It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 2:42 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4765
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Aren't the Bears making a big mistake trying to implement the 3-4 scheme, rather than have Fangio adapt to the 4-3?? It worked in San Francisco because they had the personnel for it, but the Bears don't have that kind of personnel. I cringe at the thought that 33 yr. old Jared Allen is going to be playing OLB, when he lacked speed at end in the 4-3 last year. Is he really going to be covering backs out of the back-field and tight-ends on outside slant and curl routes? How about having to shed blockers and tackle Adrian Petersen on the sweep? Not!! Maybe his illness at the beginning of the season set him back, but my feeling is the defense as a whole is going to be a train-wreck again this year with no perimeter defense at all.

They're at least 3 or 4 years away from being competitive defensively in the new scheme is the way I see it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Dignified Rube wrote:
Aren't the Bears making a big mistake trying to implement the 3-4 scheme, rather than have Fangio adapt to the 4-3?? It worked in San Francisco because they had the personnel for it, but the Bears don't have that kind of personnel. I cringe at the thought that 33 yr. old Jared Allen is going to be playing OLB, when he lacked speed at end in the 4-3 last year. Is he really going to be covering backs out of the back-field and tight-ends on outside slant and curl routes? How about having to shed blockers and tackle Adrian Petersen on the sweep? Not!! Maybe his illness at the beginning of the season set him back, but my feeling is the defense as a whole is going to be a train-wreck again this year with no perimeter defense at all.

They're at least 3 or 4 years away from being competitive defensively in the new scheme is the way I see it.


Coaches run their system. If the Bears want to build a team for the long term, you let the coach run his system rather than forcing him to use a different system. Sure there are differences between the 3-4 and 4-3 defense, but it isnt like its a completely different sport, and many players have played in both at some point in their careers.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I've always liked the 3-4 better , at least you can disguise the blitzer and get creative. I'm not worried about the defense..its the QB throwing the ball to the other team that's my concern.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 11:44 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38355
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
312player wrote:
I've always liked the 3-4 better , at least you can disguise the blitzer and get creative. I'm not worried about the defense..its the QB throwing the ball to the other team that's my concern.



And now Aaron Rodgers will actually have to spend some time preparing to face the Bears.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4765
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Scorehead wrote:
Dignified Rube wrote:
Aren't the Bears making a big mistake trying to implement the 3-4 scheme, rather than have Fangio adapt to the 4-3?? It worked in San Francisco because they had the personnel for it, but the Bears don't have that kind of personnel. I cringe at the thought that 33 yr. old Jared Allen is going to be playing OLB, when he lacked speed at end in the 4-3 last year. Is he really going to be covering backs out of the back-field and tight-ends on outside slant and curl routes? How about having to shed blockers and tackle Adrian Petersen on the sweep? Not!! Maybe his illness at the beginning of the season set him back, but my feeling is the defense as a whole is going to be a train-wreck again this year with no perimeter defense at all.

They're at least 3 or 4 years away from being competitive defensively in the new scheme is the way I see it.


Coaches run their system. If the Bears want to build a team for the long term, you let the coach run his system rather than forcing him to use a different system. Sure there are differences between the 3-4 and 4-3 defense, but it isnt like its a completely different sport, and many players have played in both at some point in their careers.


The one difference is that the OLBs have to cover tight-ends and backs out of the backfield in the flat. How can Jared Allen be expected to do that well when he's never done it before? He ran a 4.7 40 yrd. dash in 2004. Ten years later he must be running a 4.9 or 5.0 now and that's not good enough for that position. But the Bears can't cut him because the $12.5 million due to him this year is guaranteed. If they cut him, they would have to eat all of that, which is close to 10% of their cap this year.

Rogers is going to be rolling Allen's way all day long on week one. This is what we're going to see a lot of.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ComkGXzFLE0


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Jared Allen sucked in the 4-3 , he's washed up. You want to design a defense around a has been who sucked last year?

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Also ..I only see Allen playing sparsely and mostly 3rd n long.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:10 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
There's a guy that used to play for the Bears that made nice adjustment to it last year. :wink:

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
3-4 won't need 3 years if Pace finds his Miller/Smith/Matthews/Suggs. Find that guy and you're all good.

Until then....Rodgers needs no prep.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11007
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
mel tucker tried to mimic lovie's 4-3 scheme... how'd that end up?

i'll let one of the proven best DC's in football run whatever the hell system he wants. I'm not expecting a superbowl this year, i'm just looking for competent leadership and player development.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4765
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
312player wrote:
Jared Allen sucked in the 4-3 , he's washed up. You want to design a defense around a has been who sucked last year?


This is my point. He did not do well in a defense where his position responsibilities were limited last year as an edge rusher and for run containment, and now the Bears change the defense to give him more responsibilities in pass defense? Where's the wisdom in that?

Make McClellin the OLB and have Allen in only on pass situations. Otherwise, we're screwed on the perimeter. But they're saying that McClellin is going to be one of the ILBs. Are you kidding me? He's going to get creamed inside, because he can't shed blocks. At least he has the speed to play OLB.

