It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:37 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 178 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:07 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't know why you would say that. The Magic/Bird era was clearly stronger than the NBA is now.
Tiger and Phil are two of the all time greats too.



Yeah. So?
My guess is just like the NBA, the average PGA golfer is better now than they were then.


The average NBA player isn't better though.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:08 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hawg Ass wrote:
I am a huge Stricker fan. :oops:


:lol: There is a Wisconsin contingent that supports him.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The average NBA player isn't better though.
Why would the average golfer get better over the past 10 years but the average NBA player not get better over 30 years?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:09 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The average NBA player isn't better though.
Why would the average golfer get better over the past 10 years but the average NBA player not get better over 30 years?


It's not evolution, Rick.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The average NBA player isn't better though.
Why would the average golfer get better over the past 10 years but the average NBA player not get better over 30 years?


It's not evolution, Rick.
So how did PGA tour golfers get better?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:15 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The average NBA player isn't better though.
Why would the average golfer get better over the past 10 years but the average NBA player not get better over 30 years?


It's not evolution, Rick.
So how did PGA tour golfers get better?


I don't know. If I had to hazard a guess I might say that the boom created by Tiger Woods increased the size of the pool of potential professionals.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30330
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The average NBA player isn't better though.
Why would the average golfer get better over the past 10 years but the average NBA player not get better over 30 years?


It's not evolution, Rick.
So how did PGA tour golfers get better?

I have a couple of decent guesses, #1 being equipment and #2 is the AJGA Tour and othes like it, these kids have played against each other since they were youngsters and when they get to the tour even at 20 years old they feel like and know they have the game to play. Sure they might blow a late lead, but they learn from it really fast.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't know. If I had to hazard a guess I might say that the boom created by Tiger Woods increased the size of the pool of potential professionals.
Just like Bird and Magic!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Hawg Ass wrote:
I have a couple of decent guesses, #1 being equipment and #2 is the AJGA Tour and othes like it, these kids have played against each other since they were youngsters and when they get to the tour even at 20 years old they feel like and know they have the game to play. Sure they might blow a late lead, but they learn from it really fast.
Don't get me wrong. I'm sure the average golfer is better now.

However, JORR thinks the average NBA player was better in the 80s. It just wouldn't make sense and I prefer the Jordan years NBA anyways.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:35 pm
Posts: 18202
Location: Headed to the 19th hole
pizza_Place: Kaisers
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The average NBA player isn't better though.
Why would the average golfer get better over the past 10 years but the average NBA player not get better over 30 years?


It's not evolution, Rick.
So how did PGA tour golfers get better?


Equipment is part of it. Some of the guys on tour are true athletes and are extremely fit. I don't think Arnie and Jack did much strength training. I think that
when Tiger Woods came along he raised the bar. These young guys that are emerging grew up idolizing Tiger and took their games to a different level. I have
no doubts that the PGA Tour is as strong talent wise as it has ever been. The winning scores of these tournaments already this year have been impressive.

_________________
Flew too close to the sun on wings of pastrami


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't know. If I had to hazard a guess I might say that the boom created by Tiger Woods increased the size of the pool of potential professionals.
Just like Bird and Magic!


I don't think Bird and Magic caused more people to play basketball. They caused more people to become fans of basketball on TV.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30330
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
I have a couple of decent guesses, #1 being equipment and #2 is the AJGA Tour and othes like it, these kids have played against each other since they were youngsters and when they get to the tour even at 20 years old they feel like and know they have the game to play. Sure they might blow a late lead, but they learn from it really fast.
Don't get me wrong. I'm sure the average golfer is better now.

However, JORR thinks the average NBA player was better in the 80s. It just wouldn't make sense and I prefer the Jordan years NBA anyways.

I would say I think the depth is better, but I also don't watch a ton of NBA basketball.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16827
pizza_Place: Salerno's
A lot of the best rounds in various majors occurred back in the 1970's, early 1980's. And most happened before 2001. 2001 until Rory and now Spieth is a bit of down period for record setting rounds in majors.

Difference between NBA vs PGA is PGA it's just the golfer vs the course. So if Johnny Miller posted a 63 in 1973 in the US Open...you have to adjust for courses, conditions, rough cuts etc...but it's just as valid as a 63 posted in the same circumstances on the same course in a major today.

Sure, the average PGA tour card holder today is better than the average PGA tour card holder back then. However, the top players at their peak of most any era could've easily won tournaments against any of the top players who have followed--no defense on a golf course. Jack at his peak vs Tiger at his peak in a US Open? Pick em.


