It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 10:46 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 463 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 16  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38674
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Its partly tied in to what Samardzijanotgonnaworkhereanymore is going to command in free agency.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:19 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79463
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bucky Chris wrote:
Sometimes I think this is the crux of the issue. Are people just comparing two players past accomplishments for the fun of internet banter? Or determining which deserves more money/years on the free market? I bet clearing that up would better define these arguments.


I think the misconception is that ERA is more of a "pure" indicator of the pitcher's performance. But it is dependent upon many things, e.g. hitter's background, weather conditions, plate umpire, other park factors. Would you like to pitch 16 games at Coors Field and have your ERA compared to the guy who gets to pitch 17 at Chavez Ravine?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Sometimes I think this is the crux of the issue. Are people just comparing two players past accomplishments for the fun of internet banter? Or determining which deserves more money/years on the free market? I bet clearing that up would better define these arguments.


I think the misconception is that ERA is more of a "pure" indicator of the pitcher's performance. But it is dependent upon many things, e.g. hitter's background, weather conditions, plate umpire, other park factors. Would you like to pitch 16 games at Coors Field and have your ERA compared to the guy who gets to pitch 17 at Chavez Ravine?

Would you concede that whether or not a pitcher wins a game has just as many, if not more, variables going into it than how many earned runs he gives up over 9 innings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
If that's true than the 2.76 pitcher and the 3.75 pitcher are pretty much equal.


That's apples and oranges. An offense cannot be judged over the space of a single game.

Neither can a starting pitcher. Not judged well anyway.

You might think Bud Smith was the greatest pitcher of all time if you thought that way.


Or even thirteen games. This White Sox team looks like the '27 Yankees right now and I really doubt they are that. If we're talking about a top pitcher, he should beat the better offense with the lesser pitcher. Or maybe he isn't really a top pitcher. Jose Fernandez is a top pitcher. That's why his team loses 100 games when he doesn't pitch but projects to win 100 when he does.[/quote]
Hernandez would have had 5 more wins if he was on any other team.

Run support matters.

That's why Jon Lester had the same winning pct as Fernandez with an ERA a full run and a half higher


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Sometimes I think this is the crux of the issue. Are people just comparing two players past accomplishments for the fun of internet banter? Or determining which deserves more money/years on the free market? I bet clearing that up would better define these arguments.


I think the misconception is that ERA is more of a "pure" indicator of the pitcher's performance. But it is dependent upon many things, e.g. hitter's background, weather conditions, plate umpire, other park factors. Would you like to pitch 16 games at Coors Field and have your ERA compared to the guy who gets to pitch 17 at Chavez Ravine?

You left out the most important factor. The other team's offense or lackthereof


Would you like to face the 2013 Red Sox every day and be compared to a guy who faced the Marlins?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79463
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

That's apples and oranges. An offense cannot be judged over the space of a single game.

Neither can a starting pitcher. Not judged well anyway.


But I'm not judging a pitcher within the space of a single game. I'm judging him based on multiple season of success or lack thereof, success being measured in terms of his won/loss record. If that doesn't matter, I'm sure I can find a lot of guys a whole lot cheaper than Chris Sale to go 11-14.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:29 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79463
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
lipidquadcab wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Sometimes I think this is the crux of the issue. Are people just comparing two players past accomplishments for the fun of internet banter? Or determining which deserves more money/years on the free market? I bet clearing that up would better define these arguments.


I think the misconception is that ERA is more of a "pure" indicator of the pitcher's performance. But it is dependent upon many things, e.g. hitter's background, weather conditions, plate umpire, other park factors. Would you like to pitch 16 games at Coors Field and have your ERA compared to the guy who gets to pitch 17 at Chavez Ravine?

Would you concede that whether or not a pitcher wins a game has just as many, if not more, variables going into it than how many earned runs he gives up over 9 innings?



There are a lot of variables there, but they should be smoothed out over time unlike the ERA variables of a guy who gets to pitch half his games in a pitcher's paradise like Washington or Oakland over a significant amount of seasons.