As usual the Bears are putting square pieces in round holes. That's what they're good at.


Last edited by Dignified Rube on Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38355
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Kirkwood wrote:
3-4 won't need 3 years if Pace finds his Miller/Smith/Matthews/Suggs. Find that guy and you're all good.

Until then....Rodgers needs no prep.



:lol: :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11007
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
Dignified Rube wrote:
312player wrote:
Jared Allen sucked in the 4-3 , he's washed up. You want to design a defense around a has been who sucked last year?


This is my point. He did not do well in a defense where his position responsibilities were limited last year as an edge rusher and for run containment, and now the Bears change the defense to give him more responsibilities in pass defense? Where's the wisdom in that?

Make McClellin the OLB and have Allen in only on pass situations. Otherwise, we're screwed on the perimeter. But they're saying that McClellin is going to be one of the ILBs. Are you kidding me? He's going to get creamed inside, because he can't shed blocks. At least he has the speed to play OLB.


who gives a shit about this year? the point of this year is hopefully the coaches can find some players on this roster are useable and can be used as they try to build a winner. jared allen is getting cut next year no matter how good he plays.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
312player wrote:
Jared Allen sucked in the 4-3 , he's washed up. You want to design a defense around a has been who sucked last year?


Exactly. This year is a transition year for the Bears. They arent expected to win anything this year.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:23 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
Scorehead wrote:
312player wrote:
Jared Allen sucked in the 4-3 , he's washed up. You want to design a defense around a has been who sucked last year?


Exactly. This year is a transition year for the Bears. They arent expected to win anything this year.

Theo running the Bears also?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Dignified Rube wrote:
312player wrote:
Jared Allen sucked in the 4-3 , he's washed up. You want to design a defense around a has been who sucked last year?


This is my point. He did not do well in a defense where his position responsibilities were limited last year as an edge rusher and for run containment, and now the Bears change the defense to give him more responsibilities in pass defense? Where's the wisdom in that?

Make McClellin the OLB and have Allen in only on pass situations. Otherwise, we're screwed on the perimeter. But they're saying that McClellin is going to be one of the ILBs. Are you kidding me? He's going to get creamed inside, because he can't shed blocks. At least he has the speed to play OLB.

As usual the Bears are putting square pieces in round holes. That's what they're good at.


You need to think long term, not short.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
wasn't that sutton guy a #2 pick just last year? Now is he going to be released?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:32 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
It's different, but not by a lot. You still rush 4 in a 3-4 for the most part. It's just you have one linebacker rushing from a 2 point stance instead of a DE rushing from a 3 point stance. That's pretty much it. And it won't be a 2 gap like in Lovie's system.

In a 3-4 it's just easier to disguise stuff. Like the rush linebacker dropping back and somebody else charging the line. Or sometimes the rush LB drops back and you do rush 3 but you zone cover with more guys.

But the Bears don't have the big fat nose tackle that you need. Unless they told one of our guys to get fat. Maybe I'm wrong. Did they draft a big fat nose guard in the 3rd or 4th? I forget.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57241
Beardown wrote:
But the Bears don't have the big fat nose tackle that you need. Unless they told one of our guys to get fat. Maybe I'm wrong. Did they draft a big fat nose guard in the 3rd or 4th? I forget.

Eddie Goldman. Drafted in 2nd round.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Hatchetman wrote:
wasn't that sutton guy a #2 pick just last year? Now is he going to be released?


3rd round....but still highly regarded. Many had him as a 1st rounder as a JR? This was gonna a steal of a pick....WOW

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4765
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Scorehead wrote:
312player wrote:
Jared Allen sucked in the 4-3 , he's washed up. You want to design a defense around a has been who sucked last year?


Exactly. This year is a transition year for the Bears. They arent expected to win anything this year.


That is a cop-out, loser argument --- a Bernstein and Zach Zaidman argument. We have been in re-load mode forever. I'm not excusing the team this year for any bad performance just because there's new coaches. The expectations should be that much greater because we have Fox now.

They have to be good enough to win eight games, maybe nine with their offense or am I wrong? We should be able to outgun most teams now except GB, PATS, Miami, Denver and Indy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Where did you see Sutton released?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fangio 3-4 Scheme
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Dignified Rube wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
312player wrote:
Jared Allen sucked in the 4-3 , he's washed up. You want to design a defense around a has been who sucked last year?


Exactly. This year is a transition year for the Bears. They arent expected to win anything this year.


That is a cop-out, loser argument --- a Bernstein and Zach Zaidman argument. We have been in re-load mode forever. I'm not excusing the team this year for any bad performance just because there's new coaches. The expectations should be that much greater because we have Fox now.

They have to be good enough to win eight games, maybe nine with their offense or am I wrong? We should be able to outgun most teams now except GB, PATS, Miami, Denver and Indy.


Yes, you are wrong. This is a new regime and new schemes. They are stuck with some players that don't fit the scheme who will be gone in 1 or 2 years. The record doesnt matter this year. This is a year of learning new systems and schemes and laying the foundation for the future.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group