It is currently Tue Feb 25, 2025 5:00 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 581 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 20  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 8:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Haha nice Denis.. :oops:

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33244
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
312player wrote:
Haha nice Denis.. :oops:



Those are actually the same things that bother me most about Republican talking points.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 8:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
denisdman wrote:
312player wrote:
Haha nice Denis.. :oops:



Those are actually the same things that bother me most about Republican talking points.


The last question in the debate was BRUTAL. I get that it's the GOP Primary and you are pandering to the base, but essentially asked just say words about God was an honest question.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 8:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I found it interesting that in two articles this morning Fox was getting slammed by Republicans and Dems and even CNN/MSNBC praised them. Fox got credit for being aggressive and not soft balling.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Trump is the only answer: Dynamic,shoots from the hip,looks like a winner and will rip Hillary and those bleeding heart celebs who support her.

Can he run the country? I say YES!

Image

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Northside_Dan wrote:
denisdman wrote:
312player wrote:
Haha nice Denis.. :oops:



Those are actually the same things that bother me most about Republican talking points.


The last question in the debate was BRUTAL. I get that it's the GOP Primary and you are pandering to the base, but essentially asked just say words about God was an honest question.




I turned it off .. It was a brutal question... They started with that ridiculous raise your hand question n ended with that absurd God question...the stuff in between was fairly entertaining.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18498
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
http://www.reactiongifs.us/rick-santorum-fapping/

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 8:51 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
This debate changed nothing. It's still Trump vs. a pack of middling weasels, demagogues, and wannabes. Trump's popularity is symptomatic of our gradual drift towards a fascist state, a shift that has been consciously and unconsciously aided by the elitist politics of both major parties. Every time I want to proclaim that we have reached the nadir of our political system, I remember that the presidential election is still fifteen months away.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10885
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
I've had to comb through the highlihgts...didn't get to watch or record it.

It appears that Fox News is definitely trying to sabotage Trump. Interesting the Jeb received most of the talk time and the Fox analysts at the end praised him....yet there's no highlights of him and I thought his closing statement was garbage. Jeb is raising the most money and definitely the Fox News favorite, but what's clear to me is he will lose BADLY against any candidate from the DEMs.

The format with 10 people is absolutely ridiculous.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:51 pm
Posts: 6302
Location: Calumet City
pizza_Place: Johns in Cal City
I was really hoping the God question would make it to Trump. WTF would he have said?

_________________
STU-GOTZ wrote:
Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:11 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
For all the talk about Fox News sabotaging his candidacy, the morning show was extolling his brilliance and moral courage in a phone interview with him.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
wdelaney72 wrote:
I've had to comb through the highlihgts...didn't get to watch or record it.

It appears that Fox News is definitely trying to sabotage Trump. Interesting the Jeb received most of the talk time and the Fox analysts at the end praised him....yet there's no highlights of him and I thought his closing statement was garbage. Jeb is raising the most money and definitely the Fox News favorite, but what's clear to me is he will lose BADLY against any candidate from the DEMs.

The format with 10 people is absolutely ridiculous.


Trump had the most talk time by almost 2 whole minutes.

FINAL Talk Times:
1 Trump 10:30
2 Bush 8:33
3 Huck 6:32
4 Carsn/Crz 6:28
6 Kasch 6:25
7 Rubio 6:22
8 Chrste 6:03
9 Walkr 5:43
10 Paul 4:5

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10885
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
then Jeb was asked the most questions?

Still...why are there little to no video highlights of Jeb?

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:21 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Quote:
Republican debate: Trump was garbled, incoherent – but dominant
His rivals scored points but Trump overshadowed the debate, not with ideas for the presidency, but with his defence of views on immigration and women

Donald Trump, the unexpected frontrunner in the race for the Republican nomination for president, plunged headfirst into the primary’s first televised debate on Thursday, causing an instant splash that was remarkable even by his own standards.

The billionaire celebrity, who has a clear lead in the polls, electrified the debate from the start, declaring “politicians are stupid” and implying he was prepared to abandon the Republican party altogether to launch his own, independent candidacy.

Combative, outlandish, at times barely coherent, Trump lived up to the hype, although he became gradually quieter as the two-hour debate dragged on into policy areas where he had little or nothing of substance to contribute.


It was a good night for the Florida senator Marco Rubio and Wisconsin’s governor, Scott Walker, who emerged unscathed with polished performances. Jeb Bush, the establishment favourite, also made it through the ordeal, dealing better than he has in the past with thorny questions about his family name.

It was a less successful debate for the Kentucky senator Rand Paul, who capped a disastrous few days for his campaign with a series of scrappy exchanges with rival candidates in which he came off the worst.

But the debate will be remembered for Trump, whose dramatic spectacle came with the very first question, when the Fox News moderator, Bret Baier, asked if there was anyone unwilling to pledge support for the eventual Republican victor – and promise not to run as a third-party candidate.

