It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 10:09 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
Sox do not have enough if the Royals and Tigers were not going to be worse than last year. Sucks.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Yup. Just like past Sox teams like in 2006, you can't control playing in the best division in baseball.

As I said from game 2, it is time to start worrying about 2016.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Bridgeport was'nt built in a day.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
The Tigers are worse, you just wait. I'm not ruling out KC zbeing better though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 10:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Just want to make sure the old "Who could have saw this coming" sign stays in its wrapper...

As almost every publication that uses a prediction computer program to pick W and L's predcited the Sox not do well.

The frantic season of the White Sox might not have been good enough

It's hard not to love the offseason of the White Sox. They picked up Adam LaRoche on a completely reasonable contract, signed Melky Cabrera to a fine deal, traded for Jeff Samardzija, and blew a lot of money on an excellent closer. It was a frenetic offseason from a team that was in danger of lulling its fans to sleep.

The only problem: PECOTA dislikes almost all of those moves. LaRoche is projected to slip down the birthday slope, Cabrera is supposed to be a solid regular and nothing more, Samardzija is projected to be barely above replacement level, and even the best relievers aren't going to make up a lot of the difference.

Then you add up the moves they didn't make. The projected starter at second base is Carlos Sanchez, who is projected to be exactly at replacement level. The good news is Emilio Bonifacio is also there, just in case, and he projects to be a tenth of a win better. If Hector Noesi sticks as the fifth starter, he might be one of the worst rotation regulars in the game, and John Danks is going to be mediocre in the best-case scenarios.

That's the best part about projections, though. You can cherry pick the ones you don't trust and remove them from your own mental calculus. Samardzija having the worst full season of his career? I'll take the over. If Noesi really is that bad, he'll be replaced in short order, possibly by golden-armed prospect, Carlos Rodon. Slap the books out of PECOTA's hands and push it into its locker, dammit. Get mad, White Sox fans!

Still, the regression forecasts for players like Conor Gillaspie and Adam Eaton are a little troubling. The White Sox spent a lot of money to contend. They can't afford to have a lot of players moving backward.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
bigfan wrote:
As almost every publication that uses a prediction computer program to pick W and L's predcited the Sox not do well.
Those will be wrong though too. I believe most of the stuff you posted had them winning around 77 games. They'll do better than that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 7:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
It's about 6 games into the season.

I'm a man living on the edge but you have to give it at least 30 games for panic to set in.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
bigfan wrote:
Just want to make sure the old "Who could have saw this coming" sign stays in its wrapper...

As almost every publication that uses a prediction computer program to pick W and L's predcited the Sox not do well.

The frantic season of the White Sox might not have been good enough

It's hard not to love the offseason of the White Sox. They picked up Adam LaRoche on a completely reasonable contract, signed Melky Cabrera to a fine deal, traded for Jeff Samardzija, and blew a lot of money on an excellent closer. It was a frenetic offseason from a team that was in danger of lulling its fans to sleep.

The only problem: PECOTA dislikes almost all of those moves. LaRoche is projected to slip down the birthday slope, Cabrera is supposed to be a solid regular and nothing more, Samardzija is projected to be barely above replacement level, and even the best relievers aren't going to make up a lot of the difference.

Then you add up the moves they didn't make. The projected starter at second base is Carlos Sanchez, who is projected to be exactly at replacement level. The good news is Emilio Bonifacio is also there, just in case, and he projects to be a tenth of a win better. If Hector Noesi sticks as the fifth starter, he might be one of the worst rotation regulars in the game, and John Danks is going to be mediocre in the best-case scenarios.

That's the best part about projections, though. You can cherry pick the ones you don't trust and remove them from your own mental calculus. Samardzija having the worst full season of his career? I'll take the over. If Noesi really is that bad, he'll be replaced in short order, possibly by golden-armed prospect, Carlos Rodon. Slap the books out of PECOTA's hands and push it into its locker, dammit. Get mad, White Sox fans!

Still, the regression forecasts for players like Conor Gillaspie and Adam Eaton are a little troubling. The White Sox spent a lot of money to contend. They can't afford to have a lot of players moving backward.

