It is currently Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:24 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Who is the board's worst sports poster
Nas 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
chas 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
JORR 19%  19%  [ 9 ]
Darkside 11%  11%  [ 5 ]
Curious Hair 15%  15%  [ 7 ]
RFDC 9%  9%  [ 4 ]
Frank 19%  19%  [ 9 ]
Bigfan 11%  11%  [ 5 ]
Write-in 13%  13%  [ 6 ]
Total votes : 47
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 7:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33907
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Both losers, don't care what kind!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 24727
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Darkside wrote:
Except of course for that super bowl win.

Yes, beating Sexy Rexy sure makes you a great QB.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66054
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
KDdidit wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Except of course for that super bowl win.

Yes, beating Sexy Rexy sure makes you a great QB.

He didn't beat Rex. He beat the Bears Defense. I don't think Rex played on defense.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 12:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 24727
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
So you agree with JORR that wins are important. He beat the Bears defense more than Rex beat the Colts defense, he threw better than the guy he was up against that day, that's very JORRsian.

Or else it was just that in 14 playoffs appearances he won the SB once, which if 12 teams make the playoffs, doesn't really weigh much.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 12:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66054
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
KDdidit wrote:
So you agree with JORR that wins are important. He beat the Bears defense more than Rex beat the Colts defense, he threw better than the guy he was up against that day, that's very JORRsian.

Or else it was just that in 14 playoffs appearances he won the SB once, which if 12 teams make the playoffs, doesn't really weigh much.

That's a pretty twisty way of twisting what I'm saying to fit a narrative, sure.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13465
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Darkside wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Except of course for that super bowl win.

Yes, beating Sexy Rexy sure makes you a great QB.

He didn't beat Rex. He beat the Bears Defense. I don't think Rex played on defense.
So the fact that Manning has a (considerable) losing record in the play-offs is over-ridden by the fact that he won a Super Bowl. I can buy that. However, then you would agree that if Romo were to accomplish the same feat he would also be deemed a winner, correct?

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Credence is given to the Peyton Manning is a loser argument when you take into account his performance in playoff games and the teams he played on. He has performed badly in a number of big games. His teams were heavily favored in a lot of those games. He has to own that.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
The ONE year Manning won his his Superbowl , he is the ONLY q.b. in NFL history to have more turnovers than t.d.s in the postseason and have his team win a Superbowl. He played poorly that postseason, his defense and running game bailed that dome queen out. He's never performed well in big games dating back to Tennessee.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
Darkside wrote:
All games are not equal.


slippery slope here. just imagine if you said "all people are not equal" because the same cavalcade of qualifiers/variables/etc is coming. at what point to we denote a more meaningful game? if it's against a good team? if it's against any team with a .500+ record in the last 2 months of the season when a team is within X games of the wildcard? we could easily say playoff games, but then remember how cutler was knocked for one of his few playoff wins being against a 7-9 seahawks team? do we take strength of opponent into consideration in the playoffs? in the arbitrary period of time we've determined is a "playoff push" ?? what about that old saying that when you miss the playoffs by 1-2 games that games in april/may are just as important as games in august/sept? is that out the window now because there wasn't a formal playoff push going on in april/may whereas there was one in august/sept and therefore the pressure was up?

so yeah to do that you're pretty much inviting in arbitrary definitions of whatever, which usually at least subconsciously get cherrypicked by the arguer to fortify their argument, so yeah like i said it's a slippery slope.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:55 pm
Posts: 3287
pizza_Place: Olde Silver Tavern, Manalapan, NJ [R.I.P.?]
Darkside wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Aren't you a fan of the Bears and which means you have watched Jay Cutler play?

I am and I have. What are you trying to say?

He is worse than Romo.

I'd rather have Jay.


And just like that, Darkside becomes your runaway winner.

_________________
The Bulls haven't done anything wrong, and they're not going to do anything wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 38042
Location: ...
long time guy wrote:
Credence is given to the Peyton Manning is a loser argument when you take into account his performance in playoff games and the teams he played on. He has performed badly in a number of big games. His teams were heavily favored in a lot of those games. He has to own that.


and that's backed up by the fact that he has a losing record in the playoffs. his whole demeanor changes in the post season. he tightens up a lot.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:47 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80576
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
KDdidit wrote:
So you agree with JORR that wins are important. He beat the Bears defense more than Rex beat the Colts defense, he threw better than the guy he was up against that day, that's very JORRsian.


For the record, I would never say a pitcher with a 2.50 ERA and a 2-4 record was a "loser". There just isn't enough there to draw such a conclusion.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66054
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Darkside wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Except of course for that super bowl win.