For a moment, no one moved. Then Trump raised his hand, to gasps from the audience.

“You’re standing on a Republican primary debate stage,” Baier said, as the crowd erupted in boos and cheers. “Experts say an independent run would almost certainly hand the race over to Democrats and likely another Clinton?”


Trump was unapologetic, although his explanation was garbled.

“I have to respect the person that, if it’s not me, the person that wins – if I do win, and I’m leading by quite a bit, that’s what I want to do,” he said. “I can totally make that pledge. If I’m the nominee, I will pledge I will not run as an independent. I am discussing it with everybody, but I’m, you know, talking about a lot of leverage.”

The thrust of this appeared to be that the Republican frontrunner was prepared to stand as independent, a move that could scupper the party’s chances in 2016.

Minutes after the debate had finished, Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, which runs the nomination process, was backstage trying to persuade reporters that Trump hadn’t really meant it.

“You can’t win an election against Hillary Clinton unless you’re running as a Republican,” he said. “Donald Trump gets that, so do we too, and I think all of this is going to work out just fine.”

Priebus’s face told a different story. He’s overseeing a chaotic and unpredictable primary; one of the few certainties is that while the Republican establishment may not think Trump will win the nomination, they do fear him, and with good reason.

For the most part, the candidates lined up on either side of Trump chose not to challenge him, leaving it instead to the three Fox News moderators, who took up the challenge with aplomb.

They grilled him over failed businesses, his vague, contradictory policies and his long history of shifting political views and loyalties.

One particularly arresting exchange came when moderator Megyn Kelly confronted him over past comments about women he variously referred to as “fat pigs”, “dogs”, “slobs” and “disgusting animals”.


The billionaire interrupted, saying those insults were only directed at Rosie O’Donnell, a comedian with whom he has clashed in the past.

Kelly disputed that, and gave further examples of offensive comments Trump had made to women.

The businessman batted away the complaint, said the country had become too politically correct and shot a veiled threat at Kelly.

“What I say is what I say. And honestly Megyn, if you don’t like it, I’m sorry,” he said. “I’ve been very nice to you, although I could probably maybe not be, based on the way you have treated me.”

In the hours and days ahead, campaign managers will be poring over polling and focus group data, desperate to discover whether the former host of The Apprentice will suffer from this bizarre debate performance.

None of the candidates explicitly endorsed a legal path to citizenship for the millions of undocumented immigrants
The alternative, of course, is that Trump continues to defy the laws of political gravity, rising further in the polls, where he enjoys double-digit leads over his nearest rivals, Bush and Walker.

Trump’s opening fracas may have made for gripping television, but it was the unseemly start to a primetime TV debate that Republican party leaders had dreaded, overshadowing policy discussions over the Iran nuclear deal, immigration, healthcare and the economy.

On those issues and more, the candidates mostly agreed, although on several topics they revealed how far the GOP’s centre of political gravity is from that of America’s wider electorate.


None of the candidates explicitly endorsed a legal path to citizenship for the millions of undocumented immigrants in the country, for example, although several have in the past.

Instead, the immigration discussion focused on border protection. Asked to provide evidence for his incendiary claim about the Mexican government was sending “criminals” and “rapists” into the US, Trump first demurred, and then suggested he had heard it from the Border Patrol.

“Our politicians are stupid,” he said. “And the Mexican government is much smarter, much sharper, much more cunning.”

John Kasich, who as the governor of Ohio had the benefit of a home crowd, concurred. “Donald Trump is hitting a nerve in this country,” he said. “He is. He’s hitting a nerve. People are frustrated. They’re fed up.”

Women’s rights take a back seat
On the vexed question of abortion, which broadly divides the country, the all-male line-up of candidates adopted the extremist language that has in the past harmed GOP’s reputation among women.


Walker, for example, did not dispute that he would make abortion illegal even in the case of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother, a position out of step with 83% of Americans. “I’m pro-life,” he said with a shrug. Rubio also suggested he was against abortion even in exceptional circumstance, an apparent U-turn on his earlier policy.

“Let me go further,” Rubio added. “Future generations will look back at this history of our country and call us barbarians for murdering millions of babies who we never gave them a chance to live.”

The issue of women’s reproductive rights has been resuscitated in the Republican base in recent weeks after an undercover sting captured employees of Planned Parenthood, which offers a range of women’s health services, discussing the sale of fetal body parts following abortions.

Mike Huckabee, the Christian evangelical former governor of Arkansas, said it was time to “change the policy to be pro-life and protect children instead of rip up their body parts and sell them like they’re parts to a Buick”.

The three Fox News moderators did not ask a single question about arguably the greatest challenge facing the next incumbent of the White House: climate change.

Foreign policy, however, featured heavily in the debate, allowing hawks like the Texan senator Ted Cruz to portray themselves as a tough commander-in-chief.

“We’ve seen the consequences of the Obama-Clinton foreign policy,” Cruz lamented. “Radical Islam is on the rise, Iran’s on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon, China is waging cyber warfare against America.”

