It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 6:39 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 220 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 7:03 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65801
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
SpiralStairs wrote:


If killing people with pipe bombs, castor beans, locking them in a burning building, etc., was easier than pointing and shooting a gun at someone why do so many people choose to use guns to do the job?

I don't think that's really 100% true. I can think of plenty of mass murders done with bombs and poisons... like I mentioned earlier, could McVeigh have killed over 180 with a gun? I doubt it.

Why are the vast majority of murders committed by women done with poisons or knives rather than firearms?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Darkside wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:


If killing people with pipe bombs, castor beans, locking them in a burning building, etc., was easier than pointing and shooting a gun at someone why do so many people choose to use guns to do the job?

I don't think that's really 100% true. I can think of plenty of mass murders done with bombs and poisons... like I mentioned earlier, could McVeigh have killed over 180 with a gun? I doubt it.

Why are the vast majority of murders committed by women done with poisons or knives rather than firearms?


I suppose everything depends on the kind of murderin' you want to accomplish and how dedicated you are to accomplishing that goal. If your intent is to set off what you think is the primer to a racial holy war by blowing up a government building, then by God you're going to load up a U-Haul truck with as much fertilizer as you can and blow that fucker to kingdom come.

If, however, you get cut off on the expressway and you don't have time to build a bomb, or take time off work so you can follow that asshole home and set his house on fire, you are going to use the most practical device for expressing exactly how angry you are at someone. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/loca ... 7347.story

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 7:31 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65801
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Well, spiral we could just pick out events in which specific things happened all day. I was responding to the question of what was the easiest way to kill a room full of people or the easiest way to kill someone. I don't agree that a gun is "easiest". It could be, if that is what you happen to have in your hand at the time. You could also say that if you want to kill 100 people it's easier to do so with a bomb than a gun.

No two situations are the same. No way is always easier than the other.

I just don't think we can eliminate murder or violence with removing one method of inflicting violence. Someone dedicated to hurting people will do so. If a knife isn't available and a gun is, that's what they'll use. If a gun isn't available or practical for their means, they'll use a bomb or something else.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
SpiralStairs wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Pretty simple.


If that kid had a gun yesterday, more people would have died.

Assuming that he knows how to handle the weapon properly. Assuming a lot of things really. But I enjoy watching people make assumptions and state them as fact. It's fascinating.


If he were to build a pipe bomb we'd have to assume he'd know how to prime it, where the best place would be to place it and what time to set it off, and even if all that was done there's no telling if the bomb would actually explode.

If killing people with pipe bombs, castor beans, locking them in a burning building, etc., was easier than pointing and shooting a gun at someone why do so many people choose to use guns to do the job?


Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30331
I would just like to apologize to all for starting this thread, I should have know, Fuck!!!

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 8:26 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65801
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Hawg Ass wrote:
I would just like to apologize to all for starting this thread, I should have know, Fuck!!!

You should know better. Damnit Hawg. You bastard!

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30331
Darkside wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
I would just like to apologize to all for starting this thread, I should have know, Fuck!!!

You should know better. Damnit Hawg. You bastard!

I know, dammit!!! :oops:

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23861
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Darkside wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Pretty simple.


If that kid had a gun yesterday, more people would have died.

Assuming that he knows how to handle the weapon properly. Assuming a lot of things really. But I enjoy watching people make assumptions and state them as fact. It's fascinating.

Just as bad as creating all sorts of magical scenarios where if everything happens perfectly, somehow, guns may be safer than knives.

That would be true had someone said guns were "safer" than knives, but I didn't read anyone saying that. I recall the argument being that it wasn't necessarily easier to kill mass amounts of people with guns than other methods though, which I believe bears out if given some thought.

It bears out if you keep doing the mental gymnastics to create perfect mass stabbing scenarios. There's a reason in the real world 5x as many people are killed each year by guns than stabbings.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:14 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65801
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
KDdidit wrote:
It bears out if you keep doing the mental gymnastics to create perfect mass stabbing scenarios. There's a reason in the real world 5x as many people are killed each year by guns than stabbings.

OK. I'm not saying it's not more popular. I'm just saying it's not always easier.
I'm really not sure what the point of this particular tangent is though. Are we saying that if shooting someone is easier then we need to eradicate guns?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23861
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Darkside wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
It bears out if you keep doing the mental gymnastics to create perfect mass stabbing scenarios. There's a reason in the real world 5x as many people are killed each year by guns than stabbings.

OK. I'm not saying it's not more popular. I'm just saying it's not always easier.
I'm really not sure what the point of this particular tangent is though. Are we saying that if shooting someone is easier then we need to eradicate guns?

You were the first person to bring up gun laws in this thread. Everybody else reasonably just said they were glad the kid had a knife and not a gun and that no one died and were happy to leave the gun control BS alone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Darkside wrote:
OK. I'm not saying it's not more popular. I'm just saying it's not always easier.


