It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:45 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 535 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:00 pm 
SomeGuy wrote:
But the tricky part is getting all members to maintain the ~2.0% of GDP for military spending.

Glad to see that you have gotten on board with drastic cuts in US Military spending.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Baby McNown wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
But the tricky part is getting all members to maintain the ~2.0% of GDP for military spending.

Glad to see that you have gotten on board with drastic cuts in US Military spending.


Always been on board, you'd know this if you actually read my posts.

BUT, reduced spending is fine and all, just as long as it's done in the right way, i.e. the DoD actually tries to shield readiness, spare parts, maintenance etc. Plenty of actual fat to be cut...much of it on the civilian side.

In fact, a full DoD audit would be nice, Congress actually said one had to be done but the DoD never did it. Congress never followed up, either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:28 pm 
SomeGuy wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
But the tricky part is getting all members to maintain the ~2.0% of GDP for military spending.

Glad to see that you have gotten on board with drastic cuts in US Military spending.


Always been on board, you'd know this if you actually read my posts.

BUT, reduced spending is fine and all, just as long as it's done in the right way, i.e. the DoD actually tries to shield readiness, spare parts, maintenance etc. Plenty of actual fat to be cut...much of it on the civilian side.

In fact, a full DoD audit would be nice, Congress actually said one had to be done but the DoD never did it. Congress never followed up, either.

You want us to be at 2% GDP? That's half the DoD budget. Nice try there skippy.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65798
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Today's warfare likely won't be fought with brute force numbers. It's going to be small units, precision airstrikes and computer hacking. We might not need to maintain a several hundred thousand strong army.
That being said, one thing Modern Warfare 2 taught me is that when the Russians invade, you MUST DEFEND BURGER TOWN!

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Baby McNown wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
But the tricky part is getting all members to maintain the ~2.0% of GDP for military spending.

Glad to see that you have gotten on board with drastic cuts in US Military spending.


Always been on board, you'd know this if you actually read my posts.

BUT, reduced spending is fine and all, just as long as it's done in the right way, i.e. the DoD actually tries to shield readiness, spare parts, maintenance etc. Plenty of actual fat to be cut...much of it on the civilian side.

In fact, a full DoD audit would be nice, Congress actually said one had to be done but the DoD never did it. Congress never followed up, either.

You want us to be at 2% GDP? That's half the DoD budget. Nice try there skippy.


You're not very smart and your reading comprehension skills aren't very good.

~2% of GDP is the minimum amount of defense spending required by each member nation. I never said that ours should be at 2% if GDP (~300 billion dollars.) Just that it could be lower.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 8:24 pm 
Nice job of adding the word minimum when you realzized you were trapped. Carry on.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 8:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Baby McNown wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Well the Soviet Union kind of did. This is like a piss ant PITA compared to that. The only thing that keeps Russia a player is the UN and the G8 crap. Their economy and trade blows. They have nothing but some oligarchs and a veto (lord knows why still) on the UN security council. Their military equipment and soldiers are a laughingstock.

Sure nukes but no one will use them.

I'm not up on the operation of the UN (except they like to send out military places), is there something preventing the SC from giving Russia the finger and going "you don't get a veto anymore until you knock this shit off"?



I think Darko answered. I do not get the UN at all if us the Chinese and Russians can just veto stuff?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 8:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Darkside wrote:
Today's warfare likely won't be fought with brute force numbers. It's going to be small units, precision airstrikes and computer hacking. We might not need to maintain a several hundred thousand strong army.
That being said, one thing Modern Warfare 2 taught me is that when the Russians invade, you MUST DEFEND BURGER TOWN!



You are right. But I guarantee you one thing that Napoleon and Hitler learned the hard way... If you are going to take on a land war with Russia (or China for that matter) you better have a shit load of people and body bags. Unless you just say fuck these guys and nuke their ass.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 8:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Darkside wrote:
Today's warfare likely won't be fought with brute force numbers. It's going to be small units, precision airstrikes and computer hacking. We might not need to maintain a several hundred thousand strong army.
That being said, one thing Modern Warfare 2 taught me is that when the Russians invade, you MUST DEFEND BURGER TOWN!



You are right. But I guarantee you one thing that Napoleon and Hitler learned the hard way... If you are going to take on a land war with Russia (or China for that matter) you better have a shit load of people and body bags. Unless you just say fuck these guys and nuke their ass.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Baby McNown wrote:
Nice job of adding the word minimum when you realzized you were trapped. Carry on.


:lol:

Trapped? What the hell are you talking about? Even to the most mentally deficient the point of my post was pretty easy to figure out.

I think even the dimmest of bulbs would be able to surmise that:
SomeGuy wrote:
But the tricky part is getting all members to maintain the ~2.0% of GDP for military spending.