Bush, who has generated huge amounts of cash but not much grassroots enthusiasm, dealt better than he has in the past with a question about his family name – and his brother’s disastrous war in Iraq.

“Knowing what we know now, with faulty intelligence, and not having security be the first priority when we invaded, it was a mistake,” he said, with a simplicity that has until now evaded him. “I wouldn’t have gone in.”

National security also sparked the standout clash of the night, when Paul, the libertarian who did most in the Senate to end the bulk collection of phone records in the wake of the disclosures from the whistleblower Edward Snowden, collided with Chris Christie, the pugnacious New Jersey governor.

When Paul lost himself in a meandering answer in which he referred to the fourth amendment, John Adams, war of independence and Bill of Rights, Christie charged at him like a bull to a red flag.

“That’s a completely ridiculous answer,” Christie interjected. “Listen, senator, you know, when you’re sitting in a subcommittee, just blowing hot air about this, you can say things like that.”

Paul retaliated by mocking Christie for embracing Barack Obama after hurricane Sandy. “I don’t trust President Obama with our records,” Paul said. “I know you gave him a big hug, and if you want to give him a big hug again, go right ahead.”


It was an exchange that would not have been out of place in a schoolyard, and did not reflect well on either candidate. But Paul probably came off the worst, and was further humiliated when he tried to cut off Trump later in the debate with a misguided critique of his healthcare policy.

“I don’t think you heard me,” Trump said. “You’re having a hard time tonight.”

Another lacklustre poor-performer was Ben Carson, a world-renowned neurosurgeon whose best line came when he touted his medical accomplishments. “I’m the only one to separate siamese twins,” he said. “The only one to take out half of a brain – although if you go to Washington, you would think that someone had beat me to it.”

Carly Fiorina shines from the second tier
Interestingly, the candidate who arguably had the best night wasn’t even on the stage. Carly Fiorina, a business executive who is the only woman in the Republican field, was relegated to a second debate hosted by Fox News two hours before the main event.

Composed and spirited, Fiorina was the only candidate on Thursday to really lay into Trump, exploiting the fact he wasn’t on the stage to hit back.

“Did any of you get a phone call from Bill Clinton? I didn’t,” she said, touching on the recent revelation that Trump consulted the former Democratic president before entering the race. “Maybe it’s because I hadn’t given money to his foundation or donated to his wife’s Senate campaign.”

Hillary Clinton, of course, was the other woman who made a strong impression on the debate, despite her absence from the stage. She was mentioned 20 times, as candidates lined up to take shots at the presumptive Democratic nominee.

It was a somewhat awkward process for Trump, who has long courted the Clintons and donated to the former secretary of state’s Senate campaign fund.

“I was a businessman. I give to everybody. When they call, I give,” Trump explained, summing up Washington’s corrupt political system in a few pithy statements. “When I need something from them two years later, three years later, I call them, they are there for me.”

Asked what, precisely, he got in return for his donation to the former first lady, Trump replied with trademark candour. “With Hillary Clinton, I said be at my wedding, and she came to my wedding.”

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30757
Tall Midget wrote:
Quote:
Republican debate: Trump was garbled, incoherent – but dominant
His rivals scored points but Trump overshadowed the debate, not with ideas for the presidency, but with his defence of views on immigration and women

Donald Trump, the unexpected frontrunner in the race for the Republican nomination for president, plunged headfirst into the primary’s first televised debate on Thursday, causing an instant splash that was remarkable even by his own standards.

The billionaire celebrity, who has a clear lead in the polls, electrified the debate from the start, declaring “politicians are stupid” and implying he was prepared to abandon the Republican party altogether to launch his own, independent candidacy.

Combative, outlandish, at times barely coherent, Trump lived up to the hype, although he became gradually quieter as the two-hour debate dragged on into policy areas where he had little or nothing of substance to contribute.


It was a good night for the Florida senator Marco Rubio and Wisconsin’s governor, Scott Walker, who emerged unscathed with polished performances. Jeb Bush, the establishment favourite, also made it through the ordeal, dealing better than he has in the past with thorny questions about his family name.

It was a less successful debate for the Kentucky senator Rand Paul, who capped a disastrous few days for his campaign with a series of scrappy exchanges with rival candidates in which he came off the worst.

But the debate will be remembered for Trump, whose dramatic spectacle came with the very first question, when the Fox News moderator, Bret Baier, asked if there was anyone unwilling to pledge support for the eventual Republican victor – and promise not to run as a third-party candidate.

For a moment, no one moved. Then Trump raised his hand, to gasps from the audience.

“You’re standing on a Republican primary debate stage,” Baier said, as the crowd erupted in boos and cheers. “Experts say an independent run would almost certainly hand the race over to Democrats and likely another Clinton?”


Trump was unapologetic, although his explanation was garbled.

