denisdman wrote:
If the Cubs put Bryant on the opening day roster, you guys would be on here saying, "hah look at those idiots. They claim to be managing the team for the long term, and all they had to do was wait 12 days."
I would not attack the Cubs for that. The Cubs have potentially one of the best power hitters in the NL, who has been MLB ready since last season, sitting there and they are going to put him in the minors. I don't care if its 12 days or 2 months. The question is this, 'Do the Cubs have a better roster with Kris Bryant or without.' The answer is clearly with, and therefore he should be on the field against the Cardinals on Opening Nite.
If Rodon had a 1.5 ERA and a3:1 K:BB ratio, then Sox fans would be screaming for him to break camp with the big club. Its clear though that he is nowhere near as ready as Bryant is.
denisdman wrote:
After the Blackhawks won the first Cup and were all in (salary cap wise), everyone was pissed the next year because of the talent unload. So even when a team wins, there are still critics.
Don't compare the Hawks and the Cubs. The Hawks WON a championship. They actually won something. And the year before that they went pretty far into the playoffs. Sure they had to flip some things around due to the salary cap (something baseball doesn't have), and then the Hawks WON again 3 years later.
I guess what I cannot wrap my head around and understand is that how Cubs fans are seemingly OK with missing the playoffs again this year. Since Theo took over, the Cubs have been one of the worst teams in all of baseball. Now they have a true ace at the top of the rotation. They have Bryant ready to go. They have upgraded at catcher. The starting rotation seems to be at least serviceable for competing this year. Castro made some progress last year after his poor season. Three straight years of being in the cellar, and Cubs fans are still saying, "This team isn't ready to compete." That is terrible. Cubs fans should be going insane saying its time to win now.
I know the Sox have lost more games than the Cubs the last two years. No Sox fan is happy about that. However, in the past 18 months Rick Hahn has taken the White Sox from a 99 loss team, and turned them into a contender. Some people are even saying that the Sox are the favorite for the AL Central this year. Hahn did all of this in half the time Theo had, with a farm system that was all but totally drained, and he didn't have to sign a pitcher to a deal where 3 or 4 years from now it could be pretty ugly. Sure the Sox still have a lot to prove, and in my eyes they need to make the playoffs this year, or come very damn close. My point that is that if Hahn can inherit a 99 loss team and turn them around in 18 months, why couldn't Theo do the same in 3 years? Some of you here are saying that its OK for it to be a 4th year as well. I know the Cubs haven't won anything in decades and that fans almost expect something bad to happen, but I just can't wrap my head around the mentality of waiting for 2016, 2018, 2020, when the only Championship worth going for right now is the 2015 World Series.
Get a play in WC spot and at the very least, you have a chance. Last year's AL Pennant winners was in that WC 'play in' game. And lets say the Cubs do that get play in game, or miss that position by a game or two. Do you not think that playing in some pressure packed games in September (or possibly October) is going to help the development of these younger guys?
_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.