It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:27 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3602 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 ... 121  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
America wrote:

Quote:
Quintana has been one of ten best qualified pitchers in the American League during his first two full seasons in the majors. That’s pretty good. This season, he has stepped up his game. He is striking out more batters, and allowing fewer home runs. He is generating more ground balls and permitting fewer fly balls.

Is that too NUMBERY for ya?


"Best" at what? All those ancillary numbers are nice, but you actually have to compete in the games you're playing in. There is an object to the game. And no matter how many websites you find to tell you otherwise, it isn't simply preventing walks and homers.

You're one of those guys. Reads websites and reguritates.

Explain to me how the Sox offense not putting up 10 runs in the 1st is Jose Quintana's fault.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Geez Eaton. Yikes


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 1553
Location: Long Grove,IL
pizza_Place: Thin crust cheese extra cheese ....Pizza DOC
96 pitchers in all of MLB have pitched enough at this point to qualify for the leader boards in IP

Of those 96 going into tonight Quintana ranked 70th in run support at 3.70. That would mean 73% of the time the opposing pitcher got better run support than Jose.

Jose ranks 36th in WAR at 2.8
He is also 36th in ERA
IN WINS he is tied for 87th
His WHIP is 57th

With better run support he would easily have more WINS

Get with Brian Kenny #KillTheWin

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I don't waste my time with the Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
THE INQUISITOR wrote:
96 pitchers in all of MLB have pitched enough at this point to qualify for the leader boards in IP

Of those 96 going into tonight Quintana ranked 70th in run support at 3.70. That would mean 73% of the time the opposing pitcher got better run support than Jose.

Jose ranks 36th in WAR at 2.8
He is also 36th in ERA
IN WINS he is tied for 87th
His WHIP is 57th

With better run support he would easily have more WINS

Get with Brian Kenny #KillTheWin


He pitches for the 12th best offense in baseball. Pretty much in the middle. Are you suggesting he's just a really unlucky guy? because if that's the case, I don't want him on my team. The fact is, if you look at Quintana's ERA it should be obvious to you that the pitchers he faces aren't getting much "run support" either, right? Why is it so fashionable to ignore game context as if it's absolutely meaningless?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 1553
Location: Long Grove,IL
pizza_Place: Thin crust cheese extra cheese ....Pizza DOC
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
THE INQUISITOR wrote:
96 pitchers in all of MLB have pitched enough at this point to qualify for the leader boards in IP

Of those 96 going into tonight Quintana ranked 70th in run support at 3.70. That would mean 73% of the time the opposing pitcher got better run support than Jose.

Jose ranks 36th in WAR at 2.8
He is also 36th in ERA
IN WINS he is tied for 87th
His WHIP is 57th

With better run support he would easily have more WINS

Get with Brian Kenny #KillTheWin


He pitches for the 12th best offense in baseball. Pretty much in the middle. Are you suggesting he's just a really unlucky guy? because if that's the case, I don't want him on my team. The fact is, if you look at Quintana's ERA it should be obvious to you that the pitchers he faces aren't getting much "run support" either, right? Why is it so fashionable to ignore game context as if it's absolutely meaningless?



The 12th best offense averages 4.22 Runs per game.
When Jose pitches he gets 3.70 runs

So YES he has been unlucky.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I don't waste my time with the Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:54 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
THE INQUISITOR wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
THE INQUISITOR wrote:
96 pitchers in all of MLB have pitched enough at this point to qualify for the leader boards in IP

Of those 96 going into tonight Quintana ranked 70th in run support at 3.70. That would mean 73% of the time the opposing pitcher got better run support than Jose.

Jose ranks 36th in WAR at 2.8
He is also 36th in ERA
IN WINS he is tied for 87th
His WHIP is 57th

With better run support he would easily have more WINS

Get with Brian Kenny #KillTheWin


He pitches for the 12th best offense in baseball. Pretty much in the middle. Are you suggesting he's just a really unlucky guy? because if that's the case, I don't want him on my team. The fact is, if you look at Quintana's ERA it should be obvious to you that the pitchers he faces aren't getting much "run support" either, right? Why is it so fashionable to ignore game context as if it's absolutely meaningless?



The 12th best offense averages 4.22 Runs per game.
When Jose pitches he gets 3.70 runs

So YES he has been unlucky.