“I have to respect the person that, if it’s not me, the person that wins – if I do win, and I’m leading by quite a bit, that’s what I want to do,” he said. “I can totally make that pledge. If I’m the nominee, I will pledge I will not run as an independent. I am discussing it with everybody, but I’m, you know, talking about a lot of leverage.”

The thrust of this appeared to be that the Republican frontrunner was prepared to stand as independent, a move that could scupper the party’s chances in 2016.

Minutes after the debate had finished, Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, which runs the nomination process, was backstage trying to persuade reporters that Trump hadn’t really meant it.

“You can’t win an election against Hillary Clinton unless you’re running as a Republican,” he said. “Donald Trump gets that, so do we too, and I think all of this is going to work out just fine.”

Priebus’s face told a different story. He’s overseeing a chaotic and unpredictable primary; one of the few certainties is that while the Republican establishment may not think Trump will win the nomination, they do fear him, and with good reason.

For the most part, the candidates lined up on either side of Trump chose not to challenge him, leaving it instead to the three Fox News moderators, who took up the challenge with aplomb.

They grilled him over failed businesses, his vague, contradictory policies and his long history of shifting political views and loyalties.

One particularly arresting exchange came when moderator Megyn Kelly confronted him over past comments about women he variously referred to as “fat pigs”, “dogs”, “slobs” and “disgusting animals”.


The billionaire interrupted, saying those insults were only directed at Rosie O’Donnell, a comedian with whom he has clashed in the past.

Kelly disputed that, and gave further examples of offensive comments Trump had made to women.

The businessman batted away the complaint, said the country had become too politically correct and shot a veiled threat at Kelly.

“What I say is what I say. And honestly Megyn, if you don’t like it, I’m sorry,” he said. “I’ve been very nice to you, although I could probably maybe not be, based on the way you have treated me.”

In the hours and days ahead, campaign managers will be poring over polling and focus group data, desperate to discover whether the former host of The Apprentice will suffer from this bizarre debate performance.

None of the candidates explicitly endorsed a legal path to citizenship for the millions of undocumented immigrants
The alternative, of course, is that Trump continues to defy the laws of political gravity, rising further in the polls, where he enjoys double-digit leads over his nearest rivals, Bush and Walker.

Trump’s opening fracas may have made for gripping television, but it was the unseemly start to a primetime TV debate that Republican party leaders had dreaded, overshadowing policy discussions over the Iran nuclear deal, immigration, healthcare and the economy.

On those issues and more, the candidates mostly agreed, although on several topics they revealed how far the GOP’s centre of political gravity is from that of America’s wider electorate.


None of the candidates explicitly endorsed a legal path to citizenship for the millions of undocumented immigrants in the country, for example, although several have in the past.

Instead, the immigration discussion focused on border protection. Asked to provide evidence for his incendiary claim about the Mexican government was sending “criminals” and “rapists” into the US, Trump first demurred, and then suggested he had heard it from the Border Patrol.

“Our politicians are stupid,” he said. “And the Mexican government is much smarter, much sharper, much more cunning.”

John Kasich, who as the governor of Ohio had the benefit of a home crowd, concurred. “Donald Trump is hitting a nerve in this country,” he said. “He is. He’s hitting a nerve. People are frustrated. They’re fed up.”

Women’s rights take a back seat
On the vexed question of abortion, which broadly divides the country, the all-male line-up of candidates adopted the extremist language that has in the past harmed GOP’s reputation among women.


Walker, for example, did not dispute that he would make abortion illegal even in the case of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother, a position out of step with 83% of Americans. “I’m pro-life,” he said with a shrug. Rubio also suggested he was against abortion even in exceptional circumstance, an apparent U-turn on his earlier policy.

“Let me go further,” Rubio added. “Future generations will look back at this history of our country and call us barbarians for murdering millions of babies who we never gave them a chance to live.”

The issue of women’s reproductive rights has been resuscitated in the Republican base in recent weeks after an undercover sting captured employees of Planned Parenthood, which offers a range of women’s health services, discussing the sale of fetal body parts following abortions.

Mike Huckabee, the Christian evangelical former governor of Arkansas, said it was time to “change the policy to be pro-life and protect children instead of rip up their body parts and sell them like they’re parts to a Buick”.

The three Fox News moderators did not ask a single question about arguably the greatest challenge facing the next incumbent of the White House: climate change.

Foreign policy, however, featured heavily in the debate, allowing hawks like the Texan senator Ted Cruz to portray themselves as a tough commander-in-chief.

“We’ve seen the consequences of the Obama-Clinton foreign policy,” Cruz lamented. “Radical Islam is on the rise, Iran’s on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon, China is waging cyber warfare against America.”

Bush, who has generated huge amounts of cash but not much grassroots enthusiasm, dealt better than he has in the past with a question about his family name – and his brother’s disastrous war in Iraq.

“Knowing what we know now, with faulty intelligence, and not having security be the first priority when we invaded, it was a mistake,” he said, with a simplicity that has until now evaded him. “I wouldn’t have gone in.”