Last edited by Hussra on Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:23 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't know. If I had to hazard a guess I might say that the boom created by Tiger Woods increased the size of the pool of potential professionals.
Just like Bird and Magic!


I don't think Bird and Magic caused more people to play basketball. They caused more people to become fans of basketball on TV.
Golf is actually facing a major crisis in terms of participation.

I guess it is all downhill from here.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:29 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
T-Bone wrote:
Equipment is part of it. Some of the guys on tour are true athletes and are extremely fit. I don't think Arnie and Jack did much strength training. I think that
when Tiger Woods came along he raised the bar. These young guys that are emerging grew up idolizing Tiger and took their games to a different level. I have
no doubts that the PGA Tour is as strong talent wise as it has ever been. The winning scores of these tournaments already this year have been impressive.


Equipment is responsible for lowering scores. Not making better golfers. That's kind of similar to the ERA argument. Horses go faster because of modified sulkies and the elimination of hubrails. That doesn't make them better horses.

You have to watch the sport and know what you're watching. For me, Chamberlain, Russell, and Alcindor are better than Howard and Bosh. I could be wrong. Palmer, Nicklaus, Player, etc. are a stronger group than anything Woods played against in his prime, as are Spieth, Watson, McIlroy, etc. I could be wrong about that too. But I can make good arguments to support my positions.

It's interesting with horses. There is a fresh crop every year. They are specifically bred to improve. But they don't necessarily. I'd argue that the strongest group of standardbred pacers that every hit the racetrack are the foals of 1982. I could be wrong about that too, but I'll argue with you about it if you want.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:31 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't know. If I had to hazard a guess I might say that the boom created by Tiger Woods increased the size of the pool of potential professionals.
Just like Bird and Magic!


I don't think Bird and Magic caused more people to play basketball. They caused more people to become fans of basketball on TV.
Golf is actually facing a major crisis in terms of participation.

I guess it is all downhill from here.


We'll know in 10-15 years.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30330
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
T-Bone wrote:
Equipment is part of it. Some of the guys on tour are true athletes and are extremely fit. I don't think Arnie and Jack did much strength training. I think that
when Tiger Woods came along he raised the bar. These young guys that are emerging grew up idolizing Tiger and took their games to a different level. I have
no doubts that the PGA Tour is as strong talent wise as it has ever been. The winning scores of these tournaments already this year have been impressive.


Equipment is responsible for lowering scores. Not making better golfers. That's kind of similar to the ERA argument. Horses go faster because of modified sulkies and the elimination of hubrails. That doesn't make them better horses.

You have to watch the sport and know what you're watching. For me, Chamberlain, Russell, and Alcindor are better than Howard and Bosh. I could be wrong. Palmer, Nicklaus, Player, etc. are a stronger group than anything Woods played against in his prime, as are Spieth, Watson, McIlroy, etc. I could be wrong about that too. But I can make good arguments to support my positions.

It's interesting with horses. There is a fresh crop every year. They are specifically bred to improve. But they don't necessarily. I'd argue that the strongest group of standardbred pacers that every hit the racetrack are the foals of 1982. I could be wrong about that too, but I'll argue with you about it if you want.

Gary Player was probably the first golfer that really got into fitness.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
I think the NBA was better then because your better teams were deeper. A guy like Mario Chalmers or Udonis would not have started on NBA champions of yrs. gone by. That's the difference. The first guard off the bench would be better than Chalmers hence Michael Cooper or Vinny Johnson. The top players argument may be a wash or very little difference but there is no doubting the depth argument.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16827
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Palmer, Nicklaus, Player, etc. are a stronger group than anything Woods played against in his prime, as are Spieth, Watson, McIlroy, etc.


Agree. I think the mid-70's into the 80's era with Jack Nicklaus, Gary Player, Tom Watson, Lee Trevino, and Johnny Miller is probably the strongest group of top golfers all at or near their best at one time....with Nicklaus and Watson mostly trading off majors.

Then you have the late 80's early 90's...pre-Tiger. Then late 90's into the early 2000's. And today's group is the best since that late 90's early 2000's.

Thing about golf equipment, no one has figured out a putter that can keep a golfer from getting the yips and missing puts. It's Tiger's short game that has abandoned him since 2009.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:35 pm
Posts: 18202
Location: Headed to the 19th hole
pizza_Place: Kaisers
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
T-Bone wrote:
Equipment is part of it. Some of the guys on tour are true athletes and are extremely fit. I don't think Arnie and Jack did much strength training. I think that
when Tiger Woods came along he raised the bar. These young guys that are emerging grew up idolizing Tiger and took their games to a different level. I have
no doubts that the PGA Tour is as strong talent wise as it has ever been. The winning scores of these tournaments already this year have been impressive.