Yes, beating Sexy Rexy sure makes you a great QB.

He didn't beat Rex. He beat the Bears Defense. I don't think Rex played on defense.
So the fact that Manning has a (considerable) losing record in the play-offs is over-ridden by the fact that he won a Super Bowl. I can buy that. However, then you would agree that if Romo were to accomplish the same feat he would also be deemed a winner, correct?

I think he's like 11-13 in the playoffs. Not "considerable losing" record really. Better than 2 and 4 Romo.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66054
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
long time guy wrote:
Credence is given to the Peyton Manning is a loser argument when you take into account his performance in playoff games and the teams he played on. He has performed badly in a number of big games. His teams were heavily favored in a lot of those games. He has to own that.

Now let's back up here. I didn't say Manning was a "winner" (although he has the ring). I said Romo was a loser. Even though he has a winning career record. I don't really think that's big time stepping out on a weird limb.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66054
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
So you agree with JORR that wins are important. He beat the Bears defense more than Rex beat the Colts defense, he threw better than the guy he was up against that day, that's very JORRsian.


For the record, I would never say a pitcher with a 2.50 ERA and a 2-4 record was a "loser". There just isn't enough there to draw such a conclusion.

And what if the season were only 4 games long with single elimination like an NFL post season?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Romo over cutler all day any day .

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80576
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Darkside wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
So you agree with JORR that wins are important. He beat the Bears defense more than Rex beat the Colts defense, he threw better than the guy he was up against that day, that's very JORRsian.


For the record, I would never say a pitcher with a 2.50 ERA and a 2-4 record was a "loser". There just isn't enough there to draw such a conclusion.

And what if the season were only 4 games long with single elimination like an NFL post season?


It's too short to draw conclusions. That's the beauty of baseball. You have huge samples. There simply isn't a starting pitcher with 200 career decisions who was "unlucky" enough to be a good pitcher and have a losing record.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
What do ya think Greg maddux' record would be if the braves drafted him ?

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:23 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80576
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
312player wrote:
What do ya think Greg maddux' record would be if the braves drafted him ?


About the same. See, you're making bad assumptions. In several of the seasons when Maddux was on the Cubs, the Cubs scored more than the Braves. The reason the Braves were so good was because of Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz, not because Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz got good "run support".

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
What do ya think Greg maddux' record would be if the braves drafted him ?


About the same. See, you're making bad assumptions. In several of the seasons when Maddux was on the Cubs, the Cubs scored more than the Braves. The reason the Braves were so good was because of Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz, not because Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz got good "run support".

If Atlanta had scored less runs, would they have had less wins?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 5:01 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80576
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
What do ya think Greg maddux' record would be if the braves drafted him ?


About the same. See, you're making bad assumptions. In several of the seasons when Maddux was on the Cubs, the Cubs scored more than the Braves. The reason the Braves were so good was because of Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz, not because Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz got good "run support".

If Atlanta had scored less runs, would they have had less wins?


That's an unknown.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Mmhmm...

But you believe that because Maddux was so great, if those Braves teams were only able to score half the runs each season that they did, Maddux would have reduced his ERA by half in order to make sure he still was an all time winning pitcher?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 5:30 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80576
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
IMU wrote:
Mmhmm...

But you believe that because Maddux was so great, if those Braves teams were only able to score half the runs each season that they did, Maddux would have reduced his ERA by half in order to make sure he still was an all time winning pitcher?


I didn't say anything like that. There is no team that scored half as many as the Braves and the Cubs certainly didn't.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 8:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
Mmhmm...

But you believe that because Maddux was so great, if those Braves teams were only able to score half the runs each season that they did, Maddux would have reduced his ERA by half in order to make sure he still was an all time winning pitcher?


I didn't say anything like that. There is no team that scored half as many as the Braves and the Cubs certainly didn't.

So less runs could affect wins? And significantly fewer runs could significantly affect wins?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
More runs generally = more wins. Unless all pitchers give up 0 runs and your team does not score. Simple unless you have really stupid baseball thoughts or.... never mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
312player wrote:
Romo over cutler all day any day .


Yes, and it isnt close.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66054
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Romo will never win you a championship.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 9:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
Darkside wrote:
Romo will never win you a championship.

He is better than Cutler though. Bears are long way from a championship. Long way.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66054
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Scooter wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Romo will never win you a championship.

He is better than Cutler though. Bears are long way from a championship. Long way.

He may be better than cutler. But he's still a loser.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 9:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
I agree. Both are losers. Romo is better.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group