It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 11:45 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 489 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 17  Next

Did Renteria get a fair shake?
No, he was fucked by an evil employer without being given a chance. 50%  50%  [ 15 ]
Yes, when you have a chance to get an all-time great like Joe Maddon honor and morality go out the window. 50%  50%  [ 15 ]
Total votes : 30
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
Lots of "Money solves everything" people in this thread. Looks like IMU has some new allies.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
You are all weak sisters.

Renteria will go home to his pseudo-mansion and be just fine.

This isn't like laying off a bunch of minimu that can really improve your business, I would certainly hope you would take advantage of that.age is typically half a million dollars.


See my post above. That isn't the point though. It's just more dishonorable behavior from a dishonorable franchise. Maybe Theo can figure out how to sell his soul to increase Ricketts' revenue streams.


Please...why should we look to you as the pillar of good character and integrity? I don't know what you do or what business you're in, but if you have the chance to get a game changer that can really improve your business, I would certainly hope you would take advantage of that. It happens at the executive level in business everyday.
But I won't shed a tear for millionaires when they lose their job. They're just fine.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
The Cubs are not the first team to ever rebuild (every team but the Yankees)

The Cubs are not the first major market team to rebuild (Mets, Phillies)

The Cubs are not the first team to fire a manager early because a better candidate became available. (Red Sox, Marlins)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Lots of "Money solves everything" people in this thread. Looks like IMU has some new allies.

:lol:

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
[It's just more dishonorable behavior from a dishonorable franchise

Im starting to believe you'll spin anything you can to get to try and make this seem true.

And even the things you bring up that have merit are not unique to the Cubs (but you act like they are)


What other team has done something like this? And don't cite Mattingly and his wins. The bar is much higher there. They have the highest payroll in baseball. To a certain degree, he has failed. Renteria has done exactly what was demanded and what was expected. Perhaps even slightly more.

Interesting you should say what was expected. Ill bet there was part of Renteria that expected this very situation (albeit probably a year or two later)


By the way it's really rich that you are arguing Mattingly and his 95 wins failed and Renteria and his 70 some wins did the job.

That kind of goes against a lot of things you've posted here


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cubs are not the first team to fire a manager early because a better candidate became available. (Red Sox, Marlins)
After 1 year?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
You are all weak sisters.

Renteria will go home to his pseudo-mansion and be just fine.

This isn't like laying off a bunch of minimum wage workers. "Business is business" is a fine motto for professional sports, where minimum wage is typically half a million dollars.


See my post above. That isn't the point though. It's just more dishonorable behavior from a dishonorable franchise. Maybe Theo can figure out how to sell his soul to increase Ricketts' revenue streams.


JORR, you know damn well that you and I are both class war mongers. But this example is not one we can use. I'm sorry - the parallel you're trying to draw is not accurate. These are all very wealthy people.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:55 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Scorehead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
You are all weak sisters.

Renteria will go home to his pseudo-mansion and be just fine.

This isn't like laying off a bunch of minimu that can really improve your business, I would certainly hope you would take advantage of that.age is typically half a million dollars.


See my post above. That isn't the point though. It's just more dishonorable behavior from a dishonorable franchise. Maybe Theo can figure out how to sell his soul to increase Ricketts' revenue streams.


Please...why should we look to you as the pillar of good character and integrity? I don't know what you do or what business you're in, but if you have the chance to get a game changer that can really improve your business, I would certainly hope you would take advantage of that. It happens at the executive level in business everyday.
But I won't shed a tear for millionaires when they lose their job. They're just fine.


The thing is, Joe Maddon isn't a "game changer". He's just another guy that will position fielders based on Theo's spray charts the same way Renteria did.

I've never claimed to be a man of particularly high integrity. I know what I can do and still be able to sleep at night. When I'm making a decision that might cause me to lose some shut-eye, I'm looking for the upside to be far greater than it is in this circumstance.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cubs are not the first team to fire a manager early because a better candidate became available. (Red Sox, Marlins)
After 1 year?


If they're not the first, oh well. Maybe the organization needs a little more fire and passion. The Bears could sure as hell use it.

Scorehead is going to back me up on this with a quote from "Management for Dummies."

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
By the way it's really rich that you are arguing Mattingly and his 95 wins failed and Renteria and his 70 some wins did the job.

