It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 8:29 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
good dolphin wrote:
remember a sub operating principal since day 1: that which cannot be quantified is to be discarded

Either:
a. making the quote up (my pick)
b. they've obviously adjusted as they've stressed the importance of leadership over and over the past 2 years.

Theo specifically mentioned he underestimated the need for strong leadership with Sveum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Don Tiny wrote:
Who in the bloody hell is going to trade for Edwin Jackson? There are sometimes trades that indicate a GM might be "out-of-town stupid", but I don't know that we're going to be able to locate a GM that's "out-of-town Terri Schiavo".


:lol: yeah,you are right!

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Kirkwood wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
remember a sub operating principal since day 1: that which cannot be quantified is to be discarded

Either:
a. making the quote up (my pick)
b. they've obviously adjusted as they've stressed the importance of leadership over and over the past 2 years.

Theo specifically mentioned he underestimated the need for strong leadership with Sveum.


then hired Renteria

It's not my job to hold them to consistency with their ideals.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
I don't understand why they would give away a draft pick to sign a 32 yr old catcher. The point of losing was to get high draft picks and a bigger spending pool to upgrade the minor leagues for sustained winning. Last year the 9th pick in the 2nd round had a value of $1,100,300. That's a lot of money and flexibility. I would think they would spend one more year improving the system then blow it out in free agency next year when they will be closer to competing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Keyser Soze wrote:
I don't understand why they would give away a draft pick to sign a 32 yr old catcher. The point of losing was to get high draft picks and a bigger spending pool to upgrade the minor leagues for sustained winning. Last year the 9th pick in the 2nd round had a value of $1,100,300. That's a lot of money and flexibility. I would think they would spend one more year improving the system then blow it out in free agency next year when they will be closer to competing.


I think Theo feels this way,too.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:13 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Keyser Soze wrote:
I don't understand why they would give away a draft pick to sign a 32 yr old catcher. The point of losing was to get high draft picks and a bigger spending pool to upgrade the minor leagues for sustained winning. Last year the 9th pick in the 2nd round had a value of $1,100,300. That's a lot of money and flexibility. I would think they would spend one more year improving the system then blow it out in free agency next year when they will be closer to competing.


If they intend to compete in the next two years, more than likely no draft picks from this coming draft will help at that time. They may feel they need Veteran ML talent now, instead of a possible high upside HS arm who could be ready by 2020.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Keyser Soze wrote:
I don't understand why they would give away a draft pick to sign a 32 yr old catcher. The point of losing was to get high draft picks and a bigger spending pool to upgrade the minor leagues for sustained winning. Last year the 9th pick in the 2nd round had a value of $1,100,300. That's a lot of money and flexibility. I would think they would spend one more year improving the system then blow it out in free agency next year when they will be closer to competing.

you said it better than I was typing. I sure hope they follow the compete in 2016 route.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
jimmypasta wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
I don't understand why they would give away a draft pick to sign a 32 yr old catcher. The point of losing was to get high draft picks and a bigger spending pool to upgrade the minor leagues for sustained winning. Last year the 9th pick in the 2nd round had a value of $1,100,300. That's a lot of money and flexibility. I would think they would spend one more year improving the system then blow it out in free agency next year when they will be closer to competing.


I think Theo feels this way,too.


Agreed, which is also why I think he put the time frame for acquiring pitching at 18 months. Despite Maddon's wishes, I don't think management believes they are competing for the playoffs next year.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Most WS champions in recent memory all have an established veteran catcher .


Woo, boy, we have a live one here!

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:16 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
good dolphin wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Most WS champions in recent memory all have an established veteran catcher .


Woo, boy, we have a live one here!


What? If the Cubs intend to compete for a WS, they most likely want to put together a team that resembles one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Most WS champions in recent memory all have an established veteran catcher .

Yea, supposedly Welington wasn't the best defensive catcher according to the advanced statistics. I like how he controlled the run game from the games I watched. But the stats say his pitch framing and such isn't stellar.

Martin would be incredibly helpful for guys like Hendricks and Wood that must paint the edges to succeed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:23 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Don Tiny wrote:
I don't know that we're going to be able to locate a GM that's "out-of-town Terri Schiavo".
I think he is at Halas Hall actually...

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Kirkwood wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Most WS champions in recent memory all have an established veteran catcher .

Yea, supposedly Welington wasn't the best defensive catcher according to the advanced statistics. I like how he controlled the run game from the games I watched. But the stats say his pitch framing and such isn't stellar.

Martin would be incredibly helpful for guys like Hendricks and Wood that must paint the edges to succeed



Who was catching Hendricks last season? I forgot if Baker came in for him. Too bad Baker hit like a 12 year old girl.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
good dolphin wrote:
You act as if the anomalous year in his career is the norm.


Um, no. My point is there's nobody actually better available.

I would politely disagree with the notion that one should, essentially, wait 'til next year. It's a position on this team that could improve to a fairly good degree from veteran leadership on and perhaps off the field even if he regresses to his mean offensive numbers, which wouldn't be terrible anyway.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Don Tiny wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
You act as if the anomalous year in his career is the norm.


Um, no. My point is there's nobody actually better available.

I would politely disagree with the notion that one should, essentially, wait 'til next year. It's a position on this team that could improve to a fairly good degree from veteran leadership on and perhaps off the field even if he regresses to his mean offensive numbers, which wouldn't be terrible anyway.


