It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 9:31 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
http://m.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article/ ... r-meetings

"Primarily, we are addressing things for the long term," Hahn said. "We are acquiring players we can add to this young core we have been able to assemble over the last year-plus and have control of for the next extended period of time. If the right situation arises on a short-term basis, whether it's someone like LaRoche or somebody who addresses another need on a shorter time horizon than our focus has been, we would make that move."

Sounds very similar to what some other front office guys have said in this city. Interesting.

Purposely lose to win.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
immessedup17 wrote:
http://m.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article/103293468/white-sox-wont-force-moves-at-winter-meetings

"Primarily, we are addressing things for the long term," Hahn said. "We are acquiring players we can add to this young core we have been able to assemble over the last year-plus and have control of for the next extended period of time. If the right situation arises on a short-term basis, whether it's someone like LaRoche or somebody who addresses another need on a shorter time horizon than our focus has been, we would make that move."

Sounds very similar to what some other front office guys have said in this city. Interesting.

Purposely lose to win.


I'm not seeing anything in that passage about Rick Hahn saying the White Sox are going to "purposely lose to win."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
immessedup17 wrote:
http://m.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article/103293468/white-sox-wont-force-moves-at-winter-meetings

"Primarily, we are addressing things for the long term," Hahn said. "We are acquiring players we can add to this young core we have been able to assemble over the last year-plus and have control of for the next extended period of time. If the right situation arises on a short-term basis, whether it's someone like LaRoche or somebody who addresses another need on a shorter time horizon than our focus has been, we would make that move."

Sounds very similar to what some other front office guys have said in this city. Interesting.

Purposely lose to win.

I don't care enough to click on that link but nothing in the part you quoted implied purposely losing. I actually don't even know how you surmised that. Maybe you quoted the wrong part?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
immessedup17 wrote:
Purposely lose to win.

Image

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
immessedup17 wrote:
http://m.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article/103293468/white-sox-wont-force-moves-at-winter-meetings

"Primarily, we are addressing things for the long term," Hahn said. "We are acquiring players we can add to this young core we have been able to assemble over the last year-plus and have control of for the next extended period of time. If the right situation arises on a short-term basis, whether it's someone like LaRoche or somebody who addresses another need on a shorter time horizon than our focus has been, we would make that move."

Sounds very similar to what some other front office guys have said in this city. Interesting.

Purposely lose to win.
No.

Like, not even close.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Even Kenny didn't want to go through with this house cleaning. Lots of turmoil on the South Side.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
immessedup17 wrote:
http://m.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article/103293468/white-sox-wont-force-moves-at-winter-meetings

"Primarily, we are addressing things for the long term," Hahn said. "We are acquiring players we can add to this young core we have been able to assemble over the last year-plus and have control of for the next extended period of time. If the right situation arises on a short-term basis, whether it's someone like LaRoche or somebody who addresses another need on a shorter time horizon than our focus has been, we would make that move."

Sounds very similar to what some other front office guys have said in this city. Interesting.

Purposely lose to win.

I don't think Hahn is purposely losing to win. He's just bad and his moves have been bad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2015 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
IMU wrote:
http://m.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article/103293468/white-sox-wont-force-moves-at-winter-meetings

"Primarily, we are addressing things for the long term," Hahn said. "We are acquiring players we can add to this young core we have been able to assemble over the last year-plus and have control of for the next extended period of time. If the right situation arises on a short-term basis, whether it's someone like LaRoche or somebody who addresses another need on a shorter time horizon than our focus has been, we would make that move."

Sounds very similar to what some other front office guys have said in this city. Interesting.

Purposely lose to win.

At least Hahn is sticking to his guns. He knows Theo and Hoyer went about this the proper way. At least Sox fans can look north and know there will be a light at the end of the tunnel.

Godspeed.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2015 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I don't think the Sox are in that bad of shape, ya got sale and quintana. I'm going to assume rodon is going to be better than quintana...that's 3\5 of your rotation.

You turn gillaspie into a utility man and spend $ on surrounding abreu with 2 legit bats ..this can all be done in an off season.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2015 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
312player wrote:
I don't think the Sox are in that bad of shape, ya got sale and quintana. I'm going to assume rodon is going to be better than quintana...that's 3\5 of your rotation.

You turn gillaspie into a utility man and spend $ on surrounding abreu with 2 legit bats ..this can all be done in an off season.

Wasn't Samardzija supposed to improve the staff and LaRoche and Melky weren't two legit bats?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2015 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I think most people knew the shark sucks n laroche is garbage...the melkman ain't shit without his juice...rick Hahn is a fool .

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2015 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Its called Reloading.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 7:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
IMU wrote:
http://m.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article/103293468/white-sox-wont-force-moves-at-winter-meetings

"Primarily, we are addressing things for the long term," Hahn said. "We are acquiring players we can add to this young core we have been able to assemble over the last year-plus and have control of for the next extended period of time. If the right situation arises on a short-term basis, whether it's someone like LaRoche or somebody who addresses another need on a shorter time horizon than our focus has been, we would make that move."

Sounds very similar to what some other front office guys have said in this city. Interesting.

Purposely lose to win.


