Chus wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
1) My blocked posters. This thread had two or three of them.
Why do you block anybody? And why haven't you blocked me?
2) I don't understand your second line. Steve or Reardon spamming? I saw Reardon mostly keep it to Politics, no? And I don't recall Steve spamming.
Reardon. He took it to other sections. Then he cried to bigfan. What a pussy. The guy attacked everybody, but went crying to bigfan when somebody gave it back to him. This is the person you are portraying as a sympathetic figure.
3) He was talking to the looters. The looters are who the looters are. But as we saw in Vancouver, they can easily be white. And they are equally shitty human beings. Color does not factor in. Bigfan specifically referenced the Occupy Wall Street protestors in his very first post; I'd venture to guess the majority of those were white hipsters. While they weren't looting, he also ripped on them for their useless protesting.
False. His ire is directed anybody protesting against the man, and the status quo. He saved the real venom for the balcks in Ferguson, as evidenced by the stolen TV comment. It's pretty clear what he was saying. He would be angry with the police, if the people in Ferguson didn't riot. It's like offsetting penalties in football. Replay the down.
Maybe you should re-read this thread. It's all right there for you.
I prefer to deal with the disease, not the symptoms.
4) But I think you do have the freedom of speech. I just think you cannot excessively go on and on if bigfan tells you to drop it. I had to deal with this lesson myself. So, I'd like to agree with you on this. But I mean...you've gone 15 pages without censorship. Can you really complain?
Sigh.
He claims that he "doesn't want certain things associated with his site". Apparently, unapologetic racism doesn't meet that criteria. He went out of his way to defend it. At one point, he pretended he didn't know the things Steve posted. Perhaps, if you had been threatened with banishment as many times as I have (you notice, he hasn't disputed that. Not one time.), you might see things my way.
5) I'm comfortable in my position. You're accurate with what happened in this thread. But you've done similarly with the cat and mouse game. It takes two to tango. Bigfan is gonna bigfan. And you kept his game, or your game, going by still accusing him (passive aggressively) of being racist when you know as a fact he is not.
It would have been many guesses before I got the right answer to "who would be bigfan's biggest supporter" today. Those would have been some long odds.
I hate predictable posts. You have indeed thrown me a curve ball. Well done, youngblood.
Who comes out looking bad? Urrrrrbody.
I disagree. Most people in this thread have not come out looking bad. This thread will probably be deleted in the morning.
1) Because one has to be in a certain mood to opt into reading a Baby McNown post.
2) You don't understand what I'm saying with Reardon. I hated him as much as the next guy. Good riddance. Steve is terrible - but not in the same realm as Reardon.
3) I also think the Ferguson protestors are stupid. Am I racist? Can't the protestors be a bad thing and the shooting of Brown be a bad thing? (For clarity, I still think it was a justified shooting.)
4) Threatened with banishment? Are you serious, bro? I've been banned. It is his board. I'm still gonna be me and you're still gonna be you and after all that it still is bigfan's board. And, again, Reardon and Steve aren't comparable. Maybe today bigfan explains what he means by not associated with his board. I think I know what he means.
5) I'm supporting reason. Not Reason, but reason. This thread has lacked it.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
