It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 10:37 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 12:56 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79462
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
denisdman wrote:
I have been in a lot of Skyboxes, and the roof tops are much better. The perspective is unique, and the food offerings and all in package are a great value.


This is why I really think the rooftop guys are stupid. What they should have done is cut their best deal with the Cubs, get a lump sum payment for cancelling the contract, ended the 17% fee, and let the Cubs put up whatever they wanted and still kept running their rooftop businesses. The views aren't great from up there and people don't really go to watch the games anyway. It's the party, the fun of it. So what if the view is partially blocked?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:13 pm
Posts: 15062
pizza_Place: Four hours away....and on fire :-(
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I have been in a lot of Skyboxes, and the roof tops are much better. The perspective is unique, and the food offerings and all in package are a great value.


This is why I really think the rooftop guys are stupid. What they should have done is cut their best deal with the Cubs, get a lump sum payment for cancelling the contract, ended the 17% fee, and let the Cubs put up whatever they wanted and still kept running their rooftop businesses. The views aren't great from up there and people don't really go to watch the games anyway. It's the party, the fun of it. So what if the view is partially blocked?


Yep. The one time I've had rooftop tickets, I spent most of the Cubs game watching the 'Hawks playoff game on the bar TVs. I would never buy rooftop tickets again.

_________________
-- source


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

And it all comes down to the money. The old guy can afford more amenities and so he demands them. That's why there's now seating and VIP sections at rock concerts. So the old Baby Boomers can "rock" without getting rocked. And they prefer their ballgame experience to be as close to sitting in their living rooms as possible.


Not in my case.

The main amenities to me are ease of getting to and leaving the park. Easy parking. The less headache before I enter the park, the better. Forget VIP tickets. I'm not paying that. I'll take the 1st row of the upper deck anytime.


To me, the main negative of Sox Park is the easy parking. That's the thing that separates the ballpark from the neighborhood. They try to get you out as quickly as possible. They don't want anyone to walk around and go to the local bars or restaurants. It's designed to put you back on the highway as quickly as possible.

I don't see going to a game as an effort.

It doesn't help that Bridgeport xenophobes prefer being segregated from the 10,000 or so Sox fans that show up every game. They like their Great Wall of parking lot asphalt. I used to (and hopefully will soon again) park at the abandoned colstor on Canal and I've had to play it like I live in the neighborhood to even make it south of 31st.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I have been in a lot of Skyboxes, and the roof tops are much better. The perspective is unique, and the food offerings and all in package are a great value.


This is why I really think the rooftop guys are stupid. What they should have done is cut their best deal with the Cubs, get a lump sum payment for cancelling the contract, ended the 17% fee, and let the Cubs put up whatever they wanted and still kept running their rooftop businesses. The views aren't great from up there and people don't really go to watch the games anyway. It's the party, the fun of it. So what if the view is partially blocked?


Interesting, hadn't considered that. It is a nice view, but the unique perspective is more my play. Thinking back to the six times I have sat there, you are right- I didn't pay that much attention to the game. The reason is you get drunk by the third inning from the all you can drink package.

Don't read my comments as having sympathy for the roof top owners. I just enjoyed their offering. I also think the roof tops are a big part of the entire Wrigley mystique. You won't hear an anti-corporate tone from me because I don't mind that capital gets invested in a good product.

I know everyone here is a big sports fan too. What I am not sure is how much others have sampled things like out of market stadiums, sky boxes, roof tops, premium seating. I am a bit spoiled because I do get to a lot of places because of corporate events. Of all the things I have done, two stand out in my mind. 1) Playing a real game in Great American Ball Park, 2) Attending a roof top outing. All else, I could have done anywhere.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79462
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
redskingreg wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I have been in a lot of Skyboxes, and the roof tops are much better. The perspective is unique, and the food offerings and all in package are a great value.


This is why I really think the rooftop guys are stupid. What they should have done is cut their best deal with the Cubs, get a lump sum payment for cancelling the contract, ended the 17% fee, and let the Cubs put up whatever they wanted and still kept running their rooftop businesses. The views aren't great from up there and people don't really go to watch the games anyway. It's the party, the fun of it. So what if the view is partially blocked?


Yep. The one time I've had rooftop tickets, I spent most of the Cubs game watching the 'Hawks playoff game on the bar TVs. I would never buy rooftop tickets again.


Like denis, I enjoy the rooftops, but it's totally a different experience than being in the park. It's not so dependent on what's happening on the field. You'll still be able to hear it, they've spent a lot of dough on those buildings, they can put up monitors for those who want to actually watch.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
redskingreg wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I have been in a lot of Skyboxes, and the roof tops are much better. The perspective is unique, and the food offerings and all in package are a great value.


This is why I really think the rooftop guys are stupid. What they should have done is cut their best deal with the Cubs, get a lump sum payment for cancelling the contract, ended the 17% fee, and let the Cubs put up whatever they wanted and still kept running their rooftop businesses. The views aren't great from up there and people don't really go to watch the games anyway. It's the party, the fun of it. So what if the view is partially blocked?