You have to pitch the games you're in. The results aren't based on your averages. It's all relative to the situation.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

That's apples and oranges. An offense cannot be judged over the space of a single game.

Neither can a starting pitcher. Not judged well anyway.


But I'm not judging a pitcher within the space of a single game. I'm judging him based on multiple season of success or lack thereof, success being measured in terms of his won/loss record. If that doesn't matter, I'm sure I can find a lot of guys a whole lot cheaper than Chris Sale to go 11-14.

I don't think you can find many pitchers who could go 11-14 with last year's Sox team for what Sale cost the Sox to pitch last season.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

That's apples and oranges. An offense cannot be judged over the space of a single game.

Neither can a starting pitcher. Not judged well anyway.


But I'm not judging a pitcher within the space of a single game. I'm judging him based on multiple season of success or lack thereof, success being measured in terms of his won/loss record. If that doesn't matter, I'm sure I can find a lot of guys a whole lot cheaper than Chris Sale to go 11-14.

In this thread you seem to be applying it to a three game sample

Over a career, Wins is a better stat.


And to answer your question, ERA is better to project future performance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
lipidquadcab wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Sometimes I think this is the crux of the issue. Are people just comparing two players past accomplishments for the fun of internet banter? Or determining which deserves more money/years on the free market? I bet clearing that up would better define these arguments.


I think the misconception is that ERA is more of a "pure" indicator of the pitcher's performance. But it is dependent upon many things, e.g. hitter's background, weather conditions, plate umpire, other park factors. Would you like to pitch 16 games at Coors Field and have your ERA compared to the guy who gets to pitch 17 at Chavez Ravine?

Would you concede that whether or not a pitcher wins a game has just as many, if not more, variables going into it than how many earned runs he gives up over 9 innings?



There are a lot of variables there, but they should be smoothed out over time unlike the ERA variables of a guy who gets to pitch half his games in a pitcher's paradise like Washington or Oakland over a significant amount of seasons.

You have to pitch the games you're in. The results aren't based on your averages. It's all relative to the situation.


(yes I know they do this, I'm just being snarky)

Well then couldn't we use data and find out what the different park's impact on ERA is, so we can compare apples to apples?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
lipidquadcab wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Sometimes I think this is the crux of the issue. Are people just comparing two players past accomplishments for the fun of internet banter? Or determining which deserves more money/years on the free market? I bet clearing that up would better define these arguments.


I think the misconception is that ERA is more of a "pure" indicator of the pitcher's performance. But it is dependent upon many things, e.g. hitter's background, weather conditions, plate umpire, other park factors. Would you like to pitch 16 games at Coors Field and have your ERA compared to the guy who gets to pitch 17 at Chavez Ravine?

Would you concede that whether or not a pitcher wins a game has just as many, if not more, variables going into it than how many earned runs he gives up over 9 innings?



There are a lot of variables there, but they should be smoothed out over time unlike the ERA variables of a guy who gets to pitch half his games in a pitcher's paradise like Washington or Oakland over a significant amount of seasons.

You have to pitch the games you're in. The results aren't based on your averages. It's all relative to the situation.

How about the variable of "my team's offense couldn't get me any run support if their lives depended on it"...does that one smooth itself out over time?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:35 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79463
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
And to answer your question, ERA is better to project future performance



I don't believe that to be necessarily true. For example, I suspect Dan Straily will have a lower ERA this year than many guys I would take going forward. Straily is a good pitcher but pitching in Oakland is a huge advantage.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:43 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Of these, what is better? Retiring all 27 batters in order, or striking out 20 while giving up a hit and a HBP?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Of these, what is better? Retiring all 27 batters in order, or striking out 20 while giving up a hit and a HBP?

Because this thread hadn't already derailed into one tired argument that was beaten to death...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Of these, what is better? Retiring all 27 batters in order, or striking out 20 while giving up a hit and a HBP?

