It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:27 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55959
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show ... poor-women
Quote:
Russell Pearce has had quite a career in Arizona. The Republican started as a fairly obscure state senator, before his anti-immigrant SB1070 pushed him into the national spotlight, which Pearce parlayed into a promotion as state Senate President.

His shooting star didn’t last – Pearce record and extremist associations undermined his standing, and in 2011, voters pushed him out of office in a recall election.

State Republicans probably should have allowed Pearce to fade from public view, but instead, GOP officials made Pearce the #2 leader in the state party. As Zach Roth reported, that didn’t turn out too well, either.

Quote:
The far-right former lawmaker who helped create Arizona’s “papers please” immigration law has resigned as a top official with the state GOP after making comments about sterilizing poor women. […]

On Saturday, the state Democratic Party highlighted comments Pearce made recently on his radio show. Discussing the state’s public assistance programs, Pearce declared: “You put me in charge of Medicaid, the first thing I’d do is get Norplant, birth-control implants, or tubal ligations…. Then we’ll test recipients for drugs and alcohol, and if you want to [reproduce] or use drugs or alcohol, then get a job.”


Just so we’re clear, by making Norplant a part of public assistance, Pearce was, fairly explicitly, talking about sterilizing low-income women.

By way of a response, the principal author of Arizona’s “papers please” law argued in a written statement that he was referencing “comments written by someone else and failed to attribute them to the author.”

It’s a rare sight: a politician trying to defend himself by relying on an admission of plagiarism.

Of course, the problem has nothing to do with attribution and everything to do with an intended message. No one cares whether Pearce was sharing someone else’s argument; everyone cares that he talked about sterilizing poor people.


[Reproduce] set off in omission brackets is particularly icky. Given that this was on the radio, which word could he have used instead?

But yeah, this guy is messed up. Arizona is the worst state.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Curious Hair wrote:
Given that this was on the radio, which word could he have used instead?


Procreate.

Curious Hair wrote:
But yeah, this guy is messed up. Arizona is the worst state.


He is a buffoon. Arizona is definitely giving Florida and Texas a run for their money.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43572
Chus wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Given that this was on the radio, which word could he have used instead?


Procreate.

Bow Chica Wow Wow...?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Curious Hair wrote:
“You put me in charge of Medicaid, the first thing I’d do is get Norplant, birth-control implants, or tubal ligations…. Then we’ll test recipients for drugs and alcohol, and if you want to [reproduce] or use drugs or alcohol, then get a job.”

This guy is a realist and people cant handle the truth


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43572
Quote:
tubal ligations….

Is this even a word? Sounds like a term Archie Bunker would use.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:50 am
Posts: 11242
Location: Schaumburg
pizza_Place: Palermo's
Douchebag wrote:
Quote:
tubal ligations….

Is this even a word? Sounds like a term Archie Bunker would use.


Tubal ligation, commonly referred to as "having your tubes tied," is a surgical procedure in which a woman's fallopian tubes are blocked, tied, or cut.

This should probably go in the "BUY, SELL, TRADE, FREE, PROMOTE, EVENTS, FEEDBACK" section, but I can do this in my garage for $350.

Just throwin' it out there...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55959
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Chus wrote:
Arizona is definitely giving Florida and Texas a run for their money.


No, I think the race is run, and Arizona is the winner. Florida is weird, and Texas is annoying, but Arizona is straight-up mean. Everything people there do or try to do is informed by some sort of contempt for people who aren't themselves. It's the state of hate.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:11 pm 
Tad Queasy wrote:
Tubal ligation, commonly referred to as "having your tubes tied," is a surgical procedure in which a woman's fallopian tubes are blocked, tied, or cut.

Tad = SHARK?


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55959
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Tubal ligation: it's a genital BITE!

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
If you agree, great, if you don't we will just shoot you.

Welcome to Arizona.

It's a state founded and run by cowboys, are people surprised?

Move there, buy a gun and dont bother anyonre, you will do fine.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55959
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
That'd be fine if not for a considerable segment of the population seemingly looking for reasons to be bothered.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group