It is currently Sun Nov 17, 2024 2:57 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2843 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 ... 95  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
In all my life, I've never seen White Sox fans this upset about the Cubs losing.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
In all my life, I've never seen White Sox fans this upset about the Cubs losing.

Yes, they are holding on to the pain.

I released it. The last three years are over now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
I don't think that the budget constraints influenced the course Theo took. I think that reading between the lines, stuff Jed said about the inability to do both build the major league team for a three year period and draft for the future (why?) had to do with budget. I think Theo looked at his budget and figured that the revenue streams needed to spend like he did with the Red Sox were still years away and so he decided to blow it all up and use this narrative of this being the best Plan. But if Theo had had unlimited budget, would we have a bunch of Edwin Jacksons? Who knows.

Whatever the failings of the plan, it is certain in my mind that this team should reach the beginning of its zenith in 2017. 2016 should still be viewed as a growing year, where the young talent gets evaluated at the major league level. It's almost as though Theo changed things midstream acquiring Lester simply because he's available. And seeing as his major failure in the plan has been to draft young immediate impact pitching, perhaps that's the move he had to make.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
WHO NEEDS PITCHING WHEN U HAVE THE 90S BRAVES SLUGGING

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
In all my life, I've never seen White Sox fans this upset about the Cubs losing.


Why do you care so much about what I care about so much?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
City of Fools wrote:
Whatever the failings of the plan, it is certain in my mind that this team should reach the beginning of its zenith in 2017. 2016 should still be viewed as a growing year, where the young talent gets evaluated at the major league level. It's almost as though Theo changed things midstream acquiring Lester simply because he's available. And seeing as his major failure in the plan has been to draft young immediate impact pitching, perhaps that's the move he had to make.


He has attempted to make a major move on a free agent starting pitcher in each of his off seasons.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 1553
Location: Long Grove,IL
pizza_Place: Thin crust cheese extra cheese ....Pizza DOC
good dolphin wrote:
Look at those guys in the Top 101. Only 2 out of 7 were acquired due to tanking. The top in the group was not acquired by losing.


More bad subdivision math.... unless you do not consider part of the "TANKING" trading your #1 and #2/3 starter as part of the plan to tank.....

Russell in trade for Shark and Hammel (the #1 and #2/3 starter)
Bryant Draft in 2013 #2 overall
Alomora Draft in 2012 #6 overall
Schwaber Draft in 2014 #4 overall
Johnson Draft inn 2012 first round #43 overall
McKinney trade for Shark and Hammel (the #1 and #2/3 starter)

so that is 6 out of 7 NOT 2

The only player that wasn't a result of "tanking" was Soler an International free agent signing

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I don't waste my time with the Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19348
If they win going forward I wont really care I stopped watching regularly the last few years.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
conns7901 wrote:
If they win going forward I wont really care I stopped watching regularly the last few years.

yep


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
THE INQUISITOR wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Look at those guys in the Top 101. Only 2 out of 7 were acquired due to tanking. The top in the group was not acquired by losing.


More bad subdivision math.... unless you do not consider part of the "TANKING" trading your #1 and #2/3 starter as part of the plan to tank.....

Russell in trade for Shark and Hammel (the #1 and #2/3 starter)
Bryant Draft in 2013 #2 overall
Alomora Draft in 2012 #6 overall
Schwaber Draft in 2014 #4 overall
Johnson Draft inn 2012 first round #43 overall
McKinney trade for Shark and Hammel (the #1 and #2/3 starter)

so that is 6 out of 7 NOT 2

The only player that wasn't a result of "tanking" was Soler an International free agent signing

as usual, someone states it better than I could have...

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
THE INQUISITOR wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Look at those guys in the Top 101. Only 2 out of 7 were acquired due to tanking. The top in the group was not acquired by losing.


More bad subdivision math.... unless you do not consider part of the "TANKING" trading your #1 and #2/3 starter as part of the plan to tank.....