National security also sparked the standout clash of the night, when Paul, the libertarian who did most in the Senate to end the bulk collection of phone records in the wake of the disclosures from the whistleblower Edward Snowden, collided with Chris Christie, the pugnacious New Jersey governor.

When Paul lost himself in a meandering answer in which he referred to the fourth amendment, John Adams, war of independence and Bill of Rights, Christie charged at him like a bull to a red flag.

“That’s a completely ridiculous answer,” Christie interjected. “Listen, senator, you know, when you’re sitting in a subcommittee, just blowing hot air about this, you can say things like that.”

Paul retaliated by mocking Christie for embracing Barack Obama after hurricane Sandy. “I don’t trust President Obama with our records,” Paul said. “I know you gave him a big hug, and if you want to give him a big hug again, go right ahead.”


It was an exchange that would not have been out of place in a schoolyard, and did not reflect well on either candidate. But Paul probably came off the worst, and was further humiliated when he tried to cut off Trump later in the debate with a misguided critique of his healthcare policy.

“I don’t think you heard me,” Trump said. “You’re having a hard time tonight.”

Another lacklustre poor-performer was Ben Carson, a world-renowned neurosurgeon whose best line came when he touted his medical accomplishments. “I’m the only one to separate siamese twins,” he said. “The only one to take out half of a brain – although if you go to Washington, you would think that someone had beat me to it.”

Carly Fiorina shines from the second tier
Interestingly, the candidate who arguably had the best night wasn’t even on the stage. Carly Fiorina, a business executive who is the only woman in the Republican field, was relegated to a second debate hosted by Fox News two hours before the main event.

Composed and spirited, Fiorina was the only candidate on Thursday to really lay into Trump, exploiting the fact he wasn’t on the stage to hit back.

“Did any of you get a phone call from Bill Clinton? I didn’t,” she said, touching on the recent revelation that Trump consulted the former Democratic president before entering the race. “Maybe it’s because I hadn’t given money to his foundation or donated to his wife’s Senate campaign.”

Hillary Clinton, of course, was the other woman who made a strong impression on the debate, despite her absence from the stage. She was mentioned 20 times, as candidates lined up to take shots at the presumptive Democratic nominee.

It was a somewhat awkward process for Trump, who has long courted the Clintons and donated to the former secretary of state’s Senate campaign fund.

“I was a businessman. I give to everybody. When they call, I give,” Trump explained, summing up Washington’s corrupt political system in a few pithy statements. “When I need something from them two years later, three years later, I call them, they are there for me.”

Asked what, precisely, he got in return for his donation to the former first lady, Trump replied with trademark candour. “With Hillary Clinton, I said be at my wedding, and she came to my wedding.”

That's a long article, tl:dr

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
wdelaney72 wrote:
then Jeb was asked the most questions?

Still...why are there little to no video highlights of Jeb?


Because he was unspectacular, just solid and looked presidential. He'll be in it for the long run.

TM is wrong about Trump. Ultimate flash in the pan and the wheels started to come off last night. Nothing more than clickbait people writing he 'won' or even did adequately. He dodged every question and showed to be the mysonginist that he is.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:51 pm
Posts: 6302
Location: Calumet City
pizza_Place: Johns in Cal City
Bush and Walker had their canned little bits and were focused on not making mistakes. Walker never used up all this time on any question, which is unheard of. You could tell they were thinking that the election wasn't going to be won at that debate, but it could have been lost.

_________________
STU-GOTZ wrote:
Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:36 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
Bush and Walker had their canned little bits and were focused on not making mistakes. Walker never used up all this time on any question, which is unheard of. You could tell they were thinking that the election wasn't going to be won at that debate, but it could have been lost.


Walker confirmed that he opposed abortion, even in cases where the procedure is necessary to save the life of the mother. If Hillary Clinton was watching, she was probably salivating at the thought that Walker could potentially be the Republican nominee.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:51 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Northside_Dan wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
then Jeb was asked the most questions?

Still...why are there little to no video highlights of Jeb?


Because he was unspectacular, just solid and looked presidential. He'll be in it for the long run.

TM is wrong about Trump. Ultimate flash in the pan and the wheels started to come off last night. Nothing more than clickbait people writing he 'won' or even did adequately. He dodged every question and showed to be the mysonginist that he is.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

1) People have been saying this about Trump for weeks, but he continues to chug along. I imagine he will implode at some point, but we haven't reached that point just yet. Since he knows nothing about the mechanics of running a campaign, he is doomed to fail.

2) Do you consider the Guardian and New York Times "clickbait" publications? They both discuss Trump's "dominant" performance, even while acknowledging his intermittent incoherence and aggressive misogyny.