That kind of goes against a lot of things you've posted here


Like what? Cub management was actively trying to lose while Dodger management was desperate to win. You really don't acknowledge the difference?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30335
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cubs are not the first team to fire a manager early because a better candidate became available. (Red Sox, Marlins)
After 1 year?


If they're not the first, oh well. Maybe the organization needs a little more fire and passion. The Bears could sure as hell use it.

Scorehead is going to back me up on this with a quote from "Management for Dummies."

You and Scorehead on the same team, I need to say prayers.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cubs are not the first team to fire a manager early because a better candidate became available. (Red Sox, Marlins)
After 1 year?

Grady Little was two years and he won 90+ games in both years

Girardi was one year


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I've never claimed to be a man of particularly high integrity. I know what I can do and still be able to sleep at night. When I'm making a decision that might cause me to lose some shut-eye, I'm looking for the upside to be far greater than it is in this circumstance.



That's a different argument altogether. It's the old hooker analogy... "now that we've established you'll do it... price... bla bla bla". If you're talking about integrity, either you do or you don't. There are no shades of gray. You seem to indicate here that it is only acceptable if the guy wins. I think that makes you as bad as anyone else.

The only question is: what is JORR's price?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Last edited by leashyourkids on Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30335
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cubs are not the first team to fire a manager early because a better candidate became available. (Red Sox, Marlins)
After 1 year?

Grady Little was two years and he won 90+ games in both years

Girardi was one year

Girardi wanted that as bad as they did.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cubs are not the first team to fire a manager early because a better candidate became available. (Red Sox, Marlins)
After 1 year?


If they're not the first, oh well. Maybe the organization needs a little more fire and passion. The Bears could sure as hell use it.

Scorehead is going to back me up on this with a quote from "Management for Dummies."


At the end of the day we need more synergy!

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
By the way it's really rich that you are arguing Mattingly and his 95 wins failed and Renteria and his 70 some wins did the job.

That kind of goes against a lot of things you've posted here


Like what? Cub management was actively trying to lose while Dodger management was desperate to win. You really don't acknowledge the difference?

I dont know, you seem to be a guy who thinks regular season wins are important

I could never envision a scenario where you would say the Cub manager did a great job winning 70g ames (unless it somehow painted the Cubs in a negative light... and here we are)


But I guess you disagree. I would not put this in the dishonorable category. Im not really looking for honor though. Was Steinbrenner's era honorable? Because Id take that era in a second


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I've never claimed to be a man of particularly high integrity. I know what I can do and still be able to sleep at night. When I'm making a decision that might cause me to lose some shut-eye, I'm looking for the upside to be far greater than it is in this circumstance.



That's a different argument altogether. It's the old hooker analogy... "now that we've established you'll do it... price... bla bla bla". If you're talking about integrity, either you do or you don't. There are no shades of gray. You seem to indicate here that it is only acceptable if the guy wins. I think that makes you as bad as anyone else.


Except I'm not making the decision.

I've done some things I'm not proud of in pursuit of money. I would never expect a mob of guys on a message board to defend my questionable actions though.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Hawg Ass wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cubs are not the first team to fire a manager early because a better candidate became available. (Red Sox, Marlins)
After 1 year?

Grady Little was two years and he won 90+ games in both years

Girardi was one year

Girardi wanted that as bad as they did.

Yeah, well they might not fit Jorr's criteria anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Scorehead wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cubs are not the first team to fire a manager early because a better candidate became available. (Red Sox, Marlins)
After 1 year?


If they're not the first, oh well. Maybe the organization needs a little more fire and passion. The Bears could sure as hell use it.

Scorehead is going to back me up on this with a quote from "Management for Dummies."


At the end of the day we need more synergy!


:lol:

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cubs are not the first team to fire a manager early because a better candidate became available. (Red Sox, Marlins)
After 1 year?

Grady Little was two years and he won 90+ games in both years

Girardi was one year
Girardi is lucky he didn't come to the Cubs or he'd be looking at the Cubs asking him to be the third base coach too!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
I dont know, you seem to be a guy who thinks regular season wins are important

I could never envision a scenario where you would say the Cub manager did a great job winning 70 games (unless it somehow painted the Cubs in a negative light... and here we are)


I don't think winning 70 games had anything to do with the manager. Do you think Maddon would have won more with that team? Anyway, I believe the Cubs actually won a couple more than their run differential would have suggested. Should Renteria get the credit?

