It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 11:14 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Thanks for the memories, Crow, but you get paid too much and Darling is more than capable of being the guy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 8:15 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Curious Hair wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Of course you'd like to move Bickell and Sharp. They're also at about their lowest value. Does anyone doubt they held Sharp too long? And I'm not saying you trade Kane now, but let's say it's three years down the road and they've won another Cup and Kane is coming off a big Finals, that might be the time you want to move a guy. When all the fans are clamoring for a guy to be traded, it's obviously too late.


You have a point, but remember that the NHL has a salary floor and that several teams desperately need to put money on the books to be compliant with the cap. Phoenix needs to add at least $17MM and I've heard as high as $19MM, which, given the fact that they've just been evicted and have one foot in the grave fucking AGAIN, is outlandish. Buffalo has to add at least 10. Nashville, Calgary, and Jersey are all under the floor. The money will end up somewhere.


Oh, they'll move them. They just won't get much in return.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Wouldn't it be a gift from above if Bickell retired with post-concussion syndrome? He's a decent buyout candidate. I'm not a big fan of buyouts, but it might be better than retaining salary.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 8:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Hockey Gay wrote:
Thanks for the memories, Crow, but you get paid too much and Darling is more than capable of being the guy.


At least HG is standing up for his statement,

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40648
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Curious Hair wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Of course you'd like to move Bickell and Sharp. They're also at about their lowest value. Does anyone doubt they held Sharp too long? And I'm not saying you trade Kane now, but let's say it's three years down the road and they've won another Cup and Kane is coming off a big Finals, that might be the time you want to move a guy. When all the fans are clamoring for a guy to be traded, it's obviously too late.


You have a point, but remember that the NHL has a salary floor and that several teams desperately need to put money on the books to be compliant with the cap. Phoenix needs to add at least $17MM and I've heard as high as $19MM, which, given the fact that they've just been evicted and have one foot in the grave fucking AGAIN, is outlandish. Buffalo has to add at least 10. Nashville, Calgary, and Jersey are all under the floor. The money will end up somewhere.



The point I keep making that no one cares to think about.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40648
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Of course you'd like to move Bickell and Sharp. They're also at about their lowest value. Does anyone doubt they held Sharp too long? And I'm not saying you trade Kane now, but let's say it's three years down the road and they've won another Cup and Kane is coming off a big Finals, that might be the time you want to move a guy. When all the fans are clamoring for a guy to be traded, it's obviously too late.


You have a point, but remember that the NHL has a salary floor and that several teams desperately need to put money on the books to be compliant with the cap. Phoenix needs to add at least $17MM and I've heard as high as $19MM, which, given the fact that they've just been evicted and have one foot in the grave fucking AGAIN, is outlandish. Buffalo has to add at least 10. Nashville, Calgary, and Jersey are all under the floor. The money will end up somewhere.


Oh, they'll move them. They just won't get much in return.



They do not want anything in return in terms of a player with money on the books. Picks and minor leaugers are fine.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Thank you Corey Crawford...you were a big part of 2 Stanley Cup Championships. Best of luck with your new franchise.

Mr. Darling, your table is ready.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
If Crawford plays this hard for the Sabres, it will really expedite their turnaround.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:05 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Bowman said Crawford was untouchable. Smart man.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
I understand Scottys philosophy with goalies, but it is the most important position in hockey and I'm not so sure that the Hawks have the nads to trade a 2 time cup winner and a guy who stood on his head and held the highest scoring team in the NHL to just 10 goals in 6 games in the stanley cup finals.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:31 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Scorehead wrote:
I understand Scottys philosophy with goalies, but it is the most important position in hockey...



It's not though, which is exactly why Bowman's philosophy is what it is.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
I understand Scottys philosophy with goalies, but it is the most important position in hockey...



It's not though, which is exactly why Bowman's philosophy is what it is.


What position is more important?

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Center is the most important position in hockey


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38688
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Scorehead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
I understand Scottys philosophy with goalies, but it is the most important position in hockey...



It's not though, which is exactly why Bowman's philosophy is what it is.


What position is more important?

I think what he's trying to say you can get by with a less than elite goalie if the horses around him are elite. That's how Bowman builds his teams. Chris Osgood went thru the same stuff in Detroit.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Nas wrote:
Bowman said Crawford was untouchable. Smart man.


Smart to say, dumb to believe.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
bigfan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Bowman said Crawford was untouchable. Smart man.


Smart to say, dumb to believe.


yep...if anything, this public statement just confirms Crawford is gone.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
wdelaney72 wrote:
bigfan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Bowman said Crawford was untouchable. Smart man.


Smart to say, dumb to believe.


yep...if anything, this public statement just confirms Crawford is gone.


Hockey GenI can correct me here...

but regarding the cap...you can cut a player and that money no longer applies to the cap?