Equipment is responsible for lowering scores. Not making better golfers. That's kind of similar to the ERA argument. Horses go faster because of modified sulkies and the elimination of hubrails. That doesn't make them better horses.

You have to watch the sport and know what you're watching. For me, Chamberlain, Russell, and Alcindor are better than Howard and Bosh. I could be wrong. Palmer, Nicklaus, Player, etc. are a stronger group than anything Woods played against in his prime, as are Spieth, Watson, McIlroy, etc. I could be wrong about that too. But I can make good arguments to support my positions.

It's interesting with horses. There is a fresh crop every year. They are specifically bred to improve. But they don't necessarily. I'd argue that the strongest group of standardbred pacers that every hit the racetrack are the foals of 1982. I could be wrong about that too, but I'll argue with you about it if you want.


The name of the game in golf and how players are judged is by lower scores. By that fact, the equipment is directly responsible for a better player. The game has been played in one
fashion or another for hundreds of years. In the modern era of golf ( lets say post 1960 ), there is virtually no difference between the players then and now. They can all do the same
thing with the ball and know how to play the game. Today's player has used technology and science to his advantage in the gym, on the course with better clubs and balls and in their
practice routine being able to slice and dice statistics and pore over tape. To your point, there is really nothing different about the actual homo sapien hitting the ball other than they
are likely more fit than many PGA Tour players 30 years ago.

_________________
Flew too close to the sun on wings of pastrami


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 11:13 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
T-Bone wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
T-Bone wrote:
Equipment is part of it. Some of the guys on tour are true athletes and are extremely fit. I don't think Arnie and Jack did much strength training. I think that
when Tiger Woods came along he raised the bar. These young guys that are emerging grew up idolizing Tiger and took their games to a different level. I have
no doubts that the PGA Tour is as strong talent wise as it has ever been. The winning scores of these tournaments already this year have been impressive.


Equipment is responsible for lowering scores. Not making better golfers. That's kind of similar to the ERA argument. Horses go faster because of modified sulkies and the elimination of hubrails. That doesn't make them better horses.

You have to watch the sport and know what you're watching. For me, Chamberlain, Russell, and Alcindor are better than Howard and Bosh. I could be wrong. Palmer, Nicklaus, Player, etc. are a stronger group than anything Woods played against in his prime, as are Spieth, Watson, McIlroy, etc. I could be wrong about that too. But I can make good arguments to support my positions.

It's interesting with horses. There is a fresh crop every year. They are specifically bred to improve. But they don't necessarily. I'd argue that the strongest group of standardbred pacers that every hit the racetrack are the foals of 1982. I could be wrong about that too, but I'll argue with you about it if you want.


The name of the game in golf and how players are judged is by lower scores. By that fact, the equipment is directly responsible for a better player. The game has been played in one
fashion or another for hundreds of years. In the modern era of golf ( lets say post 1960 ), there is virtually no difference between the players then and now. They can all do the same
thing with the ball and know how to play the game. Today's player has used technology and science to his advantage in the gym, on the course with better clubs and balls and in their
practice routine being able to slice and dice statistics and pore over tape. To your point, there is really nothing different about the actual homo sapien hitting the ball other than they
are likely more fit than many PGA Tour players 30 years ago.


But that doesn't work comparing across eras. Like bowling, there are guys who average 210 today and they certainly aren't better than guys who averaged 180 in 1970.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
what's a modern driver compared to a wooden one? 50 yards?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4772
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I. FEEL. GOOD. THE. COURSE. LOOKS. GOOD. I. LIKE. MY. CHANCES.
I am talking about personality on the course. Tiger has plenty of it.

Most athletes just give generic answers in interviews. As I said before, Jordan was pretty much useless in interviews. On the court, he was must watch television


How does Tiger have so much personality on the golf course, other than his fist pump and faking injuries when he's not playing well?

The reason why people liked Tiger when he first appeared is because he was a golf prodigy who dominated the game at an early age. Other than being white, I don't see how Spieth is really any different. It's better for his game that he doesn't have a flamboyant personality or isn't some Johnny Manziel. The key to hitting a golf ball well is not to have to think at all, where it comes automatically and effortlessly. Being ego driven would only get in the way of developing a good swing.

