It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:45 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 111 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55851
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Literally every Cubs fan thinks like this.

I beg your pardon?

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
denisdman wrote:
I get it, you guys don't like the plan or its execution. It certainly seems behind schedule. I am on board with it because I believe it will result in a Braves-like dynasty. Independent baseball experts all rate the Cubs system highly. Whether that turns into HOFer's, All Stars, or even quality everyday players, well that is the gamble with building through the draft and trades for prospects. You have to admit they seemed to have picked the right guys in round 1 of the last two drafts. Also, paying below slot was a smart move to get quality picks later on that others didn't have the bonus money to sign. They seem like they know what they're doing. They told us about this plan upfront.

My main point to Kirkwood is that the Cubs fans on this board will be the first in line when they start winning. I have patience because I didn't like the Hendry model. We had a lot of guys that I found difficult to cheer for. I love the Blackhawks model where there are a lot of "our guys". Given a choice, I love winning with our own draft picks and youngsters.

Take out the silly Braves dynasty expectation and Id be mostly in agreement with your first paragraph.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Hatchetman wrote:
sox had the #1 ranked minor league system in the early 90s if I recall. they got like one division title or something out of it. BFD. Nobody cares.

People care because REALLY. SMART. PEOPLE. are ranking the systems now. THEY'RE USING MATH!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Hey,wait..Didn't I start this thread about 19 different times already?

The one thing I would say to dennisdman is under Hendry,I seem to remember the Cubs
having success every year at the minor league level. I don't know where you look it up
for that stat,but it seemed like every season they would have a few teams finishing 1st
in their leagues.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Curious Hair wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Literally every Cubs fan thinks like this.

I beg your pardon?
It was a joke, but the Braves dynasty stuff will be bumped by jealous Sox fans like me.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 3:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
I do think the Cubs could have chased a wildcard spot this year with some real OF's, but they chose to have seaosn long tryouts.

I dont exepct this same crap next year.

At best, Junior Lake is my 4th OF of this group. or Even Ruggiano, is my 5th....

Melky- No reason a 3-4 year deal cant be on the table.

Also, a number of good OF's will be looking for 1 and 2 year deals. Guys who are 33...like Nelson Cruz,,,and if you arent going to bring up kids, then make sure it is no longer Open tryouts!

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I have patience because I didn't like the Hendry model.


What didn't you like about it? The winning?


Which playoff sweep are you referencing here?

I must have missed the parade.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Peoria Matt wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I have patience because I didn't like the Hendry model.


What didn't you like about it? The winning?


Which playoff sweep are you referencing here?

I must have missed the parade.


In a vacuum, I'll take the on field results of 03-08 over 09-14 any day.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
If things like the Milton Bradley signing and overpaying Soriano by a wide margin are your idea of a better plan, then you should cheer for the Dodgers. It is clear what Theo & Co are trying to do. They first had to clean-up the Tribune mess from a crumbling stadium to a bloated payroll and empty farm system. I commend them for what they have accomplished so far. I see the light at the end of the tunnel. Sorry for those that don't.

I wish they were winning like those Hendry teams, but I want something built to last. And lest anyone forgets, Hendry didn't bring us a World Series victory.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 7:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
denisdman wrote:
If things like the Milton Bradley signing and overpaying Soriano by a wide margin are your idea of a better plan, then you should cheer for the Dodgers. It is clear what Theo & Co are trying to do. They first had to clean-up the Tribune mess from a crumbling stadium to a bloated payroll and empty farm system. I commend them for what they have accomplished so far. I see the light at the end of the tunnel. Sorry for those that don't.

The Cubs are assuming a historic hit rate on these prospects to exit the tunnel. Do you think Ricketts is willing to open the wallet when one busts and there is a hole? Or will we have to wait 5 years for a prospect to develop and plug in?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55851
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Kirkwood wrote:
The Cubs are assuming a historic hit rate on these prospects to exit the tunnel.


Yeah, really. We talk about how the Blackhawks admirably built from within, and they sure did, but man, did they have a lot of whiffs in the draft. Barker and Skille are the big two, and Kyle Beach the biggest of all, but then in the lower rounds you had tons of guys who didn't come close to panning out, because that's what prospects do. Fortunately, Dale Tallon got to steppin' and started trading and signing for quality players, something the Cubs haven't been in any hurry to do and don't seem to be in any hurry to do because they don't have any money and will continue to not have any money as they fail to sign away their TV rights and broker time on channel 32.2.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:02 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
denisdman wrote:
If things like the Milton Bradley signing and overpaying Soriano by a wide margin are your idea of a better plan, then you should cheer for the Dodgers.