Yep. The one time I've had rooftop tickets, I spent most of the Cubs game watching the 'Hawks playoff game on the bar TVs. I would never buy rooftop tickets again.


Come on now. I have been with a lot of folks, and to a person, they loved it.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:05 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79462
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
America wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

And it all comes down to the money. The old guy can afford more amenities and so he demands them. That's why there's now seating and VIP sections at rock concerts. So the old Baby Boomers can "rock" without getting rocked. And they prefer their ballgame experience to be as close to sitting in their living rooms as possible.


Not in my case.

The main amenities to me are ease of getting to and leaving the park. Easy parking. The less headache before I enter the park, the better. Forget VIP tickets. I'm not paying that. I'll take the 1st row of the upper deck anytime.


To me, the main negative of Sox Park is the easy parking. That's the thing that separates the ballpark from the neighborhood. They try to get you out as quickly as possible. They don't want anyone to walk around and go to the local bars or restaurants. It's designed to put you back on the highway as quickly as possible.

I don't see going to a game as an effort.

It doesn't help that Bridgeport xenophobes prefer being segregated from the 10,000 or so Sox fans that show up every game. They like their Great Wall of parking lot asphalt. I used to (and hopefully will soon again) park at the abandoned colstor on Canal and I've had to play it like I live in the neighborhood to even make it south of 31st.


I always park on the street and get a pass from a bar. I don't like paying for parking in my own hometown.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I used to do that in Wrigleyville for friends that have zone parking passes. Now I just part far enough West of the stadium to get outside the zones. Actually, I haven't driven to Wrigley very much the past few years. I waste three hours on public transportation.....I wish they had an El line from I-90 to Clark.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43552
denisdman wrote:
I used to do that in Wrigleyville for friends that have zone parking passes. Now I just part far enough West of the stadium to get outside the zones. Actually, I haven't driven to Wrigley very much the past few years. I waste three hours on public transportation.....I wish they had an El line from I-90 to Clark.

If you're in Schaumburg, just drive over to the skokie yellow line, and take the El to the game that way. I've done that a few times, and it worked out great.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
O.co is a giant dump, but was also the most fun I've ever had at a game.

There's a decent point to be made that what made Wrigley such a fun place died 10 years ago, that even if they left in its charmingly decrepit state it'd still be a hollow corporate monolith of class segregation and the overindulgent wealthy. The rooftops probably fall into the same category.

But, they're still going to crank up the ticket prices so old, boring white guys and their young, boring white kids can be assured anyone making less than six figures wont interrupt their fan experience. Even shitty old O.co and quarter-full concrete US Cellular will at least fulfill some of the democratic baseball ideal.


Last edited by America on Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55844
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
You could take a bus from Addison-Blue if you'd deign to take a bus, and if you wouldn't, I totally support you.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Douchebag wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I used to do that in Wrigleyville for friends that have zone parking passes. Now I just part far enough West of the stadium to get outside the zones. Actually, I haven't driven to Wrigley very much the past few years. I waste three hours on public transportation.....I wish they had an El line from I-90 to Clark.

If you're in Schaumburg, just drive over to the skokie yellow line, and take the El to the game that way. I've done that a few times, and it worked out great.


I live out in West Dundee, although I often go from work, which is Schaumburg. From home I use the Barrington Metra station. From work I use the Arlington Park one. Schaumburg to Skokie seems tough....? The worst is the bus ride back to the Metra station after the game. Irving is terrible, especially with all the students on the bus forcing it to make every stop. I am sure those students hate the drunk Cubs fans on the bus......

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Paying for parking actively supports those fucking lots, and I'm not going to support those fucking lots.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:13 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79462
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
denisdman wrote:
I used to do that in Wrigleyville for friends that have zone parking passes. Now I just part far enough West of the stadium to get outside the zones. Actually, I haven't driven to Wrigley very much the past few years. I waste three hours on public transportation.....I wish they had an El line from I-90 to Clark.


Yeah, on a nice day, I have no problem parking west of Ashland and walking.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:15 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79462
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Curious Hair wrote:
You could take a bus from Addison-Blue if you'd deign to take a bus, and if you wouldn't, I totally support you.


I rode that fucking bus way too many times in high school.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Another motorcycle bonus: exempt from residential parking rules.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55844
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
"Addison Blue" sounds like a porn name.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Curious Hair wrote:
You could take a bus from Addison-Blue if you'd deign to take a bus, and if you wouldn't, I totally support you.

If the weather is nice I hop on Rosemont early enough to just walk. Once you get east of Western it's quite pleasant.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
You could take a bus from Addison-Blue if you'd deign to take a bus, and if you wouldn't, I totally support you.


I rode that fucking bus way too many times in high school.


I find Addison to be slower than Irving. If you take that Cumberland Blue line in, then you get stuck at Addison. I tend to do Metra because it makes my car ride home shorter, and it gives me more time to sober up. Typically it take 2-2.5 hours to get from Wrigley to the Barrington Metra station after a day game. Then I have a 20-30 minute ride back to West Dundee. The Cubs are a labor of love for me.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Curious Hair wrote:
"Addison Blue" sounds like a porn name.


