It is currently Sun Dec 01, 2024 6:17 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 264 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Hank, if there's even a slight chance wearing your seatbelt will stop your car from killing other people isnt that reason enough?



There's no chance of that. KEEP YOUR LAWS OFF MY BODY!

That's not true

Its absolutely happened where a vehicle went out of control after someone was thrown from their seat and if they remained in the seat they could have steered off.

You can argue its a very remote chance but you cant say its impossible


there's also a chance you could be involved in a crash and be unable to remove your seatbelt, and thus die


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43584
Hawg Ass wrote:
denisdman wrote:
The sad thing is, you shouldn't need a law to have people wear seat belts. You'd think people would have common sense enough to realize it's a smart choice. But then I see all the folks who ride around IL without motorcycle helmets, and I just sigh.

For the record, I do not think there should be a law requiring seat belts, but I have always worn mine and would regardless of the law.

For the life of me, I can't understand how this one hasn't been addressed.

I saw a father and son on a motorcycle last weekend. Kid was probably 10-12 years old. Neither of them were wearing helmets, and the kid was also wearing shorts.

Father of the year...

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33072
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Hawg Ass wrote:
denisdman wrote:
The sad thing is, you shouldn't need a law to have people wear seat belts. You'd think people would have common sense enough to realize it's a smart choice. But then I see all the folks who ride around IL without motorcycle helmets, and I just sigh.

For the record, I do not think there should be a law requiring seat belts, but I have always worn mine and would regardless of the law.

For the life of me, I can't understand how this one hasn't been addressed.


It's the case of most people not caring that much, but a small group caring very much.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Hank Scorpio wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Hank, if there's even a slight chance wearing your seatbelt will stop your car from killing other people isnt that reason enough?



There's no chance of that. KEEP YOUR LAWS OFF MY BODY!

That's not true

Its absolutely happened where a vehicle went out of control after someone was thrown from their seat and if they remained in the seat they could have steered off.

You can argue its a very remote chance but you cant say its impossible


OK, by this logic can we argue anything. Almost anything is possible.

It's absolutely happened that a bird has shit on someone while driving with a sunroof open and they got in an accident because of it. Make a new law and start writing tickets for driving with your sunroof open.

Its not as remote a chance as that.

And I think for Semi trucks, they should definitely be required. You lose control of that thing and you could kill 50 people.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's just like tinted windows or requiring you to clean the snow off your windshield.


It's not. If your windows are obstructed that affects the way you drive a vehicle and makes you dangerous to others.


As far as the crosswalk thing, I'm not telling people to drive however they want to. I'm saying a seatbelt doesnt change the basic function of your vehicle. Jaywalking changes the basic function of traffic flow. You are creating a hazard and should use your "lane".

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Bagels wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Hank, if there's even a slight chance wearing your seatbelt will stop your car from killing other people isnt that reason enough?



There's no chance of that. KEEP YOUR LAWS OFF MY BODY!

That's not true

Its absolutely happened where a vehicle went out of control after someone was thrown from their seat and if they remained in the seat they could have steered off.

You can argue its a very remote chance but you cant say its impossible


there's also a chance you could be involved in a crash and be unable to remove your seatbelt, and thus die

Id think the numbers are definitely a lot higher on my side


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92130
Location: To the left of my post
Hank Scorpio wrote:
OK, by this logic can we argue anything. Almost anything is possible.

It's absolutely happened that a bird has shit on someone while driving with a sunroof open and they got in an accident because of it. Make a new law and start writing tickets for driving with your sunroof open.
Seatbelts are the first line of defense in car accidents. Virtually every other safety feature on a car is based around supplementing a seat belt.

I guess the larger point is that this is a terrible place to draw the line in the sand. You, and the rest of society, will be just fine if we lose the right to not wear a seatbelt without risking a $25 fine.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bagels wrote:

there's also a chance you could be involved in a crash and be unable to remove your seatbelt, and thus die

Id think the numbers are definitely a lot higher on my side


i don't know the numbers, but in all seriousness i've heard of that happening. you can even buy some kind of blade/tool that will cut your seatbelt in an emergency


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
rogers park bryan wrote:

And I think for Semi trucks, they should definitely be required. You lose control of that thing and you could kill 50 people.


You could certainly talk me into supporting this.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92130
Location: To the left of my post
Hank Scorpio wrote:
It's not. If your windows are obstructed that affects the way you drive a vehicle and makes you dangerous to others.
Tinted windows don't obstruct your view. Also, as I've said a few times, seat belts do effect what you can do in an accident. Have you ever been in a car and had the brakes slammed? What do you think happens to you with that force if you don't have a seatbelt on?
Hank Scorpio wrote:
As far as the crosswalk thing, I'm not telling people to drive however they want to. I'm saying a seatbelt doesnt change the basic function of your vehicle. Jaywalking changes the basic function of traffic flow. You are creating a hazard and should use your "lane".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
OK, by this logic can we argue anything. Almost anything is possible.

It's absolutely happened that a bird has shit on someone while driving with a sunroof open and they got in an accident because of it. Make a new law and start writing tickets for driving with your sunroof open.
Seatbelts are the first line of defense in car accidents. Virtually every other safety feature on a car is based around supplementing a seat belt.



I couldnt agree more. That is why I wear mine. That is why everyone should wear one. Dont need a bogus law about it. It's revenue generating and allows police reasons to hassle people, it has nothing to do with your safety.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
It's not. If your windows are obstructed that affects the way you drive a vehicle and makes you dangerous to others.
Tinted windows don't obstruct your view. Also, as I've said a few times, seat belts do effect what you can do in an accident. Have you ever been in a car and had the brakes slammed? What do you think happens to you with that force if you don't have a seatbelt on?
Hank Scorpio wrote:
As far as the crosswalk thing, I'm not telling people to drive however they want to. I'm saying a seatbelt doesnt change the basic function of your vehicle. Jaywalking changes the basic function of traffic flow. You are creating a hazard and should use your "lane".