I assume you root for the Cubs as an accident of birth rather than because of the silly thought that any "Cubs Way" might be superior to whatever the Dodgers do.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
If things like the Milton Bradley signing and overpaying Soriano by a wide margin are your idea of a better plan, then you should cheer for the Dodgers.


I assume you root for the Cubs as an accident of birth rather than because of the silly thought that any "Cubs Way" might be superior to whatever the Dodgers do.



Yes, my entire family grew up Cubs fans, and while it is a sad existence, I am infinitely loyal to my teams. We've have seen numerous franchises try to spend their way to perpetual success. The Mets are the best example of whiffing on it. The Yankees and Red Sox have been the best at it. The Dodgers and Blue Jays look silly so far but may yet come up with victories. I found it ironic that the free spending Red Sox actually dumped their high priced talent to the Dodgers, and then go onto win the World Series.

The Cubs can have the best of both worlds. First build a strong nucleus of young talent. They are doing that. Unlike the Twins or A's, they will have the dollars to keep that talent. As examples, they already made the smart moves to lock-up Rizzo and Castro through their early free agent years. They'll do the same with Bryant and the others. Then you fill a few needs with high priced free agents. This is in contrast to trying to buy an entire team like Hendry did. You tend to overpay, and you also end up with a lot of older guys. You have no assets to trade. The Cubs have plenty of money, assets, and young talent.

I understand why the win now strategy is appealing. I just prefer the Plan, and I think it will work in the long run. It doesn't happen overnight.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
denisdman wrote:
They'll do the same with Bryant and the others.

This assumes they pan out! And how can we ever know if they deserve a contract if fucking cheapwad Ricketts keeps them in AAA b/c God forbid they hit free agency in 2021 instead of 2022.

Quote:
Then you fill a few needs with high priced free agents. This is in contrast to trying to buy an entire team like Hendry did. You tend to overpay, and you also end up with a lot of older guys. You have no assets to trade. The Cubs have plenty of money, assets, and young talent.

How can the Cubs have money if Ricketts is crying poor? His big TV deal is to put the Cubs on public access channel!


We're so fucked.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:27 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Kirkwood wrote:
denisdman wrote:
They'll do the same with Bryant and the others.

This assumes they pan out! And how can we ever know if they deserve a contract if fucking cheapwad Ricketts keeps them in AAA b/c God forbid they hit free agency in 2021 instead of 2022.

Quote:
Then you fill a few needs with high priced free agents. This is in contrast to trying to buy an entire team like Hendry did. You tend to overpay, and you also end up with a lot of older guys. You have no assets to trade. The Cubs have plenty of money, assets, and young talent.

How can the Cubs have money if Ricketts is crying poor? His big TV deal is to put the Cubs on public access channel!


We're so fucked.


Kirkwood, why do you get so angry when Sox fans point out exactly the same stuff you're saying now? Just because they're Sox fans?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
denisdman wrote:
Then you fill a few needs with high priced free agents.

There has been absolutely nothing to indicate this will happen

And you're wrong about the Hendry years. Look into it a little more. The Cubs had a great minor league system in the early 2000s and turned three of them into Aramis Ramirez, Kenny Lofton, and Derrek Lee. I hope Theo is that good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
denisdman wrote:
They'll do the same with Bryant and the others.

This assumes they pan out! And how can we ever know if they deserve a contract if fucking cheapwad Ricketts keeps them in AAA b/c God forbid they hit free agency in 2021 instead of 2022.

Quote:
Then you fill a few needs with high priced free agents. This is in contrast to trying to buy an entire team like Hendry did. You tend to overpay, and you also end up with a lot of older guys. You have no assets to trade. The Cubs have plenty of money, assets, and young talent.

How can the Cubs have money if Ricketts is crying poor? His big TV deal is to put the Cubs on public access channel!


We're so fucked.


Kirkwood, why do you get so angry when Sox fans point out exactly the same stuff you're saying now? Just because they're Sox fans?

Ill answer that as if it were addressed at me

A Sox fan would start that post by saying "You guys all think every prospect is going to the hall of fame and that Theo walks on water, well guess what buddy....Im smart, because Im a Sox fan, and here's the real deal....."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
rogers park bryan wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Then you fill a few needs with high priced free agents.