Russell in trade for Shark and Hammel (the #1 and #2/3 starter)
Bryant Draft in 2013 #2 overall
Alomora Draft in 2012 #6 overall
Schwaber Draft in 2014 #4 overall
Johnson Draft inn 2012 first round #43 overall
McKinney trade for Shark and Hammel (the #1 and #2/3 starter)

so that is 6 out of 7 NOT 2

The only player that wasn't a result of "tanking" was Soler an International free agent signing


He tried but failed to sign Shark, so anything resulting from that is incidental. So remove Russell and Mc Kinney.

Schwarber was universally considered available in the mid teens of the draft. You yourself have said that he was drafted over slot. Remove him from the list.

Johnson was available to every team. Remove him from the list.

So now we are back to my original statement of truth.

I could have removed Almora, as he was drafted after Hendry's losing season, not as a part of Theo's tanking plan.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
City of Fools wrote:
THE INQUISITOR wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Look at those guys in the Top 101. Only 2 out of 7 were acquired due to tanking. The top in the group was not acquired by losing.


More bad subdivision math.... unless you do not consider part of the "TANKING" trading your #1 and #2/3 starter as part of the plan to tank.....

Russell in trade for Shark and Hammel (the #1 and #2/3 starter)
Bryant Draft in 2013 #2 overall
Alomora Draft in 2012 #6 overall
Schwaber Draft in 2014 #4 overall
Johnson Draft inn 2012 first round #43 overall
McKinney trade for Shark and Hammel (the #1 and #2/3 starter)

so that is 6 out of 7 NOT 2

The only player that wasn't a result of "tanking" was Soler an International free agent signing

as usual, someone states it better than I could have...


and you end up being just as incorrect

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
Schwarber was universally considered available in the mid teens of the draft. You yourself have said that he was drafted over slot. Remove him from the list.
:lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
good dolphin wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
THE INQUISITOR wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Look at those guys in the Top 101. Only 2 out of 7 were acquired due to tanking. The top in the group was not acquired by losing.


More bad subdivision math.... unless you do not consider part of the "TANKING" trading your #1 and #2/3 starter as part of the plan to tank.....

Russell in trade for Shark and Hammel (the #1 and #2/3 starter)
Bryant Draft in 2013 #2 overall
Alomora Draft in 2012 #6 overall
Schwaber Draft in 2014 #4 overall
Johnson Draft inn 2012 first round #43 overall
McKinney trade for Shark and Hammel (the #1 and #2/3 starter)

so that is 6 out of 7 NOT 2

The only player that wasn't a result of "tanking" was Soler an International free agent signing

as usual, someone states it better than I could have...


and you end up being just as incorrect

what are you disagreeing with?

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
good dolphin wrote:
He tried but failed to sign Shark

good dolphin wrote:
312player wrote:
Agreed, never liked simardzida ...I just shake my head when I hear all these dopes talk about him being an ace and wanting to lock him up long term. I feel confident in 3 months his era and whip will be real close to his career total ...he's never been great and never will be...I don't understand why Epstein is not moving this clown now...he should have been traded a month ago.


I think it's pretty clear the rest of MLB is not fooled.

viewtopic.php?p=2008803#p2008803

good dolphin wrote:
...with Rizzo and Castro looking like fool's gold and all those great prospects in A ball it looks like the earliest you will see some light is 2015 with winning seasons no earlier that 2017. It seems like a long term contract for Samardzija would not be a good investment as he will be well into his 30s when the team is good.

viewtopic.php?p=1749316#p1749316

good dolphin wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
I don't think this guy can handle a full season of MLB. His arm seems to "go dead" here and there. Flip him & keep Garza?


It's not a matter of arm, it's just a regression to the mean. The guy is a 4.00 ERA pitcher and, surprise, he has a 4 ERA as the season moves. You are seeing the good side of this is Edwin Jackson.

viewtopic.php?p=1771176#p1771176

Sorry just wanted to make sure I documented several of good dolphin's Samardzija thoughts over the last couple of seasons. Before he joined the South Side, if you couldn't tell.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
good dolphin wrote:
5 of 9 is a bad percentage even if your were correct, which you are not

Samardzija is a #1 for the Cubs. He is a #4 for everyone else.
Castillo is and would be a starter on most MLB teams
Baez arrival is indeterminate
Your point on Jackson was that he was a #4 OF. I suppose you are correct if your meant at AA

viewtopic.php?p=1935922#p1935922

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
good dolphin wrote:

He tried but failed to sign Shark (to a favorable discount), so anything resulting from that is incidental. So remove Russell and Mc Kinney.