So, Sharpe and Bicks, probably return a minor league type guy at best....if not....they get cut?

Crawford....no way he is gone...Darling was fine for his stint and his presence probably made Crow focus....but come on....unless you have something better coming in , not named Darling....

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
bigfan wrote:
but regarding the cap...you can cut a player and that money no longer applies to the cap?

No, this was eliminated in the 2013 CBA. If you send a player to the AHL or overseas, you can't take the entire cap hit off the books, you can only subtract the league minimum + $375,000.

Cutting Bickell would mean carrying $3,050,000 a year in dead cap space for two years. Buying him out would carry $1,320,000 in dead cap space for four years.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 6:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Hockey Gay wrote:
Center is the most important position in hockey


No single hockey player has a bigger impact on the outcome of a game than the goalie...and the goalie is the only player to play all 60 minutes.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
We saw this show already with Niemi. They weren't afraid to let a world class goalie go with a solid guy in the wings.
That said... Crow did amazing things this postseason. He had his urpy moments though, but I guess everyone does.
Overall, he was fucking magnificent in the final.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16815
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
At the time you asked this Darling was the correct answer. We might not win this thing, but for Darlings amazing relief pitching. His hot streak ended after a few games and then it was right to go back to Crow.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
shakes wrote:
At the time you asked this Darling was the correct answer. We might not win this thing, but for Darlings amazing relief pitching. His hot streak ended after a few games and then it was right to go back to Crow.

Q plays it perfectly.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 6:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
At the time Crawford was still the answer.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 6:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:
At the time Crawford was still the answer.

He most certainly was not. And he admitted to as much on Monday night.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 6:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
At the time Crawford was still the answer.

He most certainly was not. And he admitted to as much on Monday night.


What did you expect him to say? The fans and Q are idiots? You just don't bench a guy that has his experience and talent because he had a bad game. He carried this team most of the season and he carried them when it mattered most. He just can't seem to get any respect or appreciation from fans.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
At the time Crawford was still the answer.

He most certainly was not. And he admitted to as much on Monday night.


What did you expect him to say? The fans and Q are idiots? You just don't bench a guy that has his experience and talent because he had a bad game. He carried this team most of the season and he carried them when it mattered most. He just can't seem to get any respect or appreciation from fans.

You do understand that sometimes a starter needs a blow right? Are we also forgetting to consider that he may have had an injury that prevented him from playing at his peak, as was theorized at times in that first series? Goalies are like closers kind of. THey can be magnificent for 9/10th of the season and can't get it together for a time and what gets them back in it might be getting replaced.
Q obviously did the right thing. That's not even really questionable. It was correct. That is without doubt.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2015 7:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Scorehead wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
Center is the most important position in hockey


No single hockey player has a bigger impact on the outcome of a game than the goalie.


That's silly. You probably aren't aware of this, but for one of the Cups the Hawks won in the 30s, they pulled a guy out of the stands to play goalie.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2015 8:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
Center is the most important position in hockey


No single hockey player has a bigger impact on the outcome of a game than the goalie.


That's silly. You probably aren't aware of this, but for one of the Cups the Hawks won in the 30s, they pulled a guy out of the stands to play goalie.

That's happened quite a bit in NHL history.

But it's not silly.
Bring a guy out of the stands to play either LW or to play G, which has a greater negative effect on your team? Of course the guy playing G.
Put 5 guys from the stands on the ice to play with either an all-world G or an all-world LW - which team has the best chance at some success? Of course the team with somebody like Carey Price playing G with 5 bums.
Of course the G is the most important position in hockey. Kinda silly to argue otherwise, really.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2015 8:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
spanky wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
Center is the most important position in hockey


No single hockey player has a bigger impact on the outcome of a game than the goalie.


That's silly. You probably aren't aware of this, but for one of the Cups the Hawks won in the 30s, they pulled a guy out of the stands to play goalie.

That's happened quite a bit in NHL history.

But it's not silly.
Bring a guy out of the stands to play either LW or to play G, which has a greater negative effect on your team? Of course the guy playing G.
Put 5 guys from the stands on the ice to play with either an all-world G or an all-world LW - which team has the best chance at some success? Of course the team with somebody like Carey Price playing G with 5 bums.
Of course the G is the most important position in hockey. Kinda silly to argue otherwise, really.


Are you saying that the Hawks would be better off replacing Kane with you than replacing Crawford with you?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling v. Crawford
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2015 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Are you saying that the Hawks would be better off replacing Kane with you than replacing Crawford with you?

Yes.
Or you.
Or any other regular guy.


Neither one of us could blow the Hawks entire chance to win a game while playing Kane's position/minutes.
We would easily destroy the Hawks chance to win if we tried to play goalie. The Hawks would have no shot with us in goal. The other team would score double digits easily.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group