chip egan wrote:
I just heard Dan talk about how one of his "sources" with the Cubs felt the best bat amongst the young players belongs to Schwarber. He said the guy gave him a three word response about his bat and it was "Babe F'ing Ruth."
First of all, it's no secret that the team is very high on him, including Theo. I apologize for not recalling exactly who said it, but one host-might have been Murph- mentioned that Theo feels most high on Schwarber's future than those of Bryant, Soler, and Baez.
In my opinion, this isn't a "source" type of thing where someone who feels Schwarber has the best bat needs to be protected because this opinion is controversial or will create some sort of issue amongst coaches, players, etc.
I'm getting tired of all these hosts, particularly Bernstein and Boers referencing their "sources" and what is supposedly going on behind the scenes in many instances. The stories and information being tossed about doesn't seem to be coming true.
And, it's not just them. I heard a sports host on WGN said sources told him the Bears did not tell Brandon Marshall he couldn't continue to do his Showtime anymore. Lo and behold, the team put out a kibosh on all players from doing shows or interviews unless it was league mandated.
Everyone's got sources, but it seems that people keep throwing things out there to see what sticks in an effort to say "I told you so". However, if it doesn't come to fruition, I don't hear too many apologizing for their misinformation.
It's become much worse in the last year or so, but this show, in particular, can't have a conversation anymore about referencing a source for supposed inside information and/or to validate their points. I think most people just don't find it believable that Boers, who doesn't leave his house, and hasn't covered any of these teams in around 2 decades has impeccable sources. I think Bernstein uses himself as the source of his inside information, the validation of his own opinions, and most of his inside information is pretty obvious and/or can't be disproven because it's not specific.