It is currently Fri Nov 29, 2024 10:49 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 382 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
Chus wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Chus wrote:
This article explains how Indiana's law is different than other states.

http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2015/03/3 ... eedom-law/




What does Kentucky's law actually state Chus? It was referenced without citation in the article.


The article explained the difference.

Quote:
Every other Religious Freedom Restoration Act applies to disputes between a person or entity and a government. Indiana’s is the only law that explicitly applies to disputes between private citizens.* This means it could be used as a cudgel by corporations to justify discrimination against individuals that might otherwise be protected under law. Indiana trial lawyer Matt Anderson, discussing this difference, writes that [b]the Indiana law is “more broadly written than its federal and state predecessors” and opens up “the path of least resistance among its species to have a court adjudicate it in a manner that could ultimately be used to discriminate…”[/b]

I posted a few articles earlier highlighting the differences.


We can only lead the horses to water, we cannot make them drink.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
pittmike wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
That's not what the caterer is saying. And you know that.

Directly asked, since you've been avoiding me in this thread...

Would Jesus refuse to break bread with a homosexual?


No for me.


You are wrong.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40652
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Don Tiny wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
That's not what the caterer is saying. And you know that.

Directly asked, since you've been avoiding me in this thread...

Would Jesus refuse to break bread with a homosexual?


No for me.


You are wrong.


I am wrong that no Jesus would not refuse to break bread?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30335
Harvard Dan wrote:
Darkside wrote:
I'm of the opinion that people that are truly religious, truly christian, would abhor this law as it's using religion to justify bigotry.



What better way to reach out to others than to serve them...true Christians would acknowledge that all sin and fall short of the glory of God.

Agree Dan

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
pittmike wrote:
I am wrong that no Jesus would not refuse to break bread?


:lol: :lol: Misunderstood ... I thought it meant "no, He wouldn't break bread".

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:17 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38376
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Harvard Dan wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Not saying I hold this position...but I suppose the argument that while those are all in sins, homosexuality would be considered being in a state of sin that is not seeking repentance while the others may want to stop etc...again not saying I hold that belief. But yes, I could refuse business to a liar, a divorcee (unless allowed under the Moses provision), a Catholic who eats meat on Friday. It becomes a slippery slope. While I sympathize with the business person who doesn't want to perform a service against their belief system..it really isn't a black and white situation in some cases (no pun intended).

Now this is becoming fascinating to me. OK, a Catholic who eats meat on Friday may be a sinner, but would other religions? Now, say, again for the sake of argument, that the gas station owners, who at least in my area are largely Islamic, find you to be in a state of sin for not facing east and praying 5 times a day. As you would be living in a state of sin, in their eyes, would it be fair for them to refuse to sell you gas, and force you to drive god who knows 20-30 miles to fill up every time you need? I mean, there's places in INdiana when you might not see a gas station for 50 miles.


As I go back and look at what I typed and see your response...I think I realize my error. It's not that you shouldn't have to serve those that are against your beliefs...but rather in the course of serving them you shouldn't have to be brought into going against your beliefs yourself...geez I need to get some sleep...sorry to be so confusing.


I think that part is clear.

Jesus would surely have a meal with people that are gay.

That isn't the issue here though. No one is asking a caterer to sit with gay people and have a meal.

They are asking them to give tacit approval for their wedding by taking part in it against the tenets of their faith.

A more apt example would be would Jesus officiate at a gay marriage.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19387
Seacrest wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Not saying I hold this position...but I suppose the argument that while those are all in sins, homosexuality would be considered being in a state of sin that is not seeking repentance while the others may want to stop etc...again not saying I hold that belief. But yes, I could refuse business to a liar, a divorcee (unless allowed under the Moses provision), a Catholic who eats meat on Friday. It becomes a slippery slope. While I sympathize with the business person who doesn't want to perform a service against their belief system..it really isn't a black and white situation in some cases (no pun intended).

