It is currently Tue Nov 19, 2024 9:51 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 232 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91977
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'm not sure what you're saying. Plenty of people still smoke tobacco. It's mainly been stigmatized because of the noxious clouds of smoke it produces annoy others. Not because anyone really cares that it's "bad".
Almost all of our grandparents and great grandparents smoked, and many of our parents did, and no one in their right mind is defending tobacco as not being really bad for you. Even smokers know it now. It is in direct opposition to your idea that if crystal meth was being used by our grandparents that it would be defended now because of it. Tabacco was being used by our grandparents and it is not defended by anyone besides big tabacco who has to pay for commercials about how much smoking is bad for you.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's funny. If your pappy, your grandpappy, and your grandpappy's pappy all drank a morning beverage that featured small amounts of meth amphetamine rather than small amounts of caffeine, that's what you'd be drinking and defending. "Are you really telling me that Folgers Crystal Methee is as dangerous as pot? :lol: :lol: "
We have an actual example of this that proves you wrong: Tobacco.

Tobacco never got the positive treatment that caffeine got/gets


I have to say, I find your claim about people saying Ecstasy was safe to be curious. I never knew it to be safe or anyone to say its safe. Pills, acid, etc dont usually get the "its safe" part


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:08 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79502
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'm not sure what you're saying. Plenty of people still smoke tobacco. It's mainly been stigmatized because of the noxious clouds of smoke it produces annoy others. Not because anyone really cares that it's "bad".
Almost all of our grandparents and great grandparents smoked, and many of our parents did, and no one in their right mind is defending tobacco as not being really bad for you. Even smokers know it now. It is in direct opposition to your idea that if crystal meth was being used by our grandparents that it would be defended now because of it. Tabacco was being used by our grandparents and it is not defended by anyone besides big tabacco who has to pay for commercials about how much smoking is bad for you.


But caffeine is bad for you too. Lots of things are bad for you.

You're a little cranky this morning. Haven't you had your first cup yet?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6841
Curious Hair wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
If Stevie Johnson gets busted for the same shit Wes Welker does it's far less outrage and more, "well it was bound to happen".


I disagree. If anything, black + exotic drugs will cause even more outrage. Remember PCP?


Doesn't even have to be drugs. Black + dog fights and lynch mobs started trending on facebook.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'm not sure what you're saying. Plenty of people still smoke tobacco. It's mainly been stigmatized because of the noxious clouds of smoke it produces annoy others. Not because anyone really cares that it's "bad".
Almost all of our grandparents and great grandparents smoked, and many of our parents did, and no one in their right mind is defending tobacco as not being really bad for you. Even smokers know it now. It is in direct opposition to your idea that if crystal meth was being used by our grandparents that it would be defended now because of it. Tabacco was being used by our grandparents and it is not defended by anyone besides big tabacco who has to pay for commercials about how much smoking is bad for you.

Its not an equal comparison. If Tobacco was thought of as helpful for work and not bad for you at all for decades, like caffeine, then it would be a fair assessment

Even at its most popular smoking was never seen as a "good thing" like caffeine


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79502
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Juiced wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
If Stevie Johnson gets busted for the same shit Wes Welker does it's far less outrage and more, "well it was bound to happen".


I disagree. If anything, black + exotic drugs will cause even more outrage. Remember PCP?


Doesn't even have to be drugs. Black + dog fights and lynch mobs started trending on facebook.


I don't really think race was a big factor with Vick though. People just love dogs. If Roethlisberger had raped a poodle there would have been lynch mobs after him too.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91977
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Tobacco never got the positive treatment that caffeine got/gets
Sure it did. We had advertisements talking about the health benefits of it. It seems like on this topic that you just take a default position to disagree with anything I've said. Mad Men basically built seasons around storylines about how it used to be treated.
rogers park bryan wrote:
I have to say, I find your claim about people saying Ecstasy was safe to be curious. I never knew it to be safe or anyone to say its safe. Pills, acid, etc dont usually get the "its safe" part
It was in my area. That was the justification for it. A lot of it came from the fact that DARE didn't really spend a lot of time on it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
From Mayo Clinic:

Is coffee good or bad for me?
Answers from Donald Hensrud, M.D.
Coffee has a long history of being blamed for many ills — from stunting your growth to claims that it causes heart disease and cancer. But recent research indicates that coffee may not be so bad after all. So which is it — good or bad? The best answer may be that for most people the health benefits outweigh the risks.