Indeed it does. Or a nasty cheese from your home state.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
That Addison bus to Wrigley is godawful. Way too many drunks, chicks complaining because they have to pee, etc. Never again. Standing near that cop who beat the shit out of that female bartender 5 or so years ago didn't help.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55844
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
denisdman wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
"Addison Blue" sounds like a porn name.


Indeed it does. Or a nasty cheese from your home state.

I was born in Illinois and spent my first 9+ years here. We just took a weekend trip that ran long.

Furious Styles wrote:
That Addison bus to Wrigley is godawful. Way too many drunks, chicks complaining because they have to pee

Girls complaining that they have to peeeeeeeeeeeeeeee is just a thing girls do.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
I've also got down a nice routine if I have tix to a weekend game where I get off at Montrose, grab the 78 and grab pregame beers at Fountainhead. If it's a mid-afternoon or night game then I have enough time to walk over to Toon's for some wings.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Furious Styles wrote:
That Addison bus to Wrigley is godawful. Way too many drunks, chicks complaining because they have to pee, etc. Never again. Standing near that cop who beat the shit out of that female bartender 5 or so years ago didn't help.


You mean "used to be awful before the one and only Olive Garden in the city opened at the el and bus stop"

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I used to do that in Wrigleyville for friends that have zone parking passes. Now I just part far enough West of the stadium to get outside the zones. Actually, I haven't driven to Wrigley very much the past few years. I waste three hours on public transportation.....I wish they had an El line from I-90 to Clark.


Yeah, on a nice day, I have no problem parking west of Ashland and walking.


spaces directly in front of Captain Nemos but park in their lot and they try to charge $20.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10781
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I have been in a lot of Skyboxes, and the roof tops are much better. The perspective is unique, and the food offerings and all in package are a great value.


This is why I really think the rooftop guys are stupid. What they should have done is cut their best deal with the Cubs, get a lump sum payment for cancelling the contract, ended the 17% fee, and let the Cubs put up whatever they wanted and still kept running their rooftop businesses. The views aren't great from up there and people don't really go to watch the games anyway. It's the party, the fun of it. So what if the view is partially blocked?


Exactly. They were greedy and were on a short term gravy train. They should have cached in while they could and just been happy they got to play.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:13 pm
Posts: 15062
pizza_Place: Four hours away....and on fire :-(
Kirkwood wrote:
I've also got down a nice routine if I have tix to a weekend game where I get off at Montrose, grab the 78 and grab pregame beers at Fountainhead. If it's a mid-afternoon or night game then I have enough time to walk over to Toon's for some wings.


Went to Fountainhead before Wilco last month. Good burgers! Beer selection was lacking, at least for hop heads. Granted it isn't really IPA season. Would definitely go back in the summer to see what they have to offer.

_________________
-- source


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Hinsdale
pizza_Place: Lugi's of Hong Kong
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I have been in a lot of Skyboxes, and the roof tops are much better. The perspective is unique, and the food offerings and all in package are a great value.


This is why I really think the rooftop guys are stupid. What they should have done is cut their best deal with the Cubs, get a lump sum payment for cancelling the contract, ended the 17% fee, and let the Cubs put up whatever they wanted and still kept running their rooftop businesses. The views aren't great from up there and people don't really go to watch the games anyway. It's the party, the fun of it. So what if the view is partially blocked?


Image

I agree 100%.

_________________
Kenny Williams fell for the banana in the tailpipe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 11:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
Peoria Matt wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
America wrote:
So future generations should be barred from ever experiencing that charm because 'Damnit I'm old and I want this instead of that!'


Exactly. Totally selfish on my part.


And it all comes down to the money. The old guy can afford more amenities and so he demands them. That's why there's now seating and VIP sections at rock concerts. So the old Baby Boomers can "rock" without getting rocked. And they prefer their ballgame experience to be as close to sitting in their living rooms as possible.


Not in my case.

The main amenities to me are ease of getting to and leaving the park. Easy parking. The less headache before I enter the park, the better. Forget VIP tickets. I'm not paying that. I'll take the 1st row of the upper deck anytime.


You realize that nothing about the Cubs upgrades are going to improve the ease of getting to (driving to) the game or parking? Probably will make it worse.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Rooftop Lawsuit
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 11:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4034
bigfan wrote:
As a neighbor , fan and season ticket holder, modernize the crap out of the place and win.


This is such a non-argument that it is stupid. The Cubs haven't sucked because they needed to squeeze more revenue out of their stadium, they have sucked because their management, players, and owners have sucked.

I stated this before, but all of the signage and additional advertisement is just incremental revenue for a franchise that already rolls in revenue. Sure it's more incremental revenue, but it's not like the Cubs have been hancuffed by a lack of revenue over the past 15 years. Forbes estimated the Cubs to have the 4th largest revenue stream in 2012 so lets stop all this bullshit right now about the Cubs needing jumbotron revenues to compete with the likes of the Pirates, Braves, Reds, Marlins, and Diamondbacks.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group