Actually, Hahn is going about this all wrong. he has acquired guys that help make the team at least mediocre or average. You do not get guys like Bryant in the draft with middle of the pack draft picks. but I understand why he has to go about things as he has. the fan base on the South side doesn't really support the team well for a .500 team. With a last place team, attendance might well be below a million for the season. That's not necessarily a knock on their fandom (some might call that good judgment) as much as an accurate assessment. But acquiring guys like Abreau, Garcia, Rondon and Eaton is a pretty good start on building a nucleus. Samardzija was a mistake though. not always going to get em right.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16490
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
You do not get guys like Bryant in the draft with middle of the pack draft picks.


Yes, but some of us simply disagree with intentional tanking. Purposefully sucking royally for years to stockpile high draft picks is an unsavory practice for teams to employ. The Cubs seem to have been given a pass due to the fanbase built up over the years and their unique situation of having a 107-year drought.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 10:05 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
You do not get guys like Bryant in the draft with middle of the pack draft picks.


Yes, but some of us simply disagree with intentional tanking. Purposefully sucking royally for years to stockpile high draft picks is an unsavory practice for teams to employ. The Cubs seem to have been given a pass due to the fanbase built up over the years and their unique situation of having a 107-year drought.


It's not true anyway. Mike Trout was the 25th pick. But maybe Steve thinks Bryant is better than Trout.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I'll give the Cubs the giddiness on the board the last few days. It is understandable. If you took a snapshot of this week's posts though and read them independently you would think they not only had Bryant but also Super Rizzo as better than Trout. :lol:

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 10:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:08 pm
Posts: 2139
pizza_Place: Lucano's
pittmike wrote:
I'll give the Cubs the giddiness on the board the last few days. It is understandable. If you took a snapshot of this week's posts though and read them independently you would think they not only had Bryant but also Super Rizzo as better than Trout. :lol:


Don't forget Soler and Russell. They are too...

:wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
pittmike wrote:
I'll give the Cubs the giddiness on the board the last few days. It is understandable. If you took a snapshot of this week's posts though and read them independently you would think they not only had Bryant but also Super Rizzo as better than Trout. :lol:

Rizzo has been better than Trout this season.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
This alone is a correct statement.

HOWEVER,

Even last year, as I saw Rizzo progress, I would still not trade Rizzo for Trout, for this team.

Trout might end up with better numbers and based on the age he was great at, the guy has potential to put up all time great numbers. Still not trading Rizzo now.

Chemistry matters....even if STATS doesnt measure it

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
I'd like Trout on my team. I have no idea who will have the better career; I'm still surprised Mike Trout is able to put up Mike Trout numbers each season.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 10:50 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Rizzo was a sixth round pick.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 10:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:08 pm
Posts: 2139
pizza_Place: Lucano's
bigfan wrote:
Even last year, as I saw Rizzo progress, I would still not trade Rizzo for Trout, for this team.


:shock:

Trout has 1 MVP and could've had another if he had played the entire season his rookie year. Even so, he won ROY and finished 2nd to Cabrera for MVP.

Also, Trout has a good reputation so I don't get your chemistry angle.

Trout over Rizzo all day, every day, and twice on Sundays.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:07 pm
Posts: 3705
I'd rather pick 2nd than 28th. Including picking earlier in round 2, 3, 4, etc...

Now back on topic....Sox are rebuilding or reloading? I'm confused.

_________________
Proud to be UNVERIFIED.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6861
walkrman5 wrote:
I'd rather pick 2nd than 28th. Including picking earlier in round 2, 3, 4, etc...

Now back on topic....Sox are rebuilding or reloading? I'm confused.


They are losing.

If they are rebuilding, then they are no better then the Cubs you hate and if they are reloading, then your GM sucks.

and don't tell me it doesn't matter where you draft. Your odds of finding a superstar are greater the higher you pick. If you take a hitter, your odds are even higher that he will succeed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 11:25 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
walkrman5 wrote:
I'd rather pick 2nd than 28th. Including picking earlier in round 2, 3, 4, etc..


That's no help when you take Dunston over Gooden or Mitchell over Trout.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 12:30 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38362
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
bigfan wrote:
Even last year, as I saw Rizzo progress, I would still not trade Rizzo for Trout, for this team.


This is why rational people question the sanity of Cubs fans.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Rizzo has a higher OPS (by over .100) and a higher WAR. Pretty much higher everything. He also bats lefty, which adds important balance to a lineup.

And Mike Trout will be pinched for PEDs.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 1:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:08 pm
Posts: 2139
pizza_Place: Lucano's
IMU wrote:
Rizzo has a higher OPS (by over .100) and a higher WAR. Pretty much higher everything. He also bats lefty, which adds important balance to a lineup.

And Mike Trout will be pinched for PEDs.


So will Soler.

I have a soft spot for Trout as I've had him on my fantasy team every year except this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:07 pm
Posts: 3705
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
walkrman5 wrote:
I'd rather pick 2nd than 28th. Including picking earlier in round 2, 3, 4, etc..


That's no help when you take Dunston over Gooden or Mitchell over Trout.


True...but I'd rather have the choice from more than from less.

_________________
Proud to be UNVERIFIED.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I'd take trout over rizzo, move Bryant to first , Castro to 3rd and Russell to short. Trout does look juiced, but you can say that about most stars.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group