It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 1:55 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 353 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:
and Rust seemed to acknowledge that he did know him but uncharacteristically losing his cool and shooting him

I don't think it was bullshit that they squeezed in. I think the writer had a plan for this information and simply couldn't close.

Interesting but how does that work? A re-write? Was there an ending that made sense with all that stuff?


I think they know how the internet is and just kept feeding them weekly in an attempt to go viral as a show


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
The show was fantastic.

I'll skip the "I thought it sucked even when everyone thought it was cool" phase and hold out until everyone likes it again.

In that respect time is indeed a flat circle.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 9:56 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79580
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
I think they know how the internet is and just kept feeding them weekly in an attempt to go viral as a show


I agree. These things were there to make people talk. They ultimately had no place in the actual plot.

Breaking Bad has some similar type stuff, most notably the pink bunny, but it tied into the plot and wasn't left ambiguously hanging.

And I feel that True Detective was laughing at me, acting as if I was crazy or stupid, or that I cared too much for noticing these things.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
SomeGuy wrote:
The show was fantastic.

I'll skip the "I thought it sucked even when everyone thought it was cool" phase and hold out until everyone likes it again.

In that respect time is indeed a flat circle.

Im not sure everyone thought it was cool. Pretty sure the prevailing opinion was great start and a terrible finish.


http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2014/03/the-em-true-detective-em-finale-thats-it/284312/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I think they know how the internet is and just kept feeding them weekly in an attempt to go viral as a show


I agree. These things were there to make people talk. They ultimately had no place in the actual plot.

Breaking Bad has some similar type stuff, most notably the pink bunny, but it tied into the plot and wasn't left ambiguously hanging.

And I feel that True Detective was laughing at me, acting as if I was crazy or stupid, or that I cared too much for noticing these things.

http://uproxx.com/tv/2014/03/okay-maybe-fault-didnt-like-true-detective-finale/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37841
Location: ...
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
and Rust seemed to acknowledge that he did know him but uncharacteristically losing his cool and shooting him

I don't think it was bullshit that they squeezed in. I think the writer had a plan for this information and simply couldn't close.

Interesting but how does that work? A re-write? Was there an ending that made sense with all that stuff?


I think they know how the internet is and just kept feeding them weekly in an attempt to go viral as a show


they film the shows before the season is aired, you realize that right? once it's done, it's done.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
W_Z wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
and Rust seemed to acknowledge that he did know him but uncharacteristically losing his cool and shooting him

I don't think it was bullshit that they squeezed in. I think the writer had a plan for this information and simply couldn't close.

Interesting but how does that work? A re-write? Was there an ending that made sense with all that stuff?


I think they know how the internet is and just kept feeding them weekly in an attempt to go viral as a show


they film the shows before the season is aired, you realize that right? once it's done, it's done.

Are you asking me or dolphin?

I understand how it works. The plan to feed them weekly was done early on. (although I see how that came off like they were writing them every week. poor wording on my part.)

But yeah, I dont know what gd is saying that he had a plan but couldnt close. If you got to the ending and those things ended up not mattering, then edit some of them out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82248
rogers park bryan wrote:
W_Z wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
and Rust seemed to acknowledge that he did know him but uncharacteristically losing his cool and shooting him

I don't think it was bullshit that they squeezed in. I think the writer had a plan for this information and simply couldn't close.

Interesting but how does that work? A re-write? Was there an ending that made sense with all that stuff?


I think they know how the internet is and just kept feeding them weekly in an attempt to go viral as a show


they film the shows before the season is aired, you realize that right? once it's done, it's done.

Are you asking me or dolphin?

I understand how it works. The plan to feed them weekly was done early on. (although I see how that came off like they were writing them every week. poor wording on my part.)

But yeah, I dont know what gd is saying that he had a plan but couldnt close. If you got to the ending and those things ended up not mattering, then edit some of them out.


I don't think he knew how to bring it all together so he just ignored what he wrote. I may be wrong as I remember reading somewhere that he envisioned the ending first and then wrote the story to the ending. It sure didn't feel that way.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Whatever he did, it didnt work.


Ill bet there is some fanfic out there that finished it nicely


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Peoria Matt wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
I liked him in The Cell.


Which Ligue did he play?


ImageImageImageImage

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79580
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Before the finale Pizzolatto said this: "I cannot think of anything more insulting as an audience than to go through eight weeks, eight hours with these people, and then to be told it was a lie—that what you were seeing wasn’t really what was happening."

But isn't that really exactly what he did?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Before the finale Pizzolatto said this: "I cannot think of anything more insulting as an audience than to go through eight weeks, eight hours with these people, and then to be told it was a lie—that what you were seeing wasn’t really what was happening."

But isn't that really exactly what he did?