Recent studies have generally found no connection between coffee and an increased risk of cancer or heart disease. In fact, most studies find an association between coffee consumption and decreased overall mortality and possibly cardiovascular mortality, although this may not be true in younger people who drink large amounts of coffee.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91977
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Its not an equal comparison. If Tobacco was thought of as helpful for work and not bad for you at all for decades, like caffeine, then it would be a fair assessment
The link to cancer wasn't even discovered until 1920. That is about 150 years after the Revolutionary war. You are right. It wasn't decades. It was centuries.
rogers park bryan wrote:
Even at its most popular smoking was never seen as a "good thing" like caffeine
There were plenty of things talking about the positive benefits of it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Tobacco never got the positive treatment that caffeine got/gets
Sure it did. We had advertisements talking about the health benefits of it. It seems like on this topic that you just take a default position to disagree with anything I've said. Mad Men basically built seasons around storylines about how it used to be treated.

No, Im not disagreeing because its you. I NEVER do that. Stop thinking that.

Ive never seen the AMC drama that you cited, but cigarettes never got the treatment like Coffee.

Coffee is seen as a magical potion that does no harm and makes you a stronger faster better person. Cigarettes never came close to that.




rogers park bryan wrote:
I have to say, I find your claim about people saying Ecstasy was safe to be curious. I never knew it to be safe or anyone to say its safe. Pills, acid, etc dont usually get the "its safe" part
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It was in my area. That was the justification for it. A lot of it came from the fact that DARE didn't really spend a lot of time on it.

Weird.

I never even considered any pills or powders to be "safe"


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Its not an equal comparison. If Tobacco was thought of as helpful for work and not bad for you at all for decades, like caffeine, then it would be a fair assessment
The link to cancer wasn't even discovered until 1920. That is about 150 years after the Revolutionary war. You are right. It wasn't decades. It was centuries.
rogers park bryan wrote:
Even at its most popular smoking was never seen as a "good thing" like caffeine
There were plenty of things talking about the positive benefits of it.

Not like coffee.

You can say that all you want. Its just not true.

Are you saying there was a common perception among most people that smoking cigarettes made you a better worker?

There is really NOTHING that gets the Coffee treatment. Coffee/caffeine is so positive most dont even consider it a drug.


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Hatchetman wrote:
From Mayo Clinic:

Is coffee good or bad for me?
Answers from Donald Hensrud, M.D.
Coffee has a long history of being blamed for many ills — from stunting your growth to claims that it causes heart disease and cancer. But recent research indicates that coffee may not be so bad after all. So which is it — good or bad? The best answer may be that for most people the health benefits outweigh the risks.

Recent studies have generally found no connection between coffee and an increased risk of cancer or heart disease. In fact, most studies find an association between coffee consumption and decreased overall mortality and possibly cardiovascular mortality, although this may not be true in younger people who drink large amounts of coffee.

We're not having this conversation. Bad source.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91977
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Not like coffee.

You can say that all you want. Its just not true.

Are you saying there was a common perception among most people that smoking cigarettes made you a better worker?

There is really NOTHING that gets the Coffee treatment. Coffee/caffeine is so positive most dont even consider it a drug.
I am now lost on exactly what your point is. JORR was saying we'd treat crystal meth the same way we do caffeine if our parents had been drinking it for breakfast.

Now, it seems like you are pointing out that caffeine, based on the science, has only small negatives which may even be counteracted by the positives. This is nothing like JORR's point.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Not like coffee.

You can say that all you want. Its just not true.

Are you saying there was a common perception among most people that smoking cigarettes made you a better worker?

There is really NOTHING that gets the Coffee treatment. Coffee/caffeine is so positive most dont even consider it a drug.
I am now lost on exactly what your point is. JORR was saying we'd treat crystal meth the same way we do caffeine if our parents had been drinking it for breakfast.

Now, it seems like you are pointing out that caffeine, based on the science, has only small negatives which may even be counteracted by the positives. This is nothing like JORR's point.

Your tobacco-caffeine analogy is inherently flawed because Tobacco has never been perceived nearly as positively as caffeine.