Those are two separate arguments. The Cubs can be horseshit and win only 70 games without it being the manager's fault.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I've never claimed to be a man of particularly high integrity. I know what I can do and still be able to sleep at night. When I'm making a decision that might cause me to lose some shut-eye, I'm looking for the upside to be far greater than it is in this circumstance.



That's a different argument altogether. It's the old hooker analogy... "now that we've established you'll do it... price... bla bla bla". If you're talking about integrity, either you do or you don't. There are no shades of gray. You seem to indicate here that it is only acceptable if the guy wins. I think that makes you as bad as anyone else.


Except I'm not making the decision.

I've done some things I'm not proud of in pursuit of money. I would never expect a mob of guys on a message board to defend my questionable actions though.


Ha. So, are you arguing that what they did is wrong or that we shouldn't be defending it?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Now it's (possibly) immoral in sports to replace somebody who is inferior in the eyes of the boss(es)?

This is a brand new concept. Literally.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cubs are not the first team to fire a manager early because a better candidate became available. (Red Sox, Marlins)
After 1 year?

Grady Little was two years and he won 90+ games in both years

Girardi was one year
Girardi is lucky he didn't come to the Cubs or he'd be looking at the Cubs asking him to be the third base coach too!

I guess


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I dont know, you seem to be a guy who thinks regular season wins are important

I could never envision a scenario where you would say the Cub manager did a great job winning 70 games (unless it somehow painted the Cubs in a negative light... and here we are)


I don't think winning 70 games had anything to do with the manager. Do you think Maddon would have won more with that team? Anyway, I believe the Cubs actually won a couple more than their run differential would have suggested. Should Renteria get the credit?

Those are two separate arguments. The Cubs can be horseshit and win only 70 games without it being the manager's fault.

I think you know I dont put much stock in managers.


I really dont care either way. If they get Maddon, that's fine. If they keep Rick (I dont call grown men by their -y names) that's fine too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I dont know, you seem to be a guy who thinks regular season wins are important

I could never envision a scenario where you would say the Cub manager did a great job winning 70 games (unless it somehow painted the Cubs in a negative light... and here we are)


I don't think winning 70 games had anything to do with the manager. Do you think Maddon would have won more with that team? Anyway, I believe the Cubs actually won a couple more than their run differential would have suggested. Should Renteria get the credit?

Those are two separate arguments. The Cubs can be horseshit and win only 70 games without it being the manager's fault.

I think you know I dont put much stock in managers.





I really dont care either way. If they get Maddon, that's fine. If they keep Rick (I dont call grown men by their -y names) that's fine too.



Hi this is JIMMY,
As everyone here knows,I'm a man of class and high values. I would not even consider firing Renteria. If this was two years in and his team showed no improvement,that's different.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:15 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
spanky wrote:
Now it's (possibly) immoral in sports to replace somebody who is inferior in the eyes of the boss(es)?

This is a brand new concept. Literally.


No. It's really not. And this isn't really a sports decision. It's a management decision. It's not like making a call on going with a younger outfielder. It's smacking a guy in the face who did exactly what those bosses wanted. If you want to cheer that, go right ahead.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's smacking a guy in the face who did exactly what those bosses wanted. If you want to cheer that, go right ahead.

If they literally slapped him, Id probably laugh a little


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's smacking a guy in the face who did exactly what those bosses wanted. If you want to cheer that, go right ahead.

If they literally slapped him, Id probably laugh a little


:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I dont know, you seem to be a guy who thinks regular season wins are important

I could never envision a scenario where you would say the Cub manager did a great job winning 70 games (unless it somehow painted the Cubs in a negative light... and here we are)


I don't think winning 70 games had anything to do with the manager. Do you think Maddon would have won more with that team? Anyway, I believe the Cubs actually won a couple more than their run differential would have suggested. Should Renteria get the credit?

Those are two separate arguments. The Cubs can be horseshit and win only 70 games without it being the manager's fault.

I think you know I dont put much stock in managers.

I really dont care either way. If they get Maddon, that's fine. If they keep Rick (I dont call grown men by their -y names) that's fine too.


I doubt that you think Quade & Sveum were fine though.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Last edited by Scorehead on Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 489 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group