It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:55 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 279 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
Keyser Soze wrote:
Gotta try to make something happen. You can't sit around waiting to get 3 hits in an inning off these fire breathing bastards. That ain't gonna happen.

so by all means lets not even give yourself a shot by running against one of the best arms in the league.

It is just stupid. He was out by a mile.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:12 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
That ball was kilt.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:13 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79556
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
They made something happen alright.

This is a brutal White Sox team. I can see that already. Just not good.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
bernstein should get rid of his TVs immediately cuz at the rate this season is going he might lose a kid

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
Frank Coztansa wrote:
That ball was kilt.

Image

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:16 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79556
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bring on John Danks! Awesome.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
It's the same shit as last year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:20 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79556
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
America wrote:
It's the same shit as last year.


It just costs more.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Best part of being on vacation has been missing this. Sounds like Jerry Manual era.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The bullpen is going to be a fucking nightmare. Bring up Rodon!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This is a brutal White Sox team. I can see that already. Just not good.
C'mon. Its two games. The Sox were down 4 different times in this game and took the lead once and tied it twice. You can't say its the same shit as last year, because last year the game would have been over when Hosmer put the Royals up 4-3.

Putnam gave up the go ahead HR, but this loss in on Quintana. Working slower than Contreras used to, and then hitting guys so he couldn't pitch inside. Throw strikes, attack hitters, and he probably doesn't give up the gopher ball to Hosmer.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Sox pitchers seem to have hit a shit ton of batters

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:28 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I think its 5, and of those 5 I think 4 of them have ended up scoring.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 6:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:07 pm
Posts: 3705
Darkside wrote:
Sox pitchers seem to have hit a shit ton of batters


Hawk loves it. He absolutely loves it! Captains of attitude!

_________________
Proud to be UNVERIFIED.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 7:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This is a brutal White Sox team. I can see that already. Just not good.
C'mon. Its two games. The Sox were down 4 different times in this game and took the lead once and tied it twice. You can't say its the same shit as last year, because last year the game would have been over when Hosmer put the Royals up 4-3.

Putnam gave up the go ahead HR, but this loss in on Quintana. Working slower than Contreras used to, and then hitting guys so he couldn't pitch inside. Throw strikes, attack hitters, and he probably doesn't give up the gopher ball to Hosmer.


10 years and two ganes

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 7:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bring on John Danks! Awesome.

:lol:

I thought that's what he said. Fucking Hawk for President!


The Royals look like the same team that went deep into the post season. Very good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 8:02 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79556
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This is a brutal White Sox team. I can see that already. Just not good.
C'mon. Its two games. The Sox were down 4 different times in this game and took the lead once and tied it twice. You can't say its the same shit as last year, because last year the game would have been over when Hosmer put the Royals up 4-3.

Putnam gave up the go ahead HR, but this loss in on Quintana. Working slower than Contreras used to, and then hitting guys so he couldn't pitch inside. Throw strikes, attack hitters, and he probably doesn't give up the gopher ball to Hosmer.


Yeah, it's two games, but you can see the same damn problems they've had for the last several years.

First, and most importantly, you can't make two outs on the goddamn bases every fucking game. It's just ridiculous.

Second, the have a lot of losing starting pitchers. If you have a real good team, maybe you can score enough to carry one of those guys, but to have three of them who are just almost always going to give the runs right back as soon as their guys give them the lead, it's fucking demoralizing for the team.

And the bullpen is still terrible. They way overpaid for Robertson and the Zach Duke Project.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This is a brutal White Sox team. I can see that already. Just not good.
C'mon. Its two games. The Sox were down 4 different times in this game and took the lead once and tied it twice. You can't say its the same shit as last year, because last year the game would have been over when Hosmer put the Royals up 4-3.

Putnam gave up the go ahead HR, but this loss in on Quintana. Working slower than Contreras used to, and then hitting guys so he couldn't pitch inside. Throw strikes, attack hitters, and he probably doesn't give up the gopher ball to Hosmer.