Not really, no.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 2:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79580
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
SomeGuy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Before the finale Pizzolatto said this: "I cannot think of anything more insulting as an audience than to go through eight weeks, eight hours with these people, and then to be told it was a lie—that what you were seeing wasn’t really what was happening."

But isn't that really exactly what he did?



Not really, no.



So, I didn't really see Marty's daughter arrange those figures exactly like the crime scene? I didn't see Rust make those beer can men? I didn't see the same art in Marty's home as the art in the nuthouse? I didn't see Rust's face tattooed on LeDoux?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Before the finale Pizzolatto said this: "I cannot think of anything more insulting as an audience than to go through eight weeks, eight hours with these people, and then to be told it was a lie—that what you were seeing wasn’t really what was happening."

But isn't that really exactly what he did?



Not really, no.



So, I didn't really see Marty's daughter arrange those figures exactly like the crime scene? I didn't see Rust make those beer can men? I didn't see the same art in Marty's home as the art in the nuthouse? I didn't see Rust's face tattooed on LeDoux?


I don't know, did you?

I'm not trying to be obtuse or troll but you are the one that saw something in those scenes, did Pizzalatto intend for those to be what you are claiming? Maybe. I guess I'm just trying to understand where the "He lied to us!" sentiment comes from.

Marty's kids drawing in the kitchen is a legit stretch, I get it though.
The tattoo is a stretch as well.
The figures? Who knows, they're kids playing with dolls. Could be anything, could be something. Again, even if it was it doesn't matter because Marty was too much of a self-absorbed narcissistic jackass to ever see what was happening around him even if it tied in with the case. Perhaps that was the point?

Even IF all of those are "red herrings" or "loose ends" or misdirections or whatever it really goes back to all going on right under Marty's nose and as time faded (just like the "Missing Children" billboard) and things change and they were only able to get "their guy" in the end and close the barn door after the animals got out.

And really, what did you want to happen? How did you want it to end? What would have been acceptable to you?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82248
SomeGuy wrote:
[Marty's kids drawing in the kitchen is a legit stretch, I get it though.
The tattoo is a stretch as well.
The figures? Who knows, they're kids playing with dolls. Could be anything, could be something. ?


The doll is naked laying on the ground with a male doll on top of her and other dolls standing in a semi circle watching. I suppose you could chalk it up to coincidence. You would be in the minority.

The kid's drawing is identical to that of the cult...identical. It also happens to be identical to the drawing in the psych ward.

What would I want to happen? Well, I'm no writer. I think it's reasonable that a political family who got all state grants for religious based education and then was found to have ritualistically killed children might be brought down by the incident.

Instead, the maintenance man took the blame.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37841
Location: ...
rogers park bryan wrote:

I understand how it works. The plan to feed them weekly was done early on. (although I see how that came off like they were writing them every week. poor wording on my part.)

But yeah, I dont know what gd is saying that he had a plan but couldnt close. If you got to the ending and those things ended up not mattering, then edit some of them out.


if you want to criticize pizzolatto on not being able to close the story in a satisfactory way, and GD points to a few pieces of evidence for him to feel that way--that's legitimate. but honestly, thinking there was a plan to coerce the internet into spawning crazy conspiracy theories is ridiculous. no one developing a show (especially one with that budget) would give a shit what people on the internet is going to say or think. only people on the internet would give themselves that much credit.

pizzolatto did a few interviews with EW early on in the year. this clip from one of them shows where he was coming from:

Quote:
EW: You said there was no conversion in the story. But was Cohle suggesting he now believes in some kind of afterlife when he told Hart about his near death experience?

NP: It’s not a belief – he’s talking about an experience. And he’s not talking about a reconciliation with loved ones after death: If you listen to what he says, he says, ‘I was gone. There was no me. Just love… and then I woke up.’ That line is significant to the whole series: “And then I woke up.” The only thing like a conversion that he has is when he says, “You’re looking at it wrong. To me, the light is winning.” And that doesn’t describe a conversion to me as much as it describes a broadening of perspective. The man who once said there is no light at the end of the tunnel is now saying there might be order to this. I don’t think it says anything more than: Pick your stories carefully.

EW: Are you prepared for the theories or varied wild interpretations that might come with this ending?

NP: About four weeks ago, I realized I had to completely avoid the Internet. So I am going to just keep doing that. Once it really got out there, and people were buying The King In Yellow, I wanted to tell them, “Don’t buy that! Go buy Galveston!” [Laughs] I realized that people need to have their own journey with the show. Whatever they end up with – whatever theories they have or don’t have – that’s what it means to connect with an audience. One of the most exciting things to see from people who really like the show is that it has inspired such great creativity in them. There are websites of True Detective artwork out there now and it’s beautiful. And I don’t want to take that away from anybody. I know what it means to me. But I don’t want to take away anyone’s interpretation of the show. If they have an interpretation that means it lives inside them and they connected with the show.


full interview: http://www.ew.com/article/2014/03/10/true-detective-post-mortem-creator-nic-pizzoletto-on-happy-endings-season-2-and-the-future-of-cohle-and-hart


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82248
What a penis.

