It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 10:06 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 6:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Here is a write up on the Sox from a gambling POV. Someone who doesnt care what thye do, just wants to win money and for the most part is actually really good at this stuff.

------------------------------------------------

Today’s MLB preview is on a team that made some major moves in the off-season and would clearly seem to be improved. But perhaps not by as much as some think, at least according to this observer.

The Chicago White Sox were pretty awful in 2014. That doesn’t figure to be the case in 2015. There’s virtually no argument to the premise that the Chisox did some good things over the winter and I would definitely agree they’re likely to at least be a respectable entry this season.

But there are still some serious holes on this roster. Second and third base are potential problem areas, particularly the former. Ditto for behind the plate. The projected regulars at those three spots are each just a shade over replacement level according projected WAR figures. The outfield should be okay with Melky Cabrera, Adam Eaton and Avisail Garcia, but there’s little in the way of depth so any injuries among that trio could be critical.

Adam LaRoche is serviceable as a 1B/DH but he’s also getting up there in years and is not going to set the world on fire at this point. Alexis Ramirez is solid as a rock at SS and then there’s Jose Abreu, who was absolutely sensational in his debut and has quickly established himself as one of the game’s most feared sluggers.

The starting pitching looks to be a genuine strength. Chris Sale might miss a little time at the start of the season, but he’s a true ace. Jeff Samardzija will be an asset as long he’s wearing a White Sox jersey, but if the team is not contending, he could once again be a rental possibility. Jose Quintana is an underrated lefty, and then there’s Carlos Rodon.

Rodon was projected as the top overall pick in last year’s draft before his stock took a mini-dip thanks to an ordinary year at North Carolina State. But that whole team was a disappointment and I think the White Sox stole this lefty in a sense. I felt the Astros should have taken him with the top overall pick. Rodin has a vicious slider that stamps him as a potential ace and if the Chisox are serious about making a playoff push, it’s my belief he should be in the rotation from opening day.

The back end of that starting staff without Rodon appears to be John Danks and Hector Noesi. That’s not going to cut it for a team striving to make the post-season. The bullpen, an absolute disaster last season, can’t be worse, and David Robertson should firm up the ninth inning. The Zach Duke addition is a plus as well. But the rest of the pen is at best still an unknown quantity.

Robin Ventura is still the head man in the dugout and there is plenty of mixed opinion as to his managerial skills. Regardless of one’s stance on that count, there’s probably little question that Ventura heads into 2015 on the hot seat to some extent.

I see this team as being headed in the right direction, but not quite as much as the current O/U might indicate. I have the White Sox tabbed at right about 77-78 wins. There are just too many question marks here for me to project them as a winning team, so I believe Under the win total is the way to play with the White Sox

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 6:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
bigfan wrote:
Here is a write up on the Sox from a gambling POV. Someone who doesnt care what thye do, just wants to win money and for the most part is actually really good at this stuff.
Who is it?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 6:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Top secret! Just a tout that CHUS would hate

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 6:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Well ok then.

How do you know he is really good at this stuff?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
follow lotsa of his stuff and his picks. He gives solid write ups on his picks, of why he is picking teams...and has done very well for me. Especially the past month picking some very obscure games. To his credit also has done very well at Vegas Hilton contest for NFL. Has been in top 5 , 3 different times.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16827
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
bigfan wrote:
follow lotsa of his stuff and his picks. He gives solid write ups on his picks, of why he is picking teams...and has done very well for me. Especially the past month picking some very obscure games. To his credit also has done very well at Vegas Hilton contest for NFL. Has been in top 5 , 3 different times.
I guess I'll take your word for it. :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16827
pizza_Place: Salerno's
bigfan wrote:
I see this team as being headed in the right direction, but not quite as much as the current O/U might indicate. I have the White Sox tabbed at right about 77-78 wins. There are just too many question marks here for me to project them as a winning team, so I believe Under the win total is the way to play with the White Sox



Exact same thing for the Cubs. 77-78 wins. Bookmark dis phread!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16827
pizza_Place: Salerno's
never mind:

http://pregame.com/pregame-forums/f/11/t/1190828.aspx

Cubs over?

http://pregame.com/pregame-forums/f/11/t/1190142.aspx

Hmm. Apparently folks are forgetting the Cubs have to play and win games against other teams.
Something this group of players hasn't shown the ability to do on a consistent basis.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
http://smokincokin.com/

$250 a week? Good work if you can get it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16827
pizza_Place: Salerno's
yeah, you'd have to be playing in 1K units for it to be worth the $1K a month solo. But if he's hitting more than he's missing and you are playing that kinda of bank, might be worth it.

I assume some/most? folks pool their resources and chip in to get access.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
any tout who spends even a paragraph talking about the manager of a baseball team in a discussion on win totals, as your guy did in both Cubs and Sox analysis, is trying to fill space

Notice, unproven Cub rookies are a reliable play to get you Over, while Sox second year bullpen who did well last year at MLB level, is unproven

The bias is apparent.

The number one factor in success this year is going to be the rotation (Sale health and Noesi/Danks quality) yet he buries it in his analysis as an afterthought. He then spends a paragraph on a guy who isn't going to make the starting rotation out of camp.

He doesn't seem to understand that Bonifacio provides depth in the OF.

Capping baseball O/U seems like a difficult proposition. This guy's analysis doesn't provide any comfort from that.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
bigfan wrote:
follow lotsa of his stuff and his picks. He gives solid write ups on his picks, of why he is picking teams...and has done very well for me. Especially the past month picking some very obscure games. To his credit also has done very well at Vegas Hilton contest for NFL. Has been in top 5 , 3 different times.

Bernstein has been pretty solid with his write ups and picks the past few months. I bet this guy is Danny.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
dude writes crap to sell to idiots to help offset his own gambling losses.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
David Cokin also picked the Atlanta Hawks to go under 42 wins this season. They are currently 50-13.

http://smokincokin.com/tag/atlanta-hawks-preview/

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
You guys are all correct, He is terrible. You should never listen to him

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
Chus wrote:
David Cokin also picked the Atlanta Hawks to go under 42 wins this season. They are currently 50-13.

http://smokincokin.com/tag/atlanta-hawks-preview/

Can you find anyone who had the Hawks winning 50 games this season?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 1:00 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38362
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Douchebag wrote:
Chus wrote:
David Cokin also picked the Atlanta Hawks to go under 42 wins this season. They are currently 50-13.

http://smokincokin.com/tag/atlanta-hawks-preview/

Can you find anyone who had the Hawks winning 50 games this season?



I did.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I am worried about that "smokincokin" site. Kind of a weird name for a site unless it's XXX.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
Seacrest wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Chus wrote:
David Cokin also picked the Atlanta Hawks to go under 42 wins this season. They are currently 50-13.

http://smokincokin.com/tag/atlanta-hawks-preview/

Can you find anyone who had the Hawks winning 50 games this season?



I did.

Link?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Prediction machine has the Sox winning 77 games.

the pure stat guys have really given the Sox a low bar to shoot for. I would be surprised for this team to be below .500.

Very few times do you find such a difference in the PECOTA & other computer guys and Vegas.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
77 is real low. I figure 83 if all goes well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Scooter wrote:
77 is real low. I figure 83 if all goes well.

Vegas is 81.5o to 82.5

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamblers POV
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
bigfan wrote:
Vegas is 81.5o to 82.5


That seems to be about right. There are better season win total bets out there, IMO.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group