Now this is becoming fascinating to me. OK, a Catholic who eats meat on Friday may be a sinner, but would other religions? Now, say, again for the sake of argument, that the gas station owners, who at least in my area are largely Islamic, find you to be in a state of sin for not facing east and praying 5 times a day. As you would be living in a state of sin, in their eyes, would it be fair for them to refuse to sell you gas, and force you to drive god who knows 20-30 miles to fill up every time you need? I mean, there's places in INdiana when you might not see a gas station for 50 miles.


As I go back and look at what I typed and see your response...I think I realize my error. It's not that you shouldn't have to serve those that are against your beliefs...but rather in the course of serving them you shouldn't have to be brought into going against your beliefs yourself...geez I need to get some sleep...sorry to be so confusing.


I think that part is clear.

Jesus would surely have a meal with people that are gay.

That isn't the issue here though. No one is asking a caterer to sit with gay people and have a meal.

They are asking them to give tacit approval for their wedding by taking part in it against the tenets of their faith.

A more apt example would be would Jesus officiate at a gay marriage.


Well then they would also have to object to working weddings where people were married without an annulment from a previous marriage.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65804
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Seacrest wrote:

They are asking them to give tacit approval for their wedding by taking part in it against the tenets of their faith.

What a total, cowardly load of horseshit that is.
They're not asking for approval. They wanted a meal cooked.

This might be the most disappointed I've ever been in a person.

I would be ashamed to have made a post like this.

I'm not a praying man, normally. I believe that the universe tends to unfold as it should to paraphrase a silly movie. But its time to pray for you.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Darkside wrote:
This might be the most disappointed I've ever been in a person.


you do realize who you're talking to


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:29 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38376
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Bagels wrote:
Darkside wrote:
This might be the most disappointed I've ever been in a person.


you do realize who you're talking to



Like I said six pages ago. Shame and misinformation is all you really have to peddle here.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:32 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38376
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Seacrest wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Not saying I hold this position...but I suppose the argument that while those are all in sins, homosexuality would be considered being in a state of sin that is not seeking repentance while the others may want to stop etc...again not saying I hold that belief. But yes, I could refuse business to a liar, a divorcee (unless allowed under the Moses provision), a Catholic who eats meat on Friday. It becomes a slippery slope. While I sympathize with the business person who doesn't want to perform a service against their belief system..it really isn't a black and white situation in some cases (no pun intended).

Now this is becoming fascinating to me. OK, a Catholic who eats meat on Friday may be a sinner, but would other religions? Now, say, again for the sake of argument, that the gas station owners, who at least in my area are largely Islamic, find you to be in a state of sin for not facing east and praying 5 times a day. As you would be living in a state of sin, in their eyes, would it be fair for them to refuse to sell you gas, and force you to drive god who knows 20-30 miles to fill up every time you need? I mean, there's places in INdiana when you might not see a gas station for 50 miles.


As I go back and look at what I typed and see your response...I think I realize my error. It's not that you shouldn't have to serve those that are against your beliefs...but rather in the course of serving them you shouldn't have to be brought into going against your beliefs yourself...geez I need to get some sleep...sorry to be so confusing.


I think that part is clear.

Jesus would surely have a meal with people that are gay.

That isn't the issue here though. No one is asking a caterer to sit with gay people and have a meal.

They are asking them to give tacit approval for their wedding by taking part in it against the tenets of their faith.

A more apt example would be would Jesus officiate at a gay marriage.


conns7901 wrote:
Well then they would also have to object to working weddings where people were married without an annulment from a previous marriage.


Protestants don't believe in annulments.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
Seacrest wrote:
Protestants don't believe in annulments.

As a catholic I can't serve protestants now? I need to catch up on the groups I should be discriminating against.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
When Pence won't answer a simple yes or no question, we know what the answer is.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/3 ... mg00000016



http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc ... nt/388997/

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Last edited by Chus on Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:02 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Douchebag wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Protestants don't believe in annulments.

As a catholic I can't serve protestants now? I need to catch up on the groups I should be discriminating against.


Start with the gays.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
LOLGOP ‏@LOLGOP 16h16 hours ago

The guys who consider you saying "Happy Holidays" a war think you're being too sensitive about a law that sanctifies discrimination.