But he was "unlucky" last year too, right? It's probably not good to have a guy so unlucky if you really believe that.

Tonight he got plenty of "run support", no? You must have been absolutely shocked when that 12th ranked offense put him in the lead and then he came back out and gave it right back up. I wasn't. That's who he is.

Look, I'm not saying he's a terrible pitcher. He just isn't a guy you use as a major building block for your rotation. if he's your second best guy, you've got problems. If you have a real high-powered offense, maybe you can live with him as your third best guy. Personally, I like him on the back end of a rotation.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
He's the #2 pitcher on almost any staff in baseball.

I mean, the White Sox have 3 big league arms in their entire organization and a few teenagers who might be something someday--that's it. If you want to make a point about the Sox pitching problems make it there, but don't just reach for the top shelf thinking you can convince anyone Jose Quintana is a back end starter. He's not. He does a good a job keeping the ball on the ground and striking enough guys out to prevent the woeful Sox defense from hurting more than it already does. He doesn't walk people, he doesn't give up the HR and he's very economical with his pitches.

You combine all that and you've got a top 20 starter in baseball. He's a very well rounded 25 year old lefty.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
America wrote:
He's the #2 pitcher on almost any staff in baseball.

I mean, the White Sox have 3 big league arms in their entire organization and a few teenagers who might be something someday--that's it. If you want to make a point about the Sox pitching problems make it there, but don't just reach for the top shelf thinking you can convince anyone Jose Quintana is a back end starter. He's not. He does a good a job keeping the ball on the ground and striking enough guys out to prevent the woeful Sox defense from hurting more than it already does. He doesn't walk people, he doesn't give up the HR and he's very economical with his pitches.

You combine all that and you've got a top 20 starter in baseball. He's a very well rounded 25 year old lefty.


That's utterly ridiculous.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Who would ya guys take goin forward QUINTANA or Porcello ?

Deaza that bum should have had that foul ball...he pulled up n dogged it ...next pitch ...2 run blast

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
That's utterly ridiculous.

Coming from the guy who blames Quintana for not getting enough run support.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
With the Indians now leading in the 10th inning 8-6, it appears likely the Sux will lose their 7th consecutive ballgame....

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 6:55 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
America wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
That's utterly ridiculous.

Coming from the guy who blames Quintana for not getting enough run support.


Do you really think the game is played in parts like that? That the events in the game are unrelated? He pitches the games he's in. He isn't a programmed robot who is designed to allow 3.25 runs every nine innings. If he were, the Sox would have won that game last night.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Keyser Soze wrote:
I can't believe that was Alexei's 13th home run of the year. It feels like he hasn't hit one since April.

Image

Just hit one Sunday

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
With the Indians now leading in the 10th inning 8-6, it appears likely the Sux will lose their 7th consecutive ballgame....


I welcome the loss as a vehicle to winning in the future.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:48 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Just awful this month. No excuse to play this poorly.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Just awful this month. No excuse to play this poorly.

That's tellin' 'em

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
America wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
That's utterly ridiculous.

Coming from the guy who blames Quintana for not getting enough run support.


Do you really think the game is played in parts like that? That the events in the game are unrelated? He pitches the games he's in. He isn't a programmed robot who is designed to allow 3.25 runs every nine innings. If he were, the Sox would have won that game last night.

Yeah he was unlucky he allowed the Indians to tie it up after the Sox gave him the lead. I don't know why the concept of a guy is what he is is that hard to understand. With more run support, hell Quintana might even be 10-10 right now.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:00 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
badrogue17 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
America wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
That's utterly ridiculous.

Coming from the guy who blames Quintana for not getting enough run support.


Do you really think the game is played in parts like that? That the events in the game are unrelated? He pitches the games he's in. He isn't a programmed robot who is designed to allow 3.25 runs every nine innings. If he were, the Sox would have won that game last night.

Yeah he was unlucky he allowed the Indians to tie it up after the Sox gave him the lead. I don't know why the concept of a guy is what he is is that hard to understand. With more run support, hell Quintana might even be 10-10 right now.


Scientists are loathe to acknowledge the existence of that which they cannot measure. Even the pseudo-scientists who spend their time analyzing baseball statistics.

Obviously, there is a competitive element to any contest. It's currently popular to ignore that fact and act like each player is simply going out with complete and utter focus on his own task with blinders on and no recognition of anything that is occurring around him.