Paying for your goddamn beer, Frank


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Of these, what is better? Retiring all 27 batters in order, or striking out 20 while giving up a hit and a HBP?

Both suck. 0-0 onto the 10th...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:13 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79463
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
lipidquadcab wrote:
How about the variable of "my team's offense couldn't get me any run support if their lives depended on it"...does that one smooth itself out over time?



There's no such thing as "run support". Why are you ignoring the efforts of the opposing pitcher(s)?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
lipidquadcab wrote:
How about the variable of "my team's offense couldn't get me any run support if their lives depended on it"...does that one smooth itself out over time?



There's no such thing as "run support".

Ok, I'm out...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:22 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79463
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
lipidquadcab wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
lipidquadcab wrote:
How about the variable of "my team's offense couldn't get me any run support if their lives depended on it"...does that one smooth itself out over time?



There's no such thing as "run support".

Ok, I'm out...



What is "run support"? Isn't it just the lower ERA of the guy(s) your hero is facing?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Once again.....top 5
Image

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
spanky wrote:
Once again.....top 5
Image

Don't be so passive aggressive about it. Are you saying you know more about baseball than JORR? You needed basically every person on here, including Cub fans, to explain to you that OPS is a better indicator of performance than BA.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
FavreFan wrote:
spanky wrote:
Once again.....top 5
Image

Don't be so passive aggressive about it. Are you saying you know more about baseball than JORR? .

How about you stop being so openly aggressive about everything?
Who said I know more about anything than anybody else?
Who cares?

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
FavreFan wrote:
You needed basically every person on here, including Cub fans, to explain to you that OPS is a better indicator of performance than BA.

Imaginary message boarding

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79463
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
spanky wrote:
Who cares?



spanky coming out strongly in favor of the Socratic method.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I haven't been openly aggressive. And wasn't imagining anything. The Dunn is back thread is real.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
spanky wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
You needed basically every person on here, including Cub fans, to explain to you that OPS is a better indicator of performance than BA.

Imaginary message boarding


I have stopped responding to many of FF's comments as he rephrases issues that then fall into exactly what he thinks, which means first you need to argue with him about the issue at hand, before you even get to what the original point was.

SO FAR, THIS SEASON, FIRST 3 GAMES. JEFF S. HAS BEEN A BETTER PITCHER THAN CHRIS S.

This in no way is a prediction of how good they will be this year, who I would rather have today, who is worth more today or anything else.

Let's add the fact that Samardzija has left each game after the 7th inning for a batter in the 8th,
Sale was removed in the 1st game in the 8th after a good, but not great outing and the most recent game, they took Sale out after the 5th, with 6 H and 3 runs. This game is the worse game of any of the 6 games you can use for both as a sample.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6839
spanky wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
spanky wrote:
Once again.....top 5
Image

Don't be so passive aggressive about it. Are you saying you know more about baseball than JORR? .

How about you stop being so openly aggressive about everything?
Who said I know more about anything than anybody else?
Who cares?

+1


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6839
FavreFan wrote:
I haven't been openly aggressive. And wasn't imagining anything. The Dunn is back thread is real.


All I want to know is if JORR thinks Dunn is back.

4+yrs vs. 1st 2 weeks of the season. Yeah, i'd go with the latter. :lol:


Last edited by Juiced on Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Juiced wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I haven't been openly aggressive. And wasn't imagining anything. The Dunn is back thread is real.


All I want to know is if JORR thinks Dunn is back.

4+yrs vs. 1st 2 weeks of the season. Yeah, i'd go with the ladder. :lol:

The ladder? :scratch:

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6839
Darkside wrote:
Juiced wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I haven't been openly aggressive. And wasn't imagining anything. The Dunn is back thread is real.


All I want to know is if JORR thinks Dunn is back.

4+yrs vs. 1st 2 weeks of the season. Yeah, i'd go with the ladder. :lol:

The ladder? :scratch:


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 463 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 16  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group