Frank Coztansa wrote:
The paragraph stated that to you, one WS title would be failure. The Cubs haven't won a title since 1908, and haven't played in a WS game since 1945. And you want Theo to come in and start winning them left and right? Asinine. Idiotic. Moronic. Sure all teams fans want them to win all the time. Cubs fans especially should start with ONE and then see what happens.
Saying shit like that you come off an arrogant little shit. If you aren't trolling (which is exactly what Juiced does) it can only be that.
How can one be arrogant about demanding their sports team win? But call it you will, I don't care.
Again...who gives a shit about what the Cubs did in 1908 or 1945 or 1969 or 1984 or during any of their many terrible seasons? For me, baseball started existing when I became a fan. And so far it has been about 20 years. I'm not holding anything about the 1969 Cubs against Theo, or Ricketts. How does Cubs history affect them at all? The past should stay dead.
I care about the current organization, and that organization has done nothing but improve since Theo has become President. And based on the method of his rebuild...I expect the goal to be worth it. So yes...if you're going to sacrifice 5-6 consecutive seasons...you bet your ass I'm looking for a powerhouse team for years to come. Not one World Series...Theo's job isn't to satisfy older Cubs fans by doing everything he can to win just one World Series. His job is to build a strong organization that competes yearly...and with that he is trying to accomplish multiple World Series within a period of time.
Some guys don't mind settling. I have no reason to be completely elated with only one World Series and then a decade of subpar performance. It hasn't been 106 years for me.