It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:31 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2626
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
I've never started a show thread, but this seems like an obvious topic of the day.

https://twitter.com/dan_bernstein/statu ... 2512791553

Quote:
Source: #Cubs hardball move due largely to one roofie who is "Too dumb to understand any negotiation. He's just a total a--hole."


I figure that source is someone who knows.how.to.close.deals.. Ricketts himself would close this if the other side just was smart enough to negotiate. Probably an uneducated oaf like Reggie Rose.

Anyway, it doesn't matter who co-hosts, and I won't listen unless the podcast feed has an interesting guest. Or you guys do recon and say it's an actually interesting show. Most of the time B&B is boring as fuck nowadays.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Is there any doubt that Dan has become a Cubs mouthpiece on this issue?

I mean, just about any knowledgeable sports person would realize the rooftop owners at least have a case here to say "We have a contract that gives us certain rights". Imagine if the Bulls went to Derrick Rose and told them they were changing the terms of his deal because they were no longer in their best interests.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
incidentally, i think the band "ricketts on roofies" is playing the empty bottle tomorrow night.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
sinicalypse wrote:
incidentally, i think the band "ricketts on roofies" is playing the empty bottle tomorrow night.


Don Tiny: sini! How you doin'?
sini: Hey, Don Tiny! Who's playing today?
Don Tiny: Ricketts on Roofies and the Shitty Beatles.
sini: Shitty Beatles? Are they any good?
Don Tiny: They suck.
sini: Then it's not just a clever name.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2626
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Imagine if the Bulls went to Derrick Rose and told them they were changing the terms of his deal because they were no longer in their best interests.


Dan would probably be all for that, too. He's been bemoaning the 'Rose rule' being some cap-crippling apparatus (that impedes super-smart-guy Gar Forman from championship aspirations) when it really just added a few million per season, and the real issue with Rose's contract isn't the amount, it's that he can't play. Which renders his deal a problem if he was making $5-7m less too.

And the only reason the rule was enacted was that Rose was putting up MVP production on a rookie-scale contract, which is a gift more than a curse. I wonder more how Dan would react if Reggie Rose demanded a raise after Derrick's first 2 seasons.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Hinsdale
pizza_Place: Lugi's of Hong Kong
Image

Ignore the special needs owner in the background.........here's the asshole.

_________________
Kenny Williams fell for the banana in the tailpipe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Hinsdale
pizza_Place: Lugi's of Hong Kong
6.6 The Cubs shall not erect windscreens or other barriers to obstruct the views of the Rooftops, provided however that temporary items such as banners, flags and decorations for special occasions, shall not be considered as having been erected to obstruct views of the Rooftops. Any expansion of Wrigley Field approved by governmental authorities shall not be a violation of this agreement, including this section.

_________________
Kenny Williams fell for the banana in the tailpipe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Is there any doubt that Dan has become a Cubs mouthpiece on this issue?


No.

That said, not everything he says in that pseudo-capacity is consequently inaccurate, wrong, or otherwise ill-informed, though I can see why some others might presume everything in that light .... I don't doubt that he could be unbearably annoying even while revealing the cure to cancer.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:01 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
8675309 wrote:
6.6 The Cubs shall not erect windscreens or other barriers to obstruct the views of the Rooftops, provided however that temporary items such as banners, flags and decorations for special occasions, shall not be considered as having been erected to obstruct views of the Rooftops. Any expansion of Wrigley Field approved by governmental authorities shall not be a violation of this agreement, including this section.


Do you have a link to the Contract?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
8675309 wrote:
6.6 The Cubs shall not erect windscreens or other barriers to obstruct the views of the Rooftops, provided however that temporary items such as banners, flags and decorations for special occasions, shall not be considered as having been erected to obstruct views of the Rooftops. Any expansion of Wrigley Field approved by governmental authorities shall not be a violation of this agreement, including this section.
Ok. That is easy then.

Start building things the day after the season ends!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Hinsdale
pizza_Place: Lugi's of Hong Kong
I get people find joy in the insane process because they have their own agenda - Sox fan - Don't trust Ricketts just because - Hate the evil rich white guy - dads polotics - sisters gay - hate change - Soldier field retro was a disaster...................forget all those and look at the facts.
Seems like a can't lose court case but I think Ricketts has been afraid that once he committed the resources (scheduled work) the rooftops would use their leverage of having a judge put a hold on things mid-project. Then what does Ricketts say? He'd have no leverage with them or the city about the even 5% chance they move.

Sorry I have issues posting links from my cell.
Just Google David Kaplan rooftop contract. He got it from a Cubs guy and confirmed with a former rooftop owner.

