spmack wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
How about some Wifi on the train, Badrogue?
If they can do it on MegaBus, the most "ghettoest" form of public transportation there is, then it can be done on Metra.
"Everybody loves Wi-Fi but they don't want to pay for Wi-Fi," board member William Widmer said, referring to Metra customers.
Widmer urged Metra to "pull the plug" on the project.
"We're spinning our wheels" with more discussions and paying for further work by the consultant, he said.
The consultant, San Francisco-based Xentrans, estimated that it would cost $3.4 million for a one-year Wi-Fi pilot project on a single Metra line, the Rock Island.
Equipping trains on all 11 Metra lines for five years would cost more than $70 million unless a private partner, such as an advertiser or a wireless service provider, could be found to offset the costs, the consultant found.
It doesn't seem like 70 million is all that much when talking about spending billions. If they're trying to market themselves and attract new riders while making current ones more content its probably something they should do. Give em what they want and throw them a bone. It'll make the fare increases a little easier to swallow. Couple things about delays as it gets brought up a lot . Nothing is ever going to prevent delays at some point. Switches malfunctioning ( fun fact, on the BNSF did you know that the switches are controlled via satellite by the dispatchers in Ft Worth? ) , Engines breaking down, crossing gates malfunctioning, track maintenance going on , freight train interference( especially on the lines Metra shares with the UP and BNSF, while they may tell the public they are working on better communication to lessen the delays freight trains cause, I can assure you those respective railroads are telling Metra to pound sand when they bitch about the delays caused by running freight first. Thats what pays the bills for those guys, the contract commuter service while not a net loss for them as it is for Metra as they get reimbursed every penny the spend to run the passenger service, is far down the list of priorities as to who gets to move first. 10x out of 10 they will run the freight first, delays to commuters be damned) . With the installation of PTC, the entire schedules are going to have to be reworked. It doesn't allow to run trains that close together as they are during the morning / evening peaks. It will mandate slower speeds and further spacing between trains that can run at top speed. In short, it will mean less trains running on the same track at once. Whereas before if you missed your 7am train , it may be 22 minutes instead of 15 between the time the next one will arrive. Thats going to be one giant clusterfuck and a lot of trial and error . Believe me when I say that the people making those schedules aren't the sharpest hens in the marquee to begin with so just hope its not winter when it first gets implemented.