Saint Theo transitioned a failed reliever into a serviceable starter with #2/#3 upside and a half-year rental into a top 5 prospect and a top 100 prospect.

I can only hope he "fails" like that again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
immessedup17 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
He tried but failed to sign Shark

good dolphin wrote:
312player wrote:
Agreed, never liked simardzida ...I just shake my head when I hear all these dopes talk about him being an ace and wanting to lock him up long term. I feel confident in 3 months his era and whip will be real close to his career total ...he's never been great and never will be...I don't understand why Epstein is not moving this clown now...he should have been traded a month ago.


I think it's pretty clear the rest of MLB is not fooled.

viewtopic.php?p=2008803#p2008803

good dolphin wrote:
...with Rizzo and Castro looking like fool's gold and all those great prospects in A ball it looks like the earliest you will see some light is 2015 with winning seasons no earlier that 2017. It seems like a long term contract for Samardzija would not be a good investment as he will be well into his 30s when the team is good.

viewtopic.php?p=1749316#p1749316

good dolphin wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
I don't think this guy can handle a full season of MLB. His arm seems to "go dead" here and there. Flip him & keep Garza?


It's not a matter of arm, it's just a regression to the mean. The guy is a 4.00 ERA pitcher and, surprise, he has a 4 ERA as the season moves. You are seeing the good side of this is Edwin Jackson.

viewtopic.php?p=1771176#p1771176

Sorry just wanted to make sure I documented several of good dolphin's Samardzija thoughts over the last couple of seasons. Before he joined the South Side, if you couldn't tell.



Responsive of nothing.

Theo tried to sign him long term. He rebuffed Theo. This was his incentive to sell.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
immessedup17 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
5 of 9 is a bad percentage even if your were correct, which you are not

Samardzija is a #1 for the Cubs. He is a #4 for everyone else.
Castillo is and would be a starter on most MLB teams
Baez arrival is indeterminate
Your point on Jackson was that he was a #4 OF. I suppose you are correct if your meant at AA

viewtopic.php?p=1935922#p1935922


Were you attempting to show that I was correct?

I was a bit off, Shark is a #3 on the Sox. I think he was no higher than that on the A's if they were healthy.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Hinsdale
pizza_Place: Lugi's of Hong Kong
The Cubs losing on purpose is horrible, unfair to other teams that couldn't weather the storm and will never work.
If they start contending every year it won't mean anything because they did it the wrong way.....Signed Mike in Murphysboro

2012) White Sox 85-77 Cubs 61-101 (2012 Year 1 of Theo, Jed, Jason)
2013) White Sox 63-99 Cubs 66-96 WS Drafted at 17 Cubs at 2
2014) White Sox 73-89 Cubs 73-89 WS Drafted at 3 Cubs at 4
2015) WS Draft at 8 Cubs at 9
Image

_________________
Kenny Williams fell for the banana in the tailpipe


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:

He tried but failed to sign Shark, so anything resulting from that is incidental.

Wrong.


That trade is a HUGE part of the rebuild and it KILLS you because you spent that whole season talking aobut how bad Samardzija is and then Theo flipped this guy you deemed a #4 starter for two hugely touted prospects

This was also after posting that Theo was smart to lowball Samardzija.


Stop lawyering. We all know what happened.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
Kirkwood wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

He tried but failed to sign Shark (to a favorable discount), so anything resulting from that is incidental. So remove Russell and Mc Kinney.

Saint Theo transitioned a failed reliever into a serviceable starter with #2/#3 upside and a half-year rental into a top 5 prospect and a top 100 prospect.

I can only hope he "fails" like that again.


This only bolsters my position that losing was not necessary to achieve future success. Good teams make good trades all the time without losing. Good GM also draft good players all over the draft.