I would compare it to a horse who beats shitty horses at a mile by running it in 1:33.5 but then loses to better horses by running 1:34.8. Why didn't he just run his 1:33.5 and win the second race? Because it doesn't work that way.

It's like you shot 71 on a course where Tiger Woods once shot 73 and saying you beat Tiger Woods.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
If Felix Hernandez was better than Ervin Santana in 2010 why didn't he win more games?

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:35 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
SpiralStairs wrote:
If Felix Hernandez was better than Ervin Santana in 2010 why didn't he win more games?


First, a single season is a small sample. Do you believe that Hernandez will have a lower career winning percentage than Santana, regardless of what teams they may play on?

Second, that Seattle team had an historically weak offense, often averaging more than two runs less than the opposing offense. That's certainly not a common circumstance. Yet in spite of that fact, Hernandez was still capable of winning more than half his decisions.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
If Felix Hernandez was better than Ervin Santana in 2010 why didn't he win more games?


First, a single season is a small sample. Do you believe that Hernandez will have a lower career winning percentage than Santana, regardless of what teams they may play on?

Second, that Seattle team had an historically weak offense, often averaging more than two runs less than the opposing offense. That's certainly not a common circumstance. Yet in spite of that fact, Hernandez was still capable of winning more than half his decisions.


So we can't just look at one statistic to tell us how good a player is, and we have to factor in the team that a player plays on to get a sense of how good they are?

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:40 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I'll bet Jose Quintana uses the knee defenders when he flies.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:53 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
SpiralStairs wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
If Felix Hernandez was better than Ervin Santana in 2010 why didn't he win more games?


First, a single season is a small sample. Do you believe that Hernandez will have a lower career winning percentage than Santana, regardless of what teams they may play on?

Second, that Seattle team had an historically weak offense, often averaging more than two runs less than the opposing offense. That's certainly not a common circumstance. Yet in spite of that fact, Hernandez was still capable of winning more than half his decisions.


So we can't just look at one statistic to tell us how good a player is, and we have to factor in the team that a player plays on to get a sense of how good they are?


The team a guy plays on has nothing to do with how good he is.

Are you really confused that Santana is better than Hernandez? Of course not. You're just trying to argue. It's a dumb argument. Almost as dumb as believing Jose Quintana is one of the best 20 pitchers in the game.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:55 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The team a guy plays on has nothing to do with how good he is.
You don't really believe this load of crap, do you? Do you really think Jon Garland wins 18 games in 2005 and 2006 if he was pitching for the Royals or Pirates?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:58 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The team a guy plays on has nothing to do with how good he is.
You don't really believe this load of crap, do you? Do you really think Jon Garland wins 16 games in 2005 and 2006 if he was pitching for the Royals or Pirates?


I have no idea. But I think you're probably underestimating Garland, just from the tone of your post. He was a damn good pitcher and if Jose Quintana ever has his career, the Sox will be very happy.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 9:01 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
This isn't about my estimation of Garland or how he compares to Quintana.

I asked a simple question that deserved a simple answer and you side stepped it.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 9:04 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
This isn't about my estimation of Garland or how he compares to Quintana.

I asked a simple question that deserved a simple answer and you side stepped it.


I didn't sidestep anything. I said I have no idea what would have happened if he had pitched for a different team.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
This isn't about my estimation of Garland or how he compares to Quintana.

I asked a simple question that deserved a simple answer and you side stepped it.



Garland is a prime example of why I dont look @ wins... 18-7 with 4.51 era..

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 9:07 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
If we're going to play Pitcher A/Pitcher B, let's try this:

Pitcher A: 1897 IP, 3.76 ERA, 3.61 FIP, 1.26 WHIP, .420 winning pct.

Pitcher B: 1889 IP, 3.85 ERA, 3.80 FIP, 1.30 WHIP, .593 winning pct.

They played on the same team- a pretty good one- in their primes. I assume most of you think Pitcher A was better.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 9:10 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
312player wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
This isn't about my estimation of Garland or how he compares to Quintana.

I asked a simple question that deserved a simple answer and you side stepped it.



Garland is a prime example of why I dont look @ wins... 18-7 with 4.51 era..


Is a 4.51 ERA in 2006 the same as a 4.51 ERA in 2014? I can see why you're so confused. In 2006 a 4.51 ERA was better than average in the American League.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3602 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 ... 121  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group