Pack it up guys, the computer says the Sox are terrible and they started 2-4. Forget about it, everyone just go home.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
bigfan wrote:
As almost every publication that uses a prediction computer program to pick W and L's predcited the Sox not do well.
Those will be wrong though too. I believe most of the stuff you posted had them winning around 77 games. They'll do better than that.

I agree with you, but lets not get into the 'nobody predicted" it again.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
bigfan wrote:
I agree with you, but lets not get into the 'nobody predicted" it again.
Didn't those predictions also say the Royals would suck?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
SomeGuy wrote:
It's about 6 games into the season.

I'm a man living on the edge but you have to give it at least 30 games for panic to set in.


Royals are continuing from last season.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Yan Gomes injury is huge


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
So the projections and complex algorithms powered by a Cray super computer predict the White Sox to be around .500

Boy, that's really something, next thing you know it will predict coin flips 50/50 as well!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
bigfan wrote:
I agree with you, but lets not get into the 'nobody predicted" it again.
Didn't those predictions also say the Royals would suck?

Its almost like the Royals, led by SABR punching bag Ned Yost, decided to do the exact opposite of what the league was doing and are succeeding because of it. Investing in bullpen? BAD SABR. Stealing bases? BAD SABR. High batting average hitters? BAD SABR.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
bigfan wrote:
Just want to make sure the old "Who could have saw this coming" sign stays in its wrapper...

As almost every publication that uses a prediction computer program to pick W and L's predcited the Sox not do well.

The frantic season of the White Sox might not have been good enough

It's hard not to love the offseason of the White Sox. They picked up Adam LaRoche on a completely reasonable contract, signed Melky Cabrera to a fine deal, traded for Jeff Samardzija, and blew a lot of money on an excellent closer. It was a frenetic offseason from a team that was in danger of lulling its fans to sleep.

The only problem: PECOTA dislikes almost all of those moves. LaRoche is projected to slip down the birthday slope, Cabrera is supposed to be a solid regular and nothing more, Samardzija is projected to be barely above replacement level, and even the best relievers aren't going to make up a lot of the difference.

Then you add up the moves they didn't make. The projected starter at second base is Carlos Sanchez, who is projected to be exactly at replacement level. The good news is Emilio Bonifacio is also there, just in case, and he projects to be a tenth of a win better. If Hector Noesi sticks as the fifth starter, he might be one of the worst rotation regulars in the game, and John Danks is going to be mediocre in the best-case scenarios.

That's the best part about projections, though. You can cherry pick the ones you don't trust and remove them from your own mental calculus. Samardzija having the worst full season of his career? I'll take the over. If Noesi really is that bad, he'll be replaced in short order, possibly by golden-armed prospect, Carlos Rodon. Slap the books out of PECOTA's hands and push it into its locker, dammit. Get mad, White Sox fans!

Still, the regression forecasts for players like Conor Gillaspie and Adam Eaton are a little troubling. The White Sox spent a lot of money to contend. They can't afford to have a lot of players moving backward.

If Eaton continues to suck then the Sox are toast. Last year when he was out they were terrible.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
SomeGuy wrote:
So the projections and complex algorithms powered by a Cray super computer predict the White Sox to be around .500

Boy, that's really something, next thing you know it will predict coin flips 50/50 as well!



Hah, nice.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Until Eaton starts striking out I wont get worried. He did this last year every once and a while, sometimes his little slap the ball around trick falls flat when it wont make it past the infielders. I'm not a huge BABIP guy, but even I know a BABIP below .100 eventually has to go up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
America wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
bigfan wrote:
I agree with you, but lets not get into the 'nobody predicted" it again.
Didn't those predictions also say the Royals would suck?

Its almost like the Royals, led by SABR punching bag Ned Yost, decided to do the exact opposite of what the league was doing and are succeeding because of it. Investing in bullpen? BAD SABR. Stealing bases? BAD SABR. High batting average hitters? BAD SABR.

I dont think SABR is largely against investing in bullpens.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
rogers park bryan wrote:
I dont think SABR is largely against investing in bullpens.

No, they really do. I forgot who wrote it but one of them (was it Dave Cameron? fuck I hate him) said he'd trade the best bullpen in the game away for a SP with a WAR of around 2.0. They cannot project their performance with their computers so they just assume they're worthless and move on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
America wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I dont think SABR is largely against investing in bullpens.