Yeah, it's two games, but you can see the same damn problems they've had for the last several years.

First, and most importantly, you can't make two outs on the goddamn bases every fucking game. It's just ridiculous.

Second, the have a lot of losing starting pitchers. If you have a real good team, maybe you can score enough to carry one of those guys, but to have three of them who are just almost always going to give the runs right back as soon as their guys give them the lead, it's fucking demoralizing for the team.

And the bullpen is still terrible. They way overpaid for Robertson and the Zach Duke Project.
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.

It didn't work. RIP 2015 White Sox.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 8:11 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79556
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
I don't want to get too stupid after just two games. My point is that the same things that made them hard to watch last season are present and accounted for in the first two games of 2015.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
John Danks has an excellent career record against the Royals and a particularly good record in KC. The W flag will be up before most of us leave the office today

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:
John Danks has an excellent career record against the Royals and a particularly good record in KC. The W flag will be up before most of us leave the office today

He does but they still lost 2 of the 3 games he started against KC last year


I do think they'll win today though


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
John Danks has an excellent career record against the Royals and a particularly good record in KC. The W flag will be up before most of us leave the office today

He does but they still lost 2 of the 3 games he started against KC last year

Can you promise that?
I do think they'll win today though


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6848
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't want to get too stupid after just two games. My point is that the same things that made them hard to watch last season are present and accounted for in the first two games of 2015.


This is what I was saying before the season started and I was flamed by some people. Arbreu is a stud and so is Sale. Add Rodon and you have a great starting point for a rebuild.

Like JORR said you have alot of losing pitchers and they need something to push them to the positive side of W/L's. A bad defense, bullpen and bad base runners are not going to get it done. If they had upgraded the defense and brought a stud to hit next to Abreu, then you have something. But they didn't do either and you are only slightly better then last year.

I was really hoping both teams would be good this year. It makes the summer fun, when both teams can trash talk each other, however I think it may be awhile before the Sox can do much trash talking. They remind me of the Sosa cubs, only replace Sosa with Abreu and the Cubs actually remind me of the great sox teams of the 90's. Young stars coming up mixed with a few free agents signings. I loved watching the Whitesox in the 90's McDowell, Ozzie, Ventura, Frank, Thigpen exc exc. and I am starting to get that same feeling about the upcoming Cubs teams.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Let's not bury Robertson before he's had a chance to pitch. The lack of command from the pitching staff is something I desperately wanted to see fixed and looks to have gotten worse.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:44 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79556
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Juiced wrote:
If they had upgraded the defense and brought a stud to hit next to Abreu, then you have something.


I think LaRoche will be fine. He's a really underrated guy. He's Anthony Rizzo. Same damn player except he's done it longer. The problem is that sillyball is taking men off the bases before Abreu and LaRoche get up to the plate.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:55 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I dont have an issue with running at times.

I do have an issue with running on Perez.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juiced wrote:
If they had upgraded the defense and brought a stud to hit next to Abreu, then you have something.


I think LaRoche will be fine. He's a really underrated guy. He's Anthony Rizzo. Same damn player except he's done it longer. The problem is that sillyball is taking men off the bases before Abreu and LaRoche get up to the plate.

LaRoche is perpetually underrated. I bet he hits 30 homers this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 10:02 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79556
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I dont have an issue with running at times.

I do have an issue with running on Perez.


There are situations when running is appropriate. Since the Sox have no clue when that actually is, I would prefer they just stand on the bases and wait for one of their sluggers to drive them in. I think they have enough bats to do that.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 10:03 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Laroche is also typically a slow starter.

Danks throws a gem today (as much of a gem as Danks can throw anyway) and the Sox win by at least 3 runs.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox @ Royals
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
America wrote:
Wendelstedt's strike zone has been weird, I know, but it looks like this new bullpen failure has the added bonus of costing $15 million.


Image

Image

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 279 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group