3) As we drift towards a fascist state in which coroporate interest become indistinguishable from the public interest, economic inequality continues to rise, and the weak are blamed for the sins of the strong, our political discourse will become increasingly debased and banal. As a result, figures like Trump will continue to ascend the political stage and shall eventually be chosen to rule. Trump is not an anomaly; he is a harbinger.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11148
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
Tall Midget wrote:
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
Bush and Walker had their canned little bits and were focused on not making mistakes. Walker never used up all this time on any question, which is unheard of. You could tell they were thinking that the election wasn't going to be won at that debate, but it could have been lost.


Walker confirmed that he opposed abortion, even in cases where the procedure is necessary to save the life of the mother. If Hillary Clinton was watching, she was probably salivating at the thought that Walker could potentially be the Republican nominee.


until something changes none of these idiots can beat a democrat in an election.... and the fact that 17 of them are there to beat each other up to a pulp is only going to help the democrats too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Trump bombed last night. It's obvious that he really isn't versed on policy but I don't really think he wants to learn either. His political playbook revolves around personal insults and grandiose proclamations about what a great businessman he is.

His answer to the illegal immigration was to state that he was on the border last week. Rubio I thought had the best answer on that issue.

Trump also was tripped up on the question of Health care and his evolution regarding it. This is the time of yr in which bombastic will carry the day. 4 yrs ago Bachmann Cain and a few others were garnering a lot of attention also. Trump has more support apparently but it won't last. His clownish behavior will eventually begin to wear thin.

I hate to say it but his biggest problem will be that he isn't "Presidential"

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56758
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Here's Lund on why Trump did fine enough, considering, and that anything to the contrary is just Roger Ailes and Frank Luntz trying to regain some control over the process:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne ... m-20150807

Quote:
What else can the Republicans do at this point? Gone are the days when candidates needed to rely on the party machine to spread awareness, churn up money and drive the votes. The institutional infrastructure is increasingly irrelevant because the party labored to make it irrelevant. The erosion of campaign finance restrictions and the victory of Citizens United have resulted in a free-for-all, where people like Jeb Bush can definitely not hire campaign staffers and definitely not coordinate campaign strategy while raising $100 million dollars before formally announcing the campaign they definitely had not decided they were going to run.

Meanwhile, as in 2012 – when Rand Paul had Peter Thiel, Rick Santorum had Foster Friess and Newt Gingrich had Sheldon Adelson – each candidate has a billionaire's leg to nuzzle up against. Ted Cruz is kept by an alleged tax cheat, and Marco Rubio – a free market champion who spent an interruptive belch of his career in the private sector – is kept along with his wife by a billionaire who has underwritten his career nearly every step of the way.

All of these candidates are now free from any accountability to the party or to actual voters. They can campaign for months at a time, drawing barely over 1 percent in national polls, at the whim of billionaire patrons who will fund their likely doomed expeditions with the expectation of compliance when figuring out which open-ended contracts to issue or regulations to vivisect. Just as in matters of rhetoric, Donald Trump isn't some manifestation of a new disease but a symptom of an increasingly acute syndrome at the heart of conservatism.

The only difference is, Trump has always had fuck-you money. There is no one to yank the chain and threaten to starve him of funds if he lashes out at other candidates receiving those same billionaires' checks. There's no one to bring him to heel when he threatens to run an independent campaign and siphon away Republican votes and let the Democratic nominee take the election in a walk. And he's taken to pointing this out, scathingly tweeting things like this:

Quote:
I wish good luck to all of the Republican candidates that traveled to California to beg for money etc. from the Koch Brothers. Puppets?


when most of the major candidates decamped to a Koch brothers retreat to stroke both billionaires in the hopes of getting some of the $900 million they've pledged to dump into the 2016 races.

It's uncomfortable when a serially wrong clownshow like Donald Trump can be unimpeachably correct. It's downright mortifying when he's noting that the system is structured in such a way that every candidate is capable of being bought by a single individual, then forced to tailor his or her campaign to exactly one voter out of nearly 300 million. When Donald Trump is the guy on stage with the biggest claim to integrity, you're fucked. When he's that guy because the system finally looks the way you fought to make it look, you've fucked yourself.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
long time guy wrote:
Trump bombed last night. It's obvious that he really isn't versed on policy but I don't really think he wants to learn either. His political playbook revolves around personal insults and grandiose proclamations about what a great businessman he is.

His answer to the illegal immigration was to state that he was on the border last week. Rubio I thought had the best answer on that issue.

Trump also was tripped up on the question of Health care and his evolution regarding it. This is the time of yr in which bombastic will carry the day. 4 yrs ago Bachmann Cain and a few others were garnering a lot of attention also. Trump has more support apparently but it won't last. His clownish behavior will eventually begin to wear thin.

I hate to say it but his biggest problem will be that he isn't "Presidential"




I bet he's better prepared next time. You gotta love that Rosie O'Donnell line.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
312player wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Trump bombed last night. It's obvious that he really isn't versed on policy but I don't really think he wants to learn either. His political playbook revolves around personal insults and grandiose proclamations about what a great businessman he is.

His answer to the illegal immigration was to state that he was on the border last week. Rubio I thought had the best answer on that issue.