Means 2% at minimum, because it wouldn't make much sense for a military alliance to have a maximum limit set on their defense budget. I don't know, maybe I put to much faith in people basic mental abilities. I'm pretty sure that Chas probably understand what I posted, it wasn't all that complicated...maybe for you. But certainly not him.

Either way, you're grasping at straws for....something, I don't know what. Strange you'd have such a reaction to my post.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 10:16 pm 
You quoted yourself saying ~ 2%. Without saying minimum. Minimum only entered in when I pointed out how that post is contrary to your Koch sucking existence on this board.

Have a good day sir.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 6:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Baby McNown wrote:
You quoted yourself saying ~ 2%. Without saying minimum. Minimum only entered in when I pointed out how that post is contrary to your Koch sucking existence on this board.

Have a good day sir.


You're reading an imaginary message board, again. And I'm sure most rational people on this board would disagree with you. I'm not even sure what a "Koch sucking existence..." is. Only that, to rational people with functioning brains, I don't participate in one. I find it fascinating at the lengths you go to lice in your own reality. It's kind of sad.

There is definitely a tinge of mental illness with you, something definitely wrong with you besides your lack of intelligence, of course. That much is obvious.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:10 am 
I'm reading your posts. The one you yourself quoted. Maybe you need glasses.

One of 2 things has to be true. Either your whole persona that you wouldn't support a Dem if they offered you a daily handy from Kate Upton is a bit, or you're just an enormous hypocritical asshole.

Either way go walk in front of a bus.

And get out of the thead. This one has been damn good bad petty void of the shit stirring.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Baby McNown wrote:
I'm reading your posts. The one you yourself quoted. Maybe you need glasses.

One of 2 things has to be true. Either your whole persona that you wouldn't support a Dem if they offered you a daily handy from Kate Upton is a bit, or you're just an enormous hypocritical asshole.

Either way go walk in front of a bus.

And get out of the thead. This one has been damn good bad petty void of the shit stirring.


All you've stated isn't true and remain unsupported assertions. No relevent, contextual proof has ever been provided nor has anyone ever agreed with you or even brought the same charges against me. Yet you keep making them about me. And most normal, intelligent people would have asked for a clarification or had the smarts to comprehend what was posted as it was a simple statement. Instead you went straight to name calling and lying about character.

No you wish death on me?

Definitely some deeper issues with you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:21 pm 
Then correct me oh wise one. Show me where you said minimum in your initial post.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Baby McNown wrote:
Then correct me oh wise one Show me where you said minimum in your initial post.


It was implied. No one else had trouble with it. Why are you having an issue? In an effort to disparage and insult you have only succeeded in making your self look like an idiot.

And, of course there's the fact that I know what I'm talking about.



Again, this points to deeper issues that you obviously have.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
I actually took SomeGuy's statement to mean he was talking about the other countries in NATO being able to acquiesce


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:54 pm 
So we have to read your mind. Thanks for admitting you never said it.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
I question the authenticity of the story (that is, not enough 'facts' known at this point) in part because I guess I don't want to believe such a thing could actually be true, but it is curently the lead on Google News at the moment .... though I can't really find it anywhere else from a 'decent' news source (usa today barely qualifies) ......

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/04/17/jews-ordered-to-register-in-east-ukraine/7816951/

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Don Tiny wrote:
I question the authenticity of the story (that is, not enough 'facts' known at this point) in part because I guess I don't want to believe such a thing could actually be true, but it is curently the lead on Google News at the moment .... though I can't really find it anywhere else from a 'decent' news source (usa today barely qualifies) ......

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/04/17/jews-ordered-to-register-in-east-ukraine/7816951/


I'm sure Chas will be by later to tell us what's REALLY happening.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:26 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
SomeGuy wrote:
Now you wish death on me?


First I threaten to run his kids over with a car and now Baby wants to drive over him in a bus. Tough spring for SomeGuy.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Now you wish death on me?


First I threaten to run his kids over with a car and now Baby wants to drive over him in a bus. Tough spring for SomeGuy.


Toss in a bad White Sox bullpen and I'm looking at drinking bleach by the end of the day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Don Tiny wrote:
I question the authenticity of the story (that is, not enough 'facts' known at this point) in part because I guess I don't want to believe such a thing could actually be true, but it is curently the lead on Google News at the moment .... though I can't really find it anywhere else from a 'decent' news source (usa today barely qualifies) ......

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/04/17/jews-ordered-to-register-in-east-ukraine/7816951/


Lets hope this is an isolated thing and not really part of a greater 'movement'. If this is real, Israel is gonna lose their shit and things are gonna get ugly.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 5:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37845
Location: ...
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16490
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Russia/Gazprom has shut off the supply of natural gas to Ukraine after Ukraine refused to pay an 80% price increase. Ukraine had been getting a lower price in exchange for letting Russia use Crimea for its Black Sea Fleet...Russia says that since Crimea now belongs to them, the discount no longer applies. Nice!

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 535 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group