32 by the start of training camp (and an everyday catcher to boot) and you think he will regress to his mean? Take a look at 2011-13. That is the Russell Martin you are most likely buying in year 1-2 of the contract. It will be less than that in year 3-4. There are far better ways to spend 15 million, as the Yankees are finding out.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
good dolphin wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
You act as if the anomalous year in his career is the norm.


Um, no. My point is there's nobody actually better available.

I would politely disagree with the notion that one should, essentially, wait 'til next year. It's a position on this team that could improve to a fairly good degree from veteran leadership on and perhaps off the field even if he regresses to his mean offensive numbers, which wouldn't be terrible anyway.


32 by the start of training camp (and an everyday catcher to boot) and you think he will regress to his mean? Take a look at 2011-13. That is the Russell Martin you are most likely buying in year 1-2 of the contract. It will be less than that in year 3-4. There are far better ways to spend 15 million, as the Yankees are finding out.

Sort of. They already have their mistake with McCann. But, yes, I wouldn't "target" Martin if I was Theo. Career year in a contract year is textbook DO NOT SIGN.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Yea Martin is going to cost to much cash. No way I go 4 years, maybe 3/27 but I think his market will exceed that easily.

Pass.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
8 year deal, no trade clause


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
You act as if the anomalous year in his career is the norm.


Um, no. My point is there's nobody actually better available.

I would politely disagree with the notion that one should, essentially, wait 'til next year. It's a position on this team that could improve to a fairly good degree from veteran leadership on and perhaps off the field even if he regresses to his mean offensive numbers, which wouldn't be terrible anyway.


32 by the start of training camp (and an everyday catcher to boot) and you think he will regress to his mean? Take a look at 2011-13. That is the Russell Martin you are most likely buying in year 1-2 of the contract.

Interestingly, he got MVP votes in 2013, even while batting .226

Also, his team seems to always end up in the playoffs (7 out of 9 years in playoffs on three different teams)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
You act as if the anomalous year in his career is the norm.


Um, no. My point is there's nobody actually better available.

I would politely disagree with the notion that one should, essentially, wait 'til next year. It's a position on this team that could improve to a fairly good degree from veteran leadership on and perhaps off the field even if he regresses to his mean offensive numbers, which wouldn't be terrible anyway.


32 by the start of training camp (and an everyday catcher to boot) and you think he will regress to his mean? Take a look at 2011-13. That is the Russell Martin you are most likely buying in year 1-2 of the contract.

Interestingly, he got MVP votes in 2013, even while batting .226

Also, his team seems to always end up in the playoffs (7 out of 9 years in playoffs on three different teams)


Yes he's a great leader for sure which is why I see someone overpaying to the tune of 4/48.

For 3/27 hell yes, or even 3/36 maybe but 4/48 no


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
The contracts last year for average catchers really changed the market. No way in the world 9 million per gets it done.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43552
This is a stab in the back to Wellington Castillo.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
good dolphin wrote:
The contracts last year for average catchers really changed the market. No way in the world 9 million per gets it done.


At the very least, I'd prefer to see what he's asking for (as one cannot expect to divine the future to see what he gets) before pretending it's a great move or not. That said, I again would be curious to know what they're supposed to otherwise do as 'punting' isn't likely to be a viable solution to improvement.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
2016 Free Agent Catchers

Chris Iannetta
Alex Avila
Dioner Navarro
Jose Molina
Jeff Mathis
Brayan Pena
Matt Wieters
Landon Powell
Corky Miller
John Jaso


We're done here.


Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38674
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
pittmike wrote:
Pirates offered 3 and he wants 4 years.

This is what I love about these guys. Like that extra fucking year is going to make a difference whether or not his family will eat or not. In 9 years he's made 36 million. Figure another 30 million at least from the next 3 years, but no dammit that 4th year is important. Crap like this is what keeps me from attending any games.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
badrogue17 wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Pirates offered 3 and he wants 4 years.

This is what I love about these guys. Like that extra fucking year is going to make a difference whether or not his family will eat or not. In 9 years he's made 36 million. Figure another 30 million at least from the next 3 years, but no dammit that 4th year is important. Crap like this is what keeps me from attending any games.


I hate people that bargain contracts based on what the market will bear.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
badrogue17 wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Pirates offered 3 and he wants 4 years.

This is what I love about these guys. Like that extra fucking year is going to make a difference whether or not his family will eat or not. In 9 years he's made 36 million. Figure another 30 million at least from the next 3 years, but no dammit that 4th year is important. Crap like this is what keeps me from attending any games.

I used to think that way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38674
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Don Tiny wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Pirates offered 3 and he wants 4 years.

This is what I love about these guys. Like that extra fucking year is going to make a difference whether or not his family will eat or not. In 9 years he's made 36 million. Figure another 30 million at least from the next 3 years, but no dammit that 4th year is important. Crap like this is what keeps me from attending any games.


I hate people that bargain contracts based on what the market will bear.

Good, then we're both content.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Not my money....pay the man...I am fine with a 31 year old very good catcher that is expected to play 350-400 AB's to start. If schwarber does play catcher, great way to work him in. But that should not be the reason to sign Martin. The guy is just good,.

Still need speed!

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Russell Martin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:42 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
bigfan wrote:
Not my money....pay the man...I am fine with a 31 year old very good catcher that is expected to play 350-400 AB's to start. If schwarber does play catcher, great way to work him in. But that should not be the reason to sign Martin. The guy is just good,.

Still need speed!


It's not my money either but I am a fan and would prefer them to spend their money wisely. Martin wouldn't be a guy I give $40M+ too.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group