It's ok. The question did reveal that 'Bernstein didn't even criticize her!' is an opinion one can have, which I really didn't foresee. I can't argue with that so I'll try and just concern myself with others. Since you keep score you can mark that down in your column.

Doesn't seem like much of a difference to me. The woman at Comcast was probably hired because she's hard-nosed or strong-willed.

Both hosts used derogatory terms to characterize the women and their attributes.

So unlike Megan Glaros or BRick's abundant nonsensical examples or some of this men's rights dipshittery about not being able to ogle women anymore, this is someone in the same industry as Bernstein, an industry where it's established (by whatever general consensus that you'd want find, SJWs on Twitter being just one) that women fighting to be above second-class. Bernstein, who has power and influence in the industry, dismissing a woman (though complimentary! Black people are good dancers!) as a sex object is a clear line-steppin' to me.

I have a problem with it, but there's nothing I can do about it, but I certainly don't point it out for the twitter-verse to see because I don't objectify women. Openly objectifying women socially is and should be unacceptable. Objectifying women without openly saying you do is currently socially acceptable.

Doesn't seem like much of a difference to me. The woman at Comcast was probably hired because she's hard-nosed or strong-willed.

Both hosts used derogatory terms to characterize the women and their attributes.

of course I'm attracted to women, but I love my wife enough to put the initial thought aside and focus on her instead. I certainly don't look at a woman as a series of body parts, although obviously women get hired to do sports largely on that basis.

HOW DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS WRONG!!?!?!?!?

of course I'm attracted to women, but I love my wife enough to put the initial thought aside and focus on her instead. I certainly don't look at a woman as a series of body parts, although obviously women get hired to do sports largely on that basis.

So you suppress your desire to objectify women because you are married?

I save all my objectification for my wife. I find the real thing to be far better than what I can view on a screen, etc. Everyone should try it.

I save all my objectification for my wife. I find the real thing to be far better than what I can view on a screen, etc. Everyone should try it.

I'm fine.

I'll bet any female on this site finds me more attractive. Including Rod.

Doesn't seem like much of a difference to me. The woman at Comcast was probably hired because she's hard-nosed or strong-willed.

Both hosts used derogatory terms to characterize the women and their attributes.

of course I'm attracted to women, but I love my wife enough to put the initial thought aside and focus on her instead. I certainly don't look at a woman as a series of body parts, although obviously women get hired to do sports largely on that basis.