No, they really do. I forgot who wrote it but one of them (was it Dave Cameron? fuck I hate him) said he'd trade the best bullpen in the game away for a SP with a WAR of around 2.0. They cannot project their performance with their computers so they just assume they're worthless and move on.

I remember a while back that they said the only thing about World Series winners that was consistent was that most of them had a dominant closer.

And Dave Cameron doesnt get to speak for a whole industry. Im sure there are many SABR people who realize the importance of bullpens.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6861
Quote:
The only problem: PECOTA dislikes almost all of those moves. LaRoche is projected to slip down the birthday slope, Cabrera is supposed to be a solid regular and nothing more, Samardzija is projected to be barely above replacement level, and even the best relievers aren't going to make up a lot of the difference.


I didn't need PECOTA to tell me these moves where not going to make a big difference. I have been saying that since spring training.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Juiced wrote:
Quote:
The only problem: PECOTA dislikes almost all of those moves. LaRoche is projected to slip down the birthday slope, Cabrera is supposed to be a solid regular and nothing more, Samardzija is projected to be barely above replacement level, and even the best relievers aren't going to make up a lot of the difference.


I didn't need PECOTA to tell me these moves where not going to make a big difference. I have been saying that since spring training.
You keep on saying this, but I believe you even said the Sox would win about 81 games.

That is a big difference. Just not enough to make the playoffs.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
That Detroit thing...is a thing. Wow. Murderers Row.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6861
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juiced wrote:
Quote:
The only problem: PECOTA dislikes almost all of those moves. LaRoche is projected to slip down the birthday slope, Cabrera is supposed to be a solid regular and nothing more, Samardzija is projected to be barely above replacement level, and even the best relievers aren't going to make up a lot of the difference.


I didn't need PECOTA to tell me these moves where not going to make a big difference. I have been saying that since spring training.
You keep on saying this, but I believe you even said the Sox would win about 81 games.

That is a big difference. Just not enough to make the playoffs.


I said 76 or something around that. Nothing in the 80's.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Juiced wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juiced wrote:
Quote:
The only problem: PECOTA dislikes almost all of those moves. LaRoche is projected to slip down the birthday slope, Cabrera is supposed to be a solid regular and nothing more, Samardzija is projected to be barely above replacement level, and even the best relievers aren't going to make up a lot of the difference.


I didn't need PECOTA to tell me these moves where not going to make a big difference. I have been saying that since spring training.
You keep on saying this, but I believe you even said the Sox would win about 81 games.

That is a big difference. Just not enough to make the playoffs.


I said 76 or something around that. Nothing in the 80's.
Oh ok. You'll be wrong then. I just have to wait now.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6861
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Oh ok. You'll be wrong then. I just have to wait now.



Wouldn't be the first time. 2005, I laughed when they let Ordonez go and signed J.Dye :? Didn't think the moves they made in '05 would win them a WS. I still don't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 2:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Yup. Just like past Sox teams like in 2006, you can't control playing in the best division in baseball.
And in 2006, the Sox still won 90 games after starting out 2-4. Same record as this year's club after 6 games, for those Cubs fans who care so much.

However in that year, the Sox shot themselves in the foot with horrible pitching down the stretch, and that is why the missed the playoffs. They were 33-41 in the season's 2nd half.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Yup. Just like past Sox teams like in 2006, you can't control playing in the best division in baseball.
And in 2006, the Sox still won 90 games after starting out 2-4. Same record as this year's club after 6 games, for those Cubs fans who care so much.

However in that year, the Sox shot themselves in the foot with horrible pitching down the stretch, and that is why the missed the playoffs. They were 33-41 in the season's 2nd half.


The bullpen was bad all year, offense was great.

Politte got bad, Cotts burned up, Jenks was shaky.

Starting wise you had the Contrares hip injury and decline. It wasn't just him on the starting aide but that was big.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
They missed Rowand's TWTW


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
rogers park bryan wrote:
They missed Rowand's TWTW

Well Brian Anderson sure wasn't the answer...what a piece of shit he was

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group