_________________
Kenny Williams fell for the banana in the tailpipe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Does a Jumbotron constitute an expansion of Wrigley Field?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
8675309 wrote:
6.6 The Cubs shall not erect windscreens or other barriers to obstruct the views of the Rooftops, provided however that temporary items such as banners, flags and decorations for special occasions, shall not be considered as having been erected to obstruct views of the Rooftops. Any expansion of Wrigley Field approved by governmental authorities shall not be a violation of this agreement, including this section.


That language is about as clear as mud.

Several hundred thousand dollars in attorney's fees will be spent on such scintillating topics as the definition of expansion.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
8675309 wrote:
I get people find joy in the insane process because they have their own agenda - Sox fan - Don't trust Ricketts just because - Hate the evil rich white guy - dads polotics - sisters gay - hate change - Soldier field retro was a disaster...................forget all those and look at the facts.
Seems like a can't lose court case but I think Ricketts has been afraid that once he committed the resources (scheduled work) the rooftops would use their leverage of having a judge put a hold on things mid-project. Then what does Ricketts say? He'd have no leverage with them or the city about the even 5% chance they move.
The problem with your theory is that if you are correct that the contract is iron clad then there is no way the process gets put on hold. Judges aren't just flipping coins to make decisions.

For whatever reason, the Cubs feel that agreements with the rooftop owners are vital to even starting the project. If they are worried the courts may halt it during the process then they believe the rooftop owners have a case.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Hatchetman wrote:
Does a Jumbotron constitute an expansion of Wrigley Field?


exactly

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Hinsdale
pizza_Place: Lugi's of Hong Kong
Bleachers will be expanded and seating capacity will stay the same because some standing room only seats will be lost during expansion - NEXT

_________________
Kenny Williams fell for the banana in the tailpipe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:40 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
8675309 wrote:
Bleachers will be expanded and seating capacity will stay the same because some standing room only seats will be lost during expansion - NEXT


Now we will have lawyers arguing over what a "standing room only seat" is.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
8675309 wrote:
Bleachers will be expanded and seating capacity will stay the same because some standing room only seats will be lost during expansion - NEXT
Answer the simple question then.

If the answers are this easy, then what is the point of any of this?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:42 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
But I do think you may have hit on something. The new plan may be at least partially designed to remove some of the ambiguity over whether this is actually an "expansion".

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
But I do think you may have hit on something. The new plan may be at least partially designed to remove some of the ambiguity over whether this is actually an "expansion".


There is an expansion in terms of the contract. If the seating went up another 50 feet in height, I don't think there is any doubt this contract covers the circumstance.

Signage does not fit within that contemplated expansion.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Hinsdale
pizza_Place: Lugi's of Hong Kong
I'm done....for now but agree or disagree on who's to blame it's really sad that stuff like this and the Soldier Field eyesore have to be so complicated.
Toss in the ~no taxpayer money thing and the insane amusements taxes and I don't see why anyone would want to stay in the city limits going forward.

_________________
Kenny Williams fell for the banana in the tailpipe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
8675309 wrote:
I'm done....for now but agree or disagree on who's to blame it's really sad that stuff like this and the Soldier Field eyesore have to be so complicated.
Toss in the ~no taxpayer money thing and the insane amusements taxes and I don't see why anyone would want to stay in the city limits going forward.


take a look at your local access cable one night and you will see the micro version of this in every suburb just about every month

It's like when Chris Christie used to bitch about Chicago style politics in the White House, just before several NJ town were raided by the feds for corruption and he shut down a bridge for a political vendetta

Everyone says "not me". They lie

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16486
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
8675309 wrote:
Toss in the ~no taxpayer money thing


I like how Ricketts states in the video that the Cubs "didn't want" taxpayer money. More like "couldn't get."

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
So I gotta believe that Papa Joe told Tommy Boy to sack up & start getting things done, right?

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
look, the rooftop owners are the bad guy. But to state that it's not Big guy versus Little guy is disingenuous. The Cubs can be content to choke the owners out through the court system without ever deciding whether the contract is valid or not...

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Matty is doing a pretty good job of countermanding Dan today.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
City of Fools wrote:
look, the rooftop owners are the bad guy.


Really? Because Beth Murphy hasn't subjected me to four years of shitty baseball.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:50 am
Posts: 11242
Location: Schaumburg
pizza_Place: Palermo's
Jerry Reinsdorf would have...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 2:12 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Tad Queasy wrote:
Jerry Reinsdorf would have...


Really. Smart. Owner.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Jerry Reinsdorf would have what.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group