Trump also was tripped up on the question of Health care and his evolution regarding it. This is the time of yr in which bombastic will carry the day. 4 yrs ago Bachmann Cain and a few others were garnering a lot of attention also. Trump has more support apparently but it won't last. His clownish behavior will eventually begin to wear thin.

I hate to say it but his biggest problem will be that he isn't "Presidential"




I bet he's better prepared next time. You gotta love that Rosie O'Donnell line.


He has to stop whining also. Politics as the old saying goes ain't beanbag and he is already complaining that Megan Kelly was "mean" to him and Fox was out to get him. His bomb throwing style and the fact that he is the front runner will make him a target.

The media loves a horse race. It's interesting that the candidates really made no mention of Sanders last night. You know why? he really isn't in the race. The media however keeps putting out reports about slippage in the Clinton campaign. Sanders has been presented as a serious threat though polls show that he is about 30 points behind.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:51 pm
Posts: 6302
Location: Calumet City
pizza_Place: Johns in Cal City
Fox knocked Trump off kilter right at the start. It was like they were trying to derail him. They knew they would get under his skin at the beginning and he never recovered.

Plus Megan's extensions looked fabulous.

_________________
STU-GOTZ wrote:
Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
Fox knocked Trump off kilter right at the start. It was like they were trying to derail him. They knew they would get under his skin at the beginning and he never recovered.

Plus Megan's extensions looked fabulous.



They definitely had an agenda where he was concerned. They also did this with Newt four yrs ago. Once Newt began to gain traction they attempted to thwart, along with help from the RNC, his momentum. They hitched their wagon to Romney and Newt was finished.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 11:35 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Curious Hair wrote:
Here's Lund on why Trump did fine enough, considering, and that anything to the contrary is just Roger Ailes and Frank Luntz trying to regain some control over the process:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne ... m-20150807

Quote:
What else can the Republicans do at this point? Gone are the days when candidates needed to rely on the party machine to spread awareness, churn up money and drive the votes. The institutional infrastructure is increasingly irrelevant because the party labored to make it irrelevant. The erosion of campaign finance restrictions and the victory of Citizens United have resulted in a free-for-all, where people like Jeb Bush can definitely not hire campaign staffers and definitely not coordinate campaign strategy while raising $100 million dollars before formally announcing the campaign they definitely had not decided they were going to run.

Meanwhile, as in 2012 – when Rand Paul had Peter Thiel, Rick Santorum had Foster Friess and Newt Gingrich had Sheldon Adelson – each candidate has a billionaire's leg to nuzzle up against. Ted Cruz is kept by an alleged tax cheat, and Marco Rubio – a free market champion who spent an interruptive belch of his career in the private sector – is kept along with his wife by a billionaire who has underwritten his career nearly every step of the way.

All of these candidates are now free from any accountability to the party or to actual voters. They can campaign for months at a time, drawing barely over 1 percent in national polls, at the whim of billionaire patrons who will fund their likely doomed expeditions with the expectation of compliance when figuring out which open-ended contracts to issue or regulations to vivisect. Just as in matters of rhetoric, Donald Trump isn't some manifestation of a new disease but a symptom of an increasingly acute syndrome at the heart of conservatism.

The only difference is, Trump has always had fuck-you money. There is no one to yank the chain and threaten to starve him of funds if he lashes out at other candidates receiving those same billionaires' checks. There's no one to bring him to heel when he threatens to run an independent campaign and siphon away Republican votes and let the Democratic nominee take the election in a walk. And he's taken to pointing this out, scathingly tweeting things like this:

Quote:
I wish good luck to all of the Republican candidates that traveled to California to beg for money etc. from the Koch Brothers. Puppets?


when most of the major candidates decamped to a Koch brothers retreat to stroke both billionaires in the hopes of getting some of the $900 million they've pledged to dump into the 2016 races.

It's uncomfortable when a serially wrong clownshow like Donald Trump can be unimpeachably correct. It's downright mortifying when he's noting that the system is structured in such a way that every candidate is capable of being bought by a single individual, then forced to tailor his or her campaign to exactly one voter out of nearly 300 million. When Donald Trump is the guy on stage with the biggest claim to integrity, you're fucked. When he's that guy because the system finally looks the way you fought to make it look, you've fucked yourself.


Much of this is another way of saying that there's little, if any, difference between neoliberalism and fascism. Republicans and Democrats have worked to create a system in which there isn't simply "a revolving door" separating the private and public sectors; rather, there's no door at all because the wall that once separated the two has been torn down. A figure like Trump can momentarily prevail in our current political moment not only because he's ridiculously wealthy, but also because he is the apotheosis of the neoliberal zeitgeist--the businessman who has remade the world through his varied corporate enterprises that have always seemed hellbent on undermining any notion of the common good or public interest.