Legal tinted windows dont. There is a reason why a limo doesnt have the black out tints all over the front of the vehicle. You can argue where the legal line should be on tints, our current enforcement level is probably too rigid.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Hank Scorpio wrote:
It's revenue generating and allows police reasons to hassle people, it has nothing to do with your safety.


ding ding ding


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Chus wrote:
I have a friend who claims that seatbelts do more harm than good. He also says that sunscreen doesn't prevent skin cancer, it causes it, nor does he believe in vaccinations. This is what happens when you consume the verbal diarrhea spewed by Alex Jones.



That is all insane though... I know a seatbelt is more safe than not wearing a seatbelt. I also know eating a salad with a grilled chicken breast on it is more healthy and safe for me than eating a mac and cheese stuffed burger with fries. I dont think the government should be regulating, giving fines or forcing me to do either thing. I can get the facts and make my own decision. Your friend has done the same, he just got the 'facts' from crazy people :lol: :lol:


My friend can be a bit goofy. His wife even more so.

I respect your opinion. I wear my seatbelt every time I get behind the wheel, and I would do so, whether or not it was the law.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92130
Location: To the left of my post
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I couldnt agree more. That is why I wear mine. That is why everyone should wear one. Dont need a bogus law about it. It's revenue generating and allows police reasons to hassle people, it has nothing to do with your safety.
It has a lot to do with safety. The fine is so low. It's $25 in Illinois.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Baygs and Hankerchief,


Here is a study on restrained and unrestrained passengers

http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/810948.pdf
Fatalities are always higher with unrestrained and the thing where bodies become human projectiles is valid and happens more than you'd think.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92130
Location: To the left of my post
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Legal tinted windows dont. There is a reason why a limo doesnt have the black out tints all over the front of the vehicle. You can argue where the legal line should be on tints, our current enforcement level is probably too rigid.
Tinted windows are illegal because you can't see in the car. It isn't because of safety of the people inside. All tinted windows do is the equivalent of sunglasses.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Hank Scorpio wrote:

OK, by this logic can we argue anything. Almost anything is possible.

It's absolutely happened that a bird has shit on someone while driving with a sunroof open and they got in an accident because of it.


I saw a pretty good sized bird fly right into the side of an SUV travelling at about 50 mph, the other day. The bird tried to get up, but it fell down immediately.

There was no car accident.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Legal tinted windows dont. There is a reason why a limo doesnt have the black out tints all over the front of the vehicle. You can argue where the legal line should be on tints, our current enforcement level is probably too rigid.
Tinted windows are illegal because you can't see in the car. It isn't because of safety of the people inside. All tinted windows do is the equivalent of sunglasses.


Ever wear your sunglasses at night while driving?

cue the Corey Hart jokes :lol:

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Chus wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:

OK, by this logic can we argue anything. Almost anything is possible.

It's absolutely happened that a bird has shit on someone while driving with a sunroof open and they got in an accident because of it.


I saw a pretty good sized bird fly right into the side of an SUV travelling at about 50 mph, the other day. The bird tried to get up, but it fell down immediately.

There was no car accident.


I would have shit my pants :lol: :lol:

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92130
Location: To the left of my post
The bottom line is that everything that happens on a public roadway has effects on others. When you are intentionally not using the #1 safety feature on a car it makes it more dangerous for everyone.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The bottom line is that everything that happens on a public roadway has effects on others. When you are intentionally not using the #1 safety feature on a car it makes it more dangerous for everyone.


how long until the breath devices are installed on every new car as a standard feature ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92130
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The bottom line is that everything that happens on a public roadway has effects on others. When you are intentionally not using the #1 safety feature on a car it makes it more dangerous for everyone.


how long until the breath devices are installed on every new car as a standard feature ?
Probably never since we don't even prosecute drunk drivers like we should.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The bottom line is that everything that happens on a public roadway has effects on others. When you are intentionally not using the #1 safety feature on a car it makes it more dangerous for everyone.


This is where we just have to agree to disagree. I think it makes it unsafe for you. I drive the same regardless of your choice.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The bottom line is that everything that happens on a public roadway has effects on others. When you are intentionally not using the #1 safety feature on a car it makes it more dangerous for everyone.


how long until the breath devices are installed on every new car as a standard feature ?
Probably never since we don't even prosecute drunk drivers like we should.


you feel the punishments are too lax ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92130
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
you feel the punishments are too lax ?
Yes, especially for those who get caught in things other than checkpoints and are proving to be an actual danger worthy of being stopped.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bagels wrote:
you feel the punishments are too lax ?
Yes, especially for those who get caught in things other than checkpoints and are proving to be an actual danger worthy of being stopped.


what difference does the checkpoint make ? in any case, what do you feel the punishment should be ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92130
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
what difference does the checkpoint make ? in any case, what do you feel the punishment should be ?
A person who gets caught at a checkpoint may not have been doing anything out of the ordinary. They weren't caught doing something dangerous. Now, they may have been driving erratically but they may not have. Someone who is pulled over likely did something that would cause you to feel they are driving recklessly. I understand that isn't always true.

The penalties for one dui may be acceptable. I don't really know enough about them. I know there are way too many people with multiple dui arrests/convictions and penalties should be more severe.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:16 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79596
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bagels wrote:
you feel the punishments are too lax ?
Yes, especially for those who get caught in things other than checkpoints and are proving to be an actual danger worthy of being stopped.


what difference does the checkpoint make ? in any case, what do you feel the punishment should be ?



Death penalty.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
What if you can't wear your seat belt because you're wearing your sport coat?

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 264 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group