It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 10:04 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13257
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Did anyone posting here actually hear the segment? This isn't some crazy Bernstein theory nor was it only about Bryant. It was simply another discussion involving advanced metrics. Bernstein was citing a relatively new stat which evaluates a catchers affect on the number of bad picthes being called strikes as well as batters that are most frequently jibed. Bryant was used as an example. Also catchers being scouted based on the projected runs they gain a team in a season rather than BA. Boers was OK with it and Bernstein thought it had gotten out of hand. It was actually a topic I had never heard discussed in much detail previously.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9964
pizza_Place: world famous
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
So it's great when the Cubs sign a free agent like Legendary Pitch Framer Miguel Montero to game the system, but when some other catcher is framing Jorge Soler right out of the big leagues it's a travesty? Who ya crappin'?


That's perfect.

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Did anyone posting here actually hear the segment? This isn't some crazy Bernstein theory nor was it only about Bryant. It was simply another discussion involving advanced metrics. Bernstein was citing a relatively new stat which evaluates a catchers affect on the number of bad picthes being called strikes as well as batters that are most frequently jibed. Bryant was used as an example. Also catchers being scouted based on the projected runs they gain a team in a season rather than BA. Boers was OK with it and Bernstein thought it had gotten out of hand. It was actually a topic I had never heard discussed in much detail previously.


Man, the tired remnants of the shattered and beaten B&B ALS are still scurrying about!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Did anyone posting here actually hear the segment? This isn't some crazy Bernstein theory nor was it only about Bryant. It was simply another discussion involving advanced metrics. Bernstein was citing a relatively new stat which evaluates a catchers affect on the number of bad picthes being called strikes as well as batters that are most frequently jibed. Bryant was used as an example. Also catchers being scouted based on the projected runs they gain a team in a season rather than BA. Boers was OK with it and Bernstein thought it had gotten out of hand. It was actually a topic I had never heard discussed in much detail previously.



Yes I heard it and you are correct but the emphasis to make his points was basically all Bryant.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
pittmike wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Did anyone posting here actually hear the segment? This isn't some crazy Bernstein theory nor was it only about Bryant. It was simply another discussion involving advanced metrics. Bernstein was citing a relatively new stat which evaluates a catchers affect on the number of bad picthes being called strikes as well as batters that are most frequently jibed. Bryant was used as an example. Also catchers being scouted based on the projected runs they gain a team in a season rather than BA. Boers was OK with it and Bernstein thought it had gotten out of hand. It was actually a topic I had never heard discussed in much detail previously.



Yes I heard it and you are correct but the emphasis to make his points was basically all Bryant.



Pittmike droppin' bombs!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13257
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
For those who are interested... http://espn.go.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/11127248/how-catcher-framing-becoming-great-skill-smart-teams-new-york-yankees-espn-magazine

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16486
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
But as JORR stated, Bernstein is discussing it in the context of defending Theo. For the last couple of years we've heard him say that Theo's brilliance was unfairly negated by new rule changes regarding international signings. Then earlier this year we listened to Dan and Len Kasper talk about David Ross's hidden value in framing pitches. But now, as Soler struggles and Bryant looks like a mere mortal, the problem is apparently the "new" strike zone -- a combination of framing and umpires who are calling strikes below the knees.

He may have a point with respect to the zone but it all comes across as being a Theo apologist. And when he and Sheehan talk about how strikeouts will kill the game, I think they are wrong. I loved watching deGrom, Betances, and Chapman blow some of these guys away.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
They can't stop listening to the idiot. ALS'ers extend that tongue:

Image

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 2:05 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
But as JORR stated, Bernstein is discussing it in the context of defending Theo. For the last couple of years we've heard him say that Theo's brilliance was unfairly negated by new rule changes regarding international signings. Then earlier this year we listened to Dan and Len Kasper talk about David Ross's hidden value in framing pitches. But now, as Soler struggles and Bryant looks like a mere mortal, the problem is apparently the "new" strike zone -- a combination of framing and umpires who are calling strikes below the knees.

He may have a point with respect to the zone but it all comes across as being a Theo apologist. And when he and Sheehan talk about how strikeouts will kill the game, I think they are wrong. I loved watching deGrom, Betances, and Chapman blow some of these guys away.



I didn't actually hear the segment, but I have heard bernstein go on about pitch framing like a kid with a new toy or an HR Director with a new buzzword. But if Sheehan or bernstein actually believes the proliferation of strikeouts has to do with a "new" strikezone or pitch framing (which has been done for one hundred years), they're just wrong. The fascination with the walk is resulting in all those strikeouts. Guys like Joey Votto come to the park to walk rather than hit. Okay, he's a guy who is good at it. But when you have these other (medicore) guys up there taking pitches they should be cutting at, what the fuck do you think is going to happen?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I didn't actually hear the segment, but I have heard bernstein go on about pitch framing like a kid with a new toy or an HR Director with a new buzzword. But if Sheehan or bernstein actually believes the proliferation of strikeouts has to do with a "new" strikezone or pitch framing (which has been done for one hundred years), they're just wrong. The fascination with the walk is resulting in all those strikeouts. Guys like Joey Votto come to the park to walk rather than hit. Okay, he's a guy who is good at it. But when you have these other (medicore) guys up there taking pitches they should be cutting at, what the fuck do you think is going to happen?



that's definitely part of it, but guys are throwing harder unless you don't believe the MPH data.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 2:15 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hatchetman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I didn't actually hear the segment, but I have heard bernstein go on about pitch framing like a kid with a new toy or an HR Director with a new buzzword. But if Sheehan or bernstein actually believes the proliferation of strikeouts has to do with a "new" strikezone or pitch framing (which has been done for one hundred years), they're just wrong. The fascination with the walk is resulting in all those strikeouts. Guys like Joey Votto come to the park to walk rather than hit. Okay, he's a guy who is good at it. But when you have these other (medicore) guys up there taking pitches they should be cutting at, what the fuck do you think is going to happen?



that's definitely part of it, but guys are throwing harder unless you don't believe the MPH data.


Well, I don't believe Chapman was throwing 103 last night. I think that's a number they throw on the Jumbotron so the fans can go, "OOOOOOHHHHHHHH!"

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
yeah I dunno. maybe related to the fact a starter is only "expected" to go six innings, so they air it out all the time.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Jaw Breaker wrote:
And when he and Sheehan talk about how strikeouts will kill the game

DAN SPENT YEARS SCREAMING THAT STRIKEOUTS ARE PREFERABLE TO OUTS ON BALLS IN PLAY

JESUS

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:


Dubious

Do any proposed metrics get rejected by the saber community?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7/14 Ah The Answer
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:35 pm
Posts: 1905
Location: Up Where We Belong
I would not rather have to read the background shit (as is my want) because Bernstein's concept of number's theory is predicated on gimickry and outcome. His over the top, measured tone when talking numbers runs into his "it works great up to the point of...." concession. That, and some of the basic concepts of numbers that he conveniently ignores (ignorant?) when introducing one of his new pet theories or when pressed on his own understanding of the concept.

_________________
DRINK BƎTTƎR. @theRIPH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group