There has been absolutely nothing to indicate this will happen

And you're wrong about the Hendry years. Look into it a little more. The Cubs had a great minor league system in the early 2000s and turned three of them into Aramis Ramirez, Kenny Lofton, and Derrek Lee. I hope Theo is that good.


Lofton was a very short term fix. The ARam and DLee trades were awesome. They got those guys because little sisters of the poor couldn't sign them to long term deals. I believe Hee Sop Choi was in the DLee trade. Not exactly stellar talent.

I have no recollection of a great minor league system in the early 2000's. Pie, Murton, Patterson, and a bunch of 3rd basemen I can hardly recall??

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Just to get back to the thread title, the major flaws are:

1) They changed the rules (he can't control that)

2) And Ricketts finances got screwed up (he can't control that)


So with those two seriously obvious pieces of information, we can safely assume the plan is no longer the plan. The plan has changed and adapted mightily from day 1. It's a whole new plan, that is being constrained by Ricketts not being able to spend money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
denisdman wrote:
They'll do the same with Bryant and the others.

This assumes they pan out! And how can we ever know if they deserve a contract if fucking cheapwad Ricketts keeps them in AAA b/c God forbid they hit free agency in 2021 instead of 2022.

Quote:
Then you fill a few needs with high priced free agents. This is in contrast to trying to buy an entire team like Hendry did. You tend to overpay, and you also end up with a lot of older guys. You have no assets to trade. The Cubs have plenty of money, assets, and young talent.

How can the Cubs have money if Ricketts is crying poor? His big TV deal is to put the Cubs on public access channel!


We're so fucked.


Kirkwood, why do you get so angry when Sox fans point out exactly the same stuff you're saying now? Just because they're Sox fans?

Well the past 3 months have really soured on me. I always thought Ricketts was a clueless spaz. But Crane Kenney got extended. The stadium deal still isn't fucking done. Baez and Almora kind of suck. Edward is injured. Management has been dangling the TV deal as a carrot for fans to spend money. Aaaaaaaand their big TV reveal is a public access channel.

Been a pretty shitty 2014 for a Cubs fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Most prospects will not achieve the hype. That is why you need so many assets, so that just a few pan out. They have an amazing collection of assets. It will get bigger when Shark and Hammel are traded. By the end of next year's draft, the Cubs should have the #1 farm system. I think they are 2nd-4th depending on who is rating them. It guarantees nothing, but it is better than being 30th.

Bryant's 27 home runs are looking pretty solid right now.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:37 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79466
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bucky Chris wrote:
Just to get back to the thread title, the major flaws are:

1) They changed the rules (he can't control that)

2) And Ricketts finances got screwed up (he can't control that)


So with those two seriously obvious pieces of information, we can safely assume the plan is no longer the plan. The plan has changed and adapted mightily from day 1. It's a whole new plan, that is being constrained by Ricketts not being able to spend money.


PLAN!

Image

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
denisdman wrote:
[ I found it ironic that the free spending Red Sox actually dumped their high priced talent to the Dodgers, and then go onto win the World Series..


I find it ironic that the Red Sox dumped Theo for signing all that high priced talent and then went on to win a world series after he left.

Each organization that lost a current member of the Cubs front office has been better for the departure. I bet Ameritrade is up like 200% since Tom Ricketts left.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Just to get back to the thread title, the major flaws are:

1) They changed the rules (he can't control that)

2) And Ricketts finances got screwed up (he can't control that)


So with those two seriously obvious pieces of information, we can safely assume the plan is no longer the plan. The plan has changed and adapted mightily from day 1. It's a whole new plan, that is being constrained by Ricketts not being able to spend money.


PLAN!

Image


You're actually right. I think "the plan" no longer exists. It's probably safe to stop using it. Now they are just going about their business like any other GM/front office would.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Bucky Chris wrote:
Just to get back to the thread title, the major flaws are:

1) They changed the rules (he can't control that)

2) And Ricketts finances got screwed up (he can't control that)


So with those two seriously obvious pieces of information, we can safely assume the plan is no longer the plan. The plan has changed and adapted mightily from day 1. It's a whole new plan, that is being constrained by Ricketts not being able to spend money.


The thing is though #1 was highly foreseeable and was instituted almost immediately upon him taking the job. We have to assume Theo knew. I am of the belief that he also knew of #2 and took the job knowing he would be the high paid flak for Ricketts for the first five years.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
They're playing the new slot game perfectly. They signed a bunch of foreign talent before the rules changed, and now they are drafting high for below slot money and using it on guys in later rounds that require above slot money.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
denisdman wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Then you fill a few needs with high priced free agents.