But the majority of the time it is easier.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:07 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65801
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
KDdidit wrote:
Darkside wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
It bears out if you keep doing the mental gymnastics to create perfect mass stabbing scenarios. There's a reason in the real world 5x as many people are killed each year by guns than stabbings.

OK. I'm not saying it's not more popular. I'm just saying it's not always easier.
I'm really not sure what the point of this particular tangent is though. Are we saying that if shooting someone is easier then we need to eradicate guns?

You were the first person to bring up gun laws in this thread. Everybody else reasonably just said they were glad the kid had a knife and not a gun and that no one died and were happy to leave the gun control BS alone.

I wasn't the first really. It came from a 2nd amendment comment rpb made.
But I was asking about the tangent of murder being easier with a gun than a knife.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:09 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65801
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
SpiralStairs wrote:
Darkside wrote:
OK. I'm not saying it's not more popular. I'm just saying it's not always easier.


But the majority of the time it is easier.

I guess I don't agree with that but it's really not important. One method of murder being easier than another isn't the problem. The problem is what brings someone to murder and or the massacre of innocents.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:20 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Darkside wrote:
The problem is what brings someone to murder and or the massacre of innocents.


For the love of God and all that is Hawger, I hope we can all agree on this.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Darkside wrote:
The problem is what brings someone to murder and or the massacre of innocents.


I don't think I'm being a pessimist when I say that that's a problem without a solution.

I know I probably come off as an anti-gun nut but I do understand the utility that a gun provides. If someone broke into my house and intended to harm me, I'd sure as shit want a gun to defend myself.

What drives me batty is the number of people who will not tolerate any discussion about guns, especially considering your point above.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Last edited by SpiralStairs on Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:25 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65801
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Seacrest wrote:
Darkside wrote:
The problem is what brings someone to murder and or the massacre of innocents.


For the love of God and all that is Hawger, I hope we can all agree on this.

Christ help us if brick sees this.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:26 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65801
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
SpiralStairs wrote:
Darkside wrote:
The problem is what brings someone to murder and or the massacre of innocents.


I don't think I'm being a pessimist when I say that that's a problem without a solution. I know I probably come off as an anti-gun nut but I do understand the utility that a gun provides. If someone broke into my house and intended to harm me, I'd sure as shit want a gun to defend myself.

What drives me batty is the number of people who will not tolerate any discussion about guns.

Not tolerating discussion is the worst thing that can happen.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
SpiralStairs wrote:
Darkside wrote:
The problem is what brings someone to murder and or the massacre of innocents.


I don't think I'm being a pessimist when I say that that's a problem without a solution.

I agree. There are certainly things we can do better to reduce the number of violent crimes without infringing on the rights of non-violent people, but we're never gonna live in a society void of violence.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Darkside wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Darkside wrote:
The problem is what brings someone to murder and or the massacre of innocents.


I don't think I'm being a pessimist when I say that that's a problem without a solution. I know I probably come off as an anti-gun nut but I do understand the utility that a gun provides. If someone broke into my house and intended to harm me, I'd sure as shit want a gun to defend myself.

What drives me batty is the number of people who will not tolerate any discussion about guns.

Not tolerating discussion is the worst thing that can happen.


You said yourself that there is a very real problem in that there are some people who want to kill other people. As soon as guns are mention in conjunction with the point above people start throwing their hands up in the air and saying, "what's the difference, if people want to kill there's nothing we can do to stop them". And of course that's true, but it's also true that at least a portion of those people would decide not to kill someone if they didn't have a gun.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:41 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65801
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
SpiralStairs wrote:
but it's also true that at least a portion of those people would decide not to kill someone if they didn't have a gun.

I think that's pure speculation. Plenty of people killing each other before the gun was invented.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
SpiralStairs wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Not tolerating discussion is the worst thing that can happen.


You said yourself that there is a very real problem in that there are some people who want to kill other people. As soon as guns are mention in conjunction with the point above people start throwing their hands up in the air and saying, "what's the difference, if people want to kill there's nothing we can do to stop them". And of course that's true, but it's also true that at least a portion of those people would decide not to kill someone if they didn't have a gun.

Of course that's correct, in theory. But in application, it's much more complicated. We've seen cities with the strictest gun control laws still have among the most gun-related deaths. Stricter gun control laws don't mean guns won't find their way into hands they theoretically don't belong, just as prohibition did little to curb drinking in this country. It just made it a much more dangerous activity for all of society. There are a lot of unintended and at times unquantifiable consequences to stricter gun control laws that people who want to simplify the discussion seem unwilling or unable to recognize.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Of course that's correct, in theory. But in application, it's much more complicated. We've seen cities with the strictest gun control laws still have among the most gun-related deaths. Stricter gun control laws don't mean guns won't find their way into hands they theoretically don't belong, just as prohibition did little to curb drinking in this country. It just made it a much more dangerous activity for all of society. There are a lot of unintended and at times unquantifiable consequences to stricter gun control laws that people who want to simplify the discussion seem unwilling or unable to recognize.


