that's the biggest problem I have with the Theo ALS society. It's always the two WS "He" won. Not that the large majority of the pieces were in place, nor that the druggies helped, nor that it was an organizational $$ win. It's "His" wins. Spare us all the Bernsteinian arrogance about His ultimate value over replacement GM(Because they/you say so).

And btw, Castro has regressed for two years, Rizzo failed in San Diego and has underwhelmed despite overhauling Cubbie minor league coaching....or Theo's former hire as manager.


Soft? Entitled? Whiny?

Sounds like a personal thing

As alluded to above, that chicken hearted bastard quit on his team because he (weep, sob) couldn't put his heart into a job he always wanted (sob, weep) where he didn't feel....(sniff, sniff) appreciated (full blown boo-hooing to follow). And then the pampered little bastard DID (as alluded to above) leave in a gorilla suit, befitting the apparently petulant and spoiled little brat he apparently is/was. But now we're all supposed to forget the details of his overwrought, overrated and yet entitled past? Oh wait, I forget, baseball as we knew it for 100+ years was wrong & the rich kids in the calculus club (& assistant team managers) know it all, are the only Way and have no fleas.

I hate quitters in pro sports, especially entitled feeling little pricks who are now upheld by obnoxious know it alls(Bernstein, Rozner) as the Second Coming for a losing franchise.


This whole post is absolutely dismissed. Come back with your actual thoughts because I know you know the game.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Ok, so The Red Sox were hugely successful while Theo Epstein was there, but none of the credit goes to him. Ok, got it.


And the 2007 WS pieces were not in place, that's just silly


Aslo, it seems you've focused your SABR angst on Epstein.


So I guess Theo Epstein is the worst GM to ever be a part of 2 World Series wins in 4 years


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91931
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
So I guess Theo Epstein is the worst GM to ever be a part of 2 World Series wins in 4 years
You probably think Robert Horry is better than Kobe too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ok, so The Red Sox were hugely successful while Theo Epstein was there, but none of the credit goes to him. Ok, got it.


Right; the success they had while he was there was essentially due to those who came before him, and the success they've had after he left was entirely due to those who followed. That's what happened and it's obvious to everyone except to those that actually take a few seconds to parse the idea out fully as was just done for those that would rather not do so.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
It's quite obvious that some don't like Theo/sabr/theo love/bernstein/rozner and that is the basis for their thoughts. The anti-Theo crowd gives him no credit for anything, while the side defending him readily admits his shortcomings. I have no real conviction either way.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Don Tiny wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ok, so The Red Sox were hugely successful while Theo Epstein was there, but none of the credit goes to him. Ok, got it.


Right; the success they had while he was there was essentially due to those who came before him, and the success they've had after he left was entirely due to those who followed. That's what happened and it's obvious to everyone except to those that actually take a few seconds to parse the idea out fully as was just done for those that would rather not do so.

Isn't it obvious the answer is in between, like usual? Theo definitely is overloved by some. But he does deserve some credit, obviously. I think it's fair to criticize the lack of progress the Cubs have made so far if the team loses 95+ again this season.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
leashyourkids wrote:
It's quite obvious that some don't like Theo/sabr/theo love/bernstein/rozner and that is the basis for their thoughts. The anti-Theo crowd gives him no credit for anything, while the side defending him readily admits his shortcomings. I have no real conviction either way.


Yeah, I just want the team to be good. I dont care what means they use to get there. They tried overpaying FA and that got close but didnt work. This a different plan, maybe it fails too. Who the fuck knows...

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
FavreFan wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ok, so The Red Sox were hugely successful while Theo Epstein was there, but none of the credit goes to him. Ok, got it.


Right; the success they had while he was there was essentially due to those who came before him, and the success they've had after he left was entirely due to those who followed. That's what happened and it's obvious to everyone except to those that actually take a few seconds to parse the idea out fully as was just done for those that would rather not do so.

Isn't it obvious the answer is in between, like usual? Theo definitely is overloved by some. But he does deserve some credit, obviously. I think it's fair to criticize the lack of progress the Cubs have made so far if the team loses 95+ again this season.


