Spaulding wrote:
No, not completely. I think they need to figure out who, why, and how it will effect people. Autoimmune diseases have risen and nobody knows why but drs will tell you it's not food and it's not vaccinations. I also don't think all reactions are being reported properly to find out if there is a link or not. There are good drs and bad ones. You seemingly put a lot of trust in them, I do not. They are in a shitty spot because they can't come out and say the vaccines can harm people but have no idea why. They also imo should not be running around saying they are great for everybody when they are not. The Lyme disease vaccine was pulled because of low demand, cost, and it's side effects. Gardasil and the one for the Rotavirus are under scrutiny currently. If these have negative effects on some, so what is to say other vaccines won't be harmful to certain people. They don't know what they don't know so to say.
You are acting like there are some great mysteries with vaccines. Please give some specific examples. The rash one you mentioned earlier is well known and it is harmless. The autism link has been proven to be junk science.
Spaulding wrote:
It's my opinion the government should never be allowed to force you to have any medial procedure or inject anything in to you or your child that you do not want. What are they going to do? Make it a law? Enforce it how? Take your kid, hold em down, and put what you don't want into them? Throw you or your kid in jail? Take your kid from you? Put all the non vaccinated kids in a camp? That's scary shit.
Well, I'd imagine the parents would be held liable if they did not vaccinate for measles and the kid got measles.
Spaulding wrote:
You also can not tell a growing population of people too bad so sad for your health problems caused by the vaccinations (or possibly caused) but now they won't get X disease so be happy. From my personal experience it's a group larger than it should be. My daughter had a moderate reaction and I don't think it was ever "reported" to anybody. It's enough to make a parent question what it's really doing to your child and is it better than not having it. Maybe it should be delayed, maybe it should never be administered but they owe it to those parents and kids to find out. I can't imagine what the parents of the severe reactions go through.
I had a reaction to the chickenpox vaccine too. I may not even have complete immunity. It was a known side effect and once again it was relatively harmless. That one ended up actually seeming like a mild case of chickenpox.
I honestly just don't understand why you think these things haven't been studied for decades and they still are constantly studying them.
Spaulding wrote:
If you find out who it will effect the people it's safe for will get vaccinations and it eliminates the panic for both sides. It makes no sense to continue down the path they are on.
They have done that. Decades of research and science has done this. This is the problem. You act like all of this stuff is basically just thrown together with no thought or care. This is why I brought it back to the fact that if the current recommended vaccines do not meet your required level of science then you should opt out of the entire medical system. Almost any surgery, medicine, or treatment will have higher risks of dangerous side effects.
That isn't hyperbole either. There are very few things in medicine more studied and tested than vaccines. Just like anything in medicine there are always chances of side effects but except in exceedingly rare circumstances the side effects are harmless.
This whole thing was because of something that was junk science.
Spaulding wrote:
I am anti flu shots.
I think everyone should get one but I understand people that don't feel they are necessary.