Without The King In Yellow, this is a mundane story

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
good dolphin wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
[Marty's kids drawing in the kitchen is a legit stretch, I get it though.
The tattoo is a stretch as well.
The figures? Who knows, they're kids playing with dolls. Could be anything, could be something. ?


The doll is naked laying on the ground with a male doll on top of her and other dolls standing in a semi circle watching. I suppose you could chalk it up to coincidence. You would be in the minority.

The kid's drawing is identical to that of the cult...identical. It also happens to be identical to the drawing in the psych ward.

What would I want to happen? Well, I'm no writer. I think it's reasonable that a political family who got all state grants for religious based education and then was found to have ritualistically killed children might be brought down by the incident.

Instead, the maintenance man took the blame.


The maintenance man was all that was left. Everything else was faded by time, there was no one else to get.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
W_Z wrote:
. but honestly, thinking there was a plan to coerce the internet into spawning crazy conspiracy theories is ridiculous.

You're taking internet too literally or something. Im not talking points about specific conspiracy theories. I just mean the audience. Internet meaning "this generation of viewers"

Are you saying the writer didn't have people's reactions in mind when writing?



W_Z wrote:
.no one developing a show (especially one with that budget) would give a shit what people on the internet is going to say or think. only people on the internet would give themselves that much credit.

What are you talking about? No one gets any credit. I'm saying he put red herrings in the story knowing people who consumed them would react. Unless you're saying the writer doesn't care what the reader/viewer thinks or how they react?


Sounds like you're mad at the internet in general though. The internet is essentially the public at this point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
The doll is naked laying on the ground with a male doll on top of her and other dolls standing in a semi circle watching. I suppose you could chalk it up to coincidence. You would be in the minority.

The kid's drawing is identical to that of the cult...identical. It also happens to be identical to the drawing in the psych ward.


This just can't be explained away by coincidence.

I don't know why you would do something like that if not for the plot or to get some reaction. Maybe I'm not thinking of some other viable reason.

It's just there cause its there?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
This sums it up nicely,imo

The Disappointing Finale of “True Detective”
BY EMILY NUSSBAUM

Two weeks ago, I published a critical article about HBO’s “True Detective” in which I argued that, as stylish and as well acted as the series was, it had a hollow center. Beneath its auteurist trappings, the show boiled down to bickering cops hunting a sinister “rape club”—a plot that has been done to death, so to speak, on many better shows. “True Detective” also had a funky gender problem: it was about the evil of men who treat women as lurid props, but the show treated women as lurid props. And, though the dialogue was deeply, sometimes deadly serious, those layers of Lovecraft and nihilism just felt like red herrings.

Well, as of the finale, I’ve changed my mind about one thing, at least: Rust Cohle’s monologues weren’t window dressing. They were the whole point—but I don’t mean that in a good way. In the finale, we discovered that the Spaghetti Man—a.k.a. the lawnmower man, a.k.a. the hulking guy with scars—was indeed our serial killer. A perverted mastermind with a cave full of skulls and thorns, he was diddling his disabled sister inside their Grey Gardens wreck of a mansion; he also had some serious elder abuse going on, a plot that gave me flashbacks to the hilarious movie “Cold Comfort Farm” (“I saw something nasty in the woodshed!”). I relished this surreal, sick, and frankly nasty opening sequence, which led deep into the territory of the notorious “X-Files” episode “Home,” but after that everything went downhill.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9975
pizza_Place: world famous
good dolphin wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
[Marty's kids drawing in the kitchen is a legit stretch, I get it though.
The tattoo is a stretch as well.
The figures? Who knows, they're kids playing with dolls. Could be anything, could be something. ?


The doll is naked laying on the ground with a male doll on top of her and other dolls standing in a semi circle watching. I suppose you could chalk it up to coincidence. You would be in the minority.

The kid's drawing is identical to that of the cult...identical. It also happens to be identical to the drawing in the psych ward.

What would I want to happen? Well, I'm no writer. I think it's reasonable that a political family who got all state grants for religious based education and then was found to have ritualistically killed children might be brought down by the incident.

Instead, the maintenance man took the blame.


There was more to the story, they just didn't explain everything. All those "easter eggs" could very well have been legit clues to something bigger. People seem to forget the scene when the detectives come into Marty's hospital room and ask if he wants to know what else they found. He said he didn't. The story was always about the two characters, Marty and Rust, and their story was told. Anyone who chose to get so involved in everything else that you were distracted by the main point of the show that's on you.