:lol:

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Predictably, Pence runs to FOX for damage control, and he blames the liberal media. :lol:

http://crooksandliars.com/2015/03/mike- ... um=twitter

When asked, point blank, if he would support a law preventing discrimination against sexual orientation, he didn't answer, and stuck to his talking points.

What a clown.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
The GOP clown car is lining up to defend this law.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/3 ... mg00000016

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Image

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65804
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Chus wrote:
The GOP clown car is lining up to defend this law.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/3 ... mg00000016

Please don't lump the whole Republican party in with these nitwits. Not that you are but you k ow what I mean.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41380
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Darkside wrote:
Chus wrote:
The GOP clown car is lining up to defend this law.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/3 ... mg00000016

Please don't lump the whole Republican party in with these nitwits. Not that you are but you k ow what I mean.

Image

How right he was, no?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Darkside wrote:
Chus wrote:
The GOP clown car is lining up to defend this law.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/3 ... mg00000016

Please don't lump the whole Republican party in with these nitwits. Not that you are but you k ow what I mean.


I was referring to the potential 2016 candidates. Many of them are quoted in that article supporting the law.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Caller Bob wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Chus wrote:
The GOP clown car is lining up to defend this law.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/3 ... mg00000016

Please don't lump the whole Republican party in with these nitwits. Not that you are but you k ow what I mean.

Image

How right he was, no?


Wow...that's some powerful stuff.
I don't think they have control of the Republican party, but they have enough influence to drive a huge wedge in the party and screw up their chances of occupying the white house.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
wdelaney72 wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Chus wrote:
The GOP clown car is lining up to defend this law.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/3 ... mg00000016

Please don't lump the whole Republican party in with these nitwits. Not that you are but you k ow what I mean.

Image

How right he was, no?


Wow...that's some powerful stuff.
I don't think they have control of the Republican party, but they have enough influence to drive a huge wedge in the party and screw up their chances of occupying the white house.


Goldwater was quite prescient in plenty of ways on plenty of things.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 3:19 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:04 am
Posts: 2251
This picture explains everything.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 3:22 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:04 am
Posts: 2251
Dems have their Benghazi. Can I trademark GAYghazi? All of the GOP candidates are backing this law. Strap it down. You will hear about this for the next two years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Mr. Belvidere wrote:
Dems have their Benghazi. Can I trademark GAYghazi? All of the GOP candidates are backing this law. Strap it down. You will hear about this for the next two years.


Gays can't get their rainbow cakes and dildo shaped pasteries!


What does it matter?!?!?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Mike Pence trying to act like Indiana's law is exactly what Clinton signed in 93 and the other states with RFRA laws is extremely disingenuous.

The Mayor of Indianapolis has been pointing out the major differences on every cable channel but the main thing is LGBT not being a protected class in Indiana as they are in other states


So they're gonna write a new bill this week that undermines the whole purpose of Indiana's law (discriminate against gays) and then no one will be happy with Governor Pence.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 3:34 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:04 am
Posts: 2251
SomeGuy wrote:
Mr. Belvidere wrote:
Dems have their Benghazi. Can I trademark GAYghazi? All of the GOP candidates are backing this law. Strap it down. You will hear about this for the next two years.


Gays can't get their rainbow cakes and dildo shaped pasteries!


What does it matter?!?!?


Im assuming you arent gay. Do you buy vagina shaped cakes? Cuz all gay men buy dildo cakes. You are an unfunny ass..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Mr. Belvidere wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Mr. Belvidere wrote:
Dems have their Benghazi. Can I trademark GAYghazi? All of the GOP candidates are backing this law. Strap it down. You will hear about this for the next two years.


Gays can't get their rainbow cakes and dildo shaped pasteries!


What does it matter?!?!?


Im assuming you arent gay. Do you buy vagina shaped cakes? Cuz all gay men buy dildo cakes. You are an unfunny ass..


Another pissy response.

Over sensitive? You bet!

I'd tell you to go cut your own throat but you've probably already got some gnarly hesitation marks to show all the ladies. You can't even do that right....

Don't let initial failure stop you from trying, though!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 3:54 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:04 am
Posts: 2251
You are a child and not worth my time.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 382 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group