Maybe we could focus more on eliminating poverty and increasing awareness of mental health problems and less on pro-gun legislation.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
If anything, what I find most objectionable are NRA folks, whether spokesmen or lobbyists, campaigning against things like stricter background checks. Why wouldn't fair minded individuals agree to something like stricter background checks for weapons? They exploit the debate about rights to ensure more profits, and in doing so I think they're being irresponsible, to be kind. Mind you I don't think stricter background checks would have prevented some of the more recent atrocities, but who knows? It should be harder to purchase a semi automatic gun than it is to get a loan to finance a car purchase, for example. Law abiding, mentally healthy citizens should be able to purchase guns, but gun manufacturers shouldn't be able to sell them to just anyone.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Image

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
veganfan21 wrote:
If anything, what I find most objectionable are NRA folks, whether spokesmen or lobbyists, campaigning against things like stricter background checks. Why wouldn't fair minded individuals agree to something like stricter background checks for weapons? They exploit the debate about rights to ensure more profits, and in doing so I think they're being irresponsible, to be kind. Mind you I don't think stricter background checks would have prevented some of the more recent atrocities, but who knows? It should be harder to purchase a semi automatic gun than it is to get a loan to finance a car purchase, for example. Law abiding, mentally healthy citizens should be able to purchase guns, but gun manufacturers shouldn't be able to sell them to just anyone.


Manufacturers can't sell them to anybody. There are plenty of laws on the books. Would anymore do any good?

Throwing more paperwork at it is hiding your head in the sand.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
SomeGuy wrote:
Throwing more paperwork at it is hiding your head in the sand.


how dare you, sir...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
veganfan21 wrote:
If anything, what I find most objectionable are NRA folks, whether spokesmen or lobbyists, campaigning against things like stricter background checks. Why wouldn't fair minded individuals agree to something like stricter background checks for weapons? They exploit the debate about rights to ensure more profits, and in doing so I think they're being irresponsible, to be kind. Mind you I don't think stricter background checks would have prevented some of the more recent atrocities, but who knows? It should be harder to purchase a semi automatic gun than it is to get a loan to finance a car purchase, for example. Law abiding, mentally healthy citizens should be able to purchase guns, but gun manufacturers shouldn't be able to sell them to just anyone.


Agreed. The NRA is disgusting. They're the ones who stifle any real debate. They don't give a shit about freedom. They care about profits.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:52 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
SomeGuy wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
If anything, what I find most objectionable are NRA folks, whether spokesmen or lobbyists, campaigning against things like stricter background checks. Why wouldn't fair minded individuals agree to something like stricter background checks for weapons? They exploit the debate about rights to ensure more profits, and in doing so I think they're being irresponsible, to be kind. Mind you I don't think stricter background checks would have prevented some of the more recent atrocities, but who knows? It should be harder to purchase a semi automatic gun than it is to get a loan to finance a car purchase, for example. Law abiding, mentally healthy citizens should be able to purchase guns, but gun manufacturers shouldn't be able to sell them to just anyone.


Manufacturers can't sell them to anybody.


Why does Henry Rifles run commercials then?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Seacrest wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
If anything, what I find most objectionable are NRA folks, whether spokesmen or lobbyists, campaigning against things like stricter background checks. Why wouldn't fair minded individuals agree to something like stricter background checks for weapons? They exploit the debate about rights to ensure more profits, and in doing so I think they're being irresponsible, to be kind. Mind you I don't think stricter background checks would have prevented some of the more recent atrocities, but who knows? It should be harder to purchase a semi automatic gun than it is to get a loan to finance a car purchase, for example. Law abiding, mentally healthy citizens should be able to purchase guns, but gun manufacturers shouldn't be able to sell them to just anyone.


Manufacturers can't sell them to anybody.


Why does Henry Rifles run commercials then?


Are you purposely being stupid?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: And Another
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
SomeGuy wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
If anything, what I find most objectionable are NRA folks, whether spokesmen or lobbyists, campaigning against things like stricter background checks. Why wouldn't fair minded individuals agree to something like stricter background checks for weapons? They exploit the debate about rights to ensure more profits, and in doing so I think they're being irresponsible, to be kind. Mind you I don't think stricter background checks would have prevented some of the more recent atrocities, but who knows? It should be harder to purchase a semi automatic gun than it is to get a loan to finance a car purchase, for example. Law abiding, mentally healthy citizens should be able to purchase guns, but gun manufacturers shouldn't be able to sell them to just anyone.


Manufacturers can't sell them to anybody.


Why does Henry Rifles run commercials then?


Are you purposely being stupid?


It lets us know someone didn't steal his password.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 220 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group