There has been absolutely nothing to indicate this will happen

And you're wrong about the Hendry years. Look into it a little more. The Cubs had a great minor league system in the early 2000s and turned three of them into Aramis Ramirez, Kenny Lofton, and Derrek Lee. I hope Theo is that good.


Lofton was a very short term fix. The ARam and DLee trades were awesome. They got those guys because little sisters of the poor couldn't sign them to long term deals. I believe Hee Sop Choi was in the DLee trade. Not exactly stellar talent.

I have no recollection of a great minor league system in the early 2000's. Pie, Murton, Patterson, and a bunch of 3rd basemen I can hardly recall??

D Lee wasnt stellar? He used the minor league system to acquire guys who would go on to be multiple time all stars

It wasnt JUST because the Pirates and Marlins were poor. Any team could have traded with them. Hendry had the assets to make it happen and he did.

Bobby Hill became Aramis Ramirez
Hee Seop Choi became D Lee

Thats about 6 all star appearances in 5 years after starting with two "prospects"
Then there is Zambrano and Prior. That's 4 more all star appearances
Oh and Patterson who contributed and made the All star team in 03


So that's 5 guys who were all acquired between 97-00 and they turned it into a combined 11 all star appearances and got them closer to the World Series than theyve been in decades


So tell me again how bad the system was


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Kirkwood wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
denisdman wrote:
They'll do the same with Bryant and the others.

This assumes they pan out! And how can we ever know if they deserve a contract if fucking cheapwad Ricketts keeps them in AAA b/c God forbid they hit free agency in 2021 instead of 2022.

Quote:
Then you fill a few needs with high priced free agents. This is in contrast to trying to buy an entire team like Hendry did. You tend to overpay, and you also end up with a lot of older guys. You have no assets to trade. The Cubs have plenty of money, assets, and young talent.

How can the Cubs have money if Ricketts is crying poor? His big TV deal is to put the Cubs on public access channel!


We're so fucked.


Kirkwood, why do you get so angry when Sox fans point out exactly the same stuff you're saying now? Just because they're Sox fans?

Well the past 3 months have really soured on me. I always thought Ricketts was a clueless spaz. But Crane Kenney got extended. The stadium deal still isn't fucking done. Baez and Almora kind of suck. Edward is injured. Management has been dangling the TV deal as a carrot for fans to spend money. Aaaaaaaand their big TV reveal is a public access channel.

Been a pretty shitty 2014 for a Cubs fan.


Stop this. You are just trying to put up an anti troll blocker.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
good dolphin wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Just to get back to the thread title, the major flaws are:

1) They changed the rules (he can't control that)

2) And Ricketts finances got screwed up (he can't control that)


So with those two seriously obvious pieces of information, we can safely assume the plan is no longer the plan. The plan has changed and adapted mightily from day 1. It's a whole new plan, that is being constrained by Ricketts not being able to spend money.


The thing is though #1 was highly foreseeable and was instituted almost immediately upon him taking the job. We have to assume Theo knew. I am of the belief that he also knew of #2 and took the job knowing he would be the high paid flak for Ricketts for the first five years.


In regards to #2, I wish I could remember exactly what he said, but when he was on the Score a week or so ago, be basically admitted he didn't know... but that they have known for awhile now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
rogers park bryan wrote:
D Lee wasnt stellar? He used the minor league system to acquire guys who would go on to be multiple time all stars

It wasnt JUST because the Pirates and Marlins were poor. Any team could have traded with them. Hendry had the assets to make it happen and he did.

Bobby Hill became Aramis Ramirez
Hee Seop Choi became D Lee

Thats about 6 all star appearances in 5 years after starting with two "prospects"
Then there is Zambrano and Prior. That's 4 more all star appearances
Oh and Patterson who contributed and made the All star team in 03


So that's 5 guys who were all acquired between 97-00 and they turned it into a combined 11 all star appearances and got them closer to the World Series than theyve been in decades


So tell me again how bad the system was


Huh? You're saying their system was stellar by using Bobby Hill and Choi as examples? Of course D Lee and A Ram were awesome. I said those were great trades. You're the one that said Hendry had a good farm system in the early 2000's. I am trying to figure out one position player that was good from that era. Not guys from other teams, as I know we acquired some great players.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 111 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group