The Rizzo thing is what really scares me. Here is a guy that Theo and Co love. They traded for him 100 times and he is just a guy... What if all these young guys are just guys... Scary thought.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
leashyourkids wrote:
It's quite obvious that some don't like Theo/sabr/theo love/bernstein/rozner and that is the basis for their thoughts. The anti-Theo crowd gives him no credit for anything, while the side defending him readily admits his shortcomings. I have no real conviction either way.


I am really not anti Theo. He seems like a well grounded, thoughtful and genuinely good guy despite having much objective success at a young age. I think he has been given too much deference by the media and many fans in this town.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Curious Hair wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
And it's possible that Boston, at the time, didn't give too much mind to their farm system due to being willing to buy people as well as having the aforementioned needle-in-the-ass veterans ... at least most teams don't usually stay up night worrying about both to the same degree.

Boston had a great farm system because, again, they could buy people. MLB drafting was (is) fucked up.


But, again, if all they did was buy people, that eliminates reason to bother with taking time, effort, and attention to "develop" someone the hard way ... which indicates to me, then, that the only informed opinion one could have on Theo is that one couldn't really have one at all - he had neither acquitted himself well or proven himself ineffective at growing players (outside of a lab anyway).

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
FavreFan wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ok, so The Red Sox were hugely successful while Theo Epstein was there, but none of the credit goes to him. Ok, got it.


Right; the success they had while he was there was essentially due to those who came before him, and the success they've had after he left was entirely due to those who followed. That's what happened and it's obvious to everyone except to those that actually take a few seconds to parse the idea out fully as was just done for those that would rather not do so.

Isn't it obvious the answer is in between, like usual? Theo definitely is overloved by some. But he does deserve some credit, obviously. I think it's fair to criticize the lack of progress the Cubs have made so far if the team loses 95+ again this season.


SURE it's in the middle, Malcom ... but there are those that can't wait to beat their dicks about Theo on one extreme end of the spectrum or the other.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
good dolphin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
It's quite obvious that some don't like Theo/sabr/theo love/bernstein/rozner and that is the basis for their thoughts. The anti-Theo crowd gives him no credit for anything, while the side defending him readily admits his shortcomings. I have no real conviction either way.


I am really not anti Theo. He seems like a well grounded, thoughtful and genuinely good guy despite having much objective success at a young age. I think he has been given too much deference by the media and many fans in this town.


I agree, but that isn't a reason to overcompensate the other way.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38674
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
There is a chance that all of them, perhaps with the exception of Baez will in fact be bad. It's fairly well settled, but never politely mentioned that Theo & his boyquarium have a spotty (at best) record of finding and developing young talent on an even playing field. The next pitcher they "find" will still be their first (I never got the Papelbon love). Their free agent record may be worse. That is, unless you can wield the resources to fleece a sob sister like the Marlins.

He no longer has his needle in the ass guys, nor his crutch (Bill James), nor the deep pockets of the BoSox organization. Nor an actual baseball guy to hand hold him (Larry Lucchino). The longer I hear about Theo and his plan, or look at how things actually came into place in Boston, the more I'm convinced he's simply another rich kid fraud. After looking at the development of Rizzo and the regression of Castro (after a big $ deal), I'm starting to believe he knows less than a LL parent whose kid is better off in the back row of a school band.

Maybe the Red Sox should have let his soft, entitled, whiny bitch ass go away the first time he quit on them.

Nailed everything.

So getting Papelbon, Jon Lester, and Clay Bucholz = cant find pitching?

Really?

And how is he soft or entitled?

I understand frustration with the plan but this post is full of nonsense
Could be argued that even the Lackey signing which looked to be a bust at the time, was responsible as any for the WS win last year. Carl Crawford however….

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12816
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
Sure, THE PLAN may fail miserably. It also may succeed remarkably. Who knows. Just buy your tickets, go to the games and have blind faith.

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 8:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40610
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
denisdman wrote:
Pittmike, All this PNC talk during the opening series reminded me. Are you and your lovely girlfriend going to join my crew for a Cubs game in June. Here's our seats at PNC?

Chicago Cubs at Pittsburgh Pirates at PNC Park, Pittsburgh, PA
Tue, 06/10/2014, 7:05 p.m. EDT
Field Level Box 25 | 5 tickets
Row J |



Yeah I just wrote it down and will have her get us a couple.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group