I dont beleive Caffeine has small negatives counteracted by positives. :lol:

Im saying that is a common held belief and your reply confirms it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:31 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I believe that I read somewhere that kids were overdosing on caffeine.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91977
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Your tobacco-caffeine analogy is inherently flawed because Tobacco has never been perceived nearly as positively as caffeine.


I dont beleive Caffeine has small negatives counteracted by positives. :lol:

Im saying that is a common held belief and your reply confirms it.
Hatchetman posted the article. I was just referencing what that said. Why are you ignoring it?

So what if my reply confirms it? Are you saying it is made up? There are positive effects of moderate coffee usage.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:34 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79502
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Not like coffee.

You can say that all you want. Its just not true.

Are you saying there was a common perception among most people that smoking cigarettes made you a better worker?

There is really NOTHING that gets the Coffee treatment. Coffee/caffeine is so positive most dont even consider it a drug.
I am now lost on exactly what your point is. JORR was saying we'd treat crystal meth the same way we do caffeine if our parents had been drinking it for breakfast.

Now, it seems like you are pointing out that caffeine, based on the science, has only small negatives which may even be counteracted by the positives. This is nothing like JORR's point.


Why don't you drink Decaf?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Cocaine and Caffeine are extremely similar


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
So MDMA, Ectasy and Molly is all the same thing? I'm a lame 31 yr old with 3 kids. I dont know what's hip anymore...

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Your tobacco-caffeine analogy is inherently flawed because Tobacco has never been perceived nearly as positively as caffeine.


I dont beleive Caffeine has small negatives counteracted by positives. :lol:

Im saying that is a common held belief and your reply confirms it.
Hatchetman posted the article. I was just referencing what that said. Why are you ignoring it?

So what if my reply confirms it? Are you saying it is made up? There are positive effects of moderate coffee usage.

I missed that post.

I understand there are positive effects of coffee.

Could say the same about cocaine though


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91977
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Why don't you drink Decaf?
I don't like coffee.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91977
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Could say the same about cocaine though
What could? The positives may outweigh the negatives?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Could say the same about cocaine though
What could? The positives may outweigh the negatives?

Here is the statment that Im referring to

There are positive effects of moderate coffee usage.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91977
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Could say the same about cocaine though
What could? The positives may outweigh the negatives?

Here is the statment that Im referring to

There are positive effects of moderate coffee usage.
There was two parts to that concept though. Virtually everything has some positive effects. Crystal meth is great weight loss aid.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Could say the same about cocaine though
What could? The positives may outweigh the negatives?

Here is the statment that Im referring to

There are positive effects of moderate coffee usage.
There was two parts to that concept though. Virtually everything has some positive effects. Crystal meth is great weight loss aid.


So is AIDS... not Magic Johnson AIDS but real people AIDS...

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:47 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55892
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Hank Scorpio wrote:
So MDMA, Ectasy and Molly is all the same thing? I'm a lame 31 yr old with 3 kids. I dont know what's hip anymore...

Ecstasy is MDMA. Molly is an MDMA analogue but people are just calling anything that fucks you up "molly" because no one knows what they're taking.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Could have easily been Cocaine that won out over caffeine and people would be getting their morning Cocaine fix instead of caffeine

Same thing with alcohol and weed.

Decision makers made their choice and told the country which was ok and which was not based on how much money could be made, not concern for public safety.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91977
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Could have easily been Cocaine that won out over caffeine and people would be getting their morning Cocaine fix instead of caffeine
No.
rogers park bryan wrote:
Same thing with alcohol and weed.
Yes, though ideally there wouldn't have been a choice between the two and they both could co-exist.
rogers park bryan wrote:
Decision makers made their choice and told the country which was ok and which was not based on how much money could be made, not concern for public safety.
No.

Marijuana clearly got a raw deal but let's not take one injustice and act like all of it was wrong.

The health effects of cocaine and caffeine are not close.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Curious Hair wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
So MDMA, Ectasy and Molly is all the same thing? I'm a lame 31 yr old with 3 kids. I dont know what's hip anymore...

Ecstasy is MDMA. Molly is an MDMA analogue but people are just calling anything that fucks you up "molly" because no one knows what they're taking.


Gotcha... Hopefully if my kids decide to try bad shit, they stick to alcohol, weed and caffeine. At least I understand that.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 232 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group