Those who criticize his ignorance of "the issues" simply don't understand that knowledge and expertise are no longer the most relevant qualities in our politics. They have been trumped by wealth and a kind of totalitarian populism that delights in turning regular people against their own interests in the name of "the people". That's what Trump's whole anti-political correctness shtick is ultimately about. He has tapped into the rage against the machine from which he has benefited, and turned that rage against the victims of the machine without anyone noticing. This is the beginning of a mainstream fascist political discourse.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Tall Midget wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Here's Lund on why Trump did fine enough, considering, and that anything to the contrary is just Roger Ailes and Frank Luntz trying to regain some control over the process:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne ... m-20150807

Quote:
What else can the Republicans do at this point? Gone are the days when candidates needed to rely on the party machine to spread awareness, churn up money and drive the votes. The institutional infrastructure is increasingly irrelevant because the party labored to make it irrelevant. The erosion of campaign finance restrictions and the victory of Citizens United have resulted in a free-for-all, where people like Jeb Bush can definitely not hire campaign staffers and definitely not coordinate campaign strategy while raising $100 million dollars before formally announcing the campaign they definitely had not decided they were going to run.

Meanwhile, as in 2012 – when Rand Paul had Peter Thiel, Rick Santorum had Foster Friess and Newt Gingrich had Sheldon Adelson – each candidate has a billionaire's leg to nuzzle up against. Ted Cruz is kept by an alleged tax cheat, and Marco Rubio – a free market champion who spent an interruptive belch of his career in the private sector – is kept along with his wife by a billionaire who has underwritten his career nearly every step of the way.

All of these candidates are now free from any accountability to the party or to actual voters. They can campaign for months at a time, drawing barely over 1 percent in national polls, at the whim of billionaire patrons who will fund their likely doomed expeditions with the expectation of compliance when figuring out which open-ended contracts to issue or regulations to vivisect. Just as in matters of rhetoric, Donald Trump isn't some manifestation of a new disease but a symptom of an increasingly acute syndrome at the heart of conservatism.

The only difference is, Trump has always had fuck-you money. There is no one to yank the chain and threaten to starve him of funds if he lashes out at other candidates receiving those same billionaires' checks. There's no one to bring him to heel when he threatens to run an independent campaign and siphon away Republican votes and let the Democratic nominee take the election in a walk. And he's taken to pointing this out, scathingly tweeting things like this:

Quote:
I wish good luck to all of the Republican candidates that traveled to California to beg for money etc. from the Koch Brothers. Puppets?


when most of the major candidates decamped to a Koch brothers retreat to stroke both billionaires in the hopes of getting some of the $900 million they've pledged to dump into the 2016 races.

It's uncomfortable when a serially wrong clownshow like Donald Trump can be unimpeachably correct. It's downright mortifying when he's noting that the system is structured in such a way that every candidate is capable of being bought by a single individual, then forced to tailor his or her campaign to exactly one voter out of nearly 300 million. When Donald Trump is the guy on stage with the biggest claim to integrity, you're fucked. When he's that guy because the system finally looks the way you fought to make it look, you've fucked yourself.


Much of this is another way of saying that there's little, if any, difference between neoliberalism and fascism. Republicans and Democrats have worked to create a system in which there isn't simply "a revolving door" separating the private and public sectors; rather, there's no door at all because the wall that once separated the two has been torn down. A figure like Trump can momentarily prevail in our current political moment not only because he's ridiculously wealthy, but also because he is the apotheosis of the neoliberal zeitgeist--the businessman who has remade the world through his varied corporate enterprises that have always seemed hellbent on undermining any notion of the common good or public interest.

Those who criticize his ignorance of "the issues" simply don't understand that knowledge and expertise are no longer the most relevant qualities in our politics. They have been trumped by wealth and a kind of totalitarian populism that delights in turning regular people against their own interests in the name of "the people". That's what Trump's whole anti-political correctness shtick is ultimately about. He has tapped into the rage against the machine from which he has benefited, and turned that rage against the victims of the machine without anyone noticing. This is the beginning of a mainstream fascist political discourse.




You still can't come across as a bumbling idiot. I think it is a tad early to be proclaiming a fascist revolution. After all Obama doesn't exactly come from wealth. Trumps popularity is mostly derived from name recognition. He has been a public figure for over 30yrs. He is that rare combination of both wealth and celebrity. This combination is not typically found in the political arena.

He has always been a marketable commodity and as such he is benefitting during the early portion of the campaign. Lack of Substance will be his undoing as there will be a bit of buyer's remorse at some point. He is running for leader of the free world not businessman of the yr. At some point he will have to present himself as a statesman because that is how the game is played.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56758
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Trump isn't selling his own foreign policy expertise, just that he'll hire people who do know that stuff.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
Fox knocked Trump off kilter right at the start. It was like they were trying to derail him. They knew they would get under his skin at the beginning and he never recovered.

Plus Megan's extensions looked fabulous.



That was so odd with the raise your hand stuff. Trued to get the crowd against him at the tipoff.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 581 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group