It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 3:47 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
Quote:
Chicago (1-3)

In fairness, losing at San Diego in the opener, against Dallas at home, and at improved Detroit isn't unexplainable. But it is rather galling for a team that played in the Super Bowl eight months ago. The Bears this offseason kept their fingers crossed and hoped Rex Grossman would magically transform himself into an efficient quarterback, and in retrospect that thinking seems foolish. In essence, Chicago sacrificed the first month of its season while trying to figure out its quandary at quarterback.

The cost of not making the necessary move at quarterback has been compounded by injuries on defense, and the lack of last year's reliable two-headed running game, which misses the departed Thomas Jones. This has the looks of a post-Super Bowl letdown season to me, and remember, before Seattle broke the trend last year, five consecutive Super Bowl losers failed to make the playoffs the following season. Even if Brian Griese steadies the offense starting this week at Green Bay, the Bears are in for a humbling fall from grace.

• The Verdict: Dead. The Packers and Lions have too much of a head start in the NFC North.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 8:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:14 pm
Posts: 2255
Killer V wrote:
Quote:
Chicago (1-3)

In fairness, losing at San Diego in the opener, against Dallas at home, and at improved Detroit isn't unexplainable. But it is rather galling for a team that played in the Super Bowl eight months ago. The Bears this offseason kept their fingers crossed and hoped Rex Grossman would magically transform himself into an efficient quarterback, and in retrospect that thinking seems foolish. In essence, Chicago sacrificed the first month of its season while trying to figure out its quandary at quarterback.

The cost of not making the necessary move at quarterback has been compounded by injuries on defense, and the lack of last year's reliable two-headed running game, which misses the departed Thomas Jones. This has the looks of a post-Super Bowl letdown season to me, and remember, before Seattle broke the trend last year, five consecutive Super Bowl losers failed to make the playoffs the following season. Even if Brian Griese steadies the offense starting this week at Green Bay, the Bears are in for a humbling fall from grace.

• The Verdict: Dead. The Packers and Lions have too much of a head start in the NFC North.


All this means is that the Bears will turn it around and do decent through the rest of the season. SI is the same magazine that claimed they'd be lucky to win 4 games 2 seasons ago, and they made the playoffs.

SI, and their whole football department, need to stop worshiping at the Brady/Manning altar.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 1506
Location: Laying in the weeds
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Frontman wrote:
Killer V wrote:
Quote:
Chicago (1-3)

In fairness, losing at San Diego in the opener, against Dallas at home, and at improved Detroit isn't unexplainable. But it is rather galling for a team that played in the Super Bowl eight months ago. The Bears this offseason kept their fingers crossed and hoped Rex Grossman would magically transform himself into an efficient quarterback, and in retrospect that thinking seems foolish. In essence, Chicago sacrificed the first month of its season while trying to figure out its quandary at quarterback.

The cost of not making the necessary move at quarterback has been compounded by injuries on defense, and the lack of last year's reliable two-headed running game, which misses the departed Thomas Jones. This has the looks of a post-Super Bowl letdown season to me, and remember, before Seattle broke the trend last year, five consecutive Super Bowl losers failed to make the playoffs the following season. Even if Brian Griese steadies the offense starting this week at Green Bay, the Bears are in for a humbling fall from grace.

• The Verdict: Dead. The Packers and Lions have too much of a head start in the NFC North.


All this means is that the Bears will turn it around and do decent through the rest of the season. SI is the same magazine that claimed they'd be lucky to win 4 games 2 seasons ago, and they made the playoffs.

SI, and their whole football department, need to stop worshiping at the Brady/Manning altar.


If the Bears don't win this Sunday (and I am on record as saying they will be made into shore lunch) they are dead. That would make 2 division losses and 3 NFC losses. They cannot comeback and get a playoff position if they lose this week.

_________________
You cannot make me care about the WNBA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 1:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
the best thing the bears have going for them is that they're in the NFC where 9-7 is probably gonna make the playoffs, and 10-6 could still win the NFC north

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 377
Location: West of That Place
Not that I love the Bears chance, but SI is a magazine that knows nothing

_________________
"Woof Woof"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 1506
Location: Laying in the weeds
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
BearBoy wrote:
Not that I love the Bears chance, but SI is a magazine that knows nothing


Are you casting aspersions on the all-knowing Peter King?

_________________
You cannot make me care about the WNBA.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: conns7901, Curious Hair, enigma, hoju, Jaw Breaker, Nardi, Sneakers O'Toole, The Doctor Of Style, USA and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group