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
rogers park bryan wrote:
This sums it up nicely,imo

The Disappointing Finale of “True Detective”
BY EMILY NUSSBAUM

Two weeks ago, I published a critical article about HBO’s “True Detective” in which I argued that, as stylish and as well acted as the series was, it had a hollow center. Beneath its auteurist trappings, the show boiled down to bickering cops hunting a sinister “rape club”—a plot that has been done to death, so to speak, on many better shows. “True Detective” also had a funky gender problem: it was about the evil of men who treat women as lurid props, but the show treated women as lurid props. And, though the dialogue was deeply, sometimes deadly serious, those layers of Lovecraft and nihilism just felt like red herrings.

Well, as of the finale, I’ve changed my mind about one thing, at least: Rust Cohle’s monologues weren’t window dressing. They were the whole point—but I don’t mean that in a good way. In the finale, we discovered that the Spaghetti Man—a.k.a. the lawnmower man, a.k.a. the hulking guy with scars—was indeed our serial killer. A perverted mastermind with a cave full of skulls and thorns, he was diddling his disabled sister inside their Grey Gardens wreck of a mansion; he also had some serious elder abuse going on, a plot that gave me flashbacks to the hilarious movie “Cold Comfort Farm” (“I saw something nasty in the woodshed!”). I relished this surreal, sick, and frankly nasty opening sequence, which led deep into the territory of the notorious “X-Files” episode “Home,” but after that everything went downhill.


That is great. Loved the show, hated the ending.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:00 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79580
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
good dolphin wrote:
Without The King In Yellow, this is a mundane story


Exactly. Without all the stuff we're discussing this show was nothing more than an extended (and admittedly well acted) CSI episode.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37841
Location: ...
rogers park bryan wrote:
W_Z wrote:
. but honestly, thinking there was a plan to coerce the internet into spawning crazy conspiracy theories is ridiculous.

You're taking internet too literally or something. Im not talking points about specific conspiracy theories. I just mean the audience. Internet meaning "this generation of viewers"


i'm taking the internet to mean exactly what you said when you said someone obviously was "working" the show to feed the internet.

Quote:
Are you saying the writer didn't have people's reactions in mind when writing?


i don't think he thought their reactions were going to be what they were. that's why i quoted him saying what he did.

Quote:
Sounds like you're mad at the internet in general though. The internet is essentially the public at this point.


i'm no more "mad" at the internet than you are mad that the show didn't do what you wanted it to. plenty of people including myself were satisfied by it. life goes on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
W_Z wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
W_Z wrote:
. but honestly, thinking there was a plan to coerce the internet into spawning crazy conspiracy theories is ridiculous.

You're taking internet too literally or something. Im not talking points about specific conspiracy theories. I just mean the audience. Internet meaning "this generation of viewers"


i'm taking the internet to mean exactly what you said when you said someone obviously was "working" the show to feed the internet.

Quote:
Are you saying the writer didn't have people's reactions in mind when writing?


i don't think he thought their reactions were going to be what they were. that's why i quoted him saying what he did.

Quote:
Sounds like you're mad at the internet in general though. The internet is essentially the public at this point.


i'm no more "mad" at the internet than you are mad that the show didn't do what you wanted it to. plenty of people including myself were satisfied by it. life goes on.

Oh I'm not mad. Its fine, I enjoyed most of the show. I actually enjoy arguing it because the sides are so far apart. (Pro and con on the finale)

I think the writer (or someone involved with the show) had peoples reactions to the aforementioned red herrings in mind despite what he may have said in an interview.

I guess I don't understand the purpose of so many dead ends. I still haven't seen an answer to that. I'm not a writer (courtroom gasps) but if it means nothing then why the similar symbols (the drawing etc) ? If they mean nothing, why are they there?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37841
Location: ...
he used a lot of misdirection and i know he did that on purpose, he said as much. as far as how people were going to interpret them, you can't predict that in the creative process. from what i gathered from his interviews, he was surprised that people came up with all those theories.

my biggest problem with the finale was the first 10 minutes and the jesus shot. most of the climactic stuff was pretty thrilling i thought, even if it was predictable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Oh so he did want to misdirect? OK. I hadn't seen anyone say that. It was too much misdirection for me.

Ya know what it felt like? Usual Suspects but instead of the coffee mug smash scene, it was just Keaton like they discussed. The End.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82248
W_Z wrote:
from what i gathered from his interviews, he was surprised that people came up with all those theories..


which only goes to show he is a man who cannot close

He is a baroque artist, creating work that is ornate and superficially interesting but ultimately meaningless.

He probably lives in one of those river forest mansions with big lion sculptures guarding the front doors

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 353 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group