The trade was good because Samardzija was going to walk. What if he were willing to sign. Would the Cubs be more or less poised for future success with Samardzija on the staff versus Russell in their pocket? That is pretty indeterminate right now.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
rpb coming off like a guy who believes in the plan!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
immessedup17 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
He tried but failed to sign Shark

good dolphin wrote:
312player wrote:
Agreed, never liked simardzida ...I just shake my head when I hear all these dopes talk about him being an ace and wanting to lock him up long term. I feel confident in 3 months his era and whip will be real close to his career total ...he's never been great and never will be...I don't understand why Epstein is not moving this clown now...he should have been traded a month ago.


I think it's pretty clear the rest of MLB is not fooled.

viewtopic.php?p=2008803#p2008803

good dolphin wrote:
...with Rizzo and Castro looking like fool's gold and all those great prospects in A ball it looks like the earliest you will see some light is 2015 with winning seasons no earlier that 2017. It seems like a long term contract for Samardzija would not be a good investment as he will be well into his 30s when the team is good.

viewtopic.php?p=1749316#p1749316

good dolphin wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
I don't think this guy can handle a full season of MLB. His arm seems to "go dead" here and there. Flip him & keep Garza?


It's not a matter of arm, it's just a regression to the mean. The guy is a 4.00 ERA pitcher and, surprise, he has a 4 ERA as the season moves. You are seeing the good side of this is Edwin Jackson.

viewtopic.php?p=1771176#p1771176

Sorry just wanted to make sure I documented several of good dolphin's Samardzija thoughts over the last couple of seasons. Before he joined the South Side, if you couldn't tell.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Rough day for dolphin


Dolphin stood on three platforms last year

Rizzo sucks (All star)
Samardzija is a #4 and will return nothing of value (2 top prospects)
White Sox are in the WC hunt (89 losses)


Also, after making the fools gold comments on Castro, dolphin would later say "why are you all surpised at Castro's resrugence? He's a known commodity?"


I guess he was a known commodity of fools gold


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb coming off like a guy who believes in the plan!

Just reporting what happened without the white sox glasses.


Id have preferred they signed an All star team in 2011 but that didnt happen so here we are



Here's the thing. The bad part is over and that has Sox fans worried (ridiculous to worry about a team like the Cubs....but they DO)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

He tried but failed to sign Shark, so anything resulting from that is incidental.

Wrong.


That trade is a HUGE part of the rebuild and it KILLS you because you spent that whole season talking aobut how bad Samardzija is and then Theo flipped this guy you deemed a #4 starter for two hugely touted prospects

This was also after posting that Theo was smart to lowball Samardzija.


Stop lawyering. We all know what happened.


The undeniable fact is that Theo wanted Samardzija long term. This was not part of the tanking plan. It was a reaction to Samardzija telling him no.

You have avoided the unpleasant answer to this question: What was Samardzija on the A's if their staff was healthy? What is he currently on the Sox?

Theo took advantage of a desperate Beane. Cherrington did as well.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb coming off like a guy who believes in the plan!

Just reporting what happened without the white sox glasses.


Id have preferred they signed an All star team in 2011 but that didnt happen so here we are



Here's the thing. The bad part is over and that has Sox fans worried (ridiculous to worry about a team like the Cubs....but they DO)


I don't think there is a single Sox fan who is worried. The Sox look fine to me in the present and future.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:

The undeniable fact is that Theo wanted Samardzija long term. This was not part of the tanking plan. It was a reaction to Samardzija telling him no.

Nope. Not only is it deniable, its the truth. I understand it blows up your whole argument though.

good dolphin wrote:
You have avoided the unpleasant answer to this question: What was Samardzija on the A's if their staff was healthy? What is he currently on the Sox?

Ive not avoided anything. He's probably #2 on the Sox. But you thought he was a #4.


If he was a #4 then Theo made an unbelievable trade and you have to give him credit
If he's a #2 then you were just flat out wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
The bad part is over and that has Sox fans worried (ridiculous to worry about a team like the Cubs....but they DO)
I don't think it is worried.

It seems like many Sox fans didn't think you had to lose for 5 straight years to rebuild. Being competitive doesn't mean that is wrong.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:

I don't think there is a single Sox fan who is worried. The Sox look fine to me in the present and future.

The Sox always look good to you. Every year.


If you think that Sox fans dont worry about the Cubs having success than I guess we disagree and that's fine. I still love you as much as ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2843 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 ... 95  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group