The real reason Dan dislikes Spieth has to be his religion, because Dan hates Christians and Christianity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
long time guy wrote:
I think the NBA was better then because your better teams were deeper. A guy like Mario Chalmers or Udonis would not have started on NBA champions of yrs. gone by. That's the difference. The first guard off the bench would be better than Chalmers hence Michael Cooper or Vinny Johnson. The top players argument may be a wash or very little difference but there is no doubting the depth argument.


i think that's mostly due to expansion....if you retracted ~5 teams you'd have pretty much the same thing


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Dignified Rube wrote:
How does Tiger have so much personality on the golf course, other than his fist pump and faking injuries when he's not playing well?
It seems like I'm the only guy who remembers what dominant Tiger was like on the course.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:35 pm
Posts: 1905
Location: Up Where We Belong
Its hard for personality to transcend during post game "gangbang" interviews where questioners try to pose the same questions differently to get their taped response. After the sixth or seventh time answering essentially the same question the answers become monotone.

Tiger's legacy started as a multiple amateur champion who gave pros a serius run for their money as a teenager.

As for the evolution of athletes and the game, I look to track where Jesse Owens 1936 times are being matched by today's high school kids. Tennis and golf are two equipment dependent sports, while the evolution of basketball is in the talent. Wilt and Kareem didn't have other seven footers who would battle them on the boards, take the ball downcourt, and then pull up and splash a three pointer. Yes, the game has changed as defense has been diluted but the offensive skill of bigger men has also improved.

_________________
DRINK BƎTTƎR. @theRIPH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30330
Bagels wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I think the NBA was better then because your better teams were deeper. A guy like Mario Chalmers or Udonis would not have started on NBA champions of yrs. gone by. That's the difference. The first guard off the bench would be better than Chalmers hence Michael Cooper or Vinny Johnson. The top players argument may be a wash or very little difference but there is no doubting the depth argument.


i think that's mostly due to expansion....if you retracted ~5 teams you'd have pretty much the same thing

That and was there a cap in place in back then?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Not a sport


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:35 pm
Posts: 18202
Location: Headed to the 19th hole
pizza_Place: Kaisers
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
T-Bone wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
T-Bone wrote:
Equipment is part of it. Some of the guys on tour are true athletes and are extremely fit. I don't think Arnie and Jack did much strength training. I think that
when Tiger Woods came along he raised the bar. These young guys that are emerging grew up idolizing Tiger and took their games to a different level. I have
no doubts that the PGA Tour is as strong talent wise as it has ever been. The winning scores of these tournaments already this year have been impressive.


Equipment is responsible for lowering scores. Not making better golfers. That's kind of similar to the ERA argument. Horses go faster because of modified sulkies and the elimination of hubrails. That doesn't make them better horses.

You have to watch the sport and know what you're watching. For me, Chamberlain, Russell, and Alcindor are better than Howard and Bosh. I could be wrong. Palmer, Nicklaus, Player, etc. are a stronger group than anything Woods played against in his prime, as are Spieth, Watson, McIlroy, etc. I could be wrong about that too. But I can make good arguments to support my positions.

It's interesting with horses. There is a fresh crop every year. They are specifically bred to improve. But they don't necessarily. I'd argue that the strongest group of standardbred pacers that every hit the racetrack are the foals of 1982. I could be wrong about that too, but I'll argue with you about it if you want.


The name of the game in golf and how players are judged is by lower scores. By that fact, the equipment is directly responsible for a better player. The game has been played in one
fashion or another for hundreds of years. In the modern era of golf ( lets say post 1960 ), there is virtually no difference between the players then and now. They can all do the same
thing with the ball and know how to play the game. Today's player has used technology and science to his advantage in the gym, on the course with better clubs and balls and in their
practice routine being able to slice and dice statistics and pore over tape. To your point, there is really nothing different about the actual homo sapien hitting the ball other than they
are likely more fit than many PGA Tour players 30 years ago.


But that doesn't work comparing across eras. Like bowling, there are guys who average 210 today and they certainly aren't better than guys who averaged 180 in 1970.


Again, bowling is a numbers game. Why can't these be compared? Have the bowling alleys and bowling equipment really come along that far to help players score? You still gotta
toss the rock down the alley. Maybe Chus or Boyd could enlighten us.

_________________
Flew too close to the sun on wings of pastrami


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bernstein on Spieth
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
bowling balls have all sorts of